"There is now an otaku movement to create a law barring female seiyuu from dating or marrying, even demanding that they be virgins."
IT's not that I don't believe this (I swear there should be a term for Otakus that are psychotic to the point of borderline-Stalker with a Crush when it comes to female seiyuu) ,but can I get a citation, I can't find any evidence that doesn't link back to the original article.
Edited by Sakubara "Life's like a movie, write your own ending. Keep believing, keep pretending."-Jim HensonWould Sarah Polley qualify? She was fired at Disney's request- though it was for a rather unusual cause. (She wore a peace sign to an awards ceremony during the first Persian Gulf War.)
This just has "Taylor Swift is an example" written over it.
Well? Does anyone know if she is?
Peace is the only battle worth waging."There was a story a few months ago about a teacher who was fired for having pictures of her drinking wine on Facebook. Another, more saddening story was about a woman where either her insurance or disability payments were cut off because she had depression, but had pictures posted of her having fun on Facebook."
The first story here fits the trope fine. The second one is related to the first story, but doesn't have much to do with Contractual Purity (Contractual Depression?). Anyone object if I remove it?
Actually a girl.
Would Cristina Valenzuela be considered an inverted case? She's mostly known for doing anime but in recent years she's developed a large child audience with her role as Marinette in Miraculous Ladybug, and just recently she's come out with having breast implants; which is usually a big issue for a star in any kids media. Yet she hasn't faced any significant backlash since she was very transparent about it to her younger fans on Twitter. So would it be ok to add her to the page as an inversion?