Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 265 (click to see context) from:
** The series has the infamous "[[Recap/KitchenNightmaresS6E15AmysBakingCompany Amy's Baking Company]]" episode, in which viewers watched in shock as they saw the restaurant's owners, Amy and Samy, berate customers, employees, and even Creator/GordonRamsay himself, their [[SmallNameBigEgo egos]] [[CantTakeCriticism clouding even the most basic of criticism]] and interpreted it as attacks -- in the end, for the first time in the series, Ramsay [[ScrewThisImOuttaHere left the restaurant]] thanks to the two's behavior. When the episode was over, many of the viewers approached their Platform/{{Facebook}} page to expressed their displeasure, only to have the two blow up at ''them''. Many people came to it on the basis of watching their meltdown. This also ironically benefited Amy's Baking Company, thanks to the BileFascination. People who went there were either a), people who didn't believe anyone could really be that bad at owning a restaurant and still be in business, thinking it was all set up as fake "reality" TV for ratings, or b), people who went there specifically to provoke a response from Amy or Samy as some weird badge of honor. When the show went back to the restaurant as part of a special episode, nobody was surprised to see that ''nothing had changed at all''. In 2015, the company finally shut down.
to:
** The series has the infamous "[[Recap/KitchenNightmaresS6E15AmysBakingCompany Amy's Baking Company]]" episode, in which viewers watched in shock as they saw the restaurant's owners, Amy and Samy, berate customers, employees, and even Creator/GordonRamsay himself, their [[SmallNameBigEgo egos]] [[CantTakeCriticism clouding even the most basic of criticism]] and interpreted it as attacks -- in the end, for the first time in the series, Ramsay [[ScrewThisImOuttaHere left the restaurant]] thanks to the two's behavior. When the episode was over, many of the viewers approached their Platform/{{Facebook}} page to expressed express their displeasure, only to have the two blow up at ''them''. Many people came to it on the basis of watching their meltdown. This also ironically benefited Amy's Baking Company, thanks to the BileFascination. People who went there were either a), people who didn't believe anyone could really be that bad at owning a restaurant and still be in business, thinking it was all set up as fake "reality" TV for ratings, or b), people who went there specifically to provoke a response from Amy or Samy as some weird badge of honor. When the show went back to the restaurant as part of a special episode, nobody was surprised to see that ''nothing had changed at all''. In 2015, the company finally shut down.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 265 (click to see context) from:
** The series has the infamous "[[Recap/KitchenNightmaresS6E15AmysBakingCompany Amy's Baking Company]]" episode, in which viewers watched in shock as they saw the restaurant's owners, Amy and Samy, berate customers, employees, and even Creator/GordonRamsay himself, their [[SmallNameBigEgo egos]] [[CantTakeCriticism clouding even the most basic of criticism]] and interpreted it as attacks -- in the end, for the first time in the series, Ramsay [[ScrewThisImOuttaHere left the restaurant]] thanks to the two's behavior. When the episode was over, many of the viewers approached their Platform/{{Facebook}} page to express their displeasure, only to have the two blow up at ''them''. Many people came to it on the basis of watching their meltdown. This also ironically benefited Amy's Baking Company, thanks to the BileFascination. People who went there were either a), people who don't believe anyone can really be that bad at owning a restaurant and still be in business, thinking it was all set up as fake "reality" TV for ratings, or b), people who go there specifically to provoke a response from Amy or Samy as some weird badge of honor. When the show went back to the restaurant as part of a special episode, nobody was surprised to see that ''nothing had changed at all''. In 2015, the company finally shut down.
to:
** The series has the infamous "[[Recap/KitchenNightmaresS6E15AmysBakingCompany Amy's Baking Company]]" episode, in which viewers watched in shock as they saw the restaurant's owners, Amy and Samy, berate customers, employees, and even Creator/GordonRamsay himself, their [[SmallNameBigEgo egos]] [[CantTakeCriticism clouding even the most basic of criticism]] and interpreted it as attacks -- in the end, for the first time in the series, Ramsay [[ScrewThisImOuttaHere left the restaurant]] thanks to the two's behavior. When the episode was over, many of the viewers approached their Platform/{{Facebook}} page to express expressed their displeasure, only to have the two blow up at ''them''. Many people came to it on the basis of watching their meltdown. This also ironically benefited Amy's Baking Company, thanks to the BileFascination. People who went there were either a), people who don't didn't believe anyone can could really be that bad at owning a restaurant and still be in business, thinking it was all set up as fake "reality" TV for ratings, or b), people who go went there specifically to provoke a response from Amy or Samy as some weird badge of honor. When the show went back to the restaurant as part of a special episode, nobody was surprised to see that ''nothing had changed at all''. In 2015, the company finally shut down.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 265 (click to see context) from:
** The series has the infamous "[[Recap/KitchenNightmaresS6E15AmysBakingCompany Amy's Baking Company]]" episode, in which viewers watched in shock as they saw the restaurant's owners, Amy and Samy, berate customers, employees, and even Creator/GordonRamsay himself, their [[SmallNameBigEgo egos]] [[CantTakeCriticism clouding even the most basic of criticism]] and interpreted it as attacks -- in the end, for the first time in the series, Ramsay [[ScrewThisImOuttaHere left the restaurant]] thanks to the two's behavior. When the episode was over, many of the viewers approached their Website/{{Facebook}} page to express their displeasure, only to have the two blow up at ''them''. Many people came to it on the basis of watching their meltdown. This also ironically benefited Amy's Baking Company, thanks to the BileFascination. People who went there were either a), people who don't believe anyone can really be that bad at owning a restaurant and still be in business, thinking it was all set up as fake "reality" TV for ratings, or b), people who go there specifically to provoke a response from Amy or Samy as some weird badge of honor. When the show went back to the restaurant as part of a special episode, nobody was surprised to see that ''nothing had changed at all''. In 2015, the company finally shut down.
to:
** The series has the infamous "[[Recap/KitchenNightmaresS6E15AmysBakingCompany Amy's Baking Company]]" episode, in which viewers watched in shock as they saw the restaurant's owners, Amy and Samy, berate customers, employees, and even Creator/GordonRamsay himself, their [[SmallNameBigEgo egos]] [[CantTakeCriticism clouding even the most basic of criticism]] and interpreted it as attacks -- in the end, for the first time in the series, Ramsay [[ScrewThisImOuttaHere left the restaurant]] thanks to the two's behavior. When the episode was over, many of the viewers approached their Website/{{Facebook}} Platform/{{Facebook}} page to express their displeasure, only to have the two blow up at ''them''. Many people came to it on the basis of watching their meltdown. This also ironically benefited Amy's Baking Company, thanks to the BileFascination. People who went there were either a), people who don't believe anyone can really be that bad at owning a restaurant and still be in business, thinking it was all set up as fake "reality" TV for ratings, or b), people who go there specifically to provoke a response from Amy or Samy as some weird badge of honor. When the show went back to the restaurant as part of a special episode, nobody was surprised to see that ''nothing had changed at all''. In 2015, the company finally shut down.
Changed line(s) 339 (click to see context) from:
* When Welsh footballer Ryan Giggs was caught having an affair with former ''Series/BigBrother'' contestant Imogen Thomas, his lawyers filed a super-injunction to keep Thomas from selling her story and the news media from revealing his name. Many news channels and magazines took offence to that, starting a debate on the nature of super-injunctions and using many {{Suspiciously Specific Denial}}s to [[CouldSayItBut hint at his identity]]. When his name was revealed on Website/{{Twitter}}, he had his lawyers try to sue Twitter for ignoring the injunction. Twitter, of course, is not bound by UK law and this action only caused many celebrities and ordinary users hitting back by revealing his name in their feeds. [[SarcasmMode Congratulations, Giggs]]: You [[EnemyMine made an enemy of both]] [[OldMediaAreEvil the Old Media]] and [[NewMediaAreEvil the New Media]] and turned a one-shot story that would have grabbed the attention of a small portion of the public for a few days into a national debate that went on for weeks, while becoming the laughing stock of the foreign media, who are not bound by UK laws. The entire mess eventually reached Parliament, where questions were raised about how relevant the law was considering the rise of social media. You know you messed up when your attempt to conceal your affair ends up with the Prime Minister discussing it ''in the democratic forum of the nation''.
to:
* When Welsh footballer Ryan Giggs was caught having an affair with former ''Series/BigBrother'' contestant Imogen Thomas, his lawyers filed a super-injunction to keep Thomas from selling her story and the news media from revealing his name. Many news channels and magazines took offence to that, starting a debate on the nature of super-injunctions and using many {{Suspiciously Specific Denial}}s to [[CouldSayItBut hint at his identity]]. When his name was revealed on Website/{{Twitter}}, Platform/{{Twitter}}, he had his lawyers try to sue Twitter for ignoring the injunction. Twitter, of course, is not bound by UK law and this action only caused many celebrities and ordinary users hitting back by revealing his name in their feeds. [[SarcasmMode Congratulations, Giggs]]: You [[EnemyMine made an enemy of both]] [[OldMediaAreEvil the Old Media]] and [[NewMediaAreEvil the New Media]] and turned a one-shot story that would have grabbed the attention of a small portion of the public for a few days into a national debate that went on for weeks, while becoming the laughing stock of the foreign media, who are not bound by UK laws. The entire mess eventually reached Parliament, where questions were raised about how relevant the law was considering the rise of social media. You know you messed up when your attempt to conceal your affair ends up with the Prime Minister discussing it ''in the democratic forum of the nation''.
Changed line(s) 353 (click to see context) from:
* Bryon "Psyguy" Beaubien from Website/Fireball20XL was subject to this effect in 2014 after many callout posts appeared on Website/{{Tumblr}}. The stories accuse Beaubien of incredibly abusive behaviors toward many of his past associates and fans, including death threats, infidelity, sexual harassment, racism, and sexually predatory conduct towards minors. The accusations alone were bad for his reputation, but he made the matter far worse by responding with [[IResembleThatRemark trying to threaten many of the people who shared their stories]] about him, use copyright claims to take down videos about the stories and delete as many of his posts that could confirm the stories told about him. The stories about Beaubien ended up spreading like wildfire throughout the internet as a result of his attempts to get them removed, which eventually led to Fireball [=20XL=] and Beaubien himself both vanishing from the internet.
to:
* Bryon "Psyguy" Beaubien from Website/Fireball20XL Platform/Fireball20XL was subject to this effect in 2014 after many callout posts appeared on Website/{{Tumblr}}.Platform/{{Tumblr}}. The stories accuse Beaubien of incredibly abusive behaviors toward many of his past associates and fans, including death threats, infidelity, sexual harassment, racism, and sexually predatory conduct towards minors. The accusations alone were bad for his reputation, but he made the matter far worse by responding with [[IResembleThatRemark trying to threaten many of the people who shared their stories]] about him, use copyright claims to take down videos about the stories and delete as many of his posts that could confirm the stories told about him. The stories about Beaubien ended up spreading like wildfire throughout the internet as a result of his attempts to get them removed, which eventually led to Fireball [=20XL=] and Beaubien himself both vanishing from the internet.
Changed line(s) 355 (click to see context) from:
* Frederick County, Maryland, Councilmember Kirby Delauter said on Website/{{Facebook}} to a ''Frederick News-Post'' reporter, "Use my name again unauthorized and you'll be paying for an Attorney [sic]. Your rights stop where mine start." With how blatantly wrong that was, it's no surprise that several newspapers and associated sites mockingly corrected him. Perhaps most notable is an editorial titled "[[TakeThat Kirby Delauter, Kirby Delauter, Kirby Delauter]]" in (you guessed it) ''[[http://www.fredericknewspost.com/news/politics_and_government/kirby-delauter-kirby-delauter-kirby-delauter/article_da85d6f4-fa3c-524f-bbf6-8e5ddc0d1c0a.html The Frederick News-Post.]]'' The memetic use of his name has received widespread coverage everywhere from Creator/{{NPR}} to Creator/TheBBC.
to:
* Frederick County, Maryland, Councilmember Kirby Delauter said on Website/{{Facebook}} Platform/{{Facebook}} to a ''Frederick News-Post'' reporter, "Use my name again unauthorized and you'll be paying for an Attorney [sic]. Your rights stop where mine start." With how blatantly wrong that was, it's no surprise that several newspapers and associated sites mockingly corrected him. Perhaps most notable is an editorial titled "[[TakeThat Kirby Delauter, Kirby Delauter, Kirby Delauter]]" in (you guessed it) ''[[http://www.fredericknewspost.com/news/politics_and_government/kirby-delauter-kirby-delauter-kirby-delauter/article_da85d6f4-fa3c-524f-bbf6-8e5ddc0d1c0a.html The Frederick News-Post.]]'' The memetic use of his name has received widespread coverage everywhere from Creator/{{NPR}} to Creator/TheBBC.
Changed line(s) 382 (click to see context) from:
* Elon Musk banned from Website/{{Twitter}} a profile that reported his private jet's whereabouts based on public flight data. Whoever didn't know about [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ElonJet said profile]], which still survived in other platforms, certainly learned about it with the incident, not helped by how Musk started removing from Twitter reporters who wrote articles on the ban. [[https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1603576251125362688 Musk eventually made a joking admission of this trope.]]
to:
* Elon Musk banned from Website/{{Twitter}} Platform/{{Twitter}} a profile that reported his private jet's whereabouts based on public flight data. Whoever didn't know about [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ElonJet said profile]], which still survived in other platforms, certainly learned about it with the incident, not helped by how Musk started removing from Twitter reporters who wrote articles on the ban. [[https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1603576251125362688 Musk eventually made a joking admission of this trope.]]
Changed line(s) 384 (click to see context) from:
* While Website/{{Twitter}}'s "hidden reply" feature allows users to hide individual replies to their tweets, other users can still access them by clicking on a button in the bottom-right of the tweet. This often has the effect of bringing more attention to replies that otherwise would've been buried amongst the others.
to:
* While Website/{{Twitter}}'s Platform/{{Twitter}}'s "hidden reply" feature allows users to hide individual replies to their tweets, other users can still access them by clicking on a button in the bottom-right of the tweet. This often has the effect of bringing more attention to replies that otherwise would've been buried amongst the others.
Changed line(s) 409 (click to see context) from:
* On the April 10, 2024 edition of Wrestling/AllEliteWrestling's flagship show ''Dynamite'', the company aired the backstage footage of Wrestling/CMPunk's scuffle with "Jungle Boy" Jack Perry at ''All In'' 2023 live on TV as part of a segment involving Wrestling/TheYoungBucks and Wrestling/{{FTR}}. For those uninitiated, Punk and the Young Bucks had their fair share of issues during the former's time in the company that led to backstage fights at the ''All Out'' 2022 and ''All In'' 2023 [=PPVs=], the latter of which prompted AEW owner Tony Khan to fire Punk for cause. Punk, who returned back to WWE starting from the 2023 ''Survivor Series'' PLE, had kept quiet about his time in AEW until he spoke about both it and the backstage incident involving Perry on Ariel Helwani's podcast ''MMA Hour'' a few days before ''[=WrestleMania=] XL''. AEW then announced the decision to air the footage hours after ''[=WrestleMania=] XL'''s Night 1 had ended, leading to speculation that AEW was doing it specifically in an attempt to tarnish Punk's reputation further. Unfortunately for AEW, a lot of people were both underwhelmed that the backstage fight was relatively innocuous and found it ridiculous that Khan, who was stationed nearby behind the monitors, was so scared that he not only fired Punk afterwards, he said that it put his life on danger. Mere hours after it was aired live on TV, AEW [[https://twitter.com/WrestleOps/status/1778247674874982605 backtracked on their decision by copyright striking anyone who posted the video of the backstage fight]] and removing said footage from their official Website/YouTube video of the segment. This not only brought awareness of the incident again after several months, it generated more support for Punk.
to:
* On the April 10, 2024 edition of Wrestling/AllEliteWrestling's flagship show ''Dynamite'', the company aired the backstage footage of Wrestling/CMPunk's scuffle with "Jungle Boy" Jack Perry at ''All In'' 2023 live on TV as part of a segment involving Wrestling/TheYoungBucks and Wrestling/{{FTR}}. For those uninitiated, Punk and the Young Bucks had their fair share of issues during the former's time in the company that led to backstage fights at the ''All Out'' 2022 and ''All In'' 2023 [=PPVs=], the latter of which prompted AEW owner Tony Khan to fire Punk for cause. Punk, who returned back to WWE starting from the 2023 ''Survivor Series'' PLE, had kept quiet about his time in AEW until he spoke about both it and the backstage incident involving Perry on Ariel Helwani's podcast ''MMA Hour'' a few days before ''[=WrestleMania=] XL''. AEW then announced the decision to air the footage hours after ''[=WrestleMania=] XL'''s Night 1 had ended, leading to speculation that AEW was doing it specifically in an attempt to tarnish Punk's reputation further. Unfortunately for AEW, a lot of people were both underwhelmed that the backstage fight was relatively innocuous and found it ridiculous that Khan, who was stationed nearby behind the monitors, was so scared that he not only fired Punk afterwards, he said that it put his life on danger. Mere hours after it was aired live on TV, AEW [[https://twitter.com/WrestleOps/status/1778247674874982605 backtracked on their decision by copyright striking anyone who posted the video of the backstage fight]] and removing said footage from their official Website/YouTube Platform/YouTube video of the segment. This not only brought awareness of the incident again after several months, it generated more support for Punk.
Changed line(s) 459 (click to see context) from:
* In September 2023, [[https://youtu.be/XyOSBp3arDo a YouTube video was released]] accusing ''VideoGame/YandereSimulator'' developer [=YandereDev=] of having groomed a 16-year old girl codenamed "Jane", followed by [[JuryAndWitnessTampering intimidating her into denying the accusations and attempting to prevent its release]]. The video was subsequently hit with a copyright strike revealing "Jane"'s real name, with her later confirming that [=YandereDev=] had done so under her name and without her permission. [=YandereDev=]'s attempts to keep the scandal under wraps merely [[RevealingCoverUp confirmed to many onlookers that he had something to hide]], and they promptly reuploaded archived links to the accusation on websites such as Website/{{Tumblr}} and Website/{{Twitter}} to spread awareness. Although the original video was reinstated a while later, the damage was done -- nearly all of ''Yandere Simulator'''s voice actors and several major crew members quit in solidarity with the allegations, and [=YandereDev=] himself was banned from both Platform/{{Twitch}} and Creator/{{Discord}}.
to:
* In September 2023, [[https://youtu.be/XyOSBp3arDo a YouTube video was released]] accusing ''VideoGame/YandereSimulator'' developer [=YandereDev=] of having groomed a 16-year old girl codenamed "Jane", followed by [[JuryAndWitnessTampering intimidating her into denying the accusations and attempting to prevent its release]]. The video was subsequently hit with a copyright strike revealing "Jane"'s real name, with her later confirming that [=YandereDev=] had done so under her name and without her permission. [=YandereDev=]'s attempts to keep the scandal under wraps merely [[RevealingCoverUp confirmed to many onlookers that he had something to hide]], and they promptly reuploaded archived links to the accusation on websites such as Website/{{Tumblr}} Platform/{{Tumblr}} and Website/{{Twitter}} Platform/{{Twitter}} to spread awareness. Although the original video was reinstated a while later, the damage was done -- nearly all of ''Yandere Simulator'''s voice actors and several major crew members quit in solidarity with the allegations, and [=YandereDev=] himself was banned from both Platform/{{Twitch}} and Creator/{{Discord}}.
Changed line(s) 477 (click to see context) from:
* Elon Musk, after taking ownership of Website/{{Twitter}}, once changed the website's logo to that of the Doge meme. It's commonly accepted this was in an attempt to obscure discussion of a [[https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/elon-musk-258-billion-dogecoin-lawsuit-expands-2022-09-07/ $258 Billion lawsuit]] about Musk's involvement with Dogecoin, a cryptocurrency that used Doge as its symbol, by making it the first thing that came up when looking up Musk and Doge. What he failed to account for, however, was that many promptly realized this and drowned out the discussion of the logo change with discussion of how Musk was using it to avoid publicity on the lawsuit, drawing attention back to the lawsuit anyway.
to:
* Elon Musk, after taking ownership of Website/{{Twitter}}, Platform/{{Twitter}}, once changed the website's logo to that of the Doge meme. It's commonly accepted this was in an attempt to obscure discussion of a [[https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/elon-musk-258-billion-dogecoin-lawsuit-expands-2022-09-07/ $258 Billion lawsuit]] about Musk's involvement with Dogecoin, a cryptocurrency that used Doge as its symbol, by making it the first thing that came up when looking up Musk and Doge. What he failed to account for, however, was that many promptly realized this and drowned out the discussion of the logo change with discussion of how Musk was using it to avoid publicity on the lawsuit, drawing attention back to the lawsuit anyway.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The original link was a dead link; substituted it with one that is accessible as of April 12, 2p24
Changed line(s) 402 (click to see context) from:
** In 2005, Danish newspaper ''Jyllands-Posten'' [[https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/03/flemming-rose-danish-cartoons/473670/ published a series of editorial cartoons depicting Muhammad]], which caused deadly riots and protests. In response, [[https://news.stanford.edu/news/2008/may14/cartoons-050408.html other Western publications]] also ran the cartoons as a defense of free speech.
to:
** In 2005, Danish newspaper ''Jyllands-Posten'' [[https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/03/flemming-rose-danish-cartoons/473670/ published a series of editorial cartoons depicting Muhammad]], which caused deadly riots and protests. In response, [[https://news.stanford.edu/news/2008/may14/cartoons-050408.html [[https://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/~rfrey/166images_of_muhammad.htm other Western publications]] also ran the cartoons as a defense of free speech.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 409 (click to see context) from:
* On the April 10, 2024 edition of Wrestling/AllEliteWrestling's flagship show ''Dynamite'', the company aired the backstage footage of Wrestling/CMPunk's scuffle with "Jungle Boy" Jack Perry at ''All In'' 2023 live on TV as part of a segment involving Wrestling/TheYoungBucks and Wrestling/{{FTR}}. For those uninitiated, Punk and Bucks had their fair share of issues during the former's time in the company that led to backstage fights at the ''All Out'' 2022 and ''All In'' 2023 [=PPVs=], the latter of which prompted AEW owner Tony Khan to fire Punk for cause. Punk, who returned back to WWE starting from the 2023 ''Survivor Series'' PLE, had kept quiet about the incidents until he spoke about the latter one in Ariel Helwani's podcast ''MMA Hour'' a few days before ''[=WrestleMania=] XL''. AEW then announced the decision to air the footage hours after ''[=WrestleMania=] XL'''s Night 1 had ended, leading to speculation that AEW was doing it specifically in an attempt to tarnish Punk's reputation further. Unfortunately for AEW, a lot of people were both underwhelmed that the backstage fight was relatively innocuous and found it ridiculous that Khan, who was stationed nearby behind the monitors, was so scared that he not only fired Punk afterwards, he said that it put his life on danger. Mere hours after it was aired live on TV, AEW [[https://twitter.com/WrestleOps/status/1778247674874982605 backtracked on their decision by copyright striking anyone who posted the video of the backstage fight]] and removing said footage from their official Website/YouTube video of the segment. This not only brought awareness of the incident again after several months, it generated more support for Punk.
to:
* On the April 10, 2024 edition of Wrestling/AllEliteWrestling's flagship show ''Dynamite'', the company aired the backstage footage of Wrestling/CMPunk's scuffle with "Jungle Boy" Jack Perry at ''All In'' 2023 live on TV as part of a segment involving Wrestling/TheYoungBucks and Wrestling/{{FTR}}. For those uninitiated, Punk and the Young Bucks had their fair share of issues during the former's time in the company that led to backstage fights at the ''All Out'' 2022 and ''All In'' 2023 [=PPVs=], the latter of which prompted AEW owner Tony Khan to fire Punk for cause. Punk, who returned back to WWE starting from the 2023 ''Survivor Series'' PLE, had kept quiet about the incidents his time in AEW until he spoke about both it and the latter one in backstage incident involving Perry on Ariel Helwani's podcast ''MMA Hour'' a few days before ''[=WrestleMania=] XL''. AEW then announced the decision to air the footage hours after ''[=WrestleMania=] XL'''s Night 1 had ended, leading to speculation that AEW was doing it specifically in an attempt to tarnish Punk's reputation further. Unfortunately for AEW, a lot of people were both underwhelmed that the backstage fight was relatively innocuous and found it ridiculous that Khan, who was stationed nearby behind the monitors, was so scared that he not only fired Punk afterwards, he said that it put his life on danger. Mere hours after it was aired live on TV, AEW [[https://twitter.com/WrestleOps/status/1778247674874982605 backtracked on their decision by copyright striking anyone who posted the video of the backstage fight]] and removing said footage from their official Website/YouTube video of the segment. This not only brought awareness of the incident again after several months, it generated more support for Punk.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 409 (click to see context) from:
* On the 10 April 2024 edition of Wrestling/AllEliteWrestling's flagship show ''Dynamite'', the company aired the backstage footage of Wrestling/CMPunk's scuffle with "Jungle Boy" Jack Perry at ''All In'' 2023 live on TV as part of a segment involving Wrestling/TheYoungBucks and Wrestling/{{FTR}}. For those uninitiated, Punk and Bucks had their fair share of issues during the former's time in the company that led to backstage controversies in the ''All Out'' 2022 and ''All In'' 2023 PPV's, the latter of which prompted Punk's firing from the company after it allegedly put the life of AEW owner's Tony Khan "in danger". Punk, who returned back to WWE starting from the 2023 ''Survivor Series'' PLE, had kept quiet about the incidents until he spoke about the latter one in Ariel Helwani's podcast ''MMA Hour'' a few days before ''[=WrestleMania=] XL''. AEW then announced the decision to air the footage hours after ''[=WrestleMania=] XL'''s Night 1 had ended, leading to speculations that AEW was doing it specifically in an attempt to tarnish Punk's reputation further. Unfortunately for AEW, the footage ''exactly'' describe Punk's point of view for the incident. If anything, people were both underwhelmed that the backstage fight was relatively innocuous and find it ridiculous that Khan (who was stationed behind the monitors, somewhat out of reach from both Punk and Perry) was so scared that he not only fired Punk afterwards, he said that it put his life on danger. Mere hours after it was aired live on TV, AEW [[https://twitter.com/WrestleOps/status/1778247674874982605 backtracked on their decision by copyright striking anyone who posted the video of the backstage fight]] and removing said footage from their official Website/YouTube video of the segment... Which not only bring more people to awareness of the incident, it generated more support for Punk who is generally agreed to have said the truth of the ''All In'' 2023 incident while AEW, Tony Khan and The Young Bucks were heavily criticized by anyone that isn't their diehard fans for being childish and unable to move on from their fallout with Punk.
to:
* On the 10 April 10, 2024 edition of Wrestling/AllEliteWrestling's flagship show ''Dynamite'', the company aired the backstage footage of Wrestling/CMPunk's scuffle with "Jungle Boy" Jack Perry at ''All In'' 2023 live on TV as part of a segment involving Wrestling/TheYoungBucks and Wrestling/{{FTR}}. For those uninitiated, Punk and Bucks had their fair share of issues during the former's time in the company that led to backstage controversies in fights at the ''All Out'' 2022 and ''All In'' 2023 PPV's, [=PPVs=], the latter of which prompted Punk's firing from the company after it allegedly put the life of AEW owner's owner Tony Khan "in danger".to fire Punk for cause. Punk, who returned back to WWE starting from the 2023 ''Survivor Series'' PLE, had kept quiet about the incidents until he spoke about the latter one in Ariel Helwani's podcast ''MMA Hour'' a few days before ''[=WrestleMania=] XL''. AEW then announced the decision to air the footage hours after ''[=WrestleMania=] XL'''s Night 1 had ended, leading to speculations speculation that AEW was doing it specifically in an attempt to tarnish Punk's reputation further. Unfortunately for AEW, the footage ''exactly'' describe Punk's point a lot of view for the incident. If anything, people were both underwhelmed that the backstage fight was relatively innocuous and find found it ridiculous that Khan (who Khan, who was stationed nearby behind the monitors, somewhat out of reach from both Punk and Perry) was so scared that he not only fired Punk afterwards, he said that it put his life on danger. Mere hours after it was aired live on TV, AEW [[https://twitter.com/WrestleOps/status/1778247674874982605 backtracked on their decision by copyright striking anyone who posted the video of the backstage fight]] and removing said footage from their official Website/YouTube video of the segment... Which segment. This not only bring more people to brought awareness of the incident, incident again after several months, it generated more support for Punk who is generally agreed to have said the truth of the ''All In'' 2023 incident while AEW, Tony Khan and The Young Bucks were heavily criticized by anyone that isn't their diehard fans for being childish and unable to move on from their fallout with Punk.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling/grammar fix(es)
Changed line(s) 409 (click to see context) from:
* On the 10 April 2024 edition of Wrestling/AllEliteWrestling's flagship show ''Dynamite'', the company aired the backstage footage of Wrestling/CMPunk's scuffle with "Jungle Boy" Jack Perry at All In 2023 live on TV as part of a segment involving Wrestling/TheYoungBucks and Wrestling/{{FTR}}. For those uninitiated, Punk and Bucks had their fair share of issues during the former's time in the company that led to backstage controversies in the All Out 2022 and All In 2023 PPV's, the latter of which prompted Punk's firing from the company after it allegedly put the life of AEW owner's Tony Khan "in danger". Punk, who returned back to WWE starting from the 2023 Survivor Series PLE, had spoken about the latter incident in Ariel Helwani's podcast ''MMA Hour'' a few days before ''[=WrestleMania=] XL'' and AEW then announced the decision to air the footage hours after ''[=WrestleMania=] XL'''s Night 1 had ended, leading to speculations that AEW did that specifically in an attempt to tarnish Punk's reputation further. Unfortunately for AEW, the footage ''exactly'' describe Punk's point of view for the incident and if anything, people were underwhelmed that the a relatively innocuous backstage fight led to Khan being so scared that he fired Punk afterwards. Mere hours after it was aired live on TV, AEW [[https://twitter.com/WrestleOps/status/1778247674874982605 backtracked on their decision by copyright striking anyone who posted the video of the backstage fight]] and removing said footage from their official Website/YouTube video of the segment... Which not only bring more people to awareness of the incident, it generated more support for Punk who is generally agreed to have said the truth of the All In 2023 incident while AEW, Tony Khan and The Young Bucks were heavily criticized by anyone that isn't their diehard fans for being childish and unable to move on from their fallout with Punk.
to:
* On the 10 April 2024 edition of Wrestling/AllEliteWrestling's flagship show ''Dynamite'', the company aired the backstage footage of Wrestling/CMPunk's scuffle with "Jungle Boy" Jack Perry at All In ''All In'' 2023 live on TV as part of a segment involving Wrestling/TheYoungBucks and Wrestling/{{FTR}}. For those uninitiated, Punk and Bucks had their fair share of issues during the former's time in the company that led to backstage controversies in the All Out ''All Out'' 2022 and All In ''All In'' 2023 PPV's, the latter of which prompted Punk's firing from the company after it allegedly put the life of AEW owner's Tony Khan "in danger". Punk, who returned back to WWE starting from the 2023 Survivor Series ''Survivor Series'' PLE, had spoken kept quiet about the incidents until he spoke about the latter incident one in Ariel Helwani's podcast ''MMA Hour'' a few days before ''[=WrestleMania=] XL'' and XL''. AEW then announced the decision to air the footage hours after ''[=WrestleMania=] XL'''s Night 1 had ended, leading to speculations that AEW did that was doing it specifically in an attempt to tarnish Punk's reputation further. Unfortunately for AEW, the footage ''exactly'' describe Punk's point of view for the incident and if incident. If anything, people were both underwhelmed that the a backstage fight was relatively innocuous backstage fight led to and find it ridiculous that Khan being (who was stationed behind the monitors, somewhat out of reach from both Punk and Perry) was so scared that he not only fired Punk afterwards.afterwards, he said that it put his life on danger. Mere hours after it was aired live on TV, AEW [[https://twitter.com/WrestleOps/status/1778247674874982605 backtracked on their decision by copyright striking anyone who posted the video of the backstage fight]] and removing said footage from their official Website/YouTube video of the segment... Which not only bring more people to awareness of the incident, it generated more support for Punk who is generally agreed to have said the truth of the All In ''All In'' 2023 incident while AEW, Tony Khan and The Young Bucks were heavily criticized by anyone that isn't their diehard fans for being childish and unable to move on from their fallout with Punk.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling/grammar fix(es)
Changed line(s) 409 (click to see context) from:
* On the 10 April 2024 edition of Wrestling/AllEliteWrestling's flagship show ''Dynamite'', the company aired the backstage footage of Wrestling/CMPunk's scuffle with "Jungle Boy" Jack Perry at All In 2023 live on TV as part of a segment involving Wrestling/TheYoungBucks and Wrestling/{{FTR}}. For those uninitiated, Punk and Bucks had their fair share of issues during the former's time in the company that led to backstage controversies in the All Out 2022 and All In 2023 PPV's, the latter of which prompted Punk's firing from the company after it allegedly put the life of AEW owner's Tony Khan "in danger". Punk, who returned back to WWE starting from the 2023 Survivor Series PLE, had spoken about the latter incident in Ariel Helwani's podcast ''MMA Hour'' a few days before ''[=WrestleMania=] XL'' and AEW then announced the decision to air the footage hours after ''[=WrestleMania=] XL'''s Night 1 had ended, leading to speculations that AEW did that specifically in an attempt to tarnish Punk's reputation further. Unfortunately for AEW, the footage ''exactly'' describe Punk's point of view for the incident and if anything, people were underwhelmed that the a relatively innocous backstage fight led to Khan being so scared that he fired Punk afterwards. Mere hours after it was aired live on TV, AEW [[https://twitter.com/WrestleOps/status/1778247674874982605 backtracked on their decision by copyright striking anyone who posted the video of the backstage fight]] and removing said footage from their official Website/YouTube video of the segment... Which not only bring more people to awareness of the incident, it generated more support for Punk who is generally agreed to have said the truth of the All In 2023 incident while AEW, Tony Khan and The Young Bucks were heavily criticized by anyone that isn't their diehard fans for being childish and unable to move on from their fallout with Punk.
to:
* On the 10 April 2024 edition of Wrestling/AllEliteWrestling's flagship show ''Dynamite'', the company aired the backstage footage of Wrestling/CMPunk's scuffle with "Jungle Boy" Jack Perry at All In 2023 live on TV as part of a segment involving Wrestling/TheYoungBucks and Wrestling/{{FTR}}. For those uninitiated, Punk and Bucks had their fair share of issues during the former's time in the company that led to backstage controversies in the All Out 2022 and All In 2023 PPV's, the latter of which prompted Punk's firing from the company after it allegedly put the life of AEW owner's Tony Khan "in danger". Punk, who returned back to WWE starting from the 2023 Survivor Series PLE, had spoken about the latter incident in Ariel Helwani's podcast ''MMA Hour'' a few days before ''[=WrestleMania=] XL'' and AEW then announced the decision to air the footage hours after ''[=WrestleMania=] XL'''s Night 1 had ended, leading to speculations that AEW did that specifically in an attempt to tarnish Punk's reputation further. Unfortunately for AEW, the footage ''exactly'' describe Punk's point of view for the incident and if anything, people were underwhelmed that the a relatively innocous innocuous backstage fight led to Khan being so scared that he fired Punk afterwards. Mere hours after it was aired live on TV, AEW [[https://twitter.com/WrestleOps/status/1778247674874982605 backtracked on their decision by copyright striking anyone who posted the video of the backstage fight]] and removing said footage from their official Website/YouTube video of the segment... Which not only bring more people to awareness of the incident, it generated more support for Punk who is generally agreed to have said the truth of the All In 2023 incident while AEW, Tony Khan and The Young Bucks were heavily criticized by anyone that isn't their diehard fans for being childish and unable to move on from their fallout with Punk.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling/grammar fix(es)
Changed line(s) 409 (click to see context) from:
* On the 10 April 2024 edition of Wrestling/AllEliteWrestling's flagship show ''Dynamite'', the company aired the backstage footage of Wrestling/CMPunk's scuffle with "Jungle Boy" Jack Perry at All In 2023 live on TV as part of a segment involving Wrestling/TheYoungBucks and Wrestling/{{FTR}}. For those uninitiated, Punk and Bucks had their fair share of issues during the former's time in the company that led to backstage controversies in the All Out 2022 and All In 2023 PPV's, the latter of which prompted Punk's firing from the company after it allegedly put the life AEW owner's Tony Khan "in danger". Punk, who returned back to WWE starting from the 2023 Survivor Series PLE, had spoken about the latter incident in Ariel Helwani's podcast ''MMA Hour'' a few days before ''[=WrestleMania=] XL'' and AEW then announced the decision to air the footage hours after ''[=WrestleMania=] XL'''s Night 1 had ended, leading to speculations that AEW did that specifically in an attempt to tarnish Punk's reputation further. Unfortunately for AEW, the footage ''exactly'' describe Punk's point of view for the incident and if anything, people were underwhelmed that the a relatively innocous backstage fight led to Khan being so scared that he fired Punk afterwards. Mere hours after it was aired live on TV, AEW [[https://twitter.com/WrestleOps/status/1778247674874982605 backtracked on their decision by copyright striking anyone who posted the video of the backstage fight]] and removing said footage from their official Website/YouTube video of the segment... Which not only bring more people to awareness of the incident, it generated more support for Punk who is generally agreed to have said the truth of the All In 2023 incident while AEW, Tony Khan and The Young Bucks were heavily criticized by anyone that isn't their diehard fans for being childish and unable to move on from their fallout with Punk.
to:
* On the 10 April 2024 edition of Wrestling/AllEliteWrestling's flagship show ''Dynamite'', the company aired the backstage footage of Wrestling/CMPunk's scuffle with "Jungle Boy" Jack Perry at All In 2023 live on TV as part of a segment involving Wrestling/TheYoungBucks and Wrestling/{{FTR}}. For those uninitiated, Punk and Bucks had their fair share of issues during the former's time in the company that led to backstage controversies in the All Out 2022 and All In 2023 PPV's, the latter of which prompted Punk's firing from the company after it allegedly put the life of AEW owner's Tony Khan "in danger". Punk, who returned back to WWE starting from the 2023 Survivor Series PLE, had spoken about the latter incident in Ariel Helwani's podcast ''MMA Hour'' a few days before ''[=WrestleMania=] XL'' and AEW then announced the decision to air the footage hours after ''[=WrestleMania=] XL'''s Night 1 had ended, leading to speculations that AEW did that specifically in an attempt to tarnish Punk's reputation further. Unfortunately for AEW, the footage ''exactly'' describe Punk's point of view for the incident and if anything, people were underwhelmed that the a relatively innocous backstage fight led to Khan being so scared that he fired Punk afterwards. Mere hours after it was aired live on TV, AEW [[https://twitter.com/WrestleOps/status/1778247674874982605 backtracked on their decision by copyright striking anyone who posted the video of the backstage fight]] and removing said footage from their official Website/YouTube video of the segment... Which not only bring more people to awareness of the incident, it generated more support for Punk who is generally agreed to have said the truth of the All In 2023 incident while AEW, Tony Khan and The Young Bucks were heavily criticized by anyone that isn't their diehard fans for being childish and unable to move on from their fallout with Punk.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 409 (click to see context) from:
* On the 10 April 2024 edition of Wrestling/AllEliteWrestling's flagship show ''Dynamite'', the company aired the backstage footage of Wrestling/CMPunk's scuffle with "Jungle Boy" Jack Perry at All In 2023 live on TV as part of a segment involving Wrestling/TheYoungBucks and Wrestling/{{FTR}}. For those uninitiated, Punk and Bucks had their fair share of issues during the former's time in the company that led to backstage controversies in the All Out 2022 and All In 2023 PPV's, the latter of which prompted Punk's firing from the company. Punk, who returned back to WWE starting from the 2023 Survivor Series PLE, had spoken about the latter incident in Ariel Helwani's podcast ''MMA Hour'' a few days before ''[=WrestleMania=] XL'' and AEW then announced the decision to air the footage hours after ''[=WrestleMania=] XL'''s Night 1 had ended, leading to speculations that AEW did that specifically in an attempt to tarnish Punk's reputation further. Unfortunately for AEW, the footage ''exactly'' describe Punk's point of view for the incident and mere hours after it was aired live on TV, AEW [[https://twitter.com/WrestleOps/status/1778247674874982605 backtracked on their decision by copyright striking anyone who posted the video of the backstage fight]] and removing said footage from their official Website/YouTube video of the segment... Which not only bring more people to awareness of the incident, it generated more support for Punk who is generally agreed to have said the truth of the All In 2023 incident while AEW was heavily criticized by anyone that isn't their diehard fans for being childish and unable to move on from their fallout with Punk.
to:
* On the 10 April 2024 edition of Wrestling/AllEliteWrestling's flagship show ''Dynamite'', the company aired the backstage footage of Wrestling/CMPunk's scuffle with "Jungle Boy" Jack Perry at All In 2023 live on TV as part of a segment involving Wrestling/TheYoungBucks and Wrestling/{{FTR}}. For those uninitiated, Punk and Bucks had their fair share of issues during the former's time in the company that led to backstage controversies in the All Out 2022 and All In 2023 PPV's, the latter of which prompted Punk's firing from the company.company after it allegedly put the life AEW owner's Tony Khan "in danger". Punk, who returned back to WWE starting from the 2023 Survivor Series PLE, had spoken about the latter incident in Ariel Helwani's podcast ''MMA Hour'' a few days before ''[=WrestleMania=] XL'' and AEW then announced the decision to air the footage hours after ''[=WrestleMania=] XL'''s Night 1 had ended, leading to speculations that AEW did that specifically in an attempt to tarnish Punk's reputation further. Unfortunately for AEW, the footage ''exactly'' describe Punk's point of view for the incident and mere if anything, people were underwhelmed that the a relatively innocous backstage fight led to Khan being so scared that he fired Punk afterwards. Mere hours after it was aired live on TV, AEW [[https://twitter.com/WrestleOps/status/1778247674874982605 backtracked on their decision by copyright striking anyone who posted the video of the backstage fight]] and removing said footage from their official Website/YouTube video of the segment... Which not only bring more people to awareness of the incident, it generated more support for Punk who is generally agreed to have said the truth of the All In 2023 incident while AEW was AEW, Tony Khan and The Young Bucks were heavily criticized by anyone that isn't their diehard fans for being childish and unable to move on from their fallout with Punk.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[folder:Professional Wrestling]]
* On the 10 April 2024 edition of Wrestling/AllEliteWrestling's flagship show ''Dynamite'', the company aired the backstage footage of Wrestling/CMPunk's scuffle with "Jungle Boy" Jack Perry at All In 2023 live on TV as part of a segment involving Wrestling/TheYoungBucks and Wrestling/{{FTR}}. For those uninitiated, Punk and Bucks had their fair share of issues during the former's time in the company that led to backstage controversies in the All Out 2022 and All In 2023 PPV's, the latter of which prompted Punk's firing from the company. Punk, who returned back to WWE starting from the 2023 Survivor Series PLE, had spoken about the latter incident in Ariel Helwani's podcast ''MMA Hour'' a few days before ''[=WrestleMania=] XL'' and AEW then announced the decision to air the footage hours after ''[=WrestleMania=] XL'''s Night 1 had ended, leading to speculations that AEW did that specifically in an attempt to tarnish Punk's reputation further. Unfortunately for AEW, the footage ''exactly'' describe Punk's point of view for the incident and mere hours after it was aired live on TV, AEW [[https://twitter.com/WrestleOps/status/1778247674874982605 backtracked on their decision by copyright striking anyone who posted the video of the backstage fight]] and removing said footage from their official Website/YouTube video of the segment... Which not only bring more people to awareness of the incident, it generated more support for Punk who is generally agreed to have said the truth of the All In 2023 incident while AEW was heavily criticized by anyone that isn't their diehard fans for being childish and unable to move on from their fallout with Punk.
[[/folder]]
* On the 10 April 2024 edition of Wrestling/AllEliteWrestling's flagship show ''Dynamite'', the company aired the backstage footage of Wrestling/CMPunk's scuffle with "Jungle Boy" Jack Perry at All In 2023 live on TV as part of a segment involving Wrestling/TheYoungBucks and Wrestling/{{FTR}}. For those uninitiated, Punk and Bucks had their fair share of issues during the former's time in the company that led to backstage controversies in the All Out 2022 and All In 2023 PPV's, the latter of which prompted Punk's firing from the company. Punk, who returned back to WWE starting from the 2023 Survivor Series PLE, had spoken about the latter incident in Ariel Helwani's podcast ''MMA Hour'' a few days before ''[=WrestleMania=] XL'' and AEW then announced the decision to air the footage hours after ''[=WrestleMania=] XL'''s Night 1 had ended, leading to speculations that AEW did that specifically in an attempt to tarnish Punk's reputation further. Unfortunately for AEW, the footage ''exactly'' describe Punk's point of view for the incident and mere hours after it was aired live on TV, AEW [[https://twitter.com/WrestleOps/status/1778247674874982605 backtracked on their decision by copyright striking anyone who posted the video of the backstage fight]] and removing said footage from their official Website/YouTube video of the segment... Which not only bring more people to awareness of the incident, it generated more support for Punk who is generally agreed to have said the truth of the All In 2023 incident while AEW was heavily criticized by anyone that isn't their diehard fans for being childish and unable to move on from their fallout with Punk.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling/grammar fix(es)
Changed line(s) 81 (click to see context) from:
* A later episode of ''Series/{{MASH}}'' had the gang trying to get a copy of the film ''Theatre/TheMoonIsBlue'' because it had been [[BannedInChina banned in Boston]] . Charles, a Boston native, cautions that Boston would have banned ''Pinocchio'', but Hawkeye and BJ pay him no heed, thinking it must be steamy. The capper to all the troubles they had obtaining it was them watching it and finding it terribly inoffensive.
to:
* A later episode of ''Series/{{MASH}}'' had the gang trying to get a copy of the film ''Theatre/TheMoonIsBlue'' because it had been [[BannedInChina banned in Boston]] .Boston]]. Charles, a Boston native, cautions that Boston would have banned ''Pinocchio'', but Hawkeye and BJ pay him no heed, thinking it must be steamy. The capper to all the troubles they had obtaining it was them watching it and finding it terribly inoffensive.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 219 (click to see context) from:
* Anthony Sbarro, owner of the mall pizza chain ''Sbarro'', praised the negative feedback that rated ''Sbarro'' as some of the worst chain restaurants in the United States in that the taste and quality of their pizzas never matched the smell permeating throughout the shopping malls. He openly stated the harsh criticisms helped his brand gain attention and increased publicity and sales at his pizza shops.
to:
* Anthony Sbarro, owner of the mall pizza chain ''Sbarro'', praised the negative feedback that rated ''Sbarro'' as some of the worst chain restaurants in the United States in that the taste and quality of their pizzas never matched the smell permeating throughout the shopping malls. He openly stated the harsh criticisms [[NoSuchThingAsBadPublicity helped his brand gain attention attention]] and increased publicity and sales at his pizza shops.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 477 (click to see context) from:
** After Selen Tatsuki had a song cover she'd been working on for months meant for release on Christmas Day 2023 taken down by Nijisanji management (allegedly for not getting the proper permissions for posting it), she went missing for over a month with no contact, to the point both online and IRL acquaintances became alarmed enough to get the hashtag "Where's Selen" trending on Twitter. Her contract was later terminated, not long after it came out she'd been hospitalised. In response to fan outcry, ANYCOLOR (the company behind Nijisanji) posted a press release that assured investors that the effects of Selen's termination would be "negligible". A cascading series of PR blunders led to the story not just spreading to people outside the [=VTuber=] community (for example, a number of legal and PR experts chimed in on just how incompetent Nijisanji's response to the whole affair was) but also Nijisanji's Japanese fanbase (which was normally completely isolated from the English-speaking fanbase). [[note]] So severe was the backlash that the term [[Anime/MobileSuitGundamCharsCounterattack Selen Shock]] came about, and fans from other countries (especially Indonesia, where fans were still bitter towards Nijisanji for shuttering the well-loved Nijisanji Indonesia branch and caused many of the livers to graduate in disillusionment) renewed their anger towards the agency. As a result, Nijisanji developed a reputation as a UsefulNotes/BlackCompany and even commenters on places like Yahoo Finance Japan observed that this black eye would cripple any further attempt at overseas expansion. [[/note]]
to:
** After Selen Tatsuki had a song the cover of "A Last Cup Of Coffee" that she'd been working on for months meant for release on Christmas Day 2023 taken down by Nijisanji management (allegedly for not getting the proper permissions for posting it), she went missing for over a month with no contact, to contact. The lack of news and the point fact she neither showed for Pomu's graduation nor sent a video message wishing her well despite their closeness caused both online and IRL acquaintances became to become alarmed enough to get the hashtag "Where's Selen" trending on Twitter. Her contract was later terminated, not long after it came out she'd been hospitalised.hospitalised [[note]] As her old identity of WebVideo/{{Dokibird}}, she would reveal that she'd been DrivenToSuicide as the affair with "A Last Cup Of Coffee" had just been the latest in a long line of projects she'd been trying to do that was undercut by Nijisanji management itself[[/note]]. In response to fan outcry, ANYCOLOR (the company behind Nijisanji) posted a press release that assured investors that the effects of Selen's termination would be "negligible". A This set off a cascading series of PR blunders that led to the story not just spreading to people outside the [=VTuber=] community (for example, a number of legal and PR experts chimed in on just how incompetent Nijisanji's response to the whole affair was) but also Nijisanji's Japanese fanbase (which was normally completely isolated from the English-speaking fanbase). [[note]] So severe was the backlash that the term [[Anime/MobileSuitGundamCharsCounterattack Selen Shock]] came about, and fans from other countries (especially Indonesia, where fans were still bitter towards Nijisanji for shuttering the well-loved Nijisanji Indonesia branch and caused many of the livers to graduate in disillusionment) renewed their anger towards the agency. As a result, Nijisanji developed a reputation as a UsefulNotes/BlackCompany and even commenters on places like Yahoo Finance Japan observed that this black eye would cripple any further attempt at overseas expansion. [[/note]][[/note]]
** On a related note, in February 2023 ANYCOLOR filed over 10 DMCA copyright takedown notices on a number of Youtube channels that specialised in [=VTuber=]-related content (generally things like official announcements but also lesser known details like financial filings or behind-the-scenes issues). Most damningly, the takedown notices were only filed on videos that included stories that depicted Nijisanji in a negative light, making it an obvious attempt by a corporation to silence critics. As a result, those same channels (and those supporting them) focused even more on Nijisanji and ANYCOLOR, and so when the Pomu and Selen controversies erupted they were more than ready to spread the word.
** On a related note, in February 2023 ANYCOLOR filed over 10 DMCA copyright takedown notices on a number of Youtube channels that specialised in [=VTuber=]-related content (generally things like official announcements but also lesser known details like financial filings or behind-the-scenes issues). Most damningly, the takedown notices were only filed on videos that included stories that depicted Nijisanji in a negative light, making it an obvious attempt by a corporation to silence critics. As a result, those same channels (and those supporting them) focused even more on Nijisanji and ANYCOLOR, and so when the Pomu and Selen controversies erupted they were more than ready to spread the word.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removed sentence that veered into complaining
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removed sentence that veered into complaining
Changed line(s) 474 (click to see context) from:
* Sweet Baby Inc., a narrative consulting firm for video game developers, ran afoul of this in early 2024 when a curator group on Platform/{{Steam}} was created called "Sweet Baby Inc. Detected", which provided a list of every game they were involved with available on Steam so gamers could avoid them (with every game listed given a "Not Recommended" rating), due to the belief that their goal of promoting inclusivity and representation is being done at the expense of a game's overall quality. Chris Kindred, a Sweet Baby Inc. employee, tried to rally their followers on Twitter to not only report the group and get it removed, but to also report the user who created it to get them banned as well. Because Kindred's attempt to get rid of this group was interpreted as censorship and a corporate harassment campaign against criticism, news of the Sweet Baby Inc. Detected curator spread like wildfire with countless videos being made about it, as well as comics, memes, a Website/KnowYourMeme entry, the works. The curator group went from [[https://archive.is/YAL0m only a few hundred followers on February 26th]], to [[https://archive.ph/8E5So over 250k followers in just a couple weeks.]] In addition, this drew attention to Sweet Baby Inc. itself, as curious people wondering what all the fuss was about began looking into what the company actually did... and many of them weren't happy with what they found.
to:
* Sweet Baby Inc., a narrative consulting firm for video game developers, ran afoul of this in early 2024 when a curator group on Platform/{{Steam}} was created called "Sweet Baby Inc. Detected", which provided a list of every game they were involved with available on Steam so gamers could avoid them (with every game listed given a "Not Recommended" rating), due to the belief that their goal of promoting inclusivity and representation is being done at the expense of a game's overall quality. Chris Kindred, a Sweet Baby Inc. employee, tried to rally their followers on Twitter to not only report the group and get it removed, but to also report the user who created it to get them banned as well. Because Kindred's attempt to get rid of this group was interpreted as censorship and a corporate harassment campaign against criticism, news of the Sweet Baby Inc. Detected curator spread like wildfire with countless videos being made about it, as well as comics, memes, a Website/KnowYourMeme entry, the works. The curator group went from [[https://archive.is/YAL0m only a few hundred followers on February 26th]], to [[https://archive.ph/8E5So over 250k followers in just a couple weeks.]] In addition, this drew attention to Sweet Baby Inc. itself, as curious people wondering what all the fuss was about began looking into what the company actually did... and many of them weren't happy with what they found.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Details on Streisand Effect in regards to Vtuber company Nijisanji
Changed line(s) 474 (click to see context) from:
* Sweet Baby Inc., a narrative consulting firm for video game developers, ran afoul of this in early 2024 when a curator group on Platform/{{Steam}} was created called "Sweet Baby Inc. Detected", which provided a list of every game they were involved with available on Steam so gamers could avoid them (with every game listed given a "Not Recommended" rating), due to the belief that their goal of promoting inclusivity and representation is being done at the expense of a game's overall quality. Chris Kindred, a Sweet Baby Inc. employee, tried to rally their followers on Twitter to not only report the group and get it removed, but to also report the user who created it to get them banned as well. Because Kindred's attempt to get rid of this group was interpreted as censorship and a corporate harassment campaign against criticism, news of the Sweet Baby Inc. Detected curator spread like wildfire with countless videos being made about it, as well as comics, memes, a Website/KnowYourMeme entry, the works. The curator group went from [[https://archive.is/YAL0m only a few hundred followers on February 26th]], to [[https://archive.ph/8E5So over 250k followers in just a couple weeks.]]
to:
* Sweet Baby Inc., a narrative consulting firm for video game developers, ran afoul of this in early 2024 when a curator group on Platform/{{Steam}} was created called "Sweet Baby Inc. Detected", which provided a list of every game they were involved with available on Steam so gamers could avoid them (with every game listed given a "Not Recommended" rating), due to the belief that their goal of promoting inclusivity and representation is being done at the expense of a game's overall quality. Chris Kindred, a Sweet Baby Inc. employee, tried to rally their followers on Twitter to not only report the group and get it removed, but to also report the user who created it to get them banned as well. Because Kindred's attempt to get rid of this group was interpreted as censorship and a corporate harassment campaign against criticism, news of the Sweet Baby Inc. Detected curator spread like wildfire with countless videos being made about it, as well as comics, memes, a Website/KnowYourMeme entry, the works. The curator group went from [[https://archive.is/YAL0m only a few hundred followers on February 26th]], to [[https://archive.ph/8E5So over 250k followers in just a couple weeks.]]]] In addition, this drew attention to Sweet Baby Inc. itself, as curious people wondering what all the fuss was about began looking into what the company actually did... and many of them weren't happy with what they found.
* ''WebAnimation/{{Nijisanji}}'' fell afoul of this ''twice'' in early 2024.
** Nijisanji English liver Pomu Rainpuff graduated from the company in January 2024. This wouldn't on its own be particularly notable despite Pomu's popularity, except that in the run-up to her departure she unprivated several members-only streams, including one where she broke down in tears recalling a "once-in-a-lifetime" opportunity she'd been offered that had been denied by Nijisanji management with no possibility of negotiation, responding to chat's attempt at comforting her by saying "more opportunities will come" with a sad, "Not here." Shortly after, Nijisanji management proceeded to once again private the aforementioned members-only stream (and '''only''' that particular stream). This resulted in the story spreading wider than it otherwise would have, as the clumsy attempt at suppressing the story simply made people suspect the story was '''true''' and did more damage to Nijisanji's reputation than would have been done had the stream been left up, or if ''all'' the members-only streams had been privated rather than just that one particular stream.
** After Selen Tatsuki had a song cover she'd been working on for months meant for release on Christmas Day 2023 taken down by Nijisanji management (allegedly for not getting the proper permissions for posting it), she went missing for over a month with no contact, to the point both online and IRL acquaintances became alarmed enough to get the hashtag "Where's Selen" trending on Twitter. Her contract was later terminated, not long after it came out she'd been hospitalised. In response to fan outcry, ANYCOLOR (the company behind Nijisanji) posted a press release that assured investors that the effects of Selen's termination would be "negligible". A cascading series of PR blunders led to the story not just spreading to people outside the [=VTuber=] community (for example, a number of legal and PR experts chimed in on just how incompetent Nijisanji's response to the whole affair was) but also Nijisanji's Japanese fanbase (which was normally completely isolated from the English-speaking fanbase). [[note]] So severe was the backlash that the term [[Anime/MobileSuitGundamCharsCounterattack Selen Shock]] came about, and fans from other countries (especially Indonesia, where fans were still bitter towards Nijisanji for shuttering the well-loved Nijisanji Indonesia branch and caused many of the livers to graduate in disillusionment) renewed their anger towards the agency. As a result, Nijisanji developed a reputation as a UsefulNotes/BlackCompany and even commenters on places like Yahoo Finance Japan observed that this black eye would cripple any further attempt at overseas expansion. [[/note]]
* ''WebAnimation/{{Nijisanji}}'' fell afoul of this ''twice'' in early 2024.
** Nijisanji English liver Pomu Rainpuff graduated from the company in January 2024. This wouldn't on its own be particularly notable despite Pomu's popularity, except that in the run-up to her departure she unprivated several members-only streams, including one where she broke down in tears recalling a "once-in-a-lifetime" opportunity she'd been offered that had been denied by Nijisanji management with no possibility of negotiation, responding to chat's attempt at comforting her by saying "more opportunities will come" with a sad, "Not here." Shortly after, Nijisanji management proceeded to once again private the aforementioned members-only stream (and '''only''' that particular stream). This resulted in the story spreading wider than it otherwise would have, as the clumsy attempt at suppressing the story simply made people suspect the story was '''true''' and did more damage to Nijisanji's reputation than would have been done had the stream been left up, or if ''all'' the members-only streams had been privated rather than just that one particular stream.
** After Selen Tatsuki had a song cover she'd been working on for months meant for release on Christmas Day 2023 taken down by Nijisanji management (allegedly for not getting the proper permissions for posting it), she went missing for over a month with no contact, to the point both online and IRL acquaintances became alarmed enough to get the hashtag "Where's Selen" trending on Twitter. Her contract was later terminated, not long after it came out she'd been hospitalised. In response to fan outcry, ANYCOLOR (the company behind Nijisanji) posted a press release that assured investors that the effects of Selen's termination would be "negligible". A cascading series of PR blunders led to the story not just spreading to people outside the [=VTuber=] community (for example, a number of legal and PR experts chimed in on just how incompetent Nijisanji's response to the whole affair was) but also Nijisanji's Japanese fanbase (which was normally completely isolated from the English-speaking fanbase). [[note]] So severe was the backlash that the term [[Anime/MobileSuitGundamCharsCounterattack Selen Shock]] came about, and fans from other countries (especially Indonesia, where fans were still bitter towards Nijisanji for shuttering the well-loved Nijisanji Indonesia branch and caused many of the livers to graduate in disillusionment) renewed their anger towards the agency. As a result, Nijisanji developed a reputation as a UsefulNotes/BlackCompany and even commenters on places like Yahoo Finance Japan observed that this black eye would cripple any further attempt at overseas expansion. [[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
Legally speaking, it can be a tricky subject. On one hand, many attorneys will warn someone of the possibility of litigation kicking a hornet's nest and creating a PR nightmare, and you can't exactly prevent people from commenting on what appears to be clear bad faith litigation. On the other hand, if you're on the receiving end of litigation, most smart attorneys will advise you to keep your mouth shut for a variety of reasons: the media and the court of public opinion are unpredictable and you cannot predict how they will treat your position, anything you say has the potential to be seen as an admission of wrongdoing, you open yourself up to potential defamation claims (or worse kinds of liability, if someone takes something you say as a "will no one rid me of this turbulent priest" and does something to harass or harm the other party), and most importantly, judges take a ''very'' dim view of undue attempts to influence the court of public opinion and it's never a good idea to piss off a judge or provide the appearance that you're trying to work around the judicial system.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 17,18 (click to see context) from:
Something horribly embarrassing or personal about you has been released -- anything from a [[HomePornMovie sex tape]], to an unflattering photograph, to the nickname you had when you were younger -- and you want to keep it out of the public eye. So you [[BuryYourArt do whatever it takes to make it go away]]: lawsuits, cease-and-desist orders, UsefulNotes/{{DMCA}} takedowns, whatever you have at hand. But it backfires: the efforts to censor the information become public, and people who would otherwise be uninterested are now dying to know what all the commotion is about. Whatever you were trying to remove from the Internet gets mirrored and copied to hundreds of other sites; the sex tape goes viral; the childhood nickname becomes national talk show fodder; the unflattering picture ends up in the newspaper. In other words, [[SelfFulfillingProphecy your fear that everyone would see the dirt on you is the very thing that caused everyone to look at it]], and the harder you try to fight it, the more popular it becomes -- and you learned the hard way that you probably should've [[JustIgnoreIt ignored it and acted like it was no big deal]].
to:
Something horribly embarrassing or personal about you has been released -- anything from a [[HomePornMovie sex tape]], to an unflattering photograph, to the nickname you had when you were younger -- and you want to keep it out of the public eye. So you [[BuryYourArt do whatever it takes to make it go away]]: lawsuits, cease-and-desist orders, UsefulNotes/{{DMCA}} MediaNotes/{{DMCA}} takedowns, whatever you have at hand. But it backfires: the efforts to censor the information become public, and people who would otherwise be uninterested are now dying to know what all the commotion is about. Whatever you were trying to remove from the Internet gets mirrored and copied to hundreds of other sites; the sex tape goes viral; the childhood nickname becomes national talk show fodder; the unflattering picture ends up in the newspaper. In other words, [[SelfFulfillingProphecy your fear that everyone would see the dirt on you is the very thing that caused everyone to look at it]], and the harder you try to fight it, the more popular it becomes -- and you learned the hard way that you probably should've [[JustIgnoreIt ignored it and acted like it was no big deal]].
Changed line(s) 200 (click to see context) from:
* When Creator/KirkCameron released ''Film/SavingChristmas'', negative critic reviews and several middling audience reviews on Website/RottenTomatoes enraged him and caused him to go on an Internet mission telling the entire world to "storm the gates of Rotten Tomatoes". While die-hard fans were the only ones watching at the time, this tirade got the general public's attention and caused the opposite to happen; it led to ''Saving Christmas'' getting a zero from critics on the site and also got the [[UsefulNotes/GoldenRaspberryAward Razzie Awards']] attention. It ended with an even lower audience score and Cameron "winning" several Razzies, including "Worst Screen Combo [[SmallNameBigEgo with his ego]]" and "Worst Picture", as a result of him tripping into this. For what it's worth, the very low-budget film did make a profit, but Cameron has [[CreatorKiller barely been heard from since.]]
to:
* When Creator/KirkCameron released ''Film/SavingChristmas'', negative critic reviews and several middling audience reviews on Website/RottenTomatoes enraged him and caused him to go on an Internet mission telling the entire world to "storm the gates of Rotten Tomatoes". While die-hard fans were the only ones watching at the time, this tirade got the general public's attention and caused the opposite to happen; it led to ''Saving Christmas'' getting a zero from critics on the site and also got the [[UsefulNotes/GoldenRaspberryAward [[MediaNotes/GoldenRaspberryAward Razzie Awards']] attention. It ended with an even lower audience score and Cameron "winning" several Razzies, including "Worst Screen Combo [[SmallNameBigEgo with his ego]]" and "Worst Picture", as a result of him tripping into this. For what it's worth, the very low-budget film did make a profit, but Cameron has [[CreatorKiller barely been heard from since.]]
Changed line(s) 415,416 (click to see context) from:
* Eurogamer writer Robert Florence posted an article about how video game journalists seem to be indistinguishable from public relations, which included some tweets from Lauren Wainwright regarding her suspicious enthusiasm towards ''VideoGame/TombRaider2013'' and her defending a journalist's right to win a free UsefulNotes/PlayStation3 by advertising on Twitter. Instead of writing a rebuttal or simply ignoring the article, Wainwright threatened legal action for libel against Eurogamer, causing Eurogamer to remove the tweets from Florence's article, and Florence to resign soon afterwards. The story spread like wildfire, and it also dug out more suspicious information, such as Wainwright's freelance employment with Creator/SquareEnix, the publisher of ''Tomb Raider''. Wainwright tried to do damage control by insisting that no legal threats were made and even removed Square Enix from her resume, but screencaps of her unaltered resume and Florence's original article are mirrored everywhere.
* At E3 2013, Geoff Keighley interviewed Don Mattrick (the then-President of Interactive Entertainment Business at Microsoft) about the UsefulNotes/XboxOne. When asked about the console's then-mandatory Internet connection, Mattrick said that if fans didn't like it, they should buy an UsefulNotes/Xbox360 instead. Microsoft immediately attempted to take down every video related to the interview, but news of it had already spread.
* At E3 2013, Geoff Keighley interviewed Don Mattrick (the then-President of Interactive Entertainment Business at Microsoft) about the UsefulNotes/XboxOne. When asked about the console's then-mandatory Internet connection, Mattrick said that if fans didn't like it, they should buy an UsefulNotes/Xbox360 instead. Microsoft immediately attempted to take down every video related to the interview, but news of it had already spread.
to:
* Eurogamer writer Robert Florence posted an article about how video game journalists seem to be indistinguishable from public relations, which included some tweets from Lauren Wainwright regarding her suspicious enthusiasm towards ''VideoGame/TombRaider2013'' and her defending a journalist's right to win a free UsefulNotes/PlayStation3 Platform/PlayStation3 by advertising on Twitter. Instead of writing a rebuttal or simply ignoring the article, Wainwright threatened legal action for libel against Eurogamer, causing Eurogamer to remove the tweets from Florence's article, and Florence to resign soon afterwards. The story spread like wildfire, and it also dug out more suspicious information, such as Wainwright's freelance employment with Creator/SquareEnix, the publisher of ''Tomb Raider''. Wainwright tried to do damage control by insisting that no legal threats were made and even removed Square Enix from her resume, but screencaps of her unaltered resume and Florence's original article are mirrored everywhere.
* At E3 2013, Geoff Keighley interviewed Don Mattrick (the then-President of Interactive Entertainment Business at Microsoft) about theUsefulNotes/XboxOne. Platform/XboxOne. When asked about the console's then-mandatory Internet connection, Mattrick said that if fans didn't like it, they should buy an UsefulNotes/Xbox360 PLatform/Xbox360 instead. Microsoft immediately attempted to take down every video related to the interview, but news of it had already spread.
* At E3 2013, Geoff Keighley interviewed Don Mattrick (the then-President of Interactive Entertainment Business at Microsoft) about the
Changed line(s) 423 (click to see context) from:
* Just after the release of ''VideoGame/BeyondTwoSouls'', a user who owned a debug UsefulNotes/PlayStation3[[note]]which was typically only given to journalists and developers[[/note]] discovered a sequence involving the main character Jodie, played by Creator/ElliotPage, taking a shower with a fully nude and anatomically correct in-game model that appears in full view several times. [[https://www.cinemablend.com/games/Beyond-Two-Souls-Leak-Features-Ellen-Page-Character-Nude-NSFW-59824.html The user uploaded pictures and videos of this to the Internet]], which initially only got a modest number of views. It wasn't until Sony [[https://www.gamespot.com/articles/sony-seeking-removal-of-nude-beyond-two-souls-images-report/1100-6415737/ attempted to have the pictures scrubbed]] that interest in the material skyrocketed, and it was quickly mirrored on many websites. For a long time, "beyond two souls shower" was the second suggestion that would pop up if someone did a Google search on the title. It doesn't help that Page himself [[https://www.businessinsider.com/ellen-page-explored-legal-action-against-sony-over-nude-video-game-images-2015-4 threatened legal action against Sony]] for producing the material of him for the game, and stated in leaked emails from the 2015 Sony hack that he had never participated in a full-body scan for the game.
to:
* Just after the release of ''VideoGame/BeyondTwoSouls'', a user who owned a debug UsefulNotes/PlayStation3[[note]]which Platform/PlayStation3[[note]]which was typically only given to journalists and developers[[/note]] discovered a sequence involving the main character Jodie, played by Creator/ElliotPage, taking a shower with a fully nude and anatomically correct in-game model that appears in full view several times. [[https://www.cinemablend.com/games/Beyond-Two-Souls-Leak-Features-Ellen-Page-Character-Nude-NSFW-59824.html The user uploaded pictures and videos of this to the Internet]], which initially only got a modest number of views. It wasn't until Sony [[https://www.gamespot.com/articles/sony-seeking-removal-of-nude-beyond-two-souls-images-report/1100-6415737/ attempted to have the pictures scrubbed]] that interest in the material skyrocketed, and it was quickly mirrored on many websites. For a long time, "beyond two souls shower" was the second suggestion that would pop up if someone did a Google search on the title. It doesn't help that Page himself [[https://www.businessinsider.com/ellen-page-explored-legal-action-against-sony-over-nude-video-game-images-2015-4 threatened legal action against Sony]] for producing the material of him for the game, and stated in leaked emails from the 2015 Sony hack that he had never participated in a full-body scan for the game.
Changed line(s) 438 (click to see context) from:
* As aforementioned, when ''VideoGame/Persona5'' was released in North America, Atlus disabled the screen capture and sharing feature on the UsefulNotes/PlayStation4. They also released a set of strict guidelines that warned [=YouTubers=] not to show any content past the in-game date of July 7th. Failure to heed the guidelines would have Atlus claim the offending videos via content ID or issue copyright takedowns to suspend or even terminate the offending channel. According to Atlus, all of this was done in the name of avoiding spoilers. Predictably, many fans began posting spoilers out of spite, including using bots on Twitter to post spoilers en masse, and the majority of them [[LoopholeAbuse used actual cameras and capture devices to create their own screenshots]], which defeated Atlus' purpose. What makes the event even stranger is that the Japanese version of the game had been released several months prior, which gave fans plenty of time to see anything they wanted to about the game. Finally, Atlus stating not to post anything beyond certain in-game dates [[{{Irony}} spoiled the fact]] that something big would happen on those dates. Eventually, the massive backlash to their move caused them to relent, pushing back the streaming ban up until November 19 in-game. Additionally, Atlus [[https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2017/09/atlus-wants-to-cut-off-a-ps3-emulator-because-it-runs-persona-5/ attempted to DMCA]] the Patreon page of a [=PS3=] emulator that claimed to be able to run the game prior to its official Western release. This only succeeded in giving the emulator more public attention, and the dispute was settled simply by the emulator's Patreon page removing any references of the game.
to:
* As aforementioned, when ''VideoGame/Persona5'' was released in North America, Atlus disabled the screen capture and sharing feature on the UsefulNotes/PlayStation4.Platform/PlayStation4. They also released a set of strict guidelines that warned [=YouTubers=] not to show any content past the in-game date of July 7th. Failure to heed the guidelines would have Atlus claim the offending videos via content ID or issue copyright takedowns to suspend or even terminate the offending channel. According to Atlus, all of this was done in the name of avoiding spoilers. Predictably, many fans began posting spoilers out of spite, including using bots on Twitter to post spoilers en masse, and the majority of them [[LoopholeAbuse used actual cameras and capture devices to create their own screenshots]], which defeated Atlus' purpose. What makes the event even stranger is that the Japanese version of the game had been released several months prior, which gave fans plenty of time to see anything they wanted to about the game. Finally, Atlus stating not to post anything beyond certain in-game dates [[{{Irony}} spoiled the fact]] that something big would happen on those dates. Eventually, the massive backlash to their move caused them to relent, pushing back the streaming ban up until November 19 in-game. Additionally, Atlus [[https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2017/09/atlus-wants-to-cut-off-a-ps3-emulator-because-it-runs-persona-5/ attempted to DMCA]] the Patreon page of a [=PS3=] emulator that claimed to be able to run the game prior to its official Western release. This only succeeded in giving the emulator more public attention, and the dispute was settled simply by the emulator's Patreon page removing any references of the game.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 447 (click to see context) from:
* ''Custer's Revenge'' for the UsefulNotes/Atari2600 has a very AudienceAlienatingPremise where the player accumulates points by raping a Native American woman tied to a cactus while dodging arrow fire[[note]]The real George Armstrong Custer is a controversial figure himself for his actions during the American Indian Wars, but there is no concrete evidence that he was a rapist[[/note]], and was fiercely protested against, but still managed to sell approximately 80,000 copies on release when the protests motivated people to find out just how bad it is. The general consensus is that the game ''is'' that bad, and to this day people are only interested in it for the BileFascination.
to:
* ''Custer's Revenge'' for the UsefulNotes/Atari2600 Platform/Atari2600 has a very AudienceAlienatingPremise where the player accumulates points by raping a Native American woman tied to a cactus while dodging arrow fire[[note]]The real George Armstrong Custer is a controversial figure himself for his actions during the American Indian Wars, but there is no concrete evidence that he was a rapist[[/note]], and was fiercely protested against, but still managed to sell approximately 80,000 copies on release when the protests motivated people to find out just how bad it is. The general consensus is that the game ''is'' that bad, and to this day people are only interested in it for the BileFascination.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling/grammar fix(es)
Changed line(s) 445 (click to see context) from:
* Creator/{{SNK}} should have seen the aforementioned incident with Mai coming, as they themselves witnessed the effect in their efforts to [[BuryYourArt erase all traces of the existence of]] ''VideoGame/TheKingOfFighters'' character K9999. Initially scorned by fans and [[CreatorsPest SNK themselves]] for the crime of being [[CaptainErsatz almost identical]] to [[Manga/{{AKIRA}} Tetsuo Shima]], the company's scorched earth attitude towards the character (even going so far as to forbid allusions to his existence from 2016 onwards) only led more people unfamiliar with the whole fiasco to search up K9999 and for him to develop a fanbase for both being almost identical to Tetsuo Shima and his LoveToHate characterization. Rather tellingly, the ''VideoGame/TheKingOfFightersXV'' character reveal trailer for Krohnen, K9999's alter ego, had the comment section full of viewers welcoming the character back with open arms.
to:
* Creator/{{SNK}} should have seen the aforementioned incident with Mai coming, as they themselves witnessed the effect in their efforts to [[BuryYourArt erase all traces of the existence of]] ''VideoGame/TheKingOfFighters'' character K9999. Initially scorned by fans and [[CreatorsPest SNK themselves]] for the crime of being [[CaptainErsatz almost identical]] to [[Manga/{{AKIRA}} Tetsuo Shima]], the company's scorched earth attitude towards the character (even going so far as to forbid allusions to his existence from 2016 onwards) only led more people unfamiliar with the whole fiasco to search up K9999 and for him to develop a fanbase for both being almost identical to Tetsuo Shima and his LoveToHate characterization. Rather tellingly, the ''VideoGame/TheKingOfFightersXV'' ''VideoGame/TheKingOfFightersXV'''s character reveal trailer for Krohnen, K9999's alter ego, had the comment section full of viewers welcoming the character back with open arms.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 228 (click to see context) from:
* The Turkish Government's refusal to acknowledge UsefulNotes/TheArmenianGenocide has helped bring attention to an atrocity that might have otherwise been forgotten (at least outside the regions it occurred). Indeed, many people in the new world wouldn't even have heard of Armenia if it wasn't because it was related to an atrocity that somehow keeps Turkey out of the EU.
to:
* The Turkish Government's refusal to acknowledge UsefulNotes/TheArmenianGenocide has helped bring attention to an atrocity that might have otherwise been forgotten (at least outside the regions in which it occurred). Indeed, many people in the new world wouldn't even have heard of Armenia the genocide if it wasn't because it was related to an atrocity that somehow keeps Turkey out of the EU.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Lewis was annoyed at the voices, but didn't try to erase or hide the Lightbringer, which he left for people to do whatever with years ago. His fans and plenty of his detractors also knew about the character long before Oney
Deleted line(s) 479 (click to see context) :
** This happened to poor Creator/LewisLovhaug when he had a... [[CantTakeCriticism less than enthusiastic]] reaction to ''WebVideo/OneyPlays'' mocking him for his ''[[OldShame The Lightbringer]]'' comics. Basically the whole reason anyone even knows what "The Lightbringer" is, let alone cares, is because they looked into why his feelings were so hurt and why he didn't want to talk about Oney after the audio from their ''VideoGame/DonkeyKongCountry2DiddysKongQuest'' introduced him as [[IncomingHam THE LIGHTBRINGER]]. Now there are numerous videos on Youtube explaining why, and several outright fan animations of the incident. [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-hJA03fAXo Lets watch!]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 472 (click to see context) from:
* Sweet Baby Inc., a narrative consulting firm for video game developers, ran afoul of this in early 2024 when a curator group on Platform/{{Steam}} was created called "Sweet Baby Inc. Detected", which provided a list of every game they were involved with available on Steam so gamers could avoid them (with every game listed given a "Not Recommended" rating), due to the belief that their goal of promoting inclusivity and representation is being done at the expense of a game’s overall quality. Chris Kindred, a Sweet Baby Inc. employee, tried to rally their followers on Twitter to not only report the group and get it removed, but to also report the user who created it to get them banned as well. Because Kindred's attempt to get rid of this group was interpreted as censorship and a corporate harassment campaign against criticism, news of the Sweet Baby Inc. Detected curator spread like wildfire with countless videos being made about it, as well as comics, memes, a Website/KnowYourMeme entry, the works.
to:
* Sweet Baby Inc., a narrative consulting firm for video game developers, ran afoul of this in early 2024 when a curator group on Platform/{{Steam}} was created called "Sweet Baby Inc. Detected", which provided a list of every game they were involved with available on Steam so gamers could avoid them (with every game listed given a "Not Recommended" rating), due to the belief that their goal of promoting inclusivity and representation is being done at the expense of a game’s overall quality. Chris Kindred, a Sweet Baby Inc. employee, tried to rally their followers on Twitter to not only report the group and get it removed, but to also report the user who created it to get them banned as well. Because Kindred's attempt to get rid of this group was interpreted as censorship and a corporate harassment campaign against criticism, news of the Sweet Baby Inc. Detected curator spread like wildfire with countless videos being made about it, as well as comics, memes, a Website/KnowYourMeme entry, the works. The curator group went from [[https://archive.is/YAL0m only a few hundred followers on February 26th]], to [[https://archive.ph/8E5So over 250k followers in just a couple weeks.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removed redundant entry.
Deleted line(s) 454 (click to see context) :
* On February 29, 2024, a few ''Sweet Baby Inc'' employees became aware of a Platform/Steam curator boycott group called ''Sweet Baby Inc Detected'' that tracks games that the company was involved with, due to the belief that their mission of promoting inclusivity and representation is being done at the expense of a game’s quality. One employee on Twitter/X, the narrative lead, proceeded to call it a harassment group that violates the platform's TOS and [[https://archive.is/TRNrr outright told their followers to mass report the group and the creator's account to get them banned]]. Needless to say, this backfired ''hard'' after people quickly caught wind of it, with the curator group growing from [[https://archive.is/YAL0m only a few hundred followers on February 26th]], to [[https://archive.vn/MfbTE over 200k followers in just a few days.]]
Changed line(s) 473 (click to see context) from:
* Sweet Baby Inc, a narrative consulting firm for video game developers, ran afoul of this in early 2024 when a group on Platform/{{Steam}} was created called "Sweet Baby Inc. Detected" to provide a list of every game they had worked on so gamers could avoid them. Chris Kindred, a Sweet Baby Inc. employee, tried to rally his followers on Twitter to not only report the group and get it removed, but to also report the user who created it to get him banned as well. Because Kindred's attempt to get rid of this group was interpreted as censorship and a corporate harassment campaign against criticism, news of Sweet Baby Inc. Detected spread like wildfire with countless videos being made about it, comics, memes, a Website/KnowYourMeme entry, the works.
to:
* Sweet Baby Inc, Inc., a narrative consulting firm for video game developers, ran afoul of this in early 2024 when a curator group on Platform/{{Steam}} was created called "Sweet Baby Inc. Detected" to provide Detected", which provided a list of every game they had worked were involved with available on Steam so gamers could avoid them.them (with every game listed given a "Not Recommended" rating), due to the belief that their goal of promoting inclusivity and representation is being done at the expense of a game’s overall quality. Chris Kindred, a Sweet Baby Inc. employee, tried to rally his their followers on Twitter to not only report the group and get it removed, but to also report the user who created it to get him them banned as well. Because Kindred's attempt to get rid of this group was interpreted as censorship and a corporate harassment campaign against criticism, news of the Sweet Baby Inc. Detected curator spread like wildfire with countless videos being made about it, as well as comics, memes, a Website/KnowYourMeme entry, the works.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 275 (click to see context) from:
* Creator/{{ABC}} faced heavy pressure from right-wing organizations and advertisers over airing "The Puppy Episode" of ''Series/{{Ellen}}'', which Creator/EllenDeGeneres used to publicly come out, and said organizations ordered boycotts of the episode. This only helped the episode become the show's highest-rated and most-awarded, and it helped pave the way for greater gay representation in popular media.
to:
* Creator/{{ABC}} faced heavy pressure from right-wing organizations and advertisers over airing "The Puppy Episode" of ''Series/{{Ellen}}'', which Creator/EllenDeGeneres used to publicly come out, and said organizations ordered boycotts of the episode. This only helped the episode become the show's highest-rated and most-awarded, and it helped pave the way for greater gay representation in popular media. Though this ended up backfiring as the show went on, with even Chaz Bono criticizing the show for now going too heavily into {{Anvilicious}} material
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Cutting down hyperbole and complaining
Changed line(s) 473 (click to see context) from:
* Sweet Baby Inc, a narrative consulting firm for video game developers, ran afoul of this ''hard'' in early 2024 when a group on Platform/{{Steam}} was created called "Sweet Baby Inc. Detected" to provide a list of every game they had worked on so gamers could avoid them. Chris Kindred, a Sweet Baby Inc. employee, tried to rally his followers on Twitter to not only report the group and get it removed, but to also report the user who created it to get him banned as well. Because Kindred's attempt to get rid of this group was interpreted as censorship and a corporate harassment campaign against criticism, news of Sweet Baby Inc. Detected spread like wildfire with countless videos being made about it, comics, memes, a Website/KnowYourMeme entry, the works. It also brought some rather dirty laundry to the public's attention when another Sweet Baby Inc. employee's racist tweets were brought to light because of the whole ordeal, which never would have been associated with the company had Kindred simply kept his mouth shut about the whole thing.
to:
* Sweet Baby Inc, a narrative consulting firm for video game developers, ran afoul of this ''hard'' in early 2024 when a group on Platform/{{Steam}} was created called "Sweet Baby Inc. Detected" to provide a list of every game they had worked on so gamers could avoid them. Chris Kindred, a Sweet Baby Inc. employee, tried to rally his followers on Twitter to not only report the group and get it removed, but to also report the user who created it to get him banned as well. Because Kindred's attempt to get rid of this group was interpreted as censorship and a corporate harassment campaign against criticism, news of Sweet Baby Inc. Detected spread like wildfire with countless videos being made about it, comics, memes, a Website/KnowYourMeme entry, the works. It also brought some rather dirty laundry to the public's attention when another Sweet Baby Inc. employee's racist tweets were brought to light because of the whole ordeal, which never would have been associated with the company had Kindred simply kept his mouth shut about the whole thing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* Sweet Baby Inc, a narrative consulting firm for video game developers, ran afoul of this ''hard'' in early 2024 when a group on Platform/{{Steam}} was created called "Sweet Baby Inc. Detected" to provide a list of every game they had worked on so gamers could avoid them. Chris Kindred, a Sweet Baby Inc. employee, tried to rally his followers on Twitter to not only report the group and get it removed, but to also report the user who created it to get him banned as well. Because Kindred's attempt to get rid of this group was interpreted as censorship and a corporate harassment campaign against criticism, news of Sweet Baby Inc. Detected spread like wildfire with countless videos being made about it, comics, memes, a Website/KnowYourMeme entry, the works. It also brought some rather dirty laundry to the public's attention when another Sweet Baby Inc. employee's racist tweets were brought to light because of the whole ordeal, which never would have been associated with the company had Kindred simply kept his mouth shut about the whole thing.
