Follow TV Tropes

Following

IP discussion: thread reasons, policies, other stuff

Go To

In an effort to keep the volume of threads in IP at a reasonable level, and to encourage creating threads that address genuine problems, we need to make some notes about when to request a thread and what constitutes valid reasons for a thread. These have been mentioned in some of the other IP procedure threads, but they're being listed here for quick reference.

    open/close all folders 

    Screening of new threads 
  • New IP threads don't require approval by the staff to be opened. Still, the staff can and will lock threads with improper reasoning and warn the troper if needed. Please take time to review the guidelines below and make sure your request is solid before submitting it.
  • A thread started within two weeks of the closing of a previous thread on the same page that doesn't have a concrete suggestion will be summarily closed.

    General notes 
  • Also refer to: About Images and Copyright, How to Pick a Good Image, and Images On Wiki Pages.
  • Going through IP for a page that doesn't have an image or an IP tag isn't obligatory, but it is strongly recommended. Otherwise, the image you put up may end up coming to the forum for work or replacement.
  • Pages that have gone through IP should have a commented-out tag showing the relevant thread(s) and any related information. Always check for these before adding a pic or requesting an IP thread for a page. If a page does have a tag, please note its information when you start a thread.
  • It's recommended to discuss image concerns and thread reasons in the threads that are pinned at the top of the forum before starting a new thread. They may be able to address the issue(s) without needing to start a dedicated thread.
  • Keep the quality criteria listed below in mind when making an image suggestion.
  • Work pages that don't have an image generally don't require an IP thread to upload one, but feel free to start a thread if you have multiple ideas.
  • Animated GIFs can't be uploaded as page pics, so don't bother trying. (The pic on Creepy Changing Painting is a bit of HTML magic and not a true GIF, in case you're wondering.)
  • In threads for specific pages, you may see people casting votes by referring to a post number and (if applicable) the number of the image in a given post. For example, "2" would refer to "the image in the second post", and "3.2" would refer to "the second image in post 3".
  • We try to operate on "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mentality, and we try not to change an image just for the sake of changing it. In reference to this, someone might call a suggestion a "lateral move". If the image on the page is not otherwise problematic, consider if your suggestion is a clear improvement before pitching it.
  • It usually takes 5-7 [tup] votes for a pic to be considered to have consensus in a thread; pics can be put up with less than this, but usually only at a moderator's discretion.
    In crowners:
    • An option has consensus if it has a minimum of a 2:1 vote ratio.
    • If a crowner ends with no options having consensus, the crowner and thread are considered to be failed and the thread will be closed unless there is significant ongoing discussion.
    • Crowners normally run for 5 days, but can go longer if more time is needed, and can be closed early for the following criteria:
      • At any point, if the leading option has a vote balance of 10 or more and no other options have consensus. This is considered "super-consensus".
      • After 3 days, if the leading option has a vote balance of at least 8 and no other options have consensus.
      • After 4 days, if the leading option is the only one that has consensus.
    • Crowners can only be made by moderators and engineers, usually after discussion has stalled for a few days. Crowners can be requested by regular users by compiling and linking options in a post and hollering for it to be made into a crowner.
    • Non-moderators can add crowner options to an ongoing crowner, but cannot edit options they didn't add, nor can they call or lock a crowner. If you add an entry to an ongoing crowner, please note this in the thread.

    IP thread reasons 

High-priority image issues

  • A pic has been changed or removed from a page for a reason that may not be valid, or no reason at all, especially if the pic was chosen by a previous IP thread. These changes can sometimes be simply reverted by a moderator without a need for further discussion.
  • Not Safe For Work (NSFW)
    • If you're unsure on whether a pic fits this or not, bring it up in the IP Discussion thread.
    • Classic works of art containing nudity, such as Michelangelo's David or Botticelli's The Birth of Venus, don't necessarily fall into this, but appropriateness for the page in question is the key factor, and SFW options should be considered whenever possible.
  • The image is a spoiler. The age and/or infamy of the work the image originates from may prevent this from being considered a valid issue.
  • Watermarking. A TV channel emblem on a screencap is a "bug", not a true watermark, and is permissible as long as it's not obtrusive.
  • Meme-based images are not permitted as page pics. The sole general exceptions are Image Macro (for obvious reasons) and a work's Memes page, where they should only be considered if there are no better options.Other exceptions
  • A page has an image that is obviously from the wrong work / programming block / network / etc.
  • Copyright issues:
    • The pic implies TV Tropes is claiming the copyright.
    • The pic has been taken from a site that deals in copyrighted images or videos, especially if a watermark has been removed and/or the site is selling their content. Screencaps from videos from these sites are not permitted, either.
    • The image is the entirety of a product for sale, such as a t-shirt design.
    • Images from illegally obtained materials, such as leaks or camrips, are not allowed.
    • Using an entire work:
      • Basically, if it's copyrighted, we have to get permission to use it. This covers single-panel cartoons, photographs, entire comic strips and webcomics, and similar works. If permission is granted to use a work, it's always noted on the page in some fashion, usually in the caption and/or with the page tag. If an artist requests a specific way to display their connection to the pic, we'll do our best to honor it.
      • The creators of xkcd and Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal have given us carte blanche to use entire works as needed. Permission notices for such cases aren't required.
      • Entire cards from card-based games like Magic: The Gathering are impractical but can be used. Using the art from these cards is fine.
      • Any such work that's in the public domain is free to use.
    • Some creators do not want their work used outside their control at all, but fair use means that we are not legally bound to honor this for the wiki's purposes, aside from the aforementioned restrictions. We'll honor a take-down request, but it's up to them to send it. We're not obliged to chase them down and ask them what their policy is. Fair use also allows us to use excerpts of works without seeking permission. In this case, the minimum needed to get the trope across should be used.
    • Per the site owner, AI generated images are allowed on TV Tropes and will be treated just like regular images.

General reasons

  • Multiple suggestions for a page without a pic. Single suggestions are currently being filtered through the Image Suggestion thread instead of getting their own threads right off the bat.
  • The current pic doesn't adequately demonstrate the trope. Examples of this include:
    • Just a Face and a Caption (JAFAAC)—the pic shows an example of the trope but relies on familiarity with its subject(s) to make the connection to the trope evident.
    • A pic that is nothing but text, or one where the text overwhelms the imagery. "May/Might as well be a page quote" is often used to describe this. There are exceptions (Spoof Aesop, for example), especially for dialogue-based tropes, but generally we want to have actual images as page pics with just enough text to support the expression of the trope.
  • Poor image quality. Graininess, motion blur, and compression artifacts are three of the most common problems. Before starting a thread for this reason, see if the Quality Upgrade thread can help find or create a nicer version of the image. Replacing images with a better-quality version is a free action, i.e. can be done without starting a thread.
If the size value in a pic's coding is larger than the actual size of the pic, it will stretch the pic to that width which will introduce artifacts. Check the image's properties before starting a thread; if this is the issue, a change to the coding will fix it.
The age of some works may make getting a truly high-quality image from them difficult. This will be taken into consideration when deciding on a pic.
  • The current pic is taken from a multi-panel work such as a comic strip or webcomic and uses more than half of the source material.
  • Fan-art on a work page instead of an image from the work itself.
  • The current pic is overly fanservicey, especially in the Creator/ namespace. In the case of Fanservice tropes, pics should be as low-key as possible while still getting the trope across.
  • Two trope pages have the same pic.
    • While it's preferred that they be separate, a trope page can have the same image as a work page or a character image from a Characters subpage. In these cases, a thread should have at least one replacement suggestion for either page.
    • Similarly, graphics can generally be reused among a work's subpages. Threads that address these will still be accepted, but should also have at least one replacement suggestion.
  • You believe you have a suggestion that better illustrates the trope than the current pic (by Image Pickin' standards, not "This is a cooler pic.")
  • A page marked as No Real Life Examples, Please! has a Real Life pic.Exceptions
  • A YMMV or Audience Reaction page has a pic that is not In-Universe.Exceptions
  • A page has an unusual image arrangement not chosen by an IP thread and you don't think it works well, e.g. having two images on a trope page or an image that's a janky collage. Some pages may have multiple pics for a reason, so check for an IP tag before starting a thread in this case.

Invalid reasons

  • Trying to solicit ideas for an image. IP has a cap of 60 threads and is usually at or near capacity on any given day, so space can't be allotted for threads whose only purpose is to brainstorm.
  • Not liking an image's art style, layout/design, or any Photoshopping or similar alterations that may have been made, provided they don't impact the pic's quality.
  • Claiming that a particular work is over-/under-represented. This can have some impact on deciding on a pic, but should never be the main gist of a thread.
  • Trying to argue that a pic you liked wasn't chosen in a previous thread, especially if it lost in a crowner, or trying to make an invalid argument that a pic doesn't work for a page even though it was chosen by a thread. Repeatedly doing this is considered griefing and is grounds for suspension from the workshop forums.
  • Some trope pages feature Visual Puns or other jokey pics rather than something that actually demonstrates the trope, usually because these pages have been very hard to find a better pic for.Example Don't request a thread just because you don't like the joke; if you've got an actual example, that's fine. Also, see the "Don't change the pic" section on the page mentioned below.

    Special cases 
For a list of pages that have unique statuses, see Image Pickin' Special Cases

General cases:

  • Pages within the FanficRecs/, Fridge/, Haiku/, Headscratchers/, ImageLinks/, Laconic/, PlayingWith/, Quotes/, Trivia/, WMG/, and YMMV/ namespaces and disambiguations default to no pic; YMMV.Home Page and Headscratchers.Home Page are the only exceptions. Pages in the Analysis/ namespace default to BUPKIS status (meaning they won't have a pic unless a really good one is found; see Image Pickin' Special Cases for more details)
  • Due to their exceptional subjectivity and persistent problems with images being poor quality and/or not illustrative, Moments pages (Awesome/, Funny/, Heartwarming/, NightmareFuel/, Shocking/, TearJerker/) are limited to one image.
  • Pages for unreleased works shall keep the first image that is uploaded to the page when it's created, with further pre-release images relegated to an Image Links page. Once the work is released, a thread may be created to decide which image is to be officially used on the page. See this Wiki Talk thread for details. Note that the first image may still be removed if it falls afoul of any of the aforementioned guidelines.

    Image Pickin' flowchart 

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/ip_flowchartdrawio_8_transformed.png

Text version:

Is the page on Image Pickin' Special Cases?

  • If yes, start a thread.
  • If no, does it already have an image?

Edited by kory on May 2nd 2024 at 11:16:14 AM

MarqFJA The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer from Deserts of the Middle East (Before Recorded History) Relationship Status: Anime is my true love
The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer
#876: Sep 18th 2014 at 5:00:51 AM

@Willbyr: But the actual caption is both appropiate and funny.

edited 18th Sep '14 5:01:18 AM by MarqFJA

Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.
rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#877: Sep 18th 2014 at 6:45:50 AM

I don't agree. Mentioning that the Trope Namer is pictured makes it feel more JAFAACey.

edited 18th Sep '14 6:46:26 AM by rodneyAnonymous

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
ShadowHog from Earth Since: May, 2009 Relationship Status: Healthy, deeply-felt respect for this here Shotgun
#878: Sep 23rd 2014 at 6:26:19 PM

Got a little confused looking at Shrinking Violet. It's a picture of Violet from The Incredibles, but I could've sworn it had a different image prior. Checked source, sure enough, IPD thread tag. Check the end of the thread... it's not the image that was chosen! Clearly somebody ignored the IPD tag and changed it unilaterally! I must report this at onc- oh. Fast Eddie replaced that one with the current. ...Huh.

Still, the IPD tag present doesn't really apply to the image FE put on the page. Should that be removed?

(Incidentally, none of the images it used to have - a picture of some Naruto chick, Fluttershy, and the IPD-chosen pic of MS-DOS-tan - were what I thought it had - a different picture of Violet, just outside her school. I swear I've seen that image used somewhere...)

edited 23rd Sep '14 6:28:33 PM by ShadowHog

Moon
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#879: Sep 24th 2014 at 3:24:16 AM

[up] I know what you're talking about, but I can't remember where that pic was, either.

I don't think that pic is an improvement over the IP-decided one...I'll bring it up to the rest of the staff.

EDIT: Okay, I figured it out, the Violet pic we're thinking of was an option in the crowner that decided on the OS-tan pic. It's also in the collage on Peek A Bangs.

edited 24th Sep '14 3:32:49 AM by Willbyr

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#880: Sep 28th 2014 at 11:26:12 AM

Another Duck, thanks for catching that my sig links had died...apparently that URL shortener site bit the dust. They should be fixed now.

edited 28th Sep '14 11:26:21 AM by Willbyr

ShadowHog from Earth Since: May, 2009 Relationship Status: Healthy, deeply-felt respect for this here Shotgun
#881: Nov 30th 2014 at 6:41:23 PM

From the Kickstarter page:

Drew will be involved in the Trope Repair Shop and Image Pickin areas of TV Tropes.
Hi, Drew.

Moon
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#882: Nov 30th 2014 at 9:18:50 PM

Now that the word's finally out about the new admins, it's time to discuss how this will affect IP, as there are probably some questions that the changeover will bring in this area. To be honest, I'm not 100% certain on everything. There's a behind-the-scenes function related to closing IP threads that we're pushing to have removed as it no longer serves a purpose, but only concerns the staff. The big thing that I can say for certain is: for the time being, all of Eddie's admin fiat decisions are staying put. That's not to say they won't ever change...there are some that I'd definitely like to revisit. However, there's a lot more pressing issues than that ahead across the wiki, and if/when the time comes to start rethinking some of those pages, the staff will make the final decision on which pages would be open for changes and which wouldn't before any discussion takes place.

Spark9 Gentleman Troper! from Castle Wulfenbach Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Pining for the fjords
Gentleman Troper!
#883: Dec 5th 2014 at 1:28:47 PM

I'm curious what the current custom is on having two pictures on one trope page? I was under the impression that (excepting collages) the default was to have one image per page, and indeed the top post here explicitly lists "having two images on a trope page" as a valid reason to open a thread. I'm asking because recently I was informed by a mod that "having two images on a trope page" is not in fact a valid reason to open a thread. If this is a new development then the top post here should be updated accordingly.

Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#884: Dec 5th 2014 at 1:33:34 PM

The thread in question is here. I mainly closed it down because I didn't see a problem in that case.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Spark9 Gentleman Troper! from Castle Wulfenbach Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Pining for the fjords
Gentleman Troper!
#885: Dec 5th 2014 at 1:57:43 PM

I'm not saying two images is a problem. In fact, it could be a solution: whenever an IP thread can't decide between two pictures, the current response is to say there's no consensus and leave the page imageless. But an alternative approach could be to put both of them up. Whenever an IP crowner is a close call, why not select the best two images and display them both?

Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#886: Dec 5th 2014 at 2:00:08 PM

Displaying more than one image (like on rotation) is one of the proposed features of the database overhaul, yes.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#887: Dec 5th 2014 at 2:57:45 PM

For the vast majority of trope pages, one image is sufficient. Of course, there are exceptions, such as Our Orcs Are Different, where multiple pics can enhance categorized description areas.

Spark9 Gentleman Troper! from Castle Wulfenbach Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Pining for the fjords
Gentleman Troper!
#888: Dec 7th 2014 at 2:01:44 PM

Ok. I get the impression that the various moderators in this forum have different ideas of what constitutes a valid IP thread, and as a result, the list of "valid general reasons to request a thread" (in the top post here) no longer represents how this forum actually works. I think it would be good if the mods reach agreement on when to accept or decline, and adjust the top post here accordingly. After all, the whole point of this thread here is to clarify what users can post in the IP forum.

For example, some mods appear to be opening threads that show a problem with an existing image (regardless of whather the thread contains a suggestion), and other mods are opening only those threads that suggest a nice image (regardless of whether they show a problem with an existing image, and explicitly disallowing threads to pull an image without replacement). There is nothing wrong with either approach, but please be consistent about it, because otherwise threads are going to end up accepted depending on which mod sees them first.

Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#889: Dec 7th 2014 at 2:04:49 PM

Different threads started for the same reasons can be weighed differently depending upon the image in question and the suggestions, if any, proposed. I am not sure how to incorporate that in IP guidelines.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#890: Dec 7th 2014 at 8:12:12 PM

The main issue is how strict or lenient each mod is when looking at the requests. For the record, I tend to be fairly lenient, especially if the image seems to have problems from my perspective, but I'm not going to step on another mod's toes if a request is closed before I get to it. That said, I've had little input when trying to discuss thread requests that I'm wavering on what to do with, so some may get opened that really should've been closed.

MrL1193 Since: Apr, 2013
#891: Jan 14th 2015 at 2:05:44 AM

Something that has come up recently is the issue of flipping manga images so that they read left to right. Last year, Fast Eddie used his admin authority to unilaterally pull some manga images because they read right to left. The procedure of flipping them came about as a way to solve that problem, but there was a fair bit of opposition to the policy at the time, enough that it seemed to me like it might not have become standard if not for the fact that Fast Eddie willed it.

Now, I don't like pushing the issue so soon after Fast Eddie stepped down, but the fact is, if we are going to reverse that particular decision, it will only become harder to do so if we wait. So if it is possible to reexamine it, I think that we should have the discussion as soon as possible. Is this something that we could discuss and perhaps change?

edited 14th Jan '15 2:07:25 AM by MrL1193

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#892: Jan 14th 2015 at 2:08:30 AM

I think we can reexamine it. With an eye towards the fact that images which require an unfamiliar reading order to understand are bad.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#893: Jan 14th 2015 at 2:15:38 AM

I think it is good policy and the opposition is overstated.

Often it is just a matter of changing panel order, and sometimes it doesn't matter at all.

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
MrL1193 Since: Apr, 2013
#894: Jan 14th 2015 at 2:58:39 AM

If it is my description of the amount of opposition that you are calling "overstated," I would like to point out that you seem to be the only person who was actively supporting Fast Eddie's decision last year, whereas some half a dozen people voiced objections of some sort. I believe that is enough to warrant another discussion.

What I am still most concerned about is making sure that everyone can consistently and easily understand each image. Fast Eddie didn't seem to care about the possibility that someone who is familiar with typical manga reading order might be confused by flipped images, but I think it is a significant flaw in the plan. Furthermore, if we do decide to go with the flipping policy, in order to achieve consistency, it would have to be applied to every single manga image, even the ones where the order doesn't really matter. Just finding every unflipped manga image would require significant effort, and educating every single new user about the policy to keep new ones from creeping in would be an ongoing struggle. And this isn't even getting into the issue of altering the works, which would bother at least a few people.

I believe it would be much easier to simply use manga images without altering them, while keeping in mind (as Septimus says) that cases in which the unfamiliar reading order could cause confusion are bad.

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#895: Jan 14th 2015 at 3:03:53 AM

Fast Eddie didn't seem to care about the possibility that someone who is familiar with typical manga reading order might be confused by flipped images, but I think it is a significant flaw in the plan.

Fast Eddie did always note that manga readers and more generally members of a given fandom are always a minority. Ergo, their concerns take a step back behind those for people who aren't in the given fandom. That is my understanding of this, anyhow.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
MarqFJA The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer from Deserts of the Middle East (Before Recorded History) Relationship Status: Anime is my true love
The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer
#896: Jan 14th 2015 at 4:49:53 AM

Would it be difficult to add a tiny white bar to the top of each manga-based image that contains a clear, attention-grabbing text message to the effect of "Note: Read from right to left"? I often see that done to a not-insignificant number of manga and doujinshi scanlations at the first page of the story (i.e. not counting the cover and text-less images preceding the story proper), especially if it's a one-shot or a 4koma. Manga/doujinshi scanlations, of course, have the advantage of a generous amount of empty margin space to utilize for this purpose.

edited 14th Jan '15 4:51:05 AM by MarqFJA

Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.
Rethkir A Trusted Friend in Science and Ponies from the gap between dimensions Since: Mar, 2013
#897: Jan 14th 2015 at 8:23:40 AM

It's less difficult and less intrusive to just flip the image. Westerners read from left to right. It's the natural assumption. It makes sense for all images to abide by a left to right reading order.

Image Source. Please update whenever an image is changed.
lexicon Since: May, 2012
#898: Jan 14th 2015 at 2:24:52 PM

I think Eddie's decision is good. This is an English site and the majority of people don't read manga.

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#899: Jan 14th 2015 at 10:07:55 PM

I'm good with flipping the images, provided it doesn't cause obvious problems like backwards-reading details.

Rethkir A Trusted Friend in Science and Ponies from the gap between dimensions Since: Mar, 2013
#900: Jan 16th 2015 at 4:15:46 PM

So, I just noticed the new image uplaoder. It seems really nifty for those who aren't used to scaling them down themselves, but what's up with the file names that it assigns them afterwards? That string of letters and numbers is kinda ugly. I figure this is more relevant in Tech Wishlist, but I'm posting it here since it's related to IP.

Image Source. Please update whenever an image is changed.

Total posts: 9,746
Top