I think this is supposed to be when companies advertise their products for something that is true but also completely irrelevant. Such as putting a big label "FAT FREE" on a pack of sugar. And yes, that is a trope.
Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!Right, and that's where the other tropes I mentioned come in; it seems like the examples aren't doing a good job of explaining why the claim is irrelevant, just that it sounds odd. At least one example (the American cheese one) is blatant Complaining and will be removed when I get around to it.
online since 1993 | huge retrocomputing and TV nerd | lee4hmz.info (under construction) | heapershangout.comAnd the name itself implies that cereal normally has it.
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.Yes, that's a frequent implementation of the trope. This is about advertising claims that are 100% true and also completely irrelevant. Advertising that your X does not contain Y, when Xs never contain Y, is a perfect example.
Calling someone a pedant is an automatic Insult Backfire. Real pedants will be flattered.Checking Weasel Words, it's just about advertisement tropes, so that would be your Super-Trope.
I read through the examples. Many are generic, with no specific brand using that argument, but they're still according to the trope.
I really love the non-gene-manipulated salt one. To actually manage to do that would be more likely to bring a Nobel Prize.
edited 11th Apr '12 10:08:49 AM by Feather7603
The Internet misuses, abuses, and overuses everything."Yes, that's a frequent implementation of the trope. This is about advertising claims that are 100% true and also completely irrelevant."
What I mean is that it would look like In-Universe that cereal actually does have asbestos. Heck, with the "pink slime" issue in Real Life, that kind of claim looks even more like it could be genuine.
"Checking Weasel Words, it's just about advertisement tropes, so that would be your Super Trope."
And that term applies to many things other than advertising, like tabloid news or political discussions. So people wouldn't realize that it's about advertising specifically.
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.For the record, the trope used to be called "Made From 100% Pure Grade A Crap", until we renamed it in this thread (I'm the one who thought of the current name, by the way). It probably didn't help any misuse.
For the record, I like this article and I love the name.
And I'm also not seeing the misuse.
edited 11th Apr '12 5:50:28 PM by Martello
"Did anybody invent this stuff on purpose?" - Phillip Marlowe on tequila, Finger Man by Raymond Chandler.FWIW I was against the current name, but I did give it the redirect of Mundane Marketing Claim.
An Ear Worm is like a Rickroll: It is never going to give you up.Mixed in with the examples of this is what I think is another trope: mundane ingredients/components/whatever being given flashy trademarked names like "Corinthian leather."
It's similar, but does sounds like it could definitely be another trope.
An Ear Worm is like a Rickroll: It is never going to give you up.Looks to me like Asbestos-Free Cereal is the supertrope, with Made in Country X and Crunchtastic (and probably the others, and possibly Get the Sensation) as subtropes.
I think that's Crunchtastic.
edited 16th Apr '12 8:53:05 AM by HersheleOstropoler
The child is father to the man —OedipusHershele pretty much nailed it, I think. Also, upon reading Crunchtastic again, it has a very narrow focus, that on sniglets or nonsense words as often used to sell stuff to kids. It's missing a Sibling Trope, that of the case where the word or phrase isn't nonsense, but isn't exactly someone outside of an ad would say.
edited 16th Apr '12 5:15:11 PM by lee4hmz
online since 1993 | huge retrocomputing and TV nerd | lee4hmz.info (under construction) | heapershangout.comBump. Anything to do here? I don't see any problems.
Seems done. Locking up.
Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.
I'm reading through this, and I'm noticing that some of the examples just don't seem to fit the trope as described very well. I've seen a few that would fit just as well on Made in Country X, Lite Crème, Here Comes the Science or Crunchtastic, and there's also quite a bit of natter as well.
What I'm seeing is that the trope itself is really, really vague. I figure it's supposed to be an advertising-specific subtrope of Suspiciously Specific Denial or Overly Narrow Superlative, but some of the examples are really Exactly What It Says on the Tin Done Badly. Any comments?
Also, now that I think about it, we may have a Missing Supertrope for dubious advertising claims.
edited 11th Apr '12 9:17:11 AM by lee4hmz
online since 1993 | huge retrocomputing and TV nerd | lee4hmz.info (under construction) | heapershangout.com