Content Violations Review: Manga.Shoujo Sect

This is a textbook case of Porn with Plot, even if the "plot"^note Or at least the "plot" of the hentai - I have not read the manga is no more complex than "A group of lesbians want to get with the women they love." Additionally, while I could see some of the women being a bit short, none of them are young enough to disqualify the page under the "No paedobait" rule. Thus, I propose the page is restored.

Please do not link to websites that break the forum rules. -Sync

Edited by Synchronicity on Feb 15th 2024 at 10:15:08 AM

Bumping for feedback

I'm going with "keep cut." The plot - and the romance - is ultimately in service of the sex scenes.

...you didn't need to link the anime. Abstaining until someone can do a through reading of it.

EDIT: Changing vote to keep cut.

Edited by Siegfried1337 on Feb 15th 2024 at 6:18:07 AM

I read it several years ago and from what I remember of it, I agree with Ramidel. Voting to keep cut.

Edited by Willbyr on Feb 15th 2024 at 8:17:42 AM

What do you mean? Pages in the Manga/ namespace can point out differences in their anime adaptations, not to mention this is an 18+ thread.

I mean, I'm pretty sure that's an illegal streaming site, for one

Whether it's legal or not is irrelevant. Besides, nowhere in the CV rules does it say not to link it.

It's literally against forum rules to link piracy sites.

Oh, so those two sites DID in fact break the forum rules. I thought they didn't. My apologies, that's on me. I will never link them again.

Edited by JHD0919 on Feb 15th 2024 at 10:20:43 AM

Anyways, back on track, I think this is a keep

Bumping for more feedback, as the discussion was derailed and I want it to get back on track.

'd

Edited by JHD0919 on Feb 15th 2024 at 11:26:59 AM

Quite on edge. It's another highschool lesbians drama.

It's an assorted collection of romcom stories of 1-2nd year girls in a dormitory.

If we go with plot/porn ratio, there sure are a lot and lots of talking. On the other hand being incoherent Slice of Life with 15 named characters (ranging from 143 to 170 cm in height), there is not much overarching narrative aside recurring characters getting closer over time, and the sex scenes occur at least Once per Episode.

The funny thing, the OVA despite being specifically H rated, is devoid of explicit scenes and it's on youtube in full and appears to be rewritten with more focus on a specific duo.

Edited by Amonimus on Feb 16th 2024 at 11:47:02 PM

EDIT: The version on Youtube appears to be a censored fan edit.

Edited by Ramidel on Feb 16th 2024 at 12:02:38 AM

Oh? Then I guess that answers why literally every other source is a hentai site.

Seeing the full version, yeah it's a solid cut.

Edited by Amonimus on Feb 16th 2024 at 12:16:55 PM

A fan edit might count as Bleached Underpants, depending on how widely consumed it is.

A fan edit counts as a fan work. It could certainly have a page made for it but it'd go under Fanfic.

Technically it would go on Web Animation: it's more similar to an Abridged Series.

So, I believe the ruling is "keep cut, but the fan edit can be troped if anyone cares to." Any opposed?

Works for me.

Keep cut, allow fan edit

tossing in a vote for the fan edit too.