What's Happening

Troperville

Tools

collapse/expand topics back to Main/ExactlyWhatItSaysOnTheTin

75.164.132.20
topic
11:05:23 AM Mar 17th 2010
This page needs a drastic overhaul. A good 75% or more of the titles do not actually fall under the trope. Just because they describe something that actually exists in the film or show does not mean that they even remotely describe the plot.

Harold & Kumar Go to White Castle: That is exactly what happens. 8 Heads in a Dufflebag: Does not tell you anything about the story except for that there's a dufflebag with 8 heads in it.

From the entry: " title should tell you what a movie, show, or episode of a show is about. Sometimes, though, the premise or plot of the story is all right there in the title. That's when you can say that the story is Exactly What It Says On The Tin."

In Zack and Mirri Make a Porno, clearly you can tell that two characters, named Zack and Mirri, spend time making a Pornographic film.

In Edward Scissorhands, ok so there's a guy named Edward, who apparently has scissors for hands, but I have no idea what happens to him?

Just having a noun in the title that also appears in the movie does not make it fall under the trope.

Aquillion
11:44:01 PM Apr 10th 2010
I've tried trimming the examples a little, and I put a note in the description to differentiate this from Spoiler Title — just saying that "Bob dies!" in the episode title might be a spoiler, but it doesn't really tell you everything about the contents. Things that qualify for this trope should be almost comically complete descriptions — the kind of thing you could picture an executive using to summarize the entire pitch for the show, movie, or whatever in one line. Speed Racer may be about a speedy racer, but you can't meaningfully summarize it with just those two words, so it isn't this trope.
Michael
12:58:25 AM Aug 14th 2010
I think the review of The Lair Of The White Worm might actually be a subversion, since although it tries to deduce what the film is about from the title, it gets it very wrong.
vadia
07:07:56 AM Dec 28th 2010
Even the caption; snakes on a plane — I thought at first it was a nature documentary. You know like there is a family of snakes on a plane and — I dunno maybe the croc hunter has to remove them safely?
Wereboar
01:34:06 PM Sep 19th 2011
Well, I would gladly do the overhaul (or at least remove the most senseless entries) but that would mean destrying someone's work and I don't know how such severe arbitrary moderation of the content is treated by other users.
96.55.140.135
topic
12:08:57 AM Apr 2nd 2010
I'm new here, but are Iceland and Greenland real life subversions?
BigT
03:17:45 AM Dec 28th 2010
Well, they were really specifically named to create the impression that they were something they were not. Iceland was named to discourage people from landing there, and Greenland was to encourage people to move there.
Wereboar
01:09:40 PM Sep 19th 2011
Greenland was actually relatively green when it was first colonized by Norsemen, at least in the southern parts where the migrants came. Iceland is a valid point though as when it was named, the climate there was even warmer than today.
58.161.18.62
topic
05:18:24 AM Aug 26th 2010
I know this comes about six months late, but did you not like the Penny Arcade line? I thought it was appropriate.
robertfm
topic
10:33:17 PM Sep 26th 2010
edited by robertfm
Just removed this from Western Animation:

  • Avatar the Last Airbender is about the Last Airbender (named Aang) who is also the Avatar. Simple, no?
    • No, not so simple. The title doesn't explain what an airbender is, why he's the Avatar, or anything about what he's doing. This fails the "ask neighbor to describe it in one sentence" test.
    • "Avatar: The Last Airbender is about a boy named Aang who is the last of some people who bend air." It's that simple.

As well as the Natter involved, the first reply got it right — I for one, despite hearing a lot about this series, have no idea what an airbender is, why Aang is the last one, why he's the Avatar (assuming he's the Avatar and not just an avatar), or even what "avatar" means in this context (there are several possibilities). Totally non-indicative.
Danel
07:00:06 AM May 21st 2011
It's not exactly non-indicative, but it's not a binary thing. Most of the examples on the page seem to be under the impression that everything in the world should either be sorted under this or under Non Indicative Title.
StongRadd
topic
08:36:22 AM Dec 16th 2010
We need a folder for TV Tropes Wiki.
108.18.13.58
topic
07:45:36 AM Jan 4th 2011
I would like to propose, in the name of comedy, that the title non indicative name and this title be switched.
GoForthAndDie
topic
10:37:19 PM Mar 30th 2011
Why, in the name of God, are people describing their entries? Here's a clue: If it needs description, it doesn't belong.
63.82.5.67
topic
01:43:03 PM Apr 20th 2011
edited by 63.82.5.67
Wereboar
topic
01:04:54 PM Sep 19th 2011
Deep frier entry makes no sense. The name comes from 'deep frying' a specific cooking technique of frying something by submerging it in hot fat. It the object in question is small you can fry it in a shallow pan. As the author of the entry clearly didn't understand its meaning, it definitely does not belong here.

The perfume entry in 'Real Life' section also does not belong here. Sure, its name says 'Lily of the Vale', but it is not Lily of the Vale (a common plant with minute white bell-like flowers) but the perfume (an oily liquid in a glass container. Said perfume would belong here if they were named 'Lily of the Valley scented perfume'.
mrincodi
topic
06:26:47 PM Jan 21st 2012
What happened to the 'Real Life' section of this trope??
back to Main/ExactlyWhatItSaysOnTheTin

This wiki is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
Privacy Policy