[001]
TompaDompa
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Well, \'\'something\'\' should be done. \'\'Franchise/{{Batman}}\'\', for instance, has north of 16000 wicks. That\'s more than four times the highest threshold, when each threshold is twice that of the previous one. Does that seem right to you?
to:
Well, \\\'\\\'something\\\'\\\' should be done. Both \\\'\\\'Franchise/{{Batman}}\\\'\\\' and \\\'\\\'Franchise/StarWars\\\'\\\' have north of 16000 wicks. That\\\'s more than four times the highest threshold, when each threshold is twice that of the previous one. Does that seem right to you?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Of course, at the bottom it says \
to:
Of course, at the bottom it says \\\"No more categories, thanks. Maintaining these three is enough work.\\\" This doesn\\\'t preclude changing the thresholds, though. Moreover, creating a category requiring even more wicks wouldn\\\'t increase maintenance very much at all.
As it is now, I think the page is far too crowded. Seeing how this index is (presumably) supposed to be at least slightly exclusive, I think that changing it to 2000-4000-8000 would be the ideal solution. It would eliminate a lot of the content (although whether or not that\\\'s a good thing is debatable) and create a new, exclusive category without necessitating too much moving of content from one category to another (it would require counting the wicks of the 4000+ category, but not the others).
As it is now, I think the page is far too crowded. Seeing how this index is (presumably) supposed to be at least slightly exclusive, I think that changing it to 2000-4000-8000 would be the ideal solution. It would eliminate a lot of the content (although whether or not that\\\'s a good thing is debatable) and create a new, exclusive category without necessitating too much moving of content from one category to another (it would require counting the wicks of the 4000+ category, but not the others).
