Follow TV Tropes

Following

Subpages cleanup: Complete Monster

Go To

During the investigation of recent hollers in the Complete Monster thread, it's become apparent to the staff that an insular, unfriendly culture has evolved in the Complete Monster and Magnificent Bastard threads that is causing problems.

Specific issues include:

  • Overzealous hollers on tropers who come into the threads without being familiar with all the rules and traditions of the tropes. And when they are familiar with said rules and traditions, they get accused (with little evidence) of being ban evaders.
  • A few tropers in the thread habitually engage in snotty, impolite mini-modding. There are also regular complaints about excessive, offtopic "socializing" posts.
  • Many many thread regulars barely post/edit anywhere else, making the threads look like they are divorced from the rest of TV Tropes.
  • Following that, there are often complaints about the threads and their regulars violating wiki rules, such as on indexing, crosswicking, example context and example categorization. Some folks are working on resolving the issues, but...
  • Often moderator action against thread regulars leads to a lot of participants suddenly showing up in the moderation threads to protest and speak on their behalf, like a clique.

It is not a super high level problem, but it has been going on for years and we cannot ignore it any longer. There will be a thread in Wiki Talk to discuss the problem; in the meantime there is a moratorium on further Complete Monster and Magnificent Bastard example discussion until we have gotten this sorted out.

Update: The new threads have been made and can be found here:

     Previous Post 
Complete Monster Cleanup Thread

Please see the Frequently Asked Questions and Common Requests List before suggesting any new entries for this trope.

IMPORTANT: To avoid a holler to the mods, please see here for the earliest date a work can be discussed, (usually two weeks from the US release), as well as who's reserved discussion.

When voting, you must specify the candidate(s). No blanket votes (i.e. "[tup] to everyone I missed").

No plagiarism: It's fair to source things, but an effortpost must be your own work and not lifted wholesale from another source.

We don't care what other sites think about a character being a Complete Monster. We judge this trope by our own criteria. Repeatedly attempting to bring up other sites will earn a suspension.

What is the Work

Here you briefly describe the work in question and explain any important setting details. Don't assume that everyone is familiar with the work in question.

Who is the Candidate and What have they Done?

This will be the main portion of the Effort Post. Here you list all of the crimes committed by the candidate. For candidates with longer rap sheets, keep the list to their most important and heinous crimes, we don't need to hear about every time they decide to do something minor or petty.

Do they have any Mitigating Factors or Freudian Excuse?

Here you discuss any potential redeeming or sympathetic features the character has, the character's Freudian Excuse if they have one, as well as any other potential mitigating factors like Offscreen Villainy or questions of moral agency. Try to present these as objectively as possible by presenting any evidence that may support or refute the mitigating factors.

Do they meet the Heinousness Standard?

Here you compare the actions of the Candidate to other character actions in the story in order to determine if they stand out or not. Remember that all characters, not just other villains, contribute to the Heinousness Standard

Final Verdict?

Simply state whether or not you think the character counts or not.

Edited by GastonRabbit on Aug 31st 2023 at 4:14:10 AM

ACW Unofficial Wiki Curator for Complete Monster from Arlington, VA (near Washington, D.C.) Since: Jul, 2009
#36401: Mar 1st 2015 at 2:33:14 PM

[up][up]Rudolph I'm guessing is posthumous? Also, add David too?

[up]Killing 35 children alone would be enough. Plus, we've had numerous silent antagonists before (Michael Myers to name perhaps the most prominent). It seems to be a horror comedy, but if he's played seriously, I don't see why he shouldn't count. [tup]

edited 1st Mar '15 2:55:18 PM by ACW

CM Dates; CM Pending; CM Drafts
holders Since: Mar, 2013
#36402: Mar 1st 2015 at 3:17:23 PM

Definite [tup] on St. Niklas, [tup] on Strasser, and [tdown] Boogeyman.

Overlord Since: Mar, 2013
#36403: Mar 1st 2015 at 3:58:57 PM

I will say yes on St. Niklas.

I have rewatched Broken Arrow and will now do an effort post on the main villain of that film:

Who is Vic Deakins? What Has he done?

Vic Deakins was a solider with 20 years experience in the military. After being passed over promotion one time too many, Deakins comes up with a plan to hijack some nukes from a training exercise and use them to extort money from the US government. Deakins attempts to kill Riley Hale, his former friend and protege so he can steal the nukes. Hale survives and tries to stop Deakins. Mercs under Deakins' command kill some civilians near the area where the nukes will be delivered. When the military sends a team to recapture the lost nukes, Deakins' mercs kill them too. Hale manages to recapture the bombs, but Deakins messed with the keypad so they would arm if someone tries to deactivate the bomb. Now the bomb explodes under ground, not doing major damage, but the EMP and shock wave destroys a military helicopter that was chasing Deakins killing everyone on board, Deakins knew that would happen when the helicopter chasing him, so he bears responsibility for those deaths. Deakins also kills personally Pritchett, the man who was financing this operation for annoying with his constant complaining. Deakins says that is the first time he has personally killed someone face to face and didn't see what the big deal was. Near the end of the film Hale cuts off Deakins means of escape, meaning he will not escape the blast radius in time, but Deakins decides to set off the bomb anyway out of spite.

Is he heinous by the standards of work?

I would say so, Deakins was aiming for a body count of several hundred thousands, if not millions. The mercs were also following Deakins plan, so think the murders they commit can be put on Deakins head. Pritchett may have been the financier, put Deakins planned everything and takes the operation over entirely after he kills Pritchett.

Any Freudian Excuse or other sympathetic factors?

Well Deakins seems to be mainly motivated by spite and greed, so nothing sympathetic about his motives. I don't think he is very concerned about his men, some of them die right in from of him and he shows no reaction. Near the end of the movie, one of his men in missing and he wants him found before they leave, but I think that is due to pragmatism, he needs all his men and if Hale or someone else killed his guy, he would want to know, so he can secure his escape route. Near the end of the film, when he decides to set off the nuke for spite, his Dragon demands he shut down the bomb, not wanting to die, but Deakins doesn't care, saying everyone dies at some point. Now Deakins told his men that he would shut down the nuke, if he gets the money, but the fact that he was willing to set off the nuke out of spite, negates that in my opinion. Now Deakins might have been a nice person at one point, him and Hale seem to have a good friendship at the beginning of the film, but by the time we see Deakins in this film, its clear he has been consumed by bitterness and greed and doesn't care about anyone but himself, by this point he was merely maintaining a friendly pretense to enact his plan. Deakins also says he plans to invest his money in Volvo, happy in the thought he will help make the safest cars in the world, but I think he was just being ironic there.

Verdict?

I think he counts.

edited 1st Mar '15 5:19:54 PM by Overlord

ACW Unofficial Wiki Curator for Complete Monster from Arlington, VA (near Washington, D.C.) Since: Jul, 2009
#36404: Mar 1st 2015 at 4:02:37 PM

Greed, willing to set the bomb off out of spite, seems like your typical action film villain. I'll give a [tup], but I'm wondering if we need a higher standard for these films.

CM Dates; CM Pending; CM Drafts
Beast from Ontario, Canada Since: Aug, 2012 Relationship Status: Browsing the selection
#36405: Mar 1st 2015 at 4:02:58 PM

Well, Sinterklaas [tup] What is it with Christmas and Horror comedy ?

Also a [tup] for Deak.

edited 1st Mar '15 4:19:22 PM by Beast

"It's like...a cliff, and if I do it, I'm just gonna...fall." "I think we're already falling."
Lightysnake Since: May, 2010
#36406: Mar 1st 2015 at 4:12:10 PM

Just throw Strasser on the pile of stuff I gotta do when my comp is back, ACW.

I'll give a yes to Martine. She seems to go over and above the call of evil in this show.

Also a yes to St. Niklas

And...Broken Arrow! DEAK! One of John Travolta's most hilarious bits: "You're out of your mind, Deak!"

"Yeah. Isn't it cool? Yes to him.

Overlord Since: Mar, 2013
#36407: Mar 1st 2015 at 4:12:19 PM

[up][up][up] But isn't attempting to set off a nuke that will kill hundreds of thousands of people, pretty far past the baseline heinous standard? I think Deakins moved beyond generic villainy as the film goes on. Isn't similar to what the two monster characters from The Rock were trying to do, for similar reasons?

Also discounting the attempted nuclear holocaust, Deakins has a decent body count, the mercs were following his plan, so all the deaths they caused are on his head, not to mention Pritchett and the helicopter that were killed by him in a more direct manner.

edited 1st Mar '15 4:17:12 PM by Overlord

Lightysnake Since: May, 2010
#36408: Mar 1st 2015 at 4:14:14 PM

Yeah, blowing up a warehouse or skyscraper is standard. A nuke is not

ACW Unofficial Wiki Curator for Complete Monster from Arlington, VA (near Washington, D.C.) Since: Jul, 2009
#36409: Mar 1st 2015 at 4:29:05 PM

[up][up][up]Done (check my sig). I also added David to the Magi YMMV.
Yeah, I'll count him. But while he counts, he doesn't at least to me engender that same feeling of revulsion that, say Ultimate Skull does. Anyway, just a random musing.

edited 1st Mar '15 4:29:23 PM by ACW

CM Dates; CM Pending; CM Drafts
bobg Since: Nov, 2012
#36410: Mar 1st 2015 at 7:56:55 PM

Here is a rough draft write up for Niklas:

edited 1st Mar '15 8:11:56 PM by bobg

jjj
WolframAndHart Since: Jun, 2011
#36411: Mar 1st 2015 at 8:00:22 PM

I'd say that Smaug from the Hobbit film Trilogy counts as a Complete Monster.

Some dragons you could say are forces of nature or just animals, but not Smaug. He's got no Freudian Excuse, his actions are heinous and treated as such, he has no regrets and actually takes pride in his evil actions, and he has no redeeming characteristics.

Sure, dragons in Middle Earth are Always Chaotic Evil, but Smaug really revels in sadism. He took over Erebor, killed hundreds of Dwarves and turned the survivors into homeless refugees all because he wanted their treasure which he has no practical use for. All that was after he destroyed Dale For the Evulz.

When Bilbo arrives, he boasts about killing people and stealing anything he wants and that no one can stop him. He also enjoys psychological torture. He tells Bilbo he's tempted to let him give Thorin the Arkenstone just to see it drive him mad. He plans to get revenge by proxy on Laketown, and when Bilbo begs him not to, he's glad Bilbo cares about them so he can make him watch as he kills all those innocent people. Then, there's the attack on Laketown, where he enjoys making Bard squirm, telling him that his son will burn and he can't save him.

And last but not least, he's fully aware of Sauron gathering power and fully intends to join him in conquering the world to enrich his treasure hoard and for the fun of killing.

edited 1st Mar '15 8:09:14 PM by WolframAndHart

VeryMelon Since: Jul, 2011 Relationship Status: Anime is my true love
#36412: Mar 1st 2015 at 8:06:34 PM

I vaguely remember Smaug being down-voted when he was brought up.

username2527 Since: Nov, 2013
#36413: Mar 1st 2015 at 8:12:32 PM

Victor Krane from Lab Rats

Who is he? - Victor Krane is a billioniare that Douglas Davenport met after he was kicked out of Davenport Industries, he agreed to fund Douglas's work if Douglas shared it with him. Victor Krane then went on to implanting himself with bionics that Douglas created. In addition, he used Douglas's tech and knowledge to genetically engineer Bionic Soldiers behind his back.

What does he do? - In his first appearance he breaks Douglas out of jail, they then go on to kidnap Adam, Bree, and Chase and lock them titanium energy rings. When they escape, Douglas activate an app to take control of them, using them to terrorize Donald, Leo, and Tasha. Fed up with Douglas's messing around Victor orders him to kill Adam, Bree, and Chase causing Donald to give a look of disgust claiming "that wasn't part of his plan". In his next appearances, he orders his new bionic soldier and partner, S-1 to kill the Kid Hero Leo by making a wall drop on him, crushing his arm in the process. Later, he attempts to take over mankind with a bionic army by signaling the Triton App to the whole planet while using government satellites.

Redeeming Qualities? - None.

Freudian Excuse? - None.

AmbarSonofDeshar Since: Jan, 2010
#36414: Mar 1st 2015 at 8:15:55 PM

Been rereading some old comic books. Not actually proposing him, but you know who comes hilariously close to qualifying? Alexei Luthor, Lex's counterpart on Earth-2. Unlike our Lex, who was, at the time at least, a robber and thief more interested in earning respect and embarrassing Superman than anything else, Alexei was a war-profiteer and war-monger who tried to start WWII a couple of years early, regularly tried to kill Superman and anybody close to him, and once tried to blow up Earths 1 & 2 for reasons that elude me. If he'd appeared more often he'd actually be worth talking about.

[up][up][up]Smaug was already voted down.

edited 1st Mar '15 8:16:20 PM by AmbarSonofDeshar

bobg Since: Nov, 2012
#36415: Mar 1st 2015 at 8:42:06 PM

[up] Ambar, what do you think of the character I am proposing (St Niklas)?

jjj
randomtroper89 from The Fire Nation Since: Nov, 2010
#36416: Mar 1st 2015 at 9:24:39 PM

@ACW: The Stasser entry is good, just change the words between the parentheses to this: (not clear if it was intentional, but he shows no remorse either way)

This may work to: (not clear if it was intentional, but either way he shows no remorse)

edited 2nd Mar '15 6:43:47 AM by randomtroper89

randomtroper89 from The Fire Nation Since: Nov, 2010
#36417: Mar 1st 2015 at 9:25:55 PM

Opps, double post.

edited 2nd Mar '15 6:43:27 AM by randomtroper89

Scraggle Since: Nov, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
#36418: Mar 2nd 2015 at 2:27:52 AM

Smaug is never going up. Victor Krane? Tries to kill the heroes and take over the world. Sounds far too generic- big [tdown] to both.

edited 2nd Mar '15 2:28:52 AM by Scraggle

Beast from Ontario, Canada Since: Aug, 2012 Relationship Status: Browsing the selection
#36419: Mar 2nd 2015 at 4:13:14 AM

[tdown] To Victor Krane. Again, pretty generic. The Villains Wiki may consider him a CM but they use that trope very loosely (they considered Malekieth to be a CM). It also should be noted that Lab Rats takes place in the DCLAU with more heinous villains in the Annihilator and Gorog, both not qualifying.

edited 2nd Mar '15 4:43:24 AM by Beast

"It's like...a cliff, and if I do it, I'm just gonna...fall." "I think we're already falling."
AustinDR Lizzid people! (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
Lizzid people!
#36420: Mar 2nd 2015 at 6:07:34 AM

The Villains Wiki considers Malekith as a GDV.

[tdown] to Krane.

edited 2nd Mar '15 6:42:30 AM by AustinDR

ST89 Since: Feb, 2015
#36421: Mar 2nd 2015 at 7:33:45 AM

Some expansion for Marathon Man:

Christian Szell aka The White Angel was a nazi dentist working at Auschwitz who used to falsely promise protection to the Jewish prisoners in exchange of their gold hidden in their teeth before sending'em to the gas chambers. After escaping WWII Szell sells most of his nazi comrades to a shadow government agency in exchange of protection and assistance in his diamonds smuggle (the ones he stole from the Jews). When he goes to New York to claim a box of diamonds he becomes increasingly paranoid for his safety starting to kill Doc Levy, one of his collaborators, believing him to be a traitor. He then kidnaps his brother Babe and cruelly tortures him with his dentist instruments without anesthetic digging first a dobe in his cavity and then drilling an healty tooth "until he reachs the pulp" all the while maintaning a friendly attitude. After he convinces himself Babe doesn't know nothing he orders him to be killed anyway. He later kills and Holocaust survivor who recognizes him by violently slashing his throat with a retractable knife.

edited 2nd Mar '15 7:52:33 AM by ST89

bobg Since: Nov, 2012
#36422: Mar 2nd 2015 at 11:17:12 AM

[up] Should "Send' em" be changed to "send them", or is it okay due to this website's use of casual, breezy language?

Any opinions on my St Niklas write up?

jjj
Beast from Ontario, Canada Since: Aug, 2012 Relationship Status: Browsing the selection
#36423: Mar 2nd 2015 at 11:30:22 AM

The Niklas write up looks decent enough, although I think it could use some expanding or links.

"It's like...a cliff, and if I do it, I'm just gonna...fall." "I think we're already falling."
ACW Unofficial Wiki Curator for Complete Monster from Arlington, VA (near Washington, D.C.) Since: Jul, 2009
Overlord Since: Mar, 2013
#36425: Mar 2nd 2015 at 6:17:11 PM

Yeah no to Victor Krane. Any other opinions on Deakins from Broken Arrow? So far I have 4 yays and 0 nays.


Total posts: 326,048
Top