spacemarine50
Since: Mar, 2012
#2: Aug 2nd 2012 at 5:56:51 PM
The word "paradox" is in the title. it's suppose to be that confusing.
kundoo
from the land of Mordor where the shadows lie
Since: Sep, 2010
Relationship Status: What is this thing you call love?
#3: Aug 2nd 2012 at 6:57:55 PM
Yeah. That's why I think the trope should be not about paradox itself, but rather about how different works deal whith it.
You didn't see anything.
#4: Aug 3rd 2012 at 1:19:39 AM
Would you be able to write up definitions that hold up on their own for those internal subtropes? What you wrote in the OP was mostly just confusing, as they all drew on each other.
Check out my fanfiction!
#5: Oct 11th 2012 at 6:00:31 AM
Clocking.
"If you aren't him, then you apparently got your brain from the same discount retailer, so..." - Fighteer
#6: Oct 22nd 2012 at 1:11:12 AM
Locking.
"If you aren't him, then you apparently got your brain from the same discount retailer, so..." - Fighteer
Total posts: 6
This trope confuses me. Clearly this is something that arises when the work is set in what supposed to be our universe where the makers of this work are also supposed to live and have their impact on it. But what exactly is this trope? When the creators don’t exist within their work? When they do? Laconic suggests former, but lots of examples are latter (and they are not said to be sub/in/ aversions), description seems not to take sides and just depicts a phenomenon.
I found these variations within examples:
2 and 3 are pretty much what Laconic says, but they are meaningless unless nonexistence of Actor A or Work Y is crucial to something happening within Work X. 4 seems to be the most referenced on the wiki.
I suggest to make them into internal subtropes to make it all more clear.
edited 2nd Aug '12 4:58:06 PM by kundoo
You didn't see anything.