Down with this sort of thing?: Fetish Retardant

I still think it's a better image for Nightmare Fetishist (which is currently imageless).

I know it's pretty much impossible to find an example of Fetish Retardant that doesn't fall under Rule 34 for some people, but as long as we find something that creeps out the majority I think it'll work.

....

Deboss: Assumes facts not in evidence from the image. You could easily assume one person is describing their fetish to someone who doesn't have it.

Which basically makes the image self-nullifying and better for Nightmare Fetishist if it's good for anything.

This man right here is sexy right? Now stare at the forehead.

This SMBC is all about the trope. Can we just use the last panel or do we need to splice in some context?

It would need some context.

The funny-sized panels might make it hard...maybe panels 1,2,5 and 6? Or just 1 and 6?

1, 2, 5, and 6 would get the entire point across...1 and 6 could work, but I think there's something lacking.

1,2,5,6

edited 16th Aug '11 1:17:50 PM by Madrugada

"My Beloved Smother goes Up To Eleven"

What about that and that? Especially panels 4-7, edited in one here

edited 1st Sep '11 4:31:12 AM by OzzieScribbler

That's good!

Too wide, try to put them all vertical.

Here it is...I think we could get away with just using the first two panels.

Possibly.

How about now?

Edited it to be vertical and have all the panels of the same width. It may be either all four panels of just two first or the two latter.

edited 1st Sep '11 5:40:20 AM by OzzieScribbler

Much better. I'd like to use all four panels, but I worry that the third may be toeing the NSFW line.

Very possible. But will just two panels make comic the justice? I'd like to know what others think.

The third panel makes it work, for it lets us know that it's a sex scene that ruins itself. Heck, we could just use the last two panels.

How about adding in the puking at the beginning — otherwise it may not be clear why the audience thinks it's gross.

Like it.

That does work a little better.

Not sure how many minor edits do we need now, so I made this version:

edited 2nd Sep '11 4:32:34 AM by OzzieScribbler

That one is even better, except it only needs the top three rows. The bottom two are unnecessary.

Or just Panel 1, 3, and 4.