Follow TV Tropes
Apparently some of the kids in question have received police attention in the past, so maybe it's not a first occurrence.
The ages were what caught my eye. Sure, in this part of Europe (Germany and Italy for example) a 14 year old would be (legally) considered old enough to make a decision regarding sexual consent by themself, but sexual assault by a kid is fairly unexpected even so. Normally one would expect the opposite age pattern.
(One wonders how such a legal case would be handled in Switzerland)
Something I heard on The Last Podcast on the Left's latest Side Stories episode and thought might be of interest here:
Cindy Hendy, girlfriend and widely suspected accomplice of David Parker Ray, a serial killer known as "The Toybox Killer" that Last Podcast covered in an early episode, is to be released from prison after serving 20 years of a 36 year sentence. According to LPOTL, it could've been more, but she was sentenced mere months before a law went into effect requiring violent offenders to serve 85% of their sentence.
Just heard that Kevin Spacey has been cleared
By the sound of it the mum has admitted to deleted bad stuff off the victims phone before handing it to the police, the destruction of evidence obviously thus compromised the phone and things were further compromised when the victims invoked his right against self incrimination when asked about the deletion of messages.
Hrm. If memory serves the Spacey affair began in California after a complaint by a former child actor who said he was 14 years old when Spacey inappropriately touched him. This is a different case, what happened with the former?
Gonna post this.
For context, here's the post being linked to;
TMPD announced that a man was arrested for sending threats to firebomb Square Enix’s office.
According to statements, suspect send a complaint because of money he lost from a game...
The timing of the episode is actually coincidental, decided weeks before as a one shot to build time so they could research their next big series, but then the the Garlic Festival, Dayton, El Paso, and others that didn't make the news all happened and they decided if they waited until there were no mass shootings before releasing an episode on a mass shooter, they were never going to release an episode on a mass shooter.
To paraphrase one of the reasons they went ahead regardless: "these assholes are as deserving of the same scorn and derision we give the serial killers we cover."
Their whole schtick is to "defang the monster" by mocking them as the losers they are. So there might be some catharsis there (I've only just started listening myself so I can't say too specifically)
Edited by sgamer82 on Aug 10th 2019 at 12:20:54 PM
Is it on-topic to ask about how certain elements of a court trial work? I've been wondering about the roles of the jury and the judge with respect to sentencing.
It varies between country to country (and jurisdiction to jurisdiction to some countries), so you'd have to be specific. But I think this thread is alright for those question, given that it is not that active.
For the U.S., my general understanding is that the jury, following conviction, has the ability to recommend a sentence (In death penalty cases, for instance, I believe it's common for the jury to determine if it's suitable.) but it is up to the judge to actually impose it. They can go softer or harder of they deem it appropriate.
However that's off the cuff and from memory, so if I'm wrong I'm sure I'll be corrected.
Wait, so who actually decides whether or not the defendant is guilty (and thus convict them of the charges levelled at them)?
The jury does.
Either the judge or the jury, depending on the kind of case and what the defense wants to do. You can opt for a “bench trial” with no jury.
Edited by archonspeaks on Aug 23rd 2019 at 5:09:06 AM
Does the jury have to be unanimous in their decision? I vaguely remember reading something about some trials suffering from their juries being unable to reach a consensus — I believe such a thing gets called a "mistrial"?
Federal courts always require a unanimous jury decision. State courts vary, usually depending on whether it’s a civil or criminal trial.
Mistrial is just a general term for a trial cancelled without a verdict. It can happen because of a hung jury or for other reasons.
Another shooting incident, this time in West Texas.
Caucasian make in 30s is the suspect. Police shot him dead.
At what point did society decide that sex crimes are more despicable than murder, even when the latter gets you more time in jail?
Now that you mention it, I'd like to know that too. It always irks me that the biggest ruckuses over "objectionable content" in a movie, video game or the like are always made over sexuality-related matters, far more than mass murder, extreme violence and torture unless the victims of the latter are a non-acceptable target group (e.g. Jews; when was the last time you saw a movie or game glorify mass murdering of innocent Jewsnote I do not count indie games like a couple of Arab-made "first person shooters" that I've seen during the oughties where you play as a Palestinian youth in occupied Palestine fighting against heavily armed Israeli soldiers with nothing but throwing stones as your default weapon, forcing you to scavenge firearms from the aforementioned Israeli soldiers (it was Harder Than Hard, for the curious; they were obviously made on low budgets and with little actual experience in FPS-style video game design).?).
Edited by MarqFJA on Sep 4th 2019 at 6:28:54 PM
Community Showcase More
How well does it match the trope?