Hmmm...the problem I see with the Frank Oz pics is that it doesn't look immediately obvious that he's actually voicing Miss Piggy.
Edit: Never mind, I just noticed the current
Edited by ravioliluigi on Feb 23rd 2020 at 11:41:52 AM
Wouldn’t that just be a lateral change from the current?
back lolThen again I cant really think of a better way to visualize this trope than that anyhow
Current is fine.
"That's right mortal. By channeling my divine rage into power, I have forged a new instrument in which to destroy you."I'm not that bothered by the current.
(Annoyed grunt)Yeah, the current is perfectly fine. Frank Oz is a puppeteer, not a voice actor (at least in that photo.)
Is he not actually not the voice actor then? Even if he isn't an example, I think OP has the right idea. In my experience, it seems pretty common for puppeteers to voice their own puppets (because of lip flaps and stuff). It definitely does a way better job of illustrating that the person and the character are at least related to each other.
Other options - maybe a shot from one of those opening credits scenes where it cycles though the main characters and says who's voicing them?
I really don't like current because it's basically just two pictures pasted next to each other.
Edited by rachiebird on Feb 24th 2020 at 2:30:17 AM
That was my thought too, and one that Noel MacNeal expressed on Defunctland's podcast: if you perform a puppet, it's expected that you perform the voice. There are exceptions, but these are few and far between. Frank Oz was indeed the performer and thus voice of Miss Piggy. (Eric Jacobsen has since taken over both roles.)
Edited by Brainulator9 on Feb 24th 2020 at 5:34:18 AM
Contains 20% less fat than the leading value brand!Clock is set.
I could go with one of the suggestions, since there's no obvious connection between the two sides of the current.
Keet cleanupI say 1.1.
back lolKeep current.
If someone can't read the trope title and figure out the lady voices Bart Simpson then we're setting a REALLY low standard for our public.
Well, yeah. But if we can replace the image with something equally or more illustrative and more visually interesting than a photo of a voice actor edited next to a random screenshot of the character they voice - there's no reason not to.
Edited by rachiebird on Mar 2nd 2020 at 6:57:31 AM
He's wearing a headset with a mic.
Current isn't that bad but 1.1 is probably better.
If a tree falls in the forest and nobody remembers it, who else will you have ice cream with?The clock's up and I'm not seeing enough consensus to make a change. Locking up.
A man playing a female puppet seems more direct to me than putting a live woman and a cartoon boy next to each other, as seen here◊ and here◊. Hopefully the quality on all of these are OK; certainly, the current isn't too good.
Contains 20% less fat than the leading value brand!