Follow TV Tropes

Following

Some issues here: Unconventional Learning Experience

Go To

Hylarn (Don’t ask) Relationship Status: Anime is my true love
#1: Sep 27th 2010 at 7:18:55 PM

Problem one: All of the examples were shoved into Troper Tales. I realize that it's somewhat subjective, but was that strictly necessary?

Problem two: The description is terrible. The only clue to what it's supposed to be about is the title, now that the examples aren't readily accessible.

SilentReverence adopting kitteh from 3 tiles right 1 tile up Since: Jan, 2010
adopting kitteh
#2: Sep 27th 2010 at 7:25:18 PM

...Wait. Issue one: why were the examples thrown into Troper Tales? Was this deemed as subjective, Not A Trope (but I'm sur eit is) or something?

Fanfic Recs orwellianretcon'd: cutlocked for committee or for Google?
Twilightdusk Since: Jan, 2001
#3: Sep 27th 2010 at 7:29:48 PM

It seems to have been moved to Troper Tales because the examples are, by definition, a personal experience that others will likely not share, which is what troper tales are for.

The definition seems to boil down to "This show was most certainly not intended to educate someone, but This Troper learned something from it anyway."

Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#4: Sep 27th 2010 at 7:54:53 PM

Bullshit.

Troper Tales are first-person experiences with the trope. "This happenbed to me". "My friend had this happen." If we're going to call any example "subjective" and a troper tale because "one troper thinks it applies", every single example in the whole damn wiki will be on the Tropert Tales pages.

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Twilightdusk Since: Jan, 2001
#5: Sep 27th 2010 at 8:03:24 PM

That seems a little...charged Mad.

In any case what I meant was, there are certain tropes that are entirely objective. If you point at a certain character and define him as a Big Bad, chances are anyone else you ask will agree.

This page however, in its current wording at least, is a personal experience, not something you can objectively state in any way shape or form for anyone other than yourself.

The setup as it is right now is terrible though, the examples from the main page were just shunted into troper tales, that's not a good way to go about things. Troper Tales is formated very differently.

The main issue here is if this should be clarified in a way that changes it from "personal" to "subjective," or if we should just clean up the Troper Tales page and leave it be to accrue anecdotes.

Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#6: Sep 27th 2010 at 9:39:55 PM

You're right, that was harsh. I apologize. But really. Not one of the examples was written as a first-person personal experience, and several of them were specifically "parents (or teachers) report".

If any example that is based on personal opinion is a troper tale, what counts as a "real" example that deserves to be on the main page?

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#7: Sep 27th 2010 at 9:46:51 PM

I recall someone linking a story where kids who played Dn D had significantly larger vocabularies than before they started and beyond their grade level.

Fight smart, not fair.
SilentReverence adopting kitteh from 3 tiles right 1 tile up Since: Jan, 2010
adopting kitteh
#8: Sep 27th 2010 at 10:11:08 PM

If any example that is based on personal opinion is a troper tale, what counts as a "real" example that deserves to be on the main page?
Examples based on facts. Like citing the aleph stuff in More Than Infinite. But I see the point.

Anyway, I don't see why the examples as put now would have to be under Troper Tales. Troper Tales is "this happened to me about this trope". Most of the examples I saw at the YKTTW, and most examples I'd guess reasonable people would come by with, would be "fact X can be tangentially learnt from show Y". That's definitively not subjective, nor a "tale".

edited 27th Sep '10 10:12:46 PM by SilentReverence

Fanfic Recs orwellianretcon'd: cutlocked for committee or for Google?
Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#9: Sep 27th 2010 at 10:18:59 PM

^ Thank you. That's what I was trying to say before my frustration got in the way.

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Mouser Since: Jan, 2001
#10: Sep 28th 2010 at 10:32:55 AM

I agree that this can be done objectively. It's been working fine for its inverse, Fun for Some.

Twilightdusk Since: Jan, 2001
#11: Sep 28th 2010 at 12:34:06 PM

I certainly agree that the page as is is terrible, but I don't think the decision to move things to troper tales was the problem, rather, the fact that the third person example list was just shunted over there with no revision.

Assuming we don't revise this trope too much, I think the main page could be for verifiable studies into this (Dn D increasing vocabulary even as various groups decry it as the game of the devil for example), and leave the Troper Tales page for personal examples that most people wouldn't share ("I was playing Super Mario Brothers one day and realized something about how I act in a game as opposed to real life").

dotchan Mind-Altering Substance from Locked in the Warner Water Tower Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Mind-Altering Substance
#12: Oct 1st 2010 at 10:38:11 AM

We should definitely restrict page examples to stuff mentioned in actual news reports, and the anecdotal stuff (like my Pacman example in the YKTTW) in Troper Tales.

ExpiryBot Since: Dec, 1969
#13: Jan 12th 2011 at 11:04:06 AM

This thread expired after 60 days of inactivity.

Add Post

Total posts: 12
Top