Follow TV Tropes
According to io9, Disney has started work on the sequel to the 2014 Maleficent movie.
...That typo is going to irritate me for ages.
Me too. It should actually be called Meleeficent. It's about Angelina Jolie punching people for two hours.
There wouldn't be away I could correct that typo?
When I read that headline, I thought the title of the movie was going to be Maleficent: All Hope Lost. I was then disappointed.
You mean like this? ;)
edited 16th Jun '15 1:04:21 PM by ElkhornTheDowntrodden
Because the zombies killed God.
Yeah, I'm with you. I knew there was a reason that Witch with a Capital B entered my nightmares recently. >.>
You can't kill God. You know how hard it is to kill God? You would need each and every raiding guild from the most densely populated server in World of Warcraft just to put a dent in Him.
edited 16th Jun '15 1:16:11 PM by Demetrios
....based on reading that i09 article, I just had a terrible idea.
Live-Action Disney Cinematic Universe.
Or you can just kill Piccolo instead, but that's a bit trickier.
If God is killed by a zombie, does he become Zombie God?
edited 16th Jun '15 1:26:01 PM by Tuckerscreator
@OP: You or I can holler the original post in order to fix the typo.
I think God would kill the zombies first.
@higherbrainpattern With the villains having sympathetic backstories to make the heroes? I actually want to to see that if only to see what it would look like
Soooo... why did she call herself Maleficent even when she was a good fairy girl?
NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Anyways, I liked Maleficent. Or at least, the relationship between Sleeping Beauty and Maleficent.
"Hey, that Maleficent movie we made did pretty well; let's make sequels until we fuck it up!"
edited 16th Jun '15 4:59:43 PM by HextarVigar
Ladies and gentlemen, we can have sequels! Horrible, horrible sequels!
I'd rather have a cinematic universe that stays true to the spirit of the original animations
We're doin' a sequel, There's no need to disguise, The studio considers us, A viable franchise!
We're doin' a sequel, The studio wants more While they wait for Pixar To screen Toy Story 4!
edited 16th Jun '15 5:56:32 PM by KnownUnknown
Is anyone considering the sequel might take Maleficent down a darker path? Maybe not full on villain but still more morally dubious than the previous film?
I thought she was fairly morally dubious in the first film.
Regardless of what's been done to you, murdering someone's children as an act of vengeance is victimizing a person who has done you no harm out of spite. Both sides of the conflict were assholes and the only reason Maleficent changed her mind about murdering Aurora for spite is because she grew fond of the child - which is, itself, the product of her own malicious curse misfiring and hitting her in the leg, as she explicitly stated that Aurora would "be loved by all," and as we see later in the film, even Maleficent is subject to the rulings of the curse.
Stefan stole Maleficent's wings, Maleficent stole Stefan's child, and then they proceeded to try to murder each other until one finally died, with many people killed and many lives ruined in the crossfire. They're both assholes.
edited 17th Jun '15 8:41:02 AM by TobiasDrake
Community Showcase More
How well does it match the trope?