I don't get the current, either. 1.1 > 1.2 pending other options.
1.2 isn't an example; it's showing stat distribution and not comparing characters' power
PSA: a cat is not a dogComparison featuring the guy that explains the system:
Or just comparison. Bigger, but no explanation.
Edited by Drope on Dec 17th 2019 at 8:59:00 AM
that first one's good
PSA: a cat is not a dogis good. I'm genuinely not sure about the explanation. I like having it. But the text is just at the size where I have to squint to read it, and I find that a little offputting.
To me, 1.1 > 4.2 > 4.1. That right panel in 4.1 doesn't add much.
The universe is under no obligation to make sense to us.How does 1.1 work in wiki size?
I wouldn't bother with 1.1 in wikisize, it's too small even for my taste:
4.2.
Edited by Piterpicher on Dec 18th 2019 at 12:10:33 PM
Currently mostly inactive. An incremental game I tested: https://galaxy.click/play/176 (Gods of Incremental)I think this looks best in graph format.
Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!I like the graph (9) too. But is there any way we could get the numbers bigger? I can still read them, but only barely. I'm definitely squinting.
Bump. Is possible?
(Annoyed grunt)Promising concept, but that image is just too hard to read. It's messy and there's a lot of distractions; the chart itself blends in too much.
Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure PurenessTried cleaning it a bit:
Edited by Prime32 on Dec 30th 2019 at 2:10:58 PM
That's not bad at all.
I'll go with that.
(Annoyed grunt)That works.
The universe is under no obligation to make sense to us.from me.
Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!Clock is set.
16.
Currently mostly inactive. An incremental game I tested: https://galaxy.click/play/176 (Gods of Incremental)I'm seeing quite a lot of support for #16; do we need a crowner to make it official?
Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!I'll pitch in another vote for 16.
she/her | TRS needs your help! | Contributor of Trope Report
I don't get the current image. It appears to be a trading card of some random kid that reads "KO". How exactly is that a power level?
A better image would be a comparison chart◊ or even a simple spiderweb chart◊.
Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!