Looks like we've got consensus on the rename. Same Content Different Age Rating it is, right?
That's Feo . . . He's a disgusting, mysoginistic, paedophilic asshat who moonlights as a shitty writer—Something AwfulCalling in favor of a rename.
Aaaaand my post was ignored. =/
This is another reason why I don't want to post in the TRS threads anymore. =/
It's not so much your post was ignored as it was noted but no one thought to say thank you to you as they should have. So, thank you.
A lot of times TRS posts are just bulletins of what people are doing and people only feel the need to reply if they object.
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. DickGiven the support for a rename, there is now an alternative titles crowner for this trope here. feel free to add names as you see fit.
edited 31st Jan '12 11:42:07 AM by LouieW
"irhgT nm0w tehre might b ea lotof th1nmgs i dont udarstannd, ubt oim ujst goinjg to keepfollowing this pazth i belieove iN !!!!!1 dSwitched.
This has consensus. Should it be called or wait for a higher vote count?
Oppression anywhere is a threat to democracy everywhere.Calling.
I've moved Rated W for Why and all its wicks to Same Content, Different Rating, created Laconic.Same Content Different Rating and cutlisted Laconic.Rated W For Why and updated Renamed Tropes and the FAQ thread.
After the discussion move, we should be done here.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanI declined the custom title request, because it was incorrectly capitilized, and moved the discussion. Looks like we're done.
Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.
Crown Description:
Vote up for yes, down for no.
Zapped natter in the Video Games section.
If that helps, that is =/