Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Seinfeld Is Unfunny clean-up
Deleted line(s) 32 (click to see context) :
* SeinfeldIsUnfunny: While many still appreciate the StopMotion used for Kong and the dinosaurs in the original version because of the effort or complexity of what was done, it's a lot easier for a modern viewer to write them off as "It looks like clay". For the time, they were the best special effects around, some shots still astound modern special effects artists with their seemlessness and complexity. But it's doubly impressive considering that the alternative would have been '''[[{{Slurpasaur}} lizards in makeup]]'''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Renamed one trope.
* QuestionableCasting: Jack Black as Carl Denham, though his performance is enjoyed by some.
Deleted line(s) 62 (click to see context) :
* WTHCastingAgency: Jack Black as Carl Denham, though his performance is enjoyed by some.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Changed line(s) 40 (click to see context) from:
** The battle between Kong and the ''[[KingOfTheDinosaurs Tyrannosaurus rex]]'' on the island.
to:
** The battle between Kong and the ''[[KingOfTheDinosaurs ''[[TerrifyingTyrannosaur Tyrannosaurus rex]]'' on the island.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Uncanny Valley is IUEO now and the subjective version has been split; cleaning up misuse and ZCE in the process
Changed line(s) 53 (click to see context) from:
* UncannyValley: Kong's eyes in the 1976 version are disturbingly human-like, owing to it being Creator/RickBaker in an ape suit.
to:
* UncannyValley: UnintentionalUncannyValley: Kong's eyes in the 1976 version are disturbingly human-like, owing to it being Creator/RickBaker in an ape suit.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 22 (click to see context) from:
** Remember Lumpy the cook and the little kleptomaniac kid from the 2005 remake? [[WesternAnimation/TheAdventuresOfTintin This wouldn't be the last time the two of them were together on a boat...]]
to:
** Remember Lumpy the cook and the little kleptomaniac kid from the 2005 remake? [[WesternAnimation/TheAdventuresOfTintin [[WesternAnimation/TheAdventuresOfTintin2011 This wouldn't be the last time the two of them were together on a boat...]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
* FairForItsDay: Yes the original Charlie the Cook is pretty cringe-worthy but this is the 1930s and the guy is the first to notice Ann is missing, is willing to help go after Ann, and brave enough to swing his cleaver at a very angry dinosaur in the sequel. Plus in the same sequel he isn't excluded from the spoilers either.
to:
* FairForItsDay: Yes the original Charlie the Cook is pretty cringe-worthy but this is the 1930s and the guy is the first to notice Ann is missing, is willing to help go after Ann, and brave enough to swing his cleaver at a very angry dinosaur in the sequel. Plus in the same sequel he isn't excluded from the spoilers either. There is also the fact that he is in the sequel at all, essentially making him one of the main characters of the duology alongside Carl and Englehorn, a duology of films from the 1930's had a non-white main character.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* AlternateAesopInterpretation: As a few film scholars have pointed out, beauty did ''not'' kill the beast. Colonialism did. Removing Kong from his natural habitat robbed him of the survival instincts necessary in keeping him alive. As such, the story can be seen as a strong allegory to white settlers ruining native lands, robbing its inhabitants of the very skills which kept them alive as long as they did and infecting them with their foreign illnesses. However, this interpretation is not without its flaws, most notable of which is that Kong was not robbed of his survival instincts, he still instinctively went to the highest place in the city, just as he dwelt on the highest place on his island. His instincts told him that height equaled safety, yet he never could have conceived of a flying enemy that could attack from a distance, so ultimately his survival instincts contributed to his destruction.
to:
* AlternateAesopInterpretation: As a few film scholars have pointed out, beauty did ''not'' kill the beast. Colonialism did. Removing Kong from his natural habitat robbed him of the survival instincts necessary in keeping him alive. As such, the story can be seen as a strong allegory to white settlers ruining native lands, robbing its inhabitants of the very skills which kept them alive as long as they did and infecting them with their foreign illnesses. However, this interpretation is not without its blatant flaws, most notable of which is that Kong was not robbed of his survival instincts, he still instinctively went to the highest place in the city, just as he dwelt on the highest place on his island. His instincts told him that height equaled safety, yet he never could have conceived of a flying enemy that could attack from a distance, so ultimately his survival instincts contributed to his destruction.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* AlternateAesopInterpretation: As a few film scholars have pointed out, beauty did ''not'' kill the beast. Colonialism did. Removing Kong from his natural habitat robbed him of the survival instincts necessary in keeping him alive. As such, the story can be seen as a strong allegory to white settlers ruining native lands, robbing its inhabitants of the very skills which kept them alive as long as they did and infecting them with their foreign illnesses.
to:
* AlternateAesopInterpretation: As a few film scholars have pointed out, beauty did ''not'' kill the beast. Colonialism did. Removing Kong from his natural habitat robbed him of the survival instincts necessary in keeping him alive. As such, the story can be seen as a strong allegory to white settlers ruining native lands, robbing its inhabitants of the very skills which kept them alive as long as they did and infecting them with their foreign illnesses. However, this interpretation is not without its flaws, most notable of which is that Kong was not robbed of his survival instincts, he still instinctively went to the highest place in the city, just as he dwelt on the highest place on his island. His instincts told him that height equaled safety, yet he never could have conceived of a flying enemy that could attack from a distance, so ultimately his survival instincts contributed to his destruction.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
There was no eagerness until it began charging at them.
Changed line(s) 57,59 (click to see context) from:
* ValuesDissonance:
** Modern audiences might find the crew's eagerness to shoot the stegosaurus somewhat jarring.
** Kong's HollywoodNatives worshippers in all films are insensitive by modern standards, which was made worse in the 2005 version where they are completely dehumanized and feral savages.
** Modern audiences might find the crew's eagerness to shoot the stegosaurus somewhat jarring.
** Kong's HollywoodNatives worshippers in all films are insensitive by modern standards, which was made worse in the 2005 version where they are completely dehumanized and feral savages.
to:
* ValuesDissonance:
** Modern audiences might find the crew's eagerness to shoot the stegosaurus somewhat jarring.
**ValuesDissonance: Kong's HollywoodNatives worshippers in all films are insensitive by modern standards, which was made worse in the 2005 version where they are completely dehumanized and feral savages.
** Modern audiences might find the crew's eagerness to shoot the stegosaurus somewhat jarring.
**
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
* EthnicScrappy: (1933) Charlie the cook, whose actor was credtied as "Victor Wong" and ''may'' have actually been Chinese-American, but whose portrayal is still considered offensive. Still doesn't prevent him from being competent ([[HyperCompetentSidekick noticing Ann's missing first and immediately raising the alarm]]) or brave ([[SugarWiki/MomentOfAwesome challenging a dinosaur with nothing but a meat cleaver and coming out on top]]).
to:
* EthnicScrappy: (1933) Charlie the cook, whose actor was credtied credited as "Victor Wong" and ''may'' have actually been Chinese-American, but whose portrayal is still considered offensive. Still doesn't prevent him from being competent ([[HyperCompetentSidekick noticing Ann's missing first and immediately raising the alarm]]) or brave ([[SugarWiki/MomentOfAwesome challenging a dinosaur with nothing but a meat cleaver and coming out on top]]).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
With The Son Of Kong showing Denham suffering the consequences of his actions and making up for them, this definitely doesn't applies nor ever did since the film's release.
Deleted line(s) 13 (click to see context) :
** Denham in the original. The trip is his idea, as is the choice to bring the ape back to New York, where it promptly wreaks havoc and causes more deaths but he is never called out for his actions. Though at the end of it, he does appear apologetic and regretful of the whole thing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 41 (click to see context) from:
** The battle between Kong and the ''TyrannosaurusRex'' on the island.
to:
** The battle between Kong and the ''TyrannosaurusRex'' ''[[KingOfTheDinosaurs Tyrannosaurus rex]]'' on the island.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 66 (click to see context) from:
* TheWoobie: Kong himself. He's always portrayed as a tragic monster who gets caught up in the activities of humans, while he just wants to be left in peace. While implied in earlier films, in most subsequent reboots it's made explicit that he's the LastOfHisKind. The 2005 version is probably the most sympathetic, since we see that all his family have been dead for a long time and he is clearly worn down from years of battles alone in a savage environment, with Ann likely his only companion in years.
to:
* TheWoobie: Kong himself. He's always portrayed as a tragic monster who gets caught up in the activities of humans, while he just wants to be left in peace. While implied in earlier films, in most subsequent reboots it's made explicit that he's the LastOfHisKind. The 2005 version is probably the most sympathetic, since we see that all his family have been dead for a long time and he is clearly worn down from years of battles alone in a savage environment, with Ann likely his only companion in years. The [=MonsterVerse=] Kong, meanwhile, has been on his own since he was an adolescent, with his parents having been killed by Skullcrawlers and being nothing but bones by the time of ''Skull Island''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
* DesignatedHero: Jack in the 2005 version. Most of the crew's deaths can be traced back to his obsession with saving Ann, and all the while, he constantly gets upstaged by both the titular ape and [[spoiler:the snooty actor he didn't like.]] His decision to draw Kong away from Times Square probably causes more death and destruction than if he'd just let him be.
to:
* DesignatedHero: DesignatedHero:
** Jack in the 2005 version. Most of the crew's deaths can be traced back to his obsession with saving Ann, and all the while, he constantly gets upstaged by both the titular ape and [[spoiler:the snooty actor he didn't like.]] His decision to draw Kong away from Times Square probably causes more death and destruction than if he'd just let him be.
** Jack in the 2005 version. Most of the crew's deaths can be traced back to his obsession with saving Ann, and all the while, he constantly gets upstaged by both the titular ape and [[spoiler:the snooty actor he didn't like.]] His decision to draw Kong away from Times Square probably causes more death and destruction than if he'd just let him be.
Changed line(s) 59 (click to see context) from:
** Kong's HollywoodNatives worshipers in all films are insensitive by modern standards, which was made worse in the 2005 version where they are completely dehumanized and feral savages.
to:
** Kong's HollywoodNatives worshipers worshippers in all films are insensitive by modern standards, which was made worse in the 2005 version where they are completely dehumanized and feral savages.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
* BigLippedAlligatorMoment: The ice skating scene in New York. On the other hand, this doubles as a SugarWiki/{{Heartwarming Moment|s}} or sad to many viewers.
to:
* BigLippedAlligatorMoment: BigLippedAlligatorMoment:
** The ice skating scene in NewYork.York from the 2005 remake. On the other hand, this doubles as a SugarWiki/{{Heartwarming Moment|s}} or sad to many viewers.
** The ice skating scene in New
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 30 (click to see context) from:
* SeinfeldIsUnfunny: The StopMotion used for Kong and the dinosaurs in the original version to modern viewers who do not begin to comprehend the effort or complexity of what was done, focusing on the layman assessment of "It looks like clay". For the time, they were the best special effects around, some shots still astound modern special effects artists with their seemlessness and complexity. But it's doubly impressive considering that the alternative would have been '''[[{{Slurpasaur}} lizards in makeup]]'''.
to:
* SeinfeldIsUnfunny: The While many still appreciate the StopMotion used for Kong and the dinosaurs in the original version to modern viewers who do not begin to comprehend because of the effort or complexity of what was done, focusing on the layman assessment of it's a lot easier for a modern viewer to write them off as "It looks like clay". For the time, they were the best special effects around, some shots still astound modern special effects artists with their seemlessness and complexity. But it's doubly impressive considering that the alternative would have been '''[[{{Slurpasaur}} lizards in makeup]]'''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* JustHereForGodzilla: The general consensus is that the stage musical is only worth watching to see the Kong puppet onstage.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* TheWoobie: Kong himself. He's always portrayed as a tragic monster who gets caught up in the activities of humans, while he just wants to be left in peace. While implied in earlier films, in most subsequent reboots it's made explicit that he's the LastOfHisKind. The 2005 version is probably the most sympathetic, since we see that all his family have been dead for a long time and he is clearly worn down from years of battles alone in a savage environment, with Ann likely his only companion in years.