Wait - weren't we thinking up new names for the old definition? No? Then I'm suggesting it preemptively. I don't think WDYMIFK is bad enough to warrant changing now that we're agreeing to use the name for What Do You Mean, It's Not for Kids?'s opposite.
Yeah, unwritten rule number one: follow all the unwritten procedures. - Camacan
Avatars may be subject to change without notice.
![[up]](https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/smiles/arrow_up.png "[up]"){kind=icon}
I mean that What Do You Mean, It's Not for Kids? is fine for "kids' show that doesn't look it".
Mweheheh
At this point it's obvious that both What Do You Mean, It's for Kids? and Blah Blah Blah Not Blah need to be renamed. What Do You Mean, It's Not an Index? is, as has already been said, broken.
I'm not crazy, I just don't give a darn!
Yes. We need to fix the entire index, but no one seems interested in doing that.
Avatars may be subject to change without notice.
What do you mean?
I mean that the entirety of What Do You Mean, It's Not an Index? is broken, but all attempts to try and fix it as a whole seem to peter out. Look at the relative inactivity of just this thread alone, for instance.
It's just so difficult for me to think of better names.
edited 29th Dec '11 4:21:58 PM by FinalStarman
I'm not crazy, I just don't give a darn!
That crowner serves no purpose. Take another look at the page action crowner hooked to this thread. We are going scrap the old definition entirely, not split the audience reaction into two definitions.
Well, nevermind then.
Yeah, unwritten rule number one: follow all the unwritten procedures. - Camacan
We've started, haven't we? And doing them individually is slower but better than together. We're less likely to settle on a new snowclone and more likely to just rename them all and cut the index.
Mweheheh
Would it still be YMMV after the redefine?
edited 30th Dec '11 4:05:29 AM by Spinosegnosaurus77
Peace is the only battle worth waging.
Avatars may be subject to change without notice.
I would think so. Whether or not something is appropriate for children is subjective by its very nature.
Avatars may be subject to change without notice.
Bump...
"The Daily Show has to be right 100% of the time; FOX News only has to be right once." - Jon Stewart
Avatars may be subject to change without notice.
Bumping again; this thread seems to keep slipping behind.
"The Daily Show has to be right 100% of the time; FOX News only has to be right once." - Jon Stewart
To whatever end
What Do You Mean, It's for Kids? and What Do You Mean, It's Not for Kids? are continually being muddled up in my mind. I heartily support a renaming, possibly for both. Dubious Kids Show works for me. xD
That One Guy
Works for me too.
Support Gravitaz on Kickstarter!
Mweheheh
... But for which trope?
Peace is the only battle worth waging.
Yeah, that's nearly as ambiguous.
So, how should we implement this course of action? And should we start another crowner to decide if we're gonna rename this?
Crown Description:
What would be the best way to fix the page?
Silly Adult This Show Is For Kids sounds too much like the old definition.
I'm not crazy, I just don't give a darn!