EmeraldSource
Since: Jan, 2021
#2: Feb 23rd 2021 at 7:33:13 PM
Depends on how closely the adaptation is following the work and the method of censorship. If the work is a broad "this is less graphic than the original" then it would be Lighter and Softer, Tamer and Chaster, etc. But if the work is generally a Shot-for-Shot Remake with the item in question being one of the only changes, I can see that as being Bowdlerized in concept.
But that's a rather narrow set of parameters, most examples of that type would probably not qualify.
Do you not know that in the service one must always choose the lesser of two weevils!
#3: Feb 25th 2021 at 10:06:04 AM
I am inclined to say it isn't, because we have other articles for adaptations, such as Adaptational Modesty.
Stories don't tell us monsters exist; we knew that already. They show us that monsters can be trademarked and milked for years.
Total posts: 3
The description for Bowdlerize implies that it applies to editing a work to remove offensive aspects in a way like Edited for Syndication or George Lucas Altered Version. Some of the examples, however, are for adaptations - a new work entirely - and something being different an adaptation doesn't change anything about the original work. Should they be part of this trope, or should there be a different trope specifically for changes made in adaptations?