Kagami Hiiragi Snuggling After Sex (Feedback Requested)

There Is No Such Thing As Notability.

If a forum thread's gotten big and interesting enough that it's useful as a trope mine, it gets a page.

edited 18th Jun '12 3:28:58 AM by Ramidel

I have to agree. There is a Troper Works Index and a Namespace for Roleplay too.

/offtopic

I don't think we've resolved whether or not the sequel Kagami Hiiragi snuggling with onions is safe yet. I guess it doesn't have a page? Or is it merged with the Kagami Hiiragi Snuggling After Sex page?

edited 18th Jun '12 3:47:20 AM by UltimatelySubjective

@50: Well, I found the page funny enough to read, and I'm not a participant...

Darn, it appears that there are 441 inbound links for this work page... though I do wonder if a good chunk of those are from SA.

Regarding whether Forum RPs should be entitled to their own pages or not: while you are all certainly entitled to your own opinions, this is probably not the right thread to air them in, and I don't think that aspect comes under 5P purview.

Inbound referrals

... Huh. Looks like I'm right. Gosh...

It really doesn't matter at this point. This page should be cut. The question is a) is it about both threads and b) does the second thread contain objectionable material?

a)it IS about BOTH threads.

I personally think that it should be cleaned and moved to Snuggling With Onions if it is okayed, with current page being left as a redirect.

If the Onions thread is clean, I'm fine with it having it's own page. My impression from Anno R's posts however was that there was problematic content in that thread as well.

Can anyone confirm whether or not the Onions thread is clean? I think we're all agreed that the "After Sex" work page will be going away.

Anno suggested that it isn't though I can provide independent confirmation after my morning coffee.

edited 18th Jun '12 6:47:41 AM by tdgoodrich1

Share the load? I can help.

Please do. Can you start at, say, page 101?

Update the first (Pages 1-20)

• Rin's inappropriate remarks begin
• And Kuro's
• Zersk wants to follow Rin and Kuro to watch them bathe

edited 18th Jun '12 7:53:52 AM by tdgoodrich1

Crap. Just did pages 1 - 51.

Highlights from Pages 1 - 60:

• Sexual innuendo and petting involving sockpuppets of two underaged characters from Kodomo no Jikan. (No link, it's everywhere.)
• Implicit nudity of a sockpuppet of an apparently twelve-year-old character.
• Implied sexual activity between sockpuppets of two underaged characters from Kodomo no Jikan and one from K On - regardless of whether it actually happened or not, the implication is there.

edited 18th Jun '12 8:33:47 AM by Pyrite

I hope you guys have some brain bleach; you know, just in case there's some skeevy stuff in there...

...Pyrite has no Brain Bleach. Pyrite needs no Brain Bleach. (Of course, Pyrite wasn't the one who reviewed Litchi Hikari Club, so his policy may require review in the future.)

edited 18th Jun '12 7:52:28 AM by Pyrite

Ok, Pyrite. Looks like I'll start at 101.

Update the first (pg. 101-120)

• Zersk's apparent continuing lust for Rin
• conversation implying cunnilingus with Zersk

Update the second:

Pages 121-140 clean of all things other than typical "in character" remarks for Rin/Kuro/Aoki

edited 18th Jun '12 8:28:56 AM by tdgoodrich1

TBH, do we really need to go further? If you go by the standards required for fanfiction, this stuff crosses the line since we've already stated that we don't want fanfic of underaged characters having sex.

The fanfic recommendations, not the pages. The former have the 16- standard; the latter not.

Thanks for clearing that up - I got them mixed up for a moment.

...Of course, the content's probably crossed the line as far as content for regular works is concerned as well.

(Also forgot that Satoko and Rika are supposedly 11. And Zersk would've been 13 in 2010 if you trust his troper page, but someone should probably have a word with the kid for his sake.)

Highlights from pages 60 - 101:

• Extended double entendres about "getting little girls off" and other sexual humour, played for laughs. Probably not a blatant violation in itself, but in the context of an RP...
• Further implied exposure of underaged sockpuppets to male genitalia.
• More underaged propositioning.

Again, the question remains: do we need to go further? Based on my assessment of the first 100 pages, I would consider this work to be pretty much a violation of our policy on grounds of paedo-pandering, unless there are any arguments to the contrary that anyone would care to provide.

edited 18th Jun '12 8:44:43 AM by Pyrite

Ok, I've seen enough to make my vote to just cut the page for both threads. Thanks for your help.

edited 18th Jun '12 8:41:47 AM by Meeble

The second thread is not clean. As you can see now. A real shame, too, since there's a lot of fun goofiness in it later on, but... yeah.

Works page needs the axe.

edited 18th Jun '12 8:43:03 AM by AnnoR

Pages 141-160:

• Submitted without comment

161-200:

• Rin in a naked apron
• beginning of a series of posts culminating in licking a pantsless catgirl

edited 18th Jun '12 9:13:18 AM by tdgoodrich1

... What Meeble said.

It's resolved off the queue and a cut request submitted. Anything else need to be said here?