Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Characters / MadeInAbyss

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
MagnumForce Since: Feb, 2017
Sep 15th 2022 at 7:20:20 AM •••

Shouldn't Gaburoon get his own folder at some point? Looking at the edit page is does seem like someone has started making one, though I can't find a reason it hasn't/shouldn't be finished. You could add Arm Cannon, Bodyguarding a Badass, Heroic Sacrifice, Meaningful Name and Undying Loyalty to it at least.

Edited by MagnumForce
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Jul 21st 2022 at 2:49:00 PM •••

The page is currently flagged for Five P review. Join the discussion here

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman Hide / Show Replies
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Aug 22nd 2022 at 12:41:29 AM •••

Discussion resolved to keep.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Sugarp1e1 Queen of the Snakes Since: Apr, 2015
Queen of the Snakes
Jul 27th 2022 at 12:37:40 PM •••

Does the Death Seeker trope apply to the villagers of Iruburu? Based on what Moogie tells Faputa in Chapter 59, I'm under the impression that they are.

This would explain why they the villagers cared about Faputa's well-being and even healed her even though she was trying to kill them. Though I'm not entirely sure since it also sounds like Moogi was referring to the act of destroying the village.

On top of that, when Moogie was talking about "coming here" was she talking about approaching Faputa or coming to the village in the first place? Because the latter would imply that these Hollows knew the village wanted to be destroyed or that something from the village would destroy them.

I'm just confused. Am I the only one?

Ryoko.
Arimaus Since: Mar, 2012
Oct 4th 2017 at 8:14:06 PM •••

Shouldn't we edit Nanachi's pronouns to be gender-neutral? I understand the manga translations most people are familiar with treat Nanachi as a girl, but if the author's intent was for the character's gender to be "unknown", I think we should respect that.

Hide / Show Replies
Nystus Since: May, 2011
Nov 17th 2017 at 6:29:42 PM •••

Last I checked, english has a lack of gender-neutral pronouns that can be used for singular

homogenized Since: Oct, 2009
Dec 12th 2017 at 8:19:43 PM •••

Usage of "they" and "their" as gender-neutral pronouns is common.

Nystus Since: May, 2011
Dec 14th 2017 at 5:44:03 PM •••

I don't know where it's common, but it sure as hell isn't gramatically accurate in any shape or form

homogenized Since: Oct, 2009
Dec 17th 2017 at 7:22:10 PM •••

The Other Wiki suggests that English grammar has evolved to include it, and even official documents include its use. Feel free to attack my laziness in not checking their references or checking other links Google threw at me when I searched "singular they".

Edit: TV Tropes itself talks a little about it in Gender Neutral Writing.

Edited by homogenized
Lyendith Since: Mar, 2011
Dec 18th 2017 at 5:23:45 AM •••

Also talked about in one of Tom Scott's videos on youtube (he makes a few questionable claims regarding gendered languages, but that's another issue):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46ehrFk-gLk&

Edited by Lyendith Flippé de participer à ce grand souper, je veux juste m'occuper de taper mon propre tempo.
Nystus Since: May, 2011
Dec 18th 2017 at 8:22:25 AM •••

Every single thing, inanimate or not, is gendered in my native language. People using dated grammar rules as if they're relevant now or completely misinterpreting when or how it is acceptable to use a singular "they" irks me to no end. When the subject (singular, without any other subjects being mentioned) talked about is unspecified, "they" can be used without tripping over syntax. When the subject is clearly known and shown, it is not

homogenized Since: Oct, 2009
Dec 18th 2017 at 10:55:53 AM •••

So should we call Nanachi the singular gender neutral "it", the default "he", or always use the proper "Nanachi"?

Arimaus Since: Mar, 2012
Dec 18th 2017 at 3:00:09 PM •••

I'd go with just "Nanachi", even if it makes some sentences sound a bit repetitive. Right now, calling Nanachi "it", "he", or "she" is simply not factual. If Tsukushi changes his mind and reveals more information about Nanachi's gender, we can always edit it again.

Lyendith Since: Mar, 2011
Dec 18th 2017 at 5:23:26 PM •••

Or else there's the last resort "he/she" or "s/he"…

Flippé de participer à ce grand souper, je veux juste m'occuper de taper mon propre tempo.
Top