Follow TV Tropes

Following

CM/MB Policy and Thread Culture

Go To

miraculous Goku Black (Apprentice)
Goku Black
#4876: Mar 30th 2023 at 10:25:59 AM

I thought the three days was so we wouldnt get a flood of eps all the time. I think its done a good job of that so uh I dont see a need to change it.

[up]Not the thread to discuss that. Go here for that

"That's right mortal. By channeling my divine rage into power, I have forged a new instrument in which to destroy you."
WarJay77 Discarded and Feeling Blue (Troper Knight)
Discarded and Feeling Blue
#4877: Mar 30th 2023 at 10:41:30 AM

[up] That, and so that things had time to really be discussed if necessary.

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
miraculous Goku Black (Apprentice)
Goku Black
#4878: Mar 30th 2023 at 10:43:00 AM

Plus three days is as noted. A really nicely long time for the more strenuous discussions to reach a conclusion.

"That's right mortal. By channeling my divine rage into power, I have forged a new instrument in which to destroy you."
ANonagon9 (Experienced, Not Yet Jaded) Relationship Status: Complex: I'm real, they are imaginary
#4879: Mar 30th 2023 at 10:45:08 AM

Also, also, three days let's someone be late to the conversation (within reason) and still have a voice.

WarJay77 Discarded and Feeling Blue (Troper Knight)
Discarded and Feeling Blue
#4880: Mar 30th 2023 at 10:45:08 AM

It's also the time period that areas like TRS and most other project threads are bound to.

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
Arawn999 Since: Dec, 2013 Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
#4881: Mar 30th 2023 at 9:02:13 PM

Looking over the Former Complete Monsters page, I'm seeing several were cut for being "too similar to [the original version]" but to my knowledge that isn't a disqualifying feature anymore — at least not if it's a work in a different medium. If that's now the case, shouldn't the entries that were cut for that reason be restored, or at least re-examined?

Edited by Arawn999 on Mar 30th 2023 at 9:02:37 AM

G-Editor Since: Mar, 2015 Relationship Status: Above such petty unnecessities
#4882: Mar 31st 2023 at 10:01:56 AM

My personal opinion I dont think an extra 24 hour waiting period needs to be necessary if the candidate a 5 [tup] over the number of [tdown] after three days given that the 72 hour period is pretty long itself

[down] I was referring to a 24 hour period after the 72 hour mark has ended

Edited by G-Editor on Mar 31st 2023 at 5:52:06 AM

papyru30 The wifi here sucks from South Dakota for school Since: Aug, 2016 Relationship Status: You cannot grasp the true form
The wifi here sucks
#4883: Mar 31st 2023 at 12:11:22 PM

[up]No one is suggesting we bring the 24 hour wait back.

EDIT:[up] I have no idea what you're talking about, I've never heard of that being a thing.

Edited by papyru30 on Mar 31st 2023 at 4:43:30 AM

Hope your prepared for an unforgettable luncheon
G-Editor Since: Mar, 2015 Relationship Status: Above such petty unnecessities
#4884: Mar 31st 2023 at 4:08:24 PM

[up] I saw Mirai Yukon post “Oh right, the news rules. If we're still going with 72 hours, we just gotta wait a bit over 24”. They said it in the MB proposal thread

[down] Sorry i must have interpreted that

Edited by G-Editor on Mar 31st 2023 at 7:28:47 AM

papyru30 The wifi here sucks from South Dakota for school Since: Aug, 2016 Relationship Status: You cannot grasp the true form
The wifi here sucks
#4885: Mar 31st 2023 at 4:15:26 PM

[up]G... He's talking about an EP that was 48 hours old and still needed 24 more hours until the 72 hour voting period was up.

Hope your prepared for an unforgettable luncheon
Ravok Caesar Since: Jun, 2015 Relationship Status: Complex: I'm real, they are imaginary
Caesar
#4886: Mar 31st 2023 at 8:54:53 PM

While I'm for keeping the 3 day period for now, I do think we might could consider bumping the "active works per troper" limit up from 2 to 3. Now that we're back in the swing of things and have cleared a lot of the backlog I don't think it'd be too much of an issue to increase that by one while still maintaining the three day rule, myself. Plus it would be nicely matching for "3 active works per 3 day rule" [lol]

Edited by Ravok on Mar 31st 2023 at 8:56:03 AM

WHAT A WONDERFUL DAY!
G-Editor Since: Mar, 2015 Relationship Status: Above such petty unnecessities
#4887: Mar 31st 2023 at 9:02:55 PM

[up] I like Ravok’s suggestion about bumping the number of works trooper’s each can have to 3 works

Edited by G-Editor on Mar 31st 2023 at 12:07:28 PM

papyru30 The wifi here sucks from South Dakota for school Since: Aug, 2016 Relationship Status: You cannot grasp the true form
The wifi here sucks
WetFlannels Classy, Refined, Unstable from Nearby, on a cosmological scale. Since: Oct, 2021 Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
Classy, Refined, Unstable
#4889: Apr 1st 2023 at 3:15:57 AM

I'm fine with moving it to 3 active works while keeping the 3 day wait. The threads are going at a steady pace now and nothing is really getting missed.

Yes, yes, old boy, we'd like nothing more than to stay and be a part of your primitive, barbaric society, but duty calls, duty calls...
43110 (Striking Back) Relationship Status: Reincarnated romance
#4890: Apr 1st 2023 at 6:09:53 AM

I think that’s a great idea!

CookieMonster69 Since: Feb, 2019
#4891: Apr 1st 2023 at 9:14:07 AM

EDIT: sorry, wrong thread.

Edited by CookieMonster69 on Apr 1st 2023 at 9:19:28 AM

Arawn999 Since: Dec, 2013 Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
#4892: Apr 1st 2023 at 9:34:23 AM

Any comment on my comment?

Agentofchaos A God Am I from Somewhere in the Universe Since: Dec, 2021
#4893: Apr 1st 2023 at 9:36:37 AM

We shouldn't automatically restore any entry, they might have other issues as well, just maybe put something at the top of the page about how being too similar is no longer grounds for DQ-ing a candidate, like how we got rid of the taste rule or fanfics being too different from their source material and so if someone wants to re-propose them they can do the normal process

REALITY IS AN ILLUSION, THE UNIVERSE IS A HOLOGRAM, BUY GOLD BYEEEE! | She/Her
Arawn999 Since: Dec, 2013 Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
#4894: Apr 1st 2023 at 10:59:12 AM

So, something along the lines of:

Similarities between different versions of a character is no longer grounds for the disqualification of a candidate. If someone wants to re-propose a candidate that was disqualified for this reason, please do so on the Proposal thread.

Ravok Caesar Since: Jun, 2015 Relationship Status: Complex: I'm real, they are imaginary
Caesar
#4895: Apr 1st 2023 at 4:08:12 PM

Sure I'm good with that

But yeah, I think amending the active works to 3 per troper should be a perfectly serviceable update to the rules thus far. The 3 day rule keeps things in a good flow already.

WHAT A WONDERFUL DAY!
Draxterrus An Eldritch Troper Since: May, 2019 Relationship Status: Wishfully thinking
An Eldritch Troper
#4896: Apr 2nd 2023 at 3:06:41 AM

I am fine with the 3 day rule as well as bumping up the number of active works per troper to 3, but I don't think there will be a lot of people having 3 active works at once (besides Lighty, Scraggle and Ravok of course).

Humanity is defined by its absurdity, and I am no exception.
G-Editor Since: Mar, 2015 Relationship Status: Above such petty unnecessities
#4897: Apr 2nd 2023 at 12:59:07 PM

Okay so with the majority of us agreeing to increase the limit from 2 to 3 works per trooper, we just have to wait for the mods to respond and see if they will make it official (that's what I think)

Ravok Caesar Since: Jun, 2015 Relationship Status: Complex: I'm real, they are imaginary
Caesar
#4898: Apr 10th 2023 at 9:21:34 PM

I think it's been a decent enough time since the idea brought up and enough majority in favor that we can update the OPs to three active works. Mods, could you see about updating that on each thread's OP in the Ground Rules segment where it mentions how many active works? Under bullet point 1, the sentence "...each individual troper should only be proposing or writing up characters from a maximum of two works at a time..." can just be amended to read "three", instead.

Edited by Ravok on Apr 10th 2023 at 9:28:46 AM

WHAT A WONDERFUL DAY!
MacronNotes (she/her) (Captain) Relationship Status: Less than three
(she/her)
#4899: Apr 10th 2023 at 10:01:21 PM

I did that but hollers are a better way to get our attention because there isn't a guarantee that we are going to actively follow a thread.

Macron's notes
Ravok Caesar Since: Jun, 2015 Relationship Status: Complex: I'm real, they are imaginary
Caesar
#4900: Apr 10th 2023 at 10:41:23 PM

Thanks Mac, it's much appreciated. Sorry for not hollering, I know now going forward to do so. Thanks again smile

WHAT A WONDERFUL DAY!

Total posts: 5,778
Top