Follow TV Tropes

Ask The Tropers

Go To

Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help. It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread for ongoing cleanup projects.

Ask the Tropers:

Trope Related Question:

Make Private (For security bugs or stuff only for moderators)

jamespolk Since: Aug, 2012
19th May, 2018 09:22:30 AM

We do not need to move anything, no matter what cockamamie name Rowling and her people have come up with. And we definitely should not move either the Literature or Film articles for Harry Potter, since those will always be the titles for those works.

RallyBot2 Since: Nov, 2013
19th May, 2018 09:58:55 AM

To give an actual answer to why we're not using it: The common name of the franchise (the name it's primarily known by) is still Harry Potter.

crazysamaritan MOD Since: Apr, 2010
19th May, 2018 11:59:44 AM

How to Create a Work's Page explains this clearly; "we require usage of the official name of the work, not Fan Nicknames."

Yes, this means if J. K. Rowling wants to rebrand the series as “Nitwit! Blubber! Oddment! Tweak!” and stuff actually gets published under that name, then yes, it is the new official name, no matter what individual fans think. There's the crux; has anything been published under the brand "Wizarding World"?

Yes.

Link to TRS threads in project mode here.
BlazingTrolls Since: Nov, 2017
19th May, 2018 01:08:46 PM

Yeah I’m pretty sure we are supposed official brand rather than preferred brand. If Rowling wants to change it , then we have to change it.

Edited by BlazingTrolls
jamespolk Since: Aug, 2012
19th May, 2018 01:10:45 PM

There is no work called "Wizarding World".

crazysamaritan MOD Since: Apr, 2010
19th May, 2018 01:20:54 PM

It refers to the multimedia franchise as a whole, not a specific book or film.

Link to TRS threads in project mode here.
shadowblack Since: Jun, 2010
19th May, 2018 01:29:37 PM

Then there is no need to rename any of the exisitng pages, as the titles of the works have not changed. At most the Franchise page might need a rename (assuming that there is a Franchise page - I haven't checked).

jamespolk Since: Aug, 2012
19th May, 2018 01:42:33 PM

^^ The rules were quoted to state that a work must be called by the official name. Well, the Franchise namespace by definition is not a work.

WhirlRX Since: Jan, 2015
19th May, 2018 04:13:46 PM

We do have Franchise.Marvel Cinematic Universe. it seems The Wizarding World can be it's own franchise namespace while leaving Harry Potter one alone.

BlazingTrolls Since: Nov, 2017
19th May, 2018 09:06:59 PM

I’m not sure how that would work considering that’s a major part of it. It seems Harry Potter would still fall under it.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wizarding_World

Edited by BlazingTrolls
AegisP Since: Oct, 2014
20th May, 2018 12:36:47 AM

I love you James Polk.

Discord: Waido X 255#1372 If you cant contact me on TV Tropes do it here.
jamespolk Since: Aug, 2012
20th May, 2018 12:43:17 AM

^I'm doing the Lord's work.

^^The book and film pages really should not be in this discussion at all. They are all still called Harry Potter and the Noun Phrase, after all.

As for the Franchise page, Harry Potter...all a Franchise page is, is a listing of various works sharing a common set of characters, at least, if not continuity. It's a glorified index.

lalalei2001 Since: Oct, 2009
20th May, 2018 12:46:25 AM

Wasn't one of the rides or something called the Wizarding World of Harry Potter?

I read a reason for it is "It doesn't make sense to brand stuff like Fantastic Beasts as Harry Potter, as it happens decades before he's born, even before Voldemort's born."

Edited by lalalei2001 The Protomen enhanced my life.
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
20th May, 2018 01:25:20 AM

I think in this case we ought to move the Franchise page and leave everything else at its place.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
bwburke94 Since: May, 2014
20th May, 2018 11:33:43 AM

You know what, I'm going to throw out an objection.

The Other Wiki describes Wizarding World as "a British-American fantasy media franchise... based on the Harry Potter novels by British author J. K. Rowling." This definition excludes the original seven books.

Essentially, Wizarding World is the expanded universe of Harry Potter.

I had a dog-themed avatar before it was cool.
lakingsif Since: Dec, 2012
20th May, 2018 01:37:23 PM

Maybe, to be inclusive of the original books and the expanded media, it could be called Harry Potter and the Wizarding World?

OH MY GOD; MY PARENTS ARE GARDENIIIIINNNNGGGGG!!!!!
bwburke94 Since: May, 2014
20th May, 2018 10:31:35 PM

^ I suppose a forum discussion about the "official names" rule may be in order, because the rule wasn't made for such a situation as this.

I had a dog-themed avatar before it was cool.
Kayube Since: Jan, 2001
20th May, 2018 10:45:40 PM

I would agree with the idea of Wizarding World as the "expanded universe". So that might end up leading to two Franchise pages (just as Star Wars, Star Wars Legends, and the current Star Wars Expanded Universe are separate pages): Harry Potter for everything based directly on the seven books (plus Cursed Child) and Wizarding World for everything else. Though I could see some debate forming about what goes where, for instance with the Fantastic Beasts, Quidditch, and Beedle the Bard books.

Edited by Kayube
Arivne Since: Jan, 2001
21st May, 2018 04:36:05 AM

This discussion is already too long for ATT and will just get longer. I suggest that it be locked and the discussion be moved to another, more appropriate place.

Edited by Arivne
Top