Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / StreisandEffect

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Eventually, Digg threw up their hands and said, "Fine. You guys want this information here so bad, so we won't try to stop you anymore." And the MPAA couldn't really do anything about it, because the way Digg works, the chances were slightly worse than "hopeless" that the initial DMCA takedown would have really worked anyway. In layman's terms, the legal system only works because people let it; if enough people refuse to, the law has nothing it can actually do about it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


A form of RevealingCoverup. Sometimes related to ClumsyCopyrightCensorship.

to:

A form of RevealingCoverup. Sometimes related to ClumsyCopyrightCensorship. See also InternetCounterattack.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

-> ''"[[NewMediaAreEvil I'm not against violence]] - I'm against censorship, because withholding [[ParallelPornTitles Cock Haemhorrage IV]] from your kids only makes them more interested. If you stopped making a big deal about it, maybe they'll recognise it for the glimmering hate-vaccuum that it is."''
->-'''[[ZeroPunctuation Ben "Yahtzee" Croshaw]]'''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

[[caption-width-right:350:Barbara Streisand doesn't want you to see this picture. Well done, Barbara.]]

Changed: 157

Removed: 473

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[OlderThanSteam In 1559]], the Pope issued the "Index of Prohibited Books", which virtually became a list of must-read books for Protestant intellectuals.
** This doesn't count because they were ''Protestants''. Protestants at that time tended to live under governments that were officially Protestant, so they were ''expected'' to stick it to the Pope. Now, if it had been ''Catholics'' reading the books (which it actually was in some cases), ''then'' it would have been this trope.
** Still fairly common in schools, at least at a more high-school level: "read, and do a book report on, a book that has been banned somewhere."

to:

* [[OlderThanSteam In 1559]], the Pope issued the "Index of Prohibited Books", which virtually became a list of must-read books for Protestant intellectuals.
** This doesn't count because they were ''Protestants''. Protestants at that time tended to live under governments that were officially Protestant, so they were ''expected'' to stick it to the Pope. Now, if it had been ''Catholics'' reading the books (which it actually was in some cases), ''then'' it would have been this trope.
** Still fairly common in schools, at least at a more high-school level: "read, and do a book report on, a book that has been banned somewhere."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


This has come to be known as the Streisand Effect; blogger Mike Masnick of Techdirt coined the phrase in response to the trope namer, Barbra Streisand, whose attempt to sue a photographer for taking a picture of her house shown at the left (and to have the photo taken down from his website) led to more people learning about the existence of the photo and quickly mirroring the photo on multiple websites as a TakeThat to Streisand. This is traditionally an Internet-based Trope, since the spread of information is much faster and easier across the 'Net than through other means.

to:

This has come to be known as the Streisand Effect; blogger Mike Masnick of Techdirt coined the phrase in response to the trope namer, Barbra Streisand, whose attempt to sue a photographer for taking a picture of her house shown at the left (and (shown above) and to have the photo taken down from his website) website led to more people learning about the existence of the photo and quickly mirroring the photo on multiple websites as a TakeThat to Streisand. This is traditionally an Internet-based Trope, since the spread of information is much faster and easier across the 'Net than through other means.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/Barbrahouse1_5204.png

to:

http://static.[[quoteright:350:http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/Barbrahouse1_5204.png
png]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Days later, Ralph Lauren apologized -- for ''the horrible Photoshop'', not the DMCA takedown notice. (Though this was NOT just a case of CompletelyMissingThePoint; the photoshop was being attacked as a new low in promoting unhealthily warped body images to children, not just for its artistic deficiencies).

to:

** Days later, Ralph Lauren apologized -- for ''the horrible Photoshop'', not the DMCA takedown notice. (Though this was NOT just a case of CompletelyMissingThePoint; the photoshop was being attacked as a new low in promoting unhealthily warped body images to children, not just for its artistic deficiencies).deficiencies. He just should have apologized for both offenses.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Days later, Ralph Lauren apologized -- for ''the horrible Photoshop'', not the DMCA takedown notice.

to:

** Days later, Ralph Lauren apologized -- for ''the horrible Photoshop'', not the DMCA takedown notice. (Though this was NOT just a case of CompletelyMissingThePoint; the photoshop was being attacked as a new low in promoting unhealthily warped body images to children, not just for its artistic deficiencies).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The MPAA encountered this in 2007; it attempted to stop popular social aggregator Digg from allowing an encryption key to the HD-DVD and Blu-Ray formats from being posted with a DMCA takedown. When the takedown attempt became public knowledge, hundreds of stories containing the key were submitted to Digg, and dozens of other websites mirrored the key in defiance of the censorship.

to:

* The MPAA encountered this in 2007; it attempted to stop popular social aggregator Digg from allowing an encryption key to the HD-DVD and Blu-Ray formats from being posted with a DMCA takedown. When the takedown attempt became public knowledge, hundreds of stories containing the key were submitted to Digg, and upvoted on Digg. For hours, dozens of repetitions of the magic number formed literally the ONLY content on the entire front page of the site. Simultaneously, dozens of other websites mirrored the key in defiance of the censorship.censorship.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Bev Stayart, for those curious enough to check history but not curious enough to Google


* Wikileaks. The US government felt huge concern when Wikileaks stated that they would leak something very big. Much to their fear, they leaked 250,000 cables, pissing them off enough to not only rant about them, but arrest and wish for the assassination of [[WhiteHairedPrettyBoy Julian Assenge]], founder of the website. Needless to say, more people have heard about it.

to:

* Wikileaks. The US government felt huge concern when Wikileaks stated that they would leak something very big. Much to their fear, they leaked 250,000 cables, pissing them off enough to not only rant about them, but arrest and wish for the assassination of [[WhiteHairedPrettyBoy Julian Assenge]], founder of the website. Needless to say, more people have heard about it.it.
* Once a lady in Wisconsin[[hottip:[who?]:We don't name her here, out of a perverted sense of mercy, but the curious reader will find plenty of Google hooks below]] posted a comment on a blog. The blog owner later let the blog's domain name lapse, and it was taken over by a namesquatter who redirected visitors to various sexually explicit websites. Some time later, the lady did a Yahoo search on her own name and was mortified to find that one of the links in the result set led to porn. She set out to restore her good name and reputation, and figured that the best way do do this would be suing Yahoo for willful malicious defamation. In open court, where she [[CompletelyMissingThePoint offered to prove]] that she ''is a sophisticated, well-educated, and highly intelligent professional woman, with important and valuable friends'', that she ''in no way has ever engaged in a promiscuous lifestyle, or other overt sexual activities'', and that she has written two poems that appear on Danish websites supporting the preservation of the baby seal population in eastern Canada. For this she was roundly ridiculed in the blogosphere. Then it appears that [[ItGotWorse Anonymous took an interest in the case]]. Guess what the poor lady now finds when she googles herself?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The Church of {{Scientology}} ran afoul of the effect in 2008, and probably wishes they could turn back time and take it all back: their DMCA takedown of a video on {{YouTube}} of TomCruise talking about Scientology resulted in the eventual creation of Project Chanology, the ongoing Internet-based crusade to have the Church's status as a religion revoked and to bring to light the various wrongdoings of the Church. Similarly, ''after'' Chanology's creation, attempts by Scientology to have specific documents about the Church and the religion itself erased from the Internet have failed miserably, with mirrors popping up almost as soon as a takedown attempt is issued.

to:

* The [[ChurchOfHappyology Church of {{Scientology}} Scientology]] ran afoul of the effect in 2008, and probably wishes they could turn back time and take it all back: their DMCA takedown of a video on {{YouTube}} of TomCruise talking about Scientology resulted in the eventual creation of Project Chanology, the ongoing Internet-based crusade to have the Church's status as a religion revoked and to bring to light the various wrongdoings of the Church. Similarly, ''after'' Chanology's creation, attempts by Scientology to have specific documents about the Church and the religion itself erased from the Internet have failed miserably, with mirrors popping up almost as soon as a takedown attempt is issued.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* For lovers of exploitation films, the old list of "Video Nasties" put together by the British government makes a great place to start.

to:

* For lovers of exploitation films, the old list of "Video Nasties" VideoNasties put together by the British government makes a great place to start.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[AC:{{Film}}]]
* For lovers of exploitation films, the old list of "Video Nasties" put together by the British government makes a great place to start.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Something horribly embarrassing or personal about you is released -- perhaps a sex tape, or a rather embarrassing photograph -- and you want that information locked back up. So you do whatever it takes to make the information go away: lawsuits, cease-and-desists, DMCA takedowns, whatever you have at hand. But instead of the information remaining obscure, the information becomes more widely known as the efforts to censor it become public. The information gets mirrored and copies and spread at a much faster rate than before the censorship attempt, often to the dismay and frustration of those trying to prevent it.

This has come to be known as the Streisand Effect; blogger Mike Masnick of Techdirt coined the phrase in response to the trope namer, BarbraStreisand, whose attempt to sue a photographer for taking a picture of her house shown at the left (and to have the photo taken down from his website) led to more people learning about the existence of the photo and quickly mirroring the photo on multiple websites as a TakeThat to Streisand. This is traditionally an Internet-based Trope, since the spread of information is much faster and easier across the 'Net than through other means.

to:

Something horribly embarrassing or personal about you is released -- perhaps a sex tape, or a rather embarrassing photograph -- and you want that information locked back up. So you do whatever it takes to make the information go away: lawsuits, cease-and-desists, DMCA takedowns, whatever you have at hand. But instead of the information remaining obscure, the information becomes more widely known as the efforts to censor it become public. The information gets mirrored and copies copied and spread at a much faster rate than before the censorship attempt, often to the dismay and frustration of those trying to prevent it.

This has come to be known as the Streisand Effect; blogger Mike Masnick of Techdirt coined the phrase in response to the trope namer, BarbraStreisand, Barbra Streisand, whose attempt to sue a photographer for taking a picture of her house shown at the left (and to have the photo taken down from his website) led to more people learning about the existence of the photo and quickly mirroring the photo on multiple websites as a TakeThat to Streisand. This is traditionally an Internet-based Trope, since the spread of information is much faster and easier across the 'Net than through other means.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Wha? I had just taken it off because it was back up on the site!


* The NostalgiaCritic's review of TheRoom got taken down soon after it was posted when the creator of the film called copyright infringement for using clips of the film. As a result, it became one of the most sought-after NC reviews. (it was still available on Youtube)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The NostalgiaCritic's review of TheRoom got taken down soon after it was posted when the creator of the film called copyright infringement for using clips of the film. As a result, it became one of the most sought-after NC reviews. (it was still available on Youtube)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Its up again, so its all okay.


* Tommy Wiseau (or a BigNameFan acting in his name) sent the video host TheNostalgiaCritic uses a complaint about his review of ''TheRoom'', forcing them to remove it. This appears to have been a mistake, as ''TheRoom'' had a very small [=~So Bad It's Good~=]/NarmCharm [[CultClassic cult following]]... until the much larger fanbase of ThatGuyWithTheGlasses [[InternetBacklash found out]] about the legal "attack" on [[ThatGuyWithTheGlasses TGWTG.com]]... It doesn't help that TheNostalgiaCritic did a rather epic TakeThat against the BigNameFan ''by name'' in the form of a ''very'' long, scathing parody sketch.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


This has come to be known as the Streisand Effect; blogger Mike Masnick of Techdirt coined the phrase in response to the trope namer, BarbraStreisand, whose attempt to sue a photographer for taking a picture of her house shown above (and to have the photo taken down from his website) led to more people learning about the existence of the photo and quickly mirroring the photo on multiple websites as a TakeThat to Streisand. This is traditionally an Internet-based Trope, since the spread of information is much faster and easier across the 'Net than through other means.

to:

This has come to be known as the Streisand Effect; blogger Mike Masnick of Techdirt coined the phrase in response to the trope namer, BarbraStreisand, whose attempt to sue a photographer for taking a picture of her house shown above at the left (and to have the photo taken down from his website) led to more people learning about the existence of the photo and quickly mirroring the photo on multiple websites as a TakeThat to Streisand. This is traditionally an Internet-based Trope, since the spread of information is much faster and easier across the 'Net than through other means.

Added: 66

Changed: 12

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/Barbrahouse1_5204.png



This has come to be known as the Streisand Effect; blogger Mike Masnick of Techdirt coined the phrase in response to the trope namer, BarbraStreisand, whose attempt to sue a photographer for taking a picture of her house (and to have the photo taken down from his website) led to more people learning about the existence of the photo and quickly mirroring the photo on multiple websites as a TakeThat to Streisand. This is traditionally an Internet-based Trope, since the spread of information is much faster and easier across the 'Net than through other means.

to:

This has come to be known as the Streisand Effect; blogger Mike Masnick of Techdirt coined the phrase in response to the trope namer, BarbraStreisand, whose attempt to sue a photographer for taking a picture of her house shown above (and to have the photo taken down from his website) led to more people learning about the existence of the photo and quickly mirroring the photo on multiple websites as a TakeThat to Streisand. This is traditionally an Internet-based Trope, since the spread of information is much faster and easier across the 'Net than through other means.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Wikileaks. Enough said.

to:

* Wikileaks. Enough said.The US government felt huge concern when Wikileaks stated that they would leak something very big. Much to their fear, they leaked 250,000 cables, pissing them off enough to not only rant about them, but arrest and wish for the assassination of [[WhiteHairedPrettyBoy Julian Assenge]], founder of the website. Needless to say, more people have heard about it.

Changed: 33

Removed: 22

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Tommy Wiseau (or a BigNameFan acting in his name) sent the video host TheNostalgiaCritic uses a complaint about his review of ''TheRoom'', forcing them to remove it. This appears to have been a mistake, as ''TheRoom'' had a very small [=~So Bad It's Good~=]/NarmCharm [[CultClassic cult following]]... until the much larger fanbase of ThatGuyWithTheGlasses [[InternetBacklash found out]] about the legal "attack" on [[ThatGuyWithTheGlasses TGWTG.com]]... It doesn't help that TheNostalgiaCritic did a rather epic TakeThat against the BigNameFan ''by name ''in the form of a ''very'' long, scathing parody sketch.

to:

* Tommy Wiseau (or a BigNameFan acting in his name) sent the video host TheNostalgiaCritic uses a complaint about his review of ''TheRoom'', forcing them to remove it. This appears to have been a mistake, as ''TheRoom'' had a very small [=~So Bad It's Good~=]/NarmCharm [[CultClassic cult following]]... until the much larger fanbase of ThatGuyWithTheGlasses [[InternetBacklash found out]] about the legal "attack" on [[ThatGuyWithTheGlasses TGWTG.com]]... It doesn't help that TheNostalgiaCritic did a rather epic TakeThat against the BigNameFan ''by name ''in name'' in the form of a ''very'' long, scathing parody sketch.



-----
<<|CensorshipTropes|>>

to:

-----
<<|CensorshipTropes|>>
* Wikileaks. Enough said.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Still fairly common in schools, at least at a more high-school level: "read, and do a book report on, a book that has been banned somewhere."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** This doesn't count because they were ''Protestants''. Protestants at that time tended to live under governments that were officially Protestant, so they were ''expected'' to stick it to the Pope. Now, if it had been ''Catholics'' reading the books (which it actually was in some cases), ''then'' it would have been this trope.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
added "Index of Prohibited Books"



to:

* [[OlderThanSteam In 1559]], the Pope issued the "Index of Prohibited Books", which virtually became a list of must-read books for Protestant intellectuals.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Correction.

Added DiffLines:

**[[http://www.google.com/search?q=%22iPood%22 894,000 now.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Something horribly embarassing or personal about you is released - perhaps a sex tape, or a rather embarassing photograph - and you want that information locked back up. So you do whatever it takes to make the information go away: lawsuits, cease-and-desists, DMCA takedowns, whatever you have at hand. But instead of the information remaining obscure, the information becomes more widely known as the efforts to censor it become public. The information gets mirrored and copies and spread at a much faster rate than before the censorship attempt, often to the dismay and frustration of those trying to prevent it.

This has come to be known as the Streisand Effect; blogger Mike Masnick of Techdirt coined the phrase in response to the trope namer, Barbra Streisand, whose attempt to sue a photographer for taking a picture of her house (and to have the photo taken down from his website) led to more people learning about the existence of the photo and quickly mirroring the photo on multiple websites as a TakeThat to Streisand. This is traditionally an Internet-based Trope, since the spread of information is much faster and easier across the 'Net than through other means.

Psychologists have done studies and found that the subjects' desire for any kind of potentially censorable material increased when the subjects were told that it was censored. The old ForbiddenFruit principle in action, in other words. Perhaps any authority considering the use of censorship should worry that this move might be counteproductive if it just gets people interested in the censored material.

to:

Something horribly embarassing embarrassing or personal about you is released - -- perhaps a sex tape, or a rather embarassing embarrassing photograph - -- and you want that information locked back up. So you do whatever it takes to make the information go away: lawsuits, cease-and-desists, DMCA takedowns, whatever you have at hand. But instead of the information remaining obscure, the information becomes more widely known as the efforts to censor it become public. The information gets mirrored and copies and spread at a much faster rate than before the censorship attempt, often to the dismay and frustration of those trying to prevent it.

This has come to be known as the Streisand Effect; blogger Mike Masnick of Techdirt coined the phrase in response to the trope namer, Barbra Streisand, BarbraStreisand, whose attempt to sue a photographer for taking a picture of her house (and to have the photo taken down from his website) led to more people learning about the existence of the photo and quickly mirroring the photo on multiple websites as a TakeThat to Streisand. This is traditionally an Internet-based Trope, since the spread of information is much faster and easier across the 'Net than through other means.

Psychologists have done studies and found that the subjects' desire for any kind of potentially censorable material increased when the subjects were told that it was censored. The old ForbiddenFruit principle in action, in other words. Perhaps any authority considering the use of censorship should worry that this move might be counteproductive counterproductive if it just gets people interested in the censored material.



* A rare fictional example: In ''HarryPotterAndTheOrderOfThePhoenix'', Hermione is delighted when Umbridge threatens to expel anyone caught with a copy of Harry's Quibbler interview, because of course that guarantees that everyone will find a way to get their hands on it.

[[AC:{{Web Comics}}]]

to:

* A rare fictional example: In ''HarryPotterAndTheOrderOfThePhoenix'', ''HarryPotter/{{Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix}}'', Hermione is delighted when Umbridge threatens to expel anyone caught with a copy of Harry's Quibbler interview, because of course that guarantees that everyone will find a way to get their hands on it.

[[AC:{{Web Comics}}]][[AC:WebComics]]



[[AC:{{Web Original}}]]

to:

[[AC:{{Web Original}}]][[AC:WebOriginal]]



* The Church of {{Scientology}} ran afoul of the effect in 2008, and probably wishes they could turn back time and take it all back: their DMCA takedown of a video on {{YouTube}} of Tom Cruise talking about Scientology resulted in the eventual creation of Project Chanology, the ongoing Internet-based crusade to have the Church's status as a religion revoked and to bring to light the various wrongdoings of the Church. Similarly, ''after'' Chanology's creation, attempts by Scientology to have specific documents about the Church and the religion itself erased from the Internet have failed miserably, with mirrors popping up almost as soon as a takedown attempt is issued.

to:

* The Church of {{Scientology}} ran afoul of the effect in 2008, and probably wishes they could turn back time and take it all back: their DMCA takedown of a video on {{YouTube}} of Tom Cruise TomCruise talking about Scientology resulted in the eventual creation of Project Chanology, the ongoing Internet-based crusade to have the Church's status as a religion revoked and to bring to light the various wrongdoings of the Church. Similarly, ''after'' Chanology's creation, attempts by Scientology to have specific documents about the Church and the religion itself erased from the Internet have failed miserably, with mirrors popping up almost as soon as a takedown attempt is issued.



* Tommy Wiseau (or a BigNameFan acting in his name) sent the video host TheNostalgiaCritic uses a complaint about his review of ''TheRoom'', forcing them to remove it. This appears to have been a mistake, as ''TheRoom'' had a very small SoBadItsGood / NarmCharm [[CultClassic cult following]]... until the much larger fanbase of ThatGuyWithTheGlasses [[InternetBacklash found out]] about the legal "attack" on [[ThatGuyWithTheGlasses TGWTG.com]]... It doesn't help that TheNostalgiaCritic did a rather epic TakeThat against the BigNameFan ''by name ''in the form of a ''very'' long, scathing parody sketch.

to:

* Tommy Wiseau (or a BigNameFan acting in his name) sent the video host TheNostalgiaCritic uses a complaint about his review of ''TheRoom'', forcing them to remove it. This appears to have been a mistake, as ''TheRoom'' had a very small SoBadItsGood / NarmCharm [=~So Bad It's Good~=]/NarmCharm [[CultClassic cult following]]... until the much larger fanbase of ThatGuyWithTheGlasses [[InternetBacklash found out]] about the legal "attack" on [[ThatGuyWithTheGlasses TGWTG.com]]... It doesn't help that TheNostalgiaCritic did a rather epic TakeThat against the BigNameFan ''by name ''in the form of a ''very'' long, scathing parody sketch.



<<|CensorshipTropes|>>

to:

<<|CensorshipTropes|>>
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Sometimes related to ClumsyCopyrightCensorship.

to:

A form of RevealingCoverup. Sometimes related to ClumsyCopyrightCensorship.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Perhaps the TropeCodifier is Scientology's attempt to shut down alt.religion.scientology in 1995. From this point on, it's called ''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientology_versus_the_Internet Scientology vs. the Internet]]''.

Added: 2105

Changed: 1

Removed: 2042

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


!Examples include:

to:

!Examples include:
!!Examples include:

[[AC:{{Literature}}]]
* A rare fictional example: In ''HarryPotterAndTheOrderOfThePhoenix'', Hermione is delighted when Umbridge threatens to expel anyone caught with a copy of Harry's Quibbler interview, because of course that guarantees that everyone will find a way to get their hands on it.

[[AC:{{Web Comics}}]]



* The MPAA encountered this in 2007; it attempted to stop popular social aggregator Digg from allowing an encryption key to the HD-DVD and Blu-Ray formats from being posted with a DMCA takedown. When the takedown attempt became public knowledge, hundreds of stories containing the key were submitted to Digg, and dozens of other websites mirrored the key in defiance of the censorship.
* The Church of {{Scientology}} ran afoul of the effect in 2008, and probably wishes they could turn back time and take it all back: their DMCA takedown of a video on {{YouTube}} of Tom Cruise talking about Scientology resulted in the eventual creation of Project Chanology, the ongoing Internet-based crusade to have the Church's status as a religion revoked and to bring to light the various wrongdoings of the Church. Similarly, ''after'' Chanology's creation, attempts by Scientology to have specific documents about the Church and the religion itself erased from the Internet have failed miserably, with mirrors popping up almost as soon as a takedown attempt is issued.
* In 2009, an advertisement from fashion company Ralph Lauren was posted on the blog "Photoshop Disasters" and tech news website Boing Boing because of the excessively thin appearance of the model in the ad. Ralph Lauren sent a DMCA takedown notice to both Blogspot (the host of "Photoshop Disasters") and Boing Boing; while Blogspot removed the post, Boing Boing refused on the grounds of Fair Use and publicly mocked the takedown notice in a satirical rebuttal. From there, the story picked up steam and was talked about on hundreds of other websites and blogs - each one mirroring the ad in question.
** Days later, Ralph Lauren apologized -- for ''the horrible Photoshop'', not the DMCA takedown notice.




[[AC:{{Web Original}}]]
* The MPAA encountered this in 2007; it attempted to stop popular social aggregator Digg from allowing an encryption key to the HD-DVD and Blu-Ray formats from being posted with a DMCA takedown. When the takedown attempt became public knowledge, hundreds of stories containing the key were submitted to Digg, and dozens of other websites mirrored the key in defiance of the censorship.
* The Church of {{Scientology}} ran afoul of the effect in 2008, and probably wishes they could turn back time and take it all back: their DMCA takedown of a video on {{YouTube}} of Tom Cruise talking about Scientology resulted in the eventual creation of Project Chanology, the ongoing Internet-based crusade to have the Church's status as a religion revoked and to bring to light the various wrongdoings of the Church. Similarly, ''after'' Chanology's creation, attempts by Scientology to have specific documents about the Church and the religion itself erased from the Internet have failed miserably, with mirrors popping up almost as soon as a takedown attempt is issued.
* In 2009, an advertisement from fashion company Ralph Lauren was posted on the blog "Photoshop Disasters" and tech news website Boing Boing because of the excessively thin appearance of the model in the ad. Ralph Lauren sent a DMCA takedown notice to both Blogspot (the host of "Photoshop Disasters") and Boing Boing; while Blogspot removed the post, Boing Boing refused on the grounds of Fair Use and publicly mocked the takedown notice in a satirical rebuttal. From there, the story picked up steam and was talked about on hundreds of other websites and blogs - each one mirroring the ad in question.
** Days later, Ralph Lauren apologized -- for ''the horrible Photoshop'', not the DMCA takedown notice.



* A rare fictional example: In ''HarryPotterAndTheOrderOfThePhoenix'', Hermione is delighted when Umbridge threatens to expel anyone caught with a copy of Harry's Quibbler interview, because of course that guarantees that everyone will find a way to get their hands on it.






<<|CensorshipTropes|>>

to:

<<|CensorshipTropes|>>

Top