Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / ComplainingaboutShowsYouDontWatch

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
AllAboutTropes232 Since: Dec, 2019
Jun 17th 2020 at 12:21:17 AM •••

Isn't it supposed to be in-universe only? The MLP one is not in-universe.

Larkmarn Since: Nov, 2010
Oct 22nd 2014 at 6:12:28 AM •••

Would a critic or figure publicly complaining about a show they didn't watch qualify as an In-Universe example for Real Life?

Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them. Hide / Show Replies
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Oct 22nd 2014 at 6:17:03 AM •••

Yes.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
flamemario12 Since: Sep, 2010
Sep 18th 2014 at 5:40:37 AM •••

Should we rename Complaining About Shows You Don't Watch into something else as it now only allows in universe examples?

Edited by 210.186.211.7 Hide / Show Replies
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Sep 18th 2014 at 5:59:10 AM •••

No, why? Plus, it has 6000+ inbounds.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Sep 4th 2014 at 6:31:47 AM •••

Trope Repair Shop has decided to turn this into a criticism trope with In-Universe Examples Only.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
BurningBusch Since: Dec, 1969
Mar 9th 2010 at 5:34:55 PM •••

the Dance In The Vampire Bund entry is funny. Could the problem be that people tried to read it but were turned off half way though the first issue by the naked 12-year old(don't care what Her real age is). And that's this entire article's problem, Tropers are naming legit complaints about the show and then saying "It's not a big deal too Me, They must not have watched it"

Edited by BurningBusch Hide / Show Replies
takashi.0 Since: Jun, 2009
Jun 7th 2010 at 6:51:32 PM •••

What kind of BS is "No complaining about complaining?"

That's the whole point of the page. Plus, it might convince some Hate Dumb of the series listed that "Wow, this sort of thing really is sturpid. I should actually read/watch/play/whatever this thing before mouthing about it."

FastEddie MOD Since: Apr, 2004
Jun 7th 2010 at 9:35:48 PM •••

We are never about complaining. Except maybe in Darth Wiki. This just defines a trope. We're not soliciting — or interested in — anyone's complaints.

Edited by FastEddie Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
192.150.10.200 Since: Dec, 1969
Jun 8th 2010 at 11:39:30 AM •••

You're working under the preconception that any example of this trope is by definition a complaint. It's a reasonable assumption, given that the name and most of the usage of the term paint the trope itself in a negative light. However, tropes are not bad still applies.

I'll take as an example the first entry from the Films section:

  • All notoriously bad modern movies. Every single one. Few people saw Gigli, Battlefield Earth, Catwoman or any of Uwe Boll's movies (and most professional movie reviewers had to), but everybody makes fun of them.

Now, it's certainly possible to interpret the above as a complaint. If one is of the belief that a movie's quality is entirely in the eye of the beholder, as it were, and that the opinions of reviewers and other customers are meaningless and/or inapplicable, then complaining about or making fun of Gigli, In the Name of the King, or Battlefield Earth (over quality, rather than scientology) would be unjustified. However, if one considers such a movie to be an Acceptable Target (or the film meta-equivalent), then pointing this out would no longer be a complaint.

In summary, if Tropes Are Not Bad, then mentioning tropes is not complaining. Also, any notable aversions, subversions, parodies or other in-universe examples could by no means be considered complaining, although I realize very few have been posted as yet. Perhaps an instruction to focus on non-complaint examples such as these would be preferable to simply forbidding examples on this page. In any event, having a discussion about the issue would seem to be preferable to individual action, and far preferable to an edit war.

Signed Since: Dec, 2009
Jun 26th 2010 at 11:56:25 PM •••

...come Gushing about shows you like isn't locked?

^^^^ what exaclty is a legit complaint?

"Every opinion that isn't mine is subjected to Your Mileage May Vary."
DragonQuestZ Since: Jan, 2001
Jun 27th 2010 at 12:56:34 PM •••

Well as stated in the description, if a well known Wall Banger actually happened, you don't have to watch the show to know it's a wall banger.

Michael Caine gave a good one when he mentioned Jaws The Revenge: "I have never seen the film, but by all accounts it was terrible."

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
192.150.10.200 Since: Dec, 1969
Jul 20th 2010 at 9:19:58 AM •••

It would seem that in-universe examples (the entire premise of the South Park movie, for instance) would be the most defensible type of entry for this page.

maedar Since: Sep, 2012
Nov 24th 2013 at 5:10:06 AM •••

Uhm, would it be acceptable to put the Trope I Do Not Like Green Eggs and Ham with the "related" Tropes? (I think it makes sense.)

KevinW Since: Jan, 2010
Jul 30th 2012 at 4:09:19 PM •••

Can someone please edit the link to Dallas so it'll link to the series page?

Bluesunnyday Big Scientist Since: Apr, 2011
Big Scientist
Oct 6th 2011 at 12:45:14 PM •••

Who cut the examples? Were they always gone or did a vandal do this recently?

Blue Pacific, signing off... Hide / Show Replies
DragonQuestZ Since: Jan, 2001
Oct 6th 2011 at 12:55:14 PM •••

It was decided a while ago that they were natter bait, and people accusing ANY sort of criticism for being this.

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
Stoogebie Since: Apr, 2011
Feb 23rd 2012 at 10:54:09 AM •••

It's true. I do think it's best if we play it safe for this one.

MugenKagemaru The Social Outcast Since: Oct, 2010
The Social Outcast
Aug 10th 2011 at 10:13:11 PM •••

Super Paper Mario has its own page. Please change the link associated with the page image to match this.

Edited by MugenKagemaru
DragonQuestZ Since: Jan, 2001
Sep 26th 2010 at 2:42:49 PM •••

No, as it's still complaining from ignorance. You'd have to be sure the complaining point is still true, even if it's asking about it or getting a bootleg or import.

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
Top