Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
If this is an edit war, then this isn't their first time
. I think you should revert it back as well until it's confirmed legitimately that this was the death that Wells is worried about.
Is this really an example? The entry says that he is avoiding conventions because it is expected there will be controversy, not that fans are actually behaving badly over it.
Also, was Wells known for going to conventions and events before this? If not, then it's definitely not an example.
Suspended, but Arctimon has a good point regarding whether this example is valid to begin with. Why Fandom Can't Have Nice Things requires creators to take away something fans previously had.
Edited by GastonRabbit Patiently awaiting the release of Paper Luigi and the Marvelous Compass.
We've now got the statement from Wells about conventions (which suggests he was referring to the leaked issue, but doesn't give any detail about the twist or plot arc outcome).
And prior to that he attended at least four conventions in the last year - so may be valid?
Does this count as an edit war? Over on The Amazing Spider-Man (2022) - note that links contain spoilers.
This was the example before the recent leaks:
After the first of the recent Content Leaks was confirmed as genuine by Marvel, KingClark added an update
(No source cited for that, and it's since been suggested that this isn't the end of the run, with Wells talking about his next year on the book)
I rephrased it a little
with the edit reason "Still scope for more twists, and it hasn't happened yet" - as of today, the issue the leaks are from is still unpublished.
KingClark has now largely reverted
that edit, returning it to a definite statement that it's because of the issue and this death.
Does that count as an edit war?
I'd like to revert it again, at least until the issue is published and/or we have a clear statement from Wells about what he meant by the original comment - but that would definitely be an edit war if done without consensus, so I'm holding fire.
Edited by Mrph1