Follow TV Tropes

Following

Split, new category?: Eagleland

Go To

savage Nice Hat from an underground bunker Since: Jan, 2001
#1: Apr 29th 2011 at 8:10:25 AM

This article is getting pretty long, it's been soft-split but the two sides of the trope really describe two nearly opposite views of America, the major similarity being that Type 2 Eaglelanders all seem to believe they ARE Type 1 (which sort of makes Type 2 a subversion of Type 1). The way potholes work, unless it's explicitly stated what type they're supposed to be it easily ends up being confusing which side of the fence the work is being said to portray unless you're familiar with the work in question.

I know there can be mixed versions of this trope where aspects of Type 1 and 2 are both present, but really that's more of a play on both tropes and your expectations of them. I think it could use a split and maybe even make an America In Media category? There's a lot of 'subtropes' listed that really don't seem like -real- subtropes, aside from being specific to an American setting.

Want to rename a trope? Step one: if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Prfnoff Since: Jan, 2001
#2: Apr 29th 2011 at 4:12:22 PM

This indeed seems like two tropes that ought to be split. (There at one point was a third section that got cut.) The name also may be a problem, since many examples are characters rather than settings.

CalamityJane from None of your business Since: Mar, 2010 Relationship Status: Robosexual
#3: Apr 29th 2011 at 7:09:30 PM

If this does get split, we'd probably have to make up a new name for the 'negative' viewpoint of America, since most potholes to Eagleland are Type 1, and that may or may not cause isues. It may not, since we also have the option of making a "Sliding scale" page for it, such as the one for Anti-Hero; it's not part of the actual page for Anti-Hero, but many people point out what type it is, leading to the subpage, which is potholed on the "main" page. It is somewhat confusing, but if enough arguments are made towards the Sliding Scale idea then it is a viable option.

Please consider supporting my artwork on Patreon
DrStarky Okay Guy from Corn And Pig Land Since: Jun, 2010 Relationship Status: Staying up all night to get lucky
Okay Guy
#4: Apr 29th 2011 at 8:36:41 PM

[up]America Sucks?

edited 29th Apr '11 8:37:49 PM by DrStarky

Put me in motion, drink the potion, use the lotion, drain the ocean, cause commotion, fake devotion, entertain a notion, be Nova Scotian
CalamityJane from None of your business Since: Mar, 2010 Relationship Status: Robosexual
#5: Apr 29th 2011 at 8:39:12 PM

I guess that would work. However, being the sidekick to Captain Patriotic, I'm not going to be much help. All I can say is that America Sucks seems to be the nicest way of saying it.

Please consider supporting my artwork on Patreon
Sackett Since: Jan, 2001
#6: Apr 29th 2011 at 8:44:01 PM

I think it's fine as a soft split.

Although I wonder who replace the type 2 image.

Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
#7: Apr 29th 2011 at 8:56:55 PM

This is, what, the fifth time this has been suggested? Anyway, support for what it's worth.

Fight smart, not fair.
petrie911 Since: Aug, 2009
#8: Apr 29th 2011 at 9:30:41 PM

I'd suggest Ugly Americans for type 2. There is the problem that it's a work name, but it's also an existing term that seems to describe exactly what type 2 is.

Belief or disbelief rests with you.
DrStarky Okay Guy from Corn And Pig Land Since: Jun, 2010 Relationship Status: Staying up all night to get lucky
Okay Guy
#9: Apr 29th 2011 at 9:54:03 PM

But America Sucks is descriptive and has no overlap with a work.

Put me in motion, drink the potion, use the lotion, drain the ocean, cause commotion, fake devotion, entertain a notion, be Nova Scotian
Sackett Since: Jan, 2001
#10: Apr 30th 2011 at 7:03:35 AM

I still think it's better as a soft split. It's a YMMV kind of trope. Sometimes the same work will reference both ideas with the same reference.

CalamityJane from None of your business Since: Mar, 2010 Relationship Status: Robosexual
#11: Apr 30th 2011 at 8:43:50 AM

It might work fine as a soft split in theory, but when you open up all the folders, the page is enormous. Either we go the way of the splitter or it just keeps getting bigger and bigger until it starts messing with something technical. After all, America is one of the planet's superpowers (for now, anyway), it's bound to show up in more and more works as time goes on.

Please consider supporting my artwork on Patreon
Sackett Since: Jan, 2001
#12: May 1st 2011 at 10:23:55 PM

[up] That's why we have folders.

The trope itself isn't that large. It just has a large example list. Tsundere has a larger example list and we still have it soft split. Even after we had to move the examples to their own pages.

StubbyPenguin from Earth, Sol System Since: Apr, 2010 Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
#13: May 31st 2011 at 7:03:08 AM

I say we just move each of the example sections (type 1, type 2, mixed) to their own subpages. No need to create an entirely new trope page.

Also, it doesn't matter if type 2 Eaglelanders think that they're type 1, this page is about how people who don't live in the US view people in the US as portray them, as clearly stated in the first line of the page.

It was either a penguin or a panda, but the choice is far less black and white than you would think!
Deraj86 Since: Jun, 2009
#14: Jun 16th 2011 at 2:58:35 PM

Well I think we should change the picture from Example 2. That photo was taken from Armed America: Portaits of Gun Owners. The people were posed like that, it wasn't "natural".

Sackett Since: Jan, 2001
#15: Jun 17th 2011 at 7:12:44 AM

Ehh???

What happened to the old picture of a fat American tourist slob eating a hamburger?

edited 17th Jun '11 7:13:15 AM by Sackett

savage Nice Hat from an underground bunker Since: Jan, 2001
#16: Jun 17th 2011 at 9:05:26 AM

[up][up][up]That just seems like you're splitting a trope but naming them both the same thing. Again, these are nearly -exactly- opposite portrayals. It's like having Good Is Not Dumb and Good Is Dumb on the same page, soft split. The same -huge- page.

Want to rename a trope? Step one: if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
TwinBird Dunkies addict from Eastern Mass Since: Oct, 2009 Relationship Status: YOU'RE TEARING ME APART LISA
Dunkies addict
#17: Jun 17th 2011 at 9:18:04 AM

[up][up]The first one's not natural, either.

My posts make considerably more sense read in the voice of John Ratzenberger.
Sackett Since: Jan, 2001
#18: Jun 17th 2011 at 5:00:20 PM

I don't think they need to be natural, but the slob was better at depicting flavor 2.

savage Nice Hat from an underground bunker Since: Jan, 2001
#19: Jul 8th 2011 at 9:25:00 AM

Giving this a bump, I think it got knocked off the first page when there was a flood of topics tossed up a month back or so, a lot of stuff I was watching got knocked off like that. The major reason I have an issue with this page is that Type 1 and Type 2 portrayals are so very much opposite each other. They really -should- be different tropes.

Want to rename a trope? Step one: if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Sackett Since: Jan, 2001
#20: Jul 8th 2011 at 9:30:09 AM

Still opposed to a hard split.

For the same reasons as stated at the beginning of this thread.

savage Nice Hat from an underground bunker Since: Jan, 2001
#21: Jul 9th 2011 at 9:46:51 AM

I think we probably need a crowner. I'm actually not sure how to do that, or even if I personally am able to do that.

Edit: Sackett, All you said was that you felt it was YMMV (it isn't, it's about specific portrayals), and that it isn't too long (it IS long, there are longer pages true, but that doesn't mean this page -isn't- long) and my -major- point is that there are really two different tropes here. This one you seem to be trying to counter by saying that they both can appear in the same works, but that's not a reason for them not to be separate tropes: Police Are Useless and I Fought the Law and the Law Won are almost opposite portrayals of police but can still appear in the same work.

edited 9th Jul '11 11:35:45 AM by savage

Want to rename a trope? Step one: if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
stormsurge Since: Dec, 1969
#22: Jul 23rd 2011 at 4:42:29 PM

If we split it into multiple articles, what would we do with the "multiple flavors" section? I don't think it's enough of a trope to give it its own article, yet it's too large to be listed separately, and it's important to have it somewhere.

FastEddie Since: Apr, 2004
#23: Jul 23rd 2011 at 4:50:36 PM

I don't think it needs a split. The trope is the discrepancy between the two views. Both have to be defined in order to describe the trope.

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
arromdee Since: Jan, 2001
#24: Jul 24th 2011 at 8:37:45 AM

Almost any split will lead to misuse; it needs to be named in a way which won't lead non-Americans to say something like "In America they don't even have decent health care. America Sucks!"

edited 24th Jul '11 8:38:46 AM by arromdee

Gundamforce Since: Apr, 2010
#25: Jul 26th 2011 at 3:34:49 AM

Agreed with Stubby Penguin in moving each of the example sections (type 1, type 2, mixed) to their own subpages.

@ Dr Starky: No. Just...No. That is just screaming misuse. We already have problems with Misplaced Nationalism with this as-is. Agreed with arromdee on that.

edited 26th Jul '11 3:36:07 AM by Gundamforce

SingleProposition: Eagleland
13th Nov '11 12:02:31 PM

Crown Description:

Should the Eagleland's two types be split into separate articles?

Total posts: 51
Top