Follow TV Tropes

Following

IP discussion: thread reasons, policies, other stuff

Go To

In an effort to keep the volume of threads in IP at a reasonable level, and to encourage creating threads that address genuine problems, we need to make some notes about when to request a thread and what constitutes valid reasons for a thread. These have been mentioned in some of the other IP procedure threads, but they're being listed here for quick reference.

    open/close all folders 

    Screening of new threads 
  • New IP threads don't require approval by the staff to be opened. Still, the staff can and will lock threads with improper reasoning and warn the troper if needed. Please take time to review the guidelines below and make sure your request is solid before submitting it.
  • A thread started within two weeks of the closing of a previous thread on the same page that doesn't have a concrete suggestion will be summarily closed.

    General notes 
  • Also refer to: About Images and Copyright, How to Pick a Good Image, and Images On Wiki Pages.
  • Going through IP for a page that doesn't have an image or an IP tag isn't obligatory, but it is strongly recommended. Otherwise, the image you put up may end up coming to the forum for work or replacement.
  • Pages that have gone through IP should have a commented-out tag showing the relevant thread(s) and any related information. Always check for these before adding a pic or requesting an IP thread for a page. If a page does have a tag, please note its information when you start a thread.
  • It's recommended to discuss image concerns and thread reasons in the threads that are pinned at the top of the forum before starting a new thread. They may be able to address the issue(s) without needing to start a dedicated thread.
  • Keep the quality criteria listed below in mind when making an image suggestion.
  • Work pages that don't have an image generally don't require an IP thread to upload one, but feel free to start a thread if you have multiple ideas.
  • Animated GIFs can't be uploaded as page pics, so don't bother trying. (The pic on Creepy Changing Painting is a bit of HTML magic and not a true GIF, in case you're wondering.)
  • In threads for specific pages, you may see people casting votes by referring to a post number and (if applicable) the number of the image in a given post. For example, "2" would refer to "the image in the second post", and "3.2" would refer to "the second image in post 3".
  • We try to operate on "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mentality, and we try not to change an image just for the sake of changing it. In reference to this, someone might call a suggestion a "lateral move". If the image on the page is not otherwise problematic, consider if your suggestion is a clear improvement before pitching it.
  • It usually takes 5-7 [tup] votes for a pic to be considered to have consensus in a thread; pics can be put up with less than this, but usually only at a moderator's discretion.
    In crowners:
    • An option has consensus if it has a minimum of a 2:1 vote ratio.
    • If a crowner ends with no options having consensus, the crowner and thread are considered to be failed and the thread will be closed unless there is significant ongoing discussion.
    • Crowners normally run for 5 days, but can go longer if more time is needed, and can be closed early for the following criteria:
      • At any point, if the leading option has a vote balance of 10 or more and no other options have consensus. This is considered "super-consensus".
      • After 3 days, if the leading option has a vote balance of at least 8 and no other options have consensus.
      • After 4 days, if the leading option is the only one that has consensus.
    • Crowners can only be made by moderators and engineers, usually after discussion has stalled for a few days. Crowners can be requested by regular users by compiling and linking options in a post and hollering for it to be made into a crowner.
    • Non-moderators can add crowner options to an ongoing crowner, but cannot edit options they didn't add, nor can they call or lock a crowner. If you add an entry to an ongoing crowner, please note this in the thread.

    IP thread reasons 

High-priority image issues

  • A pic has been changed or removed from a page for a reason that may not be valid, or no reason at all, especially if the pic was chosen by a previous IP thread. These changes can sometimes be simply reverted by a moderator without a need for further discussion.
  • Not Safe For Work (NSFW)
    • If you're unsure on whether a pic fits this or not, bring it up in the IP Discussion thread.
    • Classic works of art containing nudity, such as Michelangelo's David or Botticelli's The Birth of Venus, don't necessarily fall into this, but appropriateness for the page in question is the key factor, and SFW options should be considered whenever possible.
  • The image is a spoiler. The age and/or infamy of the work the image originates from may prevent this from being considered a valid issue.
  • Watermarking. A TV channel emblem on a screencap is a "bug", not a true watermark, and is permissible as long as it's not obtrusive.
  • Meme-based images are not permitted as page pics. The sole general exceptions are Image Macro (for obvious reasons) and a work's Memes page, where they should only be considered if there are no better options.Other exceptions
  • A page has an image that is obviously from the wrong work / programming block / network / etc.
  • Copyright issues:
    • The pic implies TV Tropes is claiming the copyright.
    • The pic has been taken from a site that deals in copyrighted images or videos, especially if a watermark has been removed and/or the site is selling their content. Screencaps from videos from these sites are not permitted, either.
    • The image is the entirety of a product for sale, such as a t-shirt design.
    • Images from illegally obtained materials, such as leaks or camrips, are not allowed.
    • Using an entire work:
      • Basically, if it's copyrighted, we have to get permission to use it. This covers single-panel cartoons, photographs, entire comic strips and webcomics, and similar works. If permission is granted to use a work, it's always noted on the page in some fashion, usually in the caption and/or with the page tag. If an artist requests a specific way to display their connection to the pic, we'll do our best to honor it.
      • The creators of xkcd and Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal have given us carte blanche to use entire works as needed. Permission notices for such cases aren't required.
      • Entire cards from card-based games like Magic: The Gathering are impractical but can be used. Using the art from these cards is fine.
      • Any such work that's in the public domain is free to use.
    • Some creators do not want their work used outside their control at all, but fair use means that we are not legally bound to honor this for the wiki's purposes, aside from the aforementioned restrictions. We'll honor a take-down request, but it's up to them to send it. We're not obliged to chase them down and ask them what their policy is. Fair use also allows us to use excerpts of works without seeking permission. In this case, the minimum needed to get the trope across should be used.
    • Per the site owner, AI generated images are allowed on TV Tropes and will be treated just like regular images.

General reasons

  • Multiple suggestions for a page without a pic. Single suggestions are currently being filtered through the Image Suggestion thread instead of getting their own threads right off the bat.
  • The current pic doesn't adequately demonstrate the trope. Examples of this include:
    • Just a Face and a Caption (JAFAAC)—the pic shows an example of the trope but relies on familiarity with its subject(s) to make the connection to the trope evident.
    • A pic that is nothing but text, or one where the text overwhelms the imagery. "May/Might as well be a page quote" is often used to describe this. There are exceptions (Spoof Aesop, for example), especially for dialogue-based tropes, but generally we want to have actual images as page pics with just enough text to support the expression of the trope.
  • Poor image quality. Graininess, motion blur, and compression artifacts are three of the most common problems. Before starting a thread for this reason, see if the Quality Upgrade thread can help find or create a nicer version of the image. Replacing images with a better-quality version is a free action, i.e. can be done without starting a thread.
If the size value in a pic's coding is larger than the actual size of the pic, it will stretch the pic to that width which will introduce artifacts. Check the image's properties before starting a thread; if this is the issue, a change to the coding will fix it.
The age of some works may make getting a truly high-quality image from them difficult. This will be taken into consideration when deciding on a pic.
  • The current pic is taken from a multi-panel work such as a comic strip or webcomic and uses more than half of the source material.
  • Fan-art on a work page instead of an image from the work itself.
  • The current pic is overly fanservicey, especially in the Creator/ namespace. In the case of Fanservice tropes, pics should be as low-key as possible while still getting the trope across.
  • Two trope pages have the same pic.
    • While it's preferred that they be separate, a trope page can have the same image as a work page or a character image from a Characters subpage. In these cases, a thread should have at least one replacement suggestion for either page.
    • Similarly, graphics can generally be reused among a work's subpages. Threads that address these will still be accepted, but should also have at least one replacement suggestion.
  • You believe you have a suggestion that better illustrates the trope than the current pic (by Image Pickin' standards, not "This is a cooler pic.")
  • A page marked as No Real Life Examples, Please! has a Real Life pic.Exceptions
  • A YMMV or Audience Reaction page has a pic that is not In-Universe.Exceptions
  • A page has an unusual image arrangement not chosen by an IP thread and you don't think it works well, e.g. having two images on a trope page or an image that's a janky collage. Some pages may have multiple pics for a reason, so check for an IP tag before starting a thread in this case.

Invalid reasons

  • Trying to solicit ideas for an image. IP has a cap of 60 threads and is usually at or near capacity on any given day, so space can't be allotted for threads whose only purpose is to brainstorm.
  • Not liking an image's art style, layout/design, or any Photoshopping or similar alterations that may have been made, provided they don't impact the pic's quality.
  • Claiming that a particular work is over-/under-represented. This can have some impact on deciding on a pic, but should never be the main gist of a thread.
  • Trying to argue that a pic you liked wasn't chosen in a previous thread, especially if it lost in a crowner, or trying to make an invalid argument that a pic doesn't work for a page even though it was chosen by a thread. Repeatedly doing this is considered griefing and is grounds for suspension from the workshop forums.
  • Some trope pages feature Visual Puns or other jokey pics rather than something that actually demonstrates the trope, usually because these pages have been very hard to find a better pic for.Example Don't request a thread just because you don't like the joke; if you've got an actual example, that's fine. Also, see the "Don't change the pic" section on the page mentioned below.

    Special cases 
For a list of pages that have unique statuses, see Image Pickin' Special Cases

General cases:

  • Pages within the FanficRecs/, Fridge/, Haiku/, Headscratchers/, ImageLinks/, Laconic/, PlayingWith/, Quotes/, Trivia/, WMG/, and YMMV/ namespaces and disambiguations default to no pic; YMMV.Home Page and Headscratchers.Home Page are the only exceptions. Pages in the Analysis/ namespace default to BUPKIS status (meaning they won't have a pic unless a really good one is found; see Image Pickin' Special Cases for more details)
  • Due to their exceptional subjectivity and persistent problems with images being poor quality and/or not illustrative, Moments pages (Awesome/, Funny/, Heartwarming/, NightmareFuel/, Shocking/, TearJerker/) are limited to one image.
  • Pages for unreleased works shall keep the first image that is uploaded to the page when it's created, with further pre-release images relegated to an Image Links page. Once the work is released, a thread may be created to decide which image is to be officially used on the page. See this Wiki Talk thread for details. Note that the first image may still be removed if it falls afoul of any of the aforementioned guidelines.

    Image Pickin' flowchart 

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/ip_flowchartdrawio_8_transformed.png

Text version:

Is the page on Image Pickin' Special Cases?

  • If yes, start a thread.
  • If no, does it already have an image?

Edited by kory on May 2nd 2024 at 11:16:14 AM

rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#751: Apr 3rd 2014 at 5:42:21 PM

It is a very good idea to check the page source (it's easier to read if you edit the page) before you start an IP thread. Commented-out notes show up in the source but not on the "live" page. There may be admin/mod comments relevant to the page image, or there may be a link to previous IP threads, which you should read (since the same issue you're bringing up might have already been discussed), and link to in your new thread (because that's polite).

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#752: Apr 4th 2014 at 12:50:22 PM

An update from Wiki Talk: The thread cap on both Image Picking and Trope Repair Shop have been replaced by an approval system per thread.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#753: Apr 4th 2014 at 1:53:43 PM

I've tweaked the OP of this thread to reflect the change.

Leaper Since: May, 2009
#754: Apr 7th 2014 at 8:54:24 PM

Given discussion in a current thread, I'd like to advocate a rule that no real life picture examples can be used in a trope page marked with No Real Life Examples Please. There's always a reason for that restriction on a trope page, and I don't think we should leave the door open for pet topic editors to evade that restriction.

FastEddie Since: Apr, 2004
#755: Apr 7th 2014 at 9:18:03 PM

Do we really have to have a rule for every little thing? It is pretty plain that no real life people should be pictured if the trope is marked for no real life ... stuff.

edited 7th Apr '14 9:19:16 PM by FastEddie

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#756: Apr 7th 2014 at 9:26:54 PM

We did discuss this issue in the past, and the conclusion was that since issues leading to NRLEP don't always apply to images (natter problems for example don't affect images) there was no point in having a general rule.

edited 7th Apr '14 9:28:40 PM by SeptimusHeap

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Leaper Since: May, 2009
#757: Apr 7th 2014 at 9:38:12 PM

[up][up] The thread on Head-in-the-Sand Management doesn't think that No Real Life Examples Please is a barrier to having a pic being a RL example.

[up] I see... and I would guess that making a rule about "just" the ones where the reason is controversy is worth it?

FastEddie Since: Apr, 2004
#758: Apr 8th 2014 at 8:10:21 AM

The image on Head-in-the-Sand Management works because it is funny and there is no debate about whether the people pictured were assholes. This is where rules don't help us, these places where common sense and a sense of humor are better guides than a follow-the-letter rigid rule.

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#759: Apr 8th 2014 at 9:50:17 AM

To follow up: The statement in the OP on this particular issue is that we should avoid it, not that we should never do it. We already have one good example where a RL pic works very well on a NRLEP page...I've no issue with keeping this one as well. Mark as admin keep?

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#760: Apr 9th 2014 at 5:27:04 AM

Just noting that the OP has a screwy bullet preceding the " A YMMV or Audience Reaction..." text.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#761: Apr 9th 2014 at 6:27:24 AM

[up] Fixed, I'd stuck a period there by accident when I was tweaking the previous line.

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#762: Apr 16th 2014 at 10:02:46 AM

Girls Bravo needs to be added to the "no image" list.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#763: Apr 16th 2014 at 10:13:07 AM

[up] Hmmmm...GIS certainly isn't providing anything that would work as a good page pic so far. Gonna see if we can at least find a title card or something.

MarqFJA The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer from Deserts of the Middle East (Before Recorded History) Relationship Status: Anime is my true love
The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer
#764: Apr 26th 2014 at 10:01:19 AM

Having a broken image counts as "does not have a pic", right? Because Bulletproof Fashion Plate had a pic added to it in November last year, but it's currently broken. (Link to broken image) It's supposed to be from The Life and Times of Scrooge McDuck, according to the pothole.

Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.
m8e from Sweden Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Wanna dance with somebody
#765: Apr 26th 2014 at 10:07:56 AM

Fixed that. The case have to match the file on the servers.

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#766: May 8th 2014 at 4:09:57 AM

Just so to be clear: The commenting out of an image for being "too gory" as was done here does justify starting an Image Picking thread, especially when someone else then adds another image, yes?

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#767: May 8th 2014 at 5:31:02 AM

I would say it depends on what image is put up in its place. Removing (or commenting out) an image as "too gory" basically puts the page back to "no image, no tag saying not to add one" and those are generally considered "ok to add an image without making an IP thread."

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#768: May 9th 2014 at 5:41:02 AM

I'm going to do my level best to get all the housekeeping in here done this weekend...not having as much free time in the evenings due to our workout routine and getting sidetracked with other stuff on the wiki has thrown me off a bit.

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#769: May 25th 2014 at 5:31:20 PM

Okay, some of you may have noticed pics disappearing from pages. Steps are being taken to police the site's page images and set up a process to evaluate the ones that are potentially too racy for Google. This sucks ass, but as long as we have to suckle that particular teat we need to keep our noses cleaner than we'd probably like.

More info will be coming shortly; in the meantime, stay calm and please don't go willy-nilly making threads about pages that might be questionable. There are a few that already have threads and will be addressed there.

Umbee Since: May, 2009 Relationship Status: YOU'RE TEARING ME APART LISA
#770: May 25th 2014 at 7:53:45 PM

The image on the page for School of Seduction is from a cut work, but is not listed in the first post as one of Fast Eddie's approved exceptions. The picture itself is about as innocuous as you can get for a trope like this, but the fact that FE hasn't specifically given it the okay makes me want to bring it to attention.

Taking steps to abandon this handle.
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#771: May 25th 2014 at 8:01:03 PM

[up] I don't think there's anything particularly bad about that one, but I'll mention it.

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#772: May 25th 2014 at 9:51:01 PM

UPDATE: Nah, that one should be fine.

FastEddie Since: Apr, 2004
#773: May 27th 2014 at 12:57:58 PM

We're trying to figure the best way to get all the images evaluated. There are roughly 30,000 images that need to be looked at. We can't just open it up to the general population because we know there are people who will just mark everything, or give a pass to things from sources they happen to like.

Can we get some volunteers? It really won't take that much time. Each volunteer would probably only have a dozen or so 100-image pages to evaluate. A minute or two per page should be plenty.

Just post here volunteering and someone will get back to you with a page assignment.

Thanks!

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#774: May 27th 2014 at 1:02:00 PM

What are the evaluation criteria? I am thinking of phallic imagery, barely-hidden nudity or barely-hidden sexual intercourse.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
FastEddie Since: Apr, 2004
#775: May 27th 2014 at 1:08:48 PM

That's a bit of an issue. Here's all the guidance we get from Google:

Google ads may not be placed on pages with adult or mature content. This includes, but is not limited to, pages with images or videos containing:

  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty

Total posts: 9,751
Top