History DethroningMoment / ScrewAttack

* Bengson26: Website/ScrewAttack's Top 5 Free-To-Play Games has this moment. Here, Nick says that in ''VideoGame/TeamFortress2'' (I'm really talking about [=TF2=] a lot here, huh?), weapons with real advantages are locked behind a paywall. This just reeks with CriticalResearchFailure. First off, while admittedly there is a massive market for weapons in [=TF2=], you could get weapons at random via a drop system. Second, none of the weapons have real advantages since they're sidegrades. Screwattack, there's a rule whenever you make Top 10 lists. It's called do your fucking research!

* Tropers/RebelFalcon: I'm normally okay with a lot of Screwattacks' ''Top 10'' series, however, as of late, a lot of them either stray off task for the sake of a joke, or are so filled with bias it may as well be a BiasSteamroller. The one that got me to stop liking these ''Top 10's'' was their ''Top 10 Worst Gen II Pokemon''. Much like the above example with ''Blazblue'', this list is done by Nervous Nick, and boy does he let his bias show, and allows a joke to derail the list. Well, it has to do with his choices for [[RuleOfThree numbers 9, 6, and 1.]] What is it? ''They're all the same Pokemon. Dunsparce.'' Had he put it once, I'd be fine with it, he just doesn't like Dunsparce, and he has a right not too. Putting it a second time got me to raise an eyebrow. He phrases it as if ''all'' of Screwattack dislikes it when it's clearly just him, and says no one would put it on their team unless it was for a joke, insulting those who ''use'' Dunsparce. He then tries to justify it by saying Dunsparce is ''so'' dumb, that it deserves ''two spots'' and [[BlatantLies no one will have a problem with it.]] Then it gets worse with #1. He is fully aware putting Dunsparce a third time wouldn't fly, so what's his LoopholeAbuse? Put ''Shiny'' Dunsparce at #1. He tries to invoke SincerityMode by saying no one would want their OneInAMillionChance Shiny Pokemon to be a Dunsparce, but he is once again making it seem like ''his'' feelings on Dunsparce are universal. Plus, I know plenty of people who'd be happy just to have a Shiny overall. The video isn't even a full ''Top 10'' due to how half-assed it is. So combine this with his feelings on ''Blazblue'' above, and I began to realize that while Top 10's are normally based on opinions, Nick takes his too far and treats his opinions like they're universal, and will gladly derail a list for the sake of a joke, even a bad one.

** keybladeoverlord: In addition to the above statement about this list, I was displeased with how Nervous Nick put not one, but TWO of the Sonic the Hedgehog cartoons on the list. First off, while the two shows in question, Sonic Underground at #8 and The Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog at #3, may not be as great as Sonic SATAM, they still have their fanbases, but it was nothing but nitpicking to an absurd degree, especially when he mentioned the shows' giving Sonic a Trademark Favorite Food which eventually became canon to the games. While I admit both shows had flaws to them, they were still some fun little experiences to watch. I wouldn't be so mad about it if he had stuck to the rule that so many other countdown makers have taken to heart these days, which is the One Entry Per Franchise rule. I also really didn't like his bashing of the Donkey Kong Country cartoon, where any legitimate complaints about the show were drowned out by pointless bitching about things like the show having songs, many of which are liked by a LOT of people and gives the show some of its charm.
* Tropers/RebelFalcon: I'm normally okay with a lot of Screwattacks ''Top 10'' series, however as of late a lot of them either stray off task for the sake of a joke, or are so filled with Bias it may as well be a BiasSteamroller. The one that got me to stop liking these ''Top 10's'' was their ''Top 10 Worst Gen II Pokemon''. Much like the above example with Blazblue, this list is done by Nervous Nick, and boy does he let his bias show, and allows a joke to derail the list. Well it has to do with his choices for [[RuleOfThree numbers 9, 6, and 1.]] What is it? ''They're all the same Pokemon. Dunsparce.'' Had he put it once, I'd be fine with it, he just doesn't like Dunsparce, and he has a right not too. Putting it a second time got me to raise an eyebrow. He phrases it as if ''all'' of Screwattack dislikes it when its clearly just him, and says no one would put it on their team unless it was for a joke, insulting those who ''use'' Dunsparce. He then tries to justify it by saying Dunsparce is ''so'' dumb, that it deserves ''two spots'' and [[BlatantLies no one will have a problem with it.]] Then it gets worse with #1. He is fully aware putting Dunsparce a third time wouldn't fly, so what's his LoopholeAbuse? Put ''Shiny'' Dunsparce at #1. He tries to invoke SincerityMode by saying no one would want their OneInAMillionChance Shiny Pokemon to be a Dunsparce, but he is once again making it seem like ''his'' feelings on Dunsparce are universal. Plus, I know plenty of people who'd be happy just to have a Shiny overall. The video isn't even a full ''Top 10'' due to how half-assed it is. So combine this with his feelings on Blazblue above, and I began to realize that while Top 10's are normally based on opinions, Nick takes his too far and treats his opinions like they're universal, and will gladly derail a list for the sake of a joke.

* Tropers/RebelFalcon I'm normally okay with a lot of Screwattacks ''Top 10'' series, however as of late a lot of them either stray off task for the sake of a joke, or are so filled with Bias it may as well be a BiasSteamroller. The one that got me to stop liking these ''Top 10's'' was their ''Top 10 Worst Gen II Pokemon''. Much like the above example with Blazblue, this list is done by Nervous Nick, and boy does he let his bias show, and allows a joke to derail the list. Well it has to do with his choices for [[RuleOfThree numbers 9, 6, and 1.]] What is it? ''They're all the same Pokemon. Dunsparce.'' Had he put it once, I'd be fine with it, he just doesn't like Dunsparce, and he has a right not too. Putting it a second time got me to raise an eyebrow. He phrases it as if ''all'' of Screwattack dislikes it when its clearly just him, and says no one would put it on their team unless it was for a joke, insulting those who ''use'' Dunsparce. He then tries to justify it by saying Dunsparce is ''so'' dumb, that it deserves ''two spots'' and [[BlatantLies no one will have a problem with it.]] Then it gets worse with #1. He is fully aware putting Dunsparce a third time wouldn't fly, so what's his LoopholeAbuse? Put ''Shiny'' Dunsparce at #1. He tries to invoke SincerityMode by saying no one would want their OneInAMillionChance Shiny Pokemon to be a Dunsparce, but he is once again making it seem like ''his'' feelings on Dunsparce are universal. Plus, I know plenty of people who'd be happy just to have a Shiny overall. The video isn't even a full ''Top 10'' due to how half-assed it is. So combine this with his feelings on Blazblue above, and I began to realize that while Top 10's are normally based on opinions, Nick takes his too far and treats his opinions like they're universal, and will gladly derail a list for the sake of a joke.

* TroperWall/Sugarp1e1: I didn't appreciate the seventh entry of Website/ScrewAttack's [[https://youtu.be/fZuki3QTb2s Top 10 Worst Cartoons Based on Video Games list]]; [[spoiler:Anime/BlazBlueAlterMemory.]] It's not the fact that Nervous Nick doesn't like [[spoiler:Franchise/BlazBlue]] that's the problem (I've never even played the game or watched the anime). As with my PhantomStrider entry above, my problem with this list is his reason for putting it on the list as well as his elitist attitude about the whole thing. He starts the entry off by making it clear that he doesn't like the game's world or story, having a very PlayTheGameSkipTheStory attitude about it. Okay, fine. But judging by the clips of the anime he used, [[spoiler:Alter Memory]] is actually a pretty faithful adaptation. So why is it bad according to Nick? [[BiasSteamroller Because it's a faithful adaptation of a game he never liked to begin with.]] His bias behind this is clear, what with him spending the entire entry summarizing the story in way that makes it sound even more confusing than it really is (instead of just explaining why he finds it confusing) and ending the entry with him absolutely losing his [[PrecisionFStrike shit]] over how much he hates [[spoiler:[=BlazBlue=]]]'s story (especially the whole [[spoiler:StableTimeLoop]] plot point), claiming "I see [[spoiler:[=BlazBlue=]]] for what it really is! It's a mess! I hate it! That's why it's #7." Um, Nick? [[OpinionMyopia Are you implying that the people who do like the story are idiotic sheep?]] To me, it sounds like he's genuinely proclaiming himself to be [[FanHater better than the fans]] because he can't get past the story. Don't get me wrong; I totally agree that the [[spoiler:StableTimeLoop]] is confusing, especially at the end when [[spoiler:the cycle is finally broken]], but I wouldn't yell at my audience that "The story sucks!" in a way that suggests my subjective opinion is objective fact. And considering how he goes from screaming his lungs out to calmly moving on to #6, it was PlayedForLaughs. You probably also noticed that this DMOS sounds more like I'm talking about the game and not the anime. Nick's tirade was the same way. On top of all that, [[MurderArsonAndJaywalking #7 was the only entry on the list that wasn't an adaptation of a game he liked.]] If he never liked [[spoiler:[=BlazBlue=]]] to begin with, then he's in no position to tell us that [[spoiler:Alter Memory]] is a bad adaptation just because it's faithful to the source material.