Follow TV Tropes

Following

The Laconic Wiki

Go To

shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#1: May 23rd 2011 at 10:24:04 AM

The Laconic Wiki has an issue. Recently in the TRS I've noticed a trend that more than half of the laconic definitions of tropes that come up there don't match the trope descriptions. Misuse then follows from these bad laconics and ends in a mess. We really need to do some quality control on laconics because it seems that a lot of people are writing them based on what they think the trope name means, and not what the trope is.

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
SpellBlade Since: Dec, 1969
TripleElation Diagonalizing The Matrix from Haifa, Isarel Since: Jan, 2001
Diagonalizing The Matrix
#3: May 23rd 2011 at 11:41:59 AM

I can confirm having seen (and corrected) poorly defined/written laconics. A good place to start would be a "fix laconics on your watchlist" drive.

Pretentious quote || In-joke from fandom you've never heard of || Shameless self-promotion || Something weird you'll habituate to
shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#4: May 23rd 2011 at 12:11:47 PM

Wife Husbandry until recently had a laconic that just made it look like it was a catch all trope for paedophilia, when most of the examples of things actually happening between the characters occur when the characters are adults.

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
KrisMahai Hm? Since: Jan, 2013
Hm?
#5: May 23rd 2011 at 1:21:30 PM

Shouldn't this be in Special Efforts, if it's as widespread of a problem as you claim? Not that I know, I rarely to never look at Laconics.

“Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?”
Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#6: May 23rd 2011 at 7:30:36 PM

I went and did laconics on all of my watchlist.

Fight smart, not fair.
suedenim Teutonic Tomboy T-Girl from Jet Dream HQ Since: Oct, 2009
Teutonic Tomboy T-Girl
#7: May 23rd 2011 at 9:01:25 PM

When doing this, however, I'd take note that sometimes a discrepancy between Laconic and Description can be a sign of problems with the description more than with the Laconic.

I still think crappy descriptions are probably TV Tropes' #2 problem (after Natter).

edited 23rd May '11 9:01:39 PM by suedenim

Jet-a-Reeno!
shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#8: May 23rd 2011 at 9:08:11 PM

Most of the time when there are crappy laconics it's obvious that the person who wrote them didn't read the trope. They're just something unrelated to anything but the title a large amount of the time.

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#9: May 23rd 2011 at 9:13:35 PM

That's not uncommon, but sometimes it's a sign of serious Trope decay on the main page, too. Usually a quick run through the history pages will help clear up which it is.

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Add Post

Total posts: 9
Top