Follow TV Tropes

Following

IP discussion: thread reasons, policies, other stuff

Go To

In an effort to keep the volume of threads in IP at a reasonable level, and to encourage creating threads that address genuine problems, we need to make some notes about when to request a thread and what constitutes valid reasons for a thread. These have been mentioned in some of the other IP procedure threads, but they're being listed here for quick reference.

    open/close all folders 

    Screening of new threads 
  • New IP threads don't require approval by the staff to be opened. Still, the staff can and will lock threads with improper reasoning and warn the troper if needed. Please take time to review the guidelines below and make sure your request is solid before submitting it.
  • A thread started within two weeks of the closing of a previous thread on the same page that doesn't have a concrete suggestion will be summarily closed.

    General notes 
  • Also refer to: About Images and Copyright, How to Pick a Good Image, and Images On Wiki Pages.
  • Going through IP for a page that doesn't have an image or an IP tag isn't obligatory, but it is strongly recommended. Otherwise, the image you put up may end up coming to the forum for work or replacement.
  • Pages that have gone through IP should have a commented-out tag showing the relevant thread(s) and any related information. Always check for these before adding a pic or requesting an IP thread for a page. If a page does have a tag, please note its information when you start a thread.
  • It's recommended to discuss image concerns and thread reasons in the threads that are pinned at the top of the forum before starting a new thread. They may be able to address the issue(s) without needing to start a dedicated thread.
  • Keep the quality criteria listed below in mind when making an image suggestion.
  • Work pages that don't have an image generally don't require an IP thread to upload one, but feel free to start a thread if you have multiple ideas.
  • Animated GIFs can't be uploaded as page pics, so don't bother trying. (The pic on Creepy Changing Painting is a bit of HTML magic and not a true GIF, in case you're wondering.)
  • In threads for specific pages, you may see people casting votes by referring to a post number and (if applicable) the number of the image in a given post. For example, "2" would refer to "the image in the second post", and "3.2" would refer to "the second image in post 3".
  • We try to operate on "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mentality, and we try not to change an image just for the sake of changing it. In reference to this, someone might call a suggestion a "lateral move". If the image on the page is not otherwise problematic, consider if your suggestion is a clear improvement before pitching it.
  • It usually takes 5-7 [tup] votes for a pic to be considered to have consensus in a thread; pics can be put up with less than this, but usually only at a moderator's discretion.
    In crowners:
    • An option has consensus if it has a minimum of a 2:1 vote ratio.
    • If a crowner ends with no options having consensus, the crowner and thread are considered to be failed and the thread will be closed unless there is significant ongoing discussion.
    • Crowners normally run for 5 days, but can go longer if more time is needed, and can be closed early for the following criteria:
      • At any point, if the leading option has a vote balance of 10 or more and no other options have consensus. This is considered "super-consensus".
      • After 3 days, if the leading option has a vote balance of at least 8 and no other options have consensus.
      • After 4 days, if the leading option is the only one that has consensus.
    • Crowners can only be made by moderators and engineers, usually after discussion has stalled for a few days. Crowners can be requested by regular users by compiling and linking options in a post and hollering for it to be made into a crowner.
    • Non-moderators can add crowner options to an ongoing crowner, but cannot edit options they didn't add, nor can they call or lock a crowner. If you add an entry to an ongoing crowner, please note this in the thread.

    IP thread reasons 

High-priority image issues

  • A pic has been changed or removed from a page for a reason that may not be valid, or no reason at all, especially if the pic was chosen by a previous IP thread. These changes can sometimes be simply reverted by a moderator without a need for further discussion.
  • Not Safe For Work (NSFW)
    • If you're unsure on whether a pic fits this or not, bring it up in the IP Discussion thread.
    • Classic works of art containing nudity, such as Michelangelo's David or Botticelli's The Birth of Venus, don't necessarily fall into this, but appropriateness for the page in question is the key factor, and SFW options should be considered whenever possible.
  • The image is a spoiler. The age and/or infamy of the work the image originates from may prevent this from being considered a valid issue.
  • Watermarking. A TV channel emblem on a screencap is a "bug", not a true watermark, and is permissible as long as it's not obtrusive.
  • Meme-based images are not permitted as page pics. The sole general exceptions are Image Macro (for obvious reasons) and a work's Memes page, where they should only be considered if there are no better options.Other exceptions
  • A page has an image that is obviously from the wrong work / programming block / network / etc.
  • Copyright issues:
    • The pic implies TV Tropes is claiming the copyright.
    • The pic has been taken from a site that deals in copyrighted images or videos, especially if a watermark has been removed and/or the site is selling their content. Screencaps from videos from these sites are not permitted, either.
    • The image is the entirety of a product for sale, such as a t-shirt design.
    • Images from illegally obtained materials, such as leaks or camrips, are not allowed.
    • Using an entire work:
      • Basically, if it's copyrighted, we have to get permission to use it. This covers single-panel cartoons, photographs, entire comic strips and webcomics, and similar works. If permission is granted to use a work, it's always noted on the page in some fashion, usually in the caption and/or with the page tag. If an artist requests a specific way to display their connection to the pic, we'll do our best to honor it.
      • The creators of xkcd and Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal have given us carte blanche to use entire works as needed. Permission notices for such cases aren't required.
      • Entire cards from card-based games like Magic: The Gathering are impractical but can be used. Using the art from these cards is fine.
      • Any such work that's in the public domain is free to use.
    • Some creators do not want their work used outside their control at all, but fair use means that we are not legally bound to honor this for the wiki's purposes, aside from the aforementioned restrictions. We'll honor a take-down request, but it's up to them to send it. We're not obliged to chase them down and ask them what their policy is. Fair use also allows us to use excerpts of works without seeking permission. In this case, the minimum needed to get the trope across should be used.
    • Per the site owner, AI generated images are allowed on TV Tropes and will be treated just like regular images.

General reasons

  • Multiple suggestions for a page without a pic. Single suggestions are currently being filtered through the Image Suggestion thread instead of getting their own threads right off the bat.
  • The current pic doesn't adequately demonstrate the trope. Examples of this include:
    • Just a Face and a Caption (JAFAAC)—the pic shows an example of the trope but relies on familiarity with its subject(s) to make the connection to the trope evident.
    • A pic that is nothing but text, or one where the text overwhelms the imagery. "May/Might as well be a page quote" is often used to describe this. There are exceptions (Spoof Aesop, for example), especially for dialogue-based tropes, but generally we want to have actual images as page pics with just enough text to support the expression of the trope.
  • Poor image quality. Graininess, motion blur, and compression artifacts are three of the most common problems. Before starting a thread for this reason, see if the Quality Upgrade thread can help find or create a nicer version of the image. Replacing images with a better-quality version is a free action, i.e. can be done without starting a thread.
If the size value in a pic's coding is larger than the actual size of the pic, it will stretch the pic to that width which will introduce artifacts. Check the image's properties before starting a thread; if this is the issue, a change to the coding will fix it.
The age of some works may make getting a truly high-quality image from them difficult. This will be taken into consideration when deciding on a pic.
  • The current pic is taken from a multi-panel work such as a comic strip or webcomic and uses more than half of the source material.
  • Fan-art on a work page instead of an image from the work itself.
  • The current pic is overly fanservicey, especially in the Creator/ namespace. In the case of Fanservice tropes, pics should be as low-key as possible while still getting the trope across.
  • Two trope pages have the same pic.
    • While it's preferred that they be separate, a trope page can have the same image as a work page or a character image from a Characters subpage. In these cases, a thread should have at least one replacement suggestion for either page.
    • Similarly, graphics can generally be reused among a work's subpages. Threads that address these will still be accepted, but should also have at least one replacement suggestion.
  • You believe you have a suggestion that better illustrates the trope than the current pic (by Image Pickin' standards, not "This is a cooler pic.")
  • A page marked as No Real Life Examples, Please! has a Real Life pic.Exceptions
  • A YMMV or Audience Reaction page has a pic that is not In-Universe.Exceptions
  • A page has an unusual image arrangement not chosen by an IP thread and you don't think it works well, e.g. having two images on a trope page or an image that's a janky collage. Some pages may have multiple pics for a reason, so check for an IP tag before starting a thread in this case.

Invalid reasons

  • Trying to solicit ideas for an image. IP has a cap of 60 threads and is usually at or near capacity on any given day, so space can't be allotted for threads whose only purpose is to brainstorm.
  • Not liking an image's art style, layout/design, or any Photoshopping or similar alterations that may have been made, provided they don't impact the pic's quality.
  • Claiming that a particular work is over-/under-represented. This can have some impact on deciding on a pic, but should never be the main gist of a thread.
  • Trying to argue that a pic you liked wasn't chosen in a previous thread, especially if it lost in a crowner, or trying to make an invalid argument that a pic doesn't work for a page even though it was chosen by a thread. Repeatedly doing this is considered griefing and is grounds for suspension from the workshop forums.
  • Some trope pages feature Visual Puns or other jokey pics rather than something that actually demonstrates the trope, usually because these pages have been very hard to find a better pic for.Example Don't request a thread just because you don't like the joke; if you've got an actual example, that's fine. Also, see the "Don't change the pic" section on the page mentioned below.

    Special cases 
For a list of pages that have unique statuses, see Image Pickin' Special Cases

General cases:

  • Pages within the FanficRecs/, Fridge/, Haiku/, Headscratchers/, ImageLinks/, Laconic/, PlayingWith/, Quotes/, Trivia/, WMG/, and YMMV/ namespaces and disambiguations default to no pic; YMMV.Home Page and Headscratchers.Home Page are the only exceptions. Pages in the Analysis/ namespace default to BUPKIS status (meaning they won't have a pic unless a really good one is found; see Image Pickin' Special Cases for more details)
  • Due to their exceptional subjectivity and persistent problems with images being poor quality and/or not illustrative, Moments pages (Awesome/, Funny/, Heartwarming/, NightmareFuel/, Shocking/, TearJerker/) are limited to one image.
  • Pages for unreleased works shall keep the first image that is uploaded to the page when it's created, with further pre-release images relegated to an Image Links page. Once the work is released, a thread may be created to decide which image is to be officially used on the page. See this Wiki Talk thread for details. Note that the first image may still be removed if it falls afoul of any of the aforementioned guidelines.

    Image Pickin' flowchart 

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/ip_flowchartdrawio_8_transformed.png

Text version:

Is the page on Image Pickin' Special Cases?

  • If yes, start a thread.
  • If no, does it already have an image?

Edited by kory on May 2nd 2024 at 11:16:14 AM

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#1751: Apr 5th 2017 at 7:45:32 AM

Not sure about "doesn't illustrate" though. The trope is about the motivation, which seems to appear in the image as well.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#1752: Apr 5th 2017 at 3:50:09 PM

Cold Ham is added to the BUPKIS list.

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#1753: Apr 6th 2017 at 6:07:40 AM

Evil Twin has been taken off the "don't change the pic" list.

Millership from Kazakhstan Since: Jan, 2014
#1754: Apr 7th 2017 at 5:00:10 AM

Are there fictional characters considered recognizable enough so the JAFAAC rule won't apply to them?

Spiral out, keep going.
AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#1755: Apr 7th 2017 at 7:20:30 AM

Very few. Superman, Mickey Mouse, Mario, and a few more. You need that level of public recognition. And even in those cases, it only applies to the most general of their characteristics. Anything more specific still needs proper illustration.

edited 7th Apr '17 7:21:37 AM by AnotherDuck

Check out my fanfiction!
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#1756: Apr 7th 2017 at 9:25:52 AM

[up] Agreed. I think Jesus and Darth Vader are on that list as well, but that's about it.

rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#1757: Apr 7th 2017 at 6:35:42 PM

Robin Hood, maybe. That list is intentionally not codified, for several reasons, but one of them is to avoid implying that it's a free pass to ignore all JAFAAC-type considerations. Universal fame is just a mitigating factor; it's water-resistant, not water-proof.

For example it might be a fair assumption that everyone knows Mario is a video game character, but it would be unreasonable to assume everyone knows he's a plumber. "Batman is a good guy" without visual cues to that effect, sure; "Batman's parents were murdered when he was a child" no.

edited 10th Apr '17 9:17:57 PM by rodneyAnonymous

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
Gosicrystal Since: Jun, 2016 Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
#1758: Apr 12th 2017 at 5:55:44 PM

If we want to make a suggestion for a BUPKIS trope, how does that work? Can we pitch some in the Image Suggestion Thread as with normal pages?

Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#1759: Apr 12th 2017 at 6:27:32 PM

If the page was voted BUPKIS, the best thing to do is start an IP thread specifically for that one, with your suggestion in the opening Post. Personally, I'd embed the suggestion so that anyone who opens the thread can see it, rather than linking.

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#1760: Apr 12th 2017 at 9:22:49 PM

The Image Suggestion Thread is for articles without images that haven't been discussed in IP before. Instead, treat making a suggestion for a BUPKIS article the same as making a suggestion for an article that already has a page image: start a thread, link to the previous discussion.

edited 12th Apr '17 9:28:38 PM by rodneyAnonymous

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
Karxrida The Unknown from Eureka, the Forbidden Land Since: May, 2012 Relationship Status: I LOVE THIS DOCTOR!
The Unknown
#1761: Apr 24th 2017 at 3:48:41 PM

What's the policy on character pages having multiple images per character? For example, Characters.Fire Emblem Recurring Characters having some characters with secondary images hidden under tags (see the Tiki or Grima entries).

edited 24th Apr '17 3:48:46 PM by Karxrida

If a tree falls in the forest and nobody remembers it, who else will you have ice cream with?
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#1762: Apr 24th 2017 at 5:52:44 PM

It's not a bad thing, but should be limited to characters where it's significant to do so.

Anyone else noticing that taking the clocking point to a week isn't doing a damn thing to help get threads decided on quicker? There are so many threads that are getting halfway to making a decision on something and then just dying, even after being clocked...it's getting rather annoying.

Karxrida The Unknown from Eureka, the Forbidden Land Since: May, 2012 Relationship Status: I LOVE THIS DOCTOR!
The Unknown
#1763: Apr 24th 2017 at 6:18:16 PM

Could you give an example where it's considered significant/acceptable? I need a good baseline here.

edited 24th Apr '17 6:19:24 PM by Karxrida

If a tree falls in the forest and nobody remembers it, who else will you have ice cream with?
justanid Since: Jan, 2010
#1764: Apr 24th 2017 at 7:24:43 PM

Is there any way to make clocked threads get bumped to the top of the list, like pinned ones? That'd help, as even with the clock icon they're not as noticeable when mixed in with a bunch of others. Also, instead of the date & time they expire, a countdown with "Days, Hours, Minutes left" would be preferable, as still I keep seeing that date as when they were clocked even though I know better.

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#1765: Apr 24th 2017 at 8:18:25 PM

[up] I'd like to see any thread that has something special stick at the top of the forum, but something like that probably isn't going to happen for a while.

DrNoPuma Tango from Toon Town Since: Mar, 2015 Relationship Status: I think I love you, so what am I so afraid of?
#1766: Apr 25th 2017 at 8:18:14 AM

Are there any special procedures for adding pictures to Trope Co. pages and other Just for Fun pages?

When I made TropeCo.Fade Around The Eyes a long time ago, I saw that TropeCo.Cat Girl had an image and assumed it was okay to add one on my page. Was that a mistake?

edited 25th Apr '17 8:20:17 AM by DrNoPuma

I haven't played the particular game that Tango is from, but still... robo kitty. :D
eroock Since: Sep, 2012
#1767: Apr 25th 2017 at 11:20:50 AM

How do you guys feel about the sticky "Pics awaiting permission" thread? It sits there on top with so little traffic, it could be handled otherwise without using up that space. Perhaps making it sticky only for the time we are actually awaiting response and letting it drop down when it's idling?

justanid Since: Jan, 2010
#1768: Apr 25th 2017 at 3:42:35 PM

[up] Personally, I think it should be another special category like clocked/crowner/final, with a button that anyone could toggle it to active again, and sorted to the bottom of the topic list. That way the "Image Pickin' Discussion" link would also show up on the wiki page and maybe inspire Wiki Magic for alternative images.

eroock Since: Sep, 2012
#1769: Apr 25th 2017 at 8:41:03 PM

^ How many user have actually come to support us via the "Image Pickin' Discussion" links? It's always the same regulars around here. The idea to keep an "awaiting response" tag within the actual thread is worth considering though.

WaterBlap Blapper of Water Since: May, 2014 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
Blapper of Water
#1770: Apr 25th 2017 at 9:48:14 PM

There's also the issue of people mindlessly skipping the stickied threads. A static list is less interesting than a dynamic one, and people are probably going to skip the static (i.e. stickied) thread list in favor of the more interesting non-stickied thread list.

I'm not saying it's guaranteed, but people tend to stop paying attention to expected or static things.

Look at all that shiny stuff ain't they pretty
justanid Since: Jan, 2010
#1771: Apr 26th 2017 at 12:56:31 PM

[up] My guess is that people miss the stickied threads because the pin icon is the same color as the text (both blue or green depending on regular or night-vision).

[up] [up] Non-regulars post in IP from time to time; as the social-media iceberg goes, for every one person that posts there's at least ten others who lurk (maybe posting regularly on another sub-forum), and twenty more that don't even register an account. I used to just browse TV Tropes and did that for three years before joining the forums.

Also, unless there's an internal-links metric keeping track, I doubt we'll know just how many or few people find IP (or TRS) through the page header links. But it doesn't hurt to increase the odds of being discovered.

edited 26th Apr '17 12:57:38 PM by justanid

WaterBlap Blapper of Water Since: May, 2014 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
Blapper of Water
#1772: Apr 26th 2017 at 9:11:06 PM

Honestly, I think it would stick out more if the thread title were right-aligned in the cell (on the table) rather than left-aligned and put with the rest of the stickied threads.

Look at all that shiny stuff ain't they pretty
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
TotemicHero No longer a forum herald from the next level Since: Dec, 2009
No longer a forum herald
#1774: Apr 30th 2017 at 10:17:47 PM

I'm trying to figure out how the fixes needed for the images on Characters.Story Of Seasons Trio Of Towns should be handled. We've got a couple of oversized images along with all left-justified images (I haven't seen the quoteleft markup in so long, I'd forgotten it was even a thing).

The guy who added them (~madgodzulcan) added a editor note telling people not to right justify the images because they break the "formating" (his spelling may be a problem, I'll have to look at his edit history later) - which, due to the length of some of them, they do. Not sure if resizing is the correct move because of the height-width ratio of some of the images - it would make them very small. Should I find new images, try the resize, or just delete them? Or a combo thereof?

Expergiscēre cras, medior quam hodie. (Awaken tomorrow, better than today.)
eroock Since: Sep, 2012
#1775: May 1st 2017 at 2:46:32 AM

^ Sandboxed a right-aligned version on Sandbox.Story Of Seasons Trio Of Towns The only problematic sections were for the characters Ludus and Hinata where I downsized the images to fit in. This page looks pretty cool in dark mode except for some of the images that don't have transparency. Perhaps those should be replaced.


Total posts: 9,728
Top