OK. So, I removed a crapload of complaining from the description. However, azul120 restored it, with the following edit reason:
"This is a sub-(if still not YMMV on the whole)trope of The Scrappy. The description goes into why these characters often end up as scrappies."
Uh, no. This is NOT a Sub-Trope of The Scrappy in any way shape or form. That would mean that being hated by the fans would be a REQUIREMENT for the trope, which would be completely stupid. And The Scrappy's description does not even mention this trope. Anyway, we do not need 3/4 of the description going on about how these characters are loathed. It's useless complaining and blatantly ignores the fact that Tropes Are Tools.
Hide / Show RepliesIt is part of the Scrappy index though. Being a scrappy may not be required, but it is one of the most notable results of the trope, particularly if the character's status is more incidental than deliberate (see also: Karma Houdini).
I find its presence in that index questionable. Characters who fit this trope might end up being a scrappy but that does not qualify this trope to be on that index.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanThe Scrappy Index in general needs cleaning. Several of its tropes don't fit (why the hell is Big Bad Wannabe on there?), and it seems too subjective as to what actually goes on there due to its loose definition.
Should I add the person who complained about the Naughty Tentacle page as an example? I mean, it led to The Second Google Incident.
I'm not LGBT. I just think Rain's really cool. Apologies if my humor gets too painful. Hide / Show Replies^Too meta for me.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanBut still...
I'm not LGBT. I just think Rain's really cool. Apologies if my humor gets too painful.Think this page could go under List Of Pages Artists Can Illustrate?
Thanks for the correction. I definitely have grammatical parsing problems sometimes.
And of course the trope itself.
Hide / Show RepliesAvatar: My entry of Aang as a swiss messenger to Fandom, an inadvertant complication that draws more ire and distain than is actually at fault for was editted out. How is this not consistent with the trope as listed and examples given (Code Geass, for example)
Hide / Show RepliesWhat does Aang draw ire for? Because the only thing I can think of is his periodic foul moods.
Hail Martin Septim!
I know it says "No Real Life Examples", but I think that the person in whose body HIV first came into existence (c. 1900s - 1930s) (the current virology hypothesis is this person killed a chimpanzee infected with Si V for bushmeat, and somehow the chimp's blood got into the person's blood, where the virus adapted and became HIV), or the person who first transmitted it out of Africa in the 1960s or early 1970s, qualify as examples.
As the album of your life plays, may there not be any scratches.