Hollywood Accounting is being discussed in a separate thread. As it currently stands, it is a UN and not a trope, so it would not be part of an index of tropes.
What is the second thing that shouldn't be there?
I had a dog-themed avatar before it was cool.There are actually two: Hollywood Hype Machine and Hollywood Beauty Standards. The trope that fits the concept but not the snowclone is Things Are More Effective in Hollywood.
And yes, the index should be about the concept rather than the snowclone.
edited 10th Dec '17 6:32:12 AM by Lymantria
Join the Five-Man Band cleanup project!The obvious remedy would be to change the description to match the index and clear out the tropes that don't fit the concept.
Hollywood Accounting should be tabled, so to speak, and the other discussion can decide what to do with it.
Personally, I'm not sure if this is worth clogging up TRS, especially since it has such a simple fix.
Look at all that shiny stuff ain't they prettyClock is set.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanClock expired with no progress; closing.
she/her | TRS needs your help! | Contributor of Trope Report
The majority of items on this index fall under the idea of "media does certain things wrong consistently because that's how people expect it in media". Which is what I thought it was about.
However, the index description claims to be a Search Generated Index of anything named "Hollywood X".
There's like, two items on the whole list that fit the naming scheme and not the concept. (And, weirdly, one that fits the concept but not the naming scheme.) Should we just rewrite this to be about the concept?
Trouble Cube continues to be a general-purpose forum for those who desire such a thing.