>I will never understand why Frozen was such a big success
Because of little kids.
Check out my forum game: Rate the above YMMV.I won’t say that it’s as true as the most egregious examples, since you do provide one concrete criticism, albeit one you then repeat to death (that the film is predictable, which is actually a problem I have problems with in general, but let’s not bog down the ultimate point of the comment), but one of the cardinal sins of writing a bad review is ranting about how much something sucks instead of bothering to talk about why, and you absolutely spend most of this review just reiterating over and over again how much you hate it, and how much you can’t understand how anyone could like it. These are much less useful to the review as a whole.
Yeah, this is just a hatchet job. Reviews are basically persuasive writing, so to convince us this is a bad film, it helps to have more concrete examples to talk around and more detail. Also, you might want to try comparing the film to others, to help build up a picture in our minds as to what the film would be like.
Book me today! I also review weddings, funerals and bar mitzvahs.Not that Frozen is a perfect movie or anything (it\'s cute but has a lot of flaws), but yeah, I also wish this had more meat. I\'m honestly curious to know more about your opinions in detail. Like, for example, why this film is considered worse to you than critically panned animated works like Minions, Emoji Movie, and Chicken Little. If it\'s how you truly feel then fair enough, but I think we\'re all just curious about why you feel so much hatred for this film.
Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure PurenessMost of the time someone refers to anything as “objectively bad”, they’re usually mistaking their subjective opinion for objectivity.
The review gets off to a poor start, spending four short paragraphs rambling about how awful the movie is before you even start to discuss specific aspects of the movie... then get back to rambling again.
As Tuckerscreator said, "objectively" is one of the most often misused words in the English language when it comes to expressing one's opinion. It's often used to assert that a poorly thought-out opinion is indisputable, when in reality it's anything but.
Even if you found the film predictable, it's poor form to put the film's main twist in a review, since they're meant to be for the benefit of people who haven't seen it.
Not only is your wet fart analogy vulgar, but it doesn't even provide a very good analogy to illustrate your point.
As someone who enjoyed Frozen even though I didn't think it was perfect, I'll concede that you don't have to like the film, but you didn't do a very good job expressing your opinion in a convincing or persuasive manner.
Leave a Comment:
Frozen stinks on ice.
I will never understand why Frozen was such a big success, because it's objectively a very flawed movie. Predictable, by the numbers, and unimaginative.
And that's just scratching the surface.
It's not only my least favorite Disney movie, but my least favorite animated movie as well, and might even be my least favorite movie I've seen.
Just so mind-numbingly awful in my opinion. And it goes way beyond just being bland and predictable.
Frozen actively angers me with its painful musical numbers, and basically insulting my intelligence by making it seem like I don't know what'll happen next despite how predictable it is and every Disney movie cliche coming from a mile away (Hans being the villain, just to name one).
It's basically the cinematic equivalent of someone pulling a long, wet fart right in your face. And I cannot forgive Frozen for that.
I seriously can't comprehend how they thought such a painfully paint-by-numbers movie would be okay to release as part of the Disney animated canon, let alone it getting a sequel that really isn't much better.