The sub-forum is used for discussions that adjudicate possible violations of The Content Policy. Threads here can be created by flagging a page through the sidebar "report" button and toggling "The page may violate the Content Policy".
This thread is for general discussion of pages.
Edited by SeptimusHeap on Sep 10th 2022 at 11:50:32 AM
I have to agree with this. Or maybe not replacing, but bringing in an additional member. If you keep the same three votes=cut/save rule, would having six people active (presuming Catalogue is okay and comes back) really be a problem?
Ultimately, that's up to the staff to decide. Best not discuss it here.
"Polite life will fill you full of cancer." - Iggy Pop "I've seen the future, brother, it is murder." -Leonard CohenOkay. Sorry.
Did word ever get passed down on what was up with the Rape tropes? I know most of them are back, but I'm kind of curious as to know what the resolution ended up being.
If I recall, it was that now none of them are allowed to have Google ads on them.
We've done that previously, to no effect. That's actually what caused the second google incident: someone went to google and complained about a page that did not have google ads.
Also, in a completely unrelated note, but can one of the mods remove Martello's P5 badge?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flower_and_Snake I know it's TECHNICALLY porn, but I find the films unique use of tropes to be compelling, so I kinda wanna make a page on it.
BUMP
David Bowie 1947-2016Hey, guys, I'm back from my short birthday break!
What Goodrich says here applies to me, too.
Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.If you know something is porn, then you should be able to tell whether you can make a page on it even without the P5.
"If you aren't him, then you apparently got your brain from the same discount retailer, so..." - FighteerWorks with two votes one way or the other:
Page 1:
- Fanfic.Beating The Heat - 2 devils, 0 angels
- Fanfic.Warming Up - 2 devils, 0 angels
- VisualNovel.Yosuga No Sora - should have 0 devils, 2 angels, 3rd is recorded erroneously
- Manga.Maicchingu Machiko Sensei - 0 devils, 2 angels
Page 2:
- Main.Ironwood - 2 devils, 2 angels, missing my vote pending Shima elaborating on a comment
- Webcomic.Tally Road - 2 devils, 0 angels
- Main.Darling - 2 devils, 0 angels
- Literature.An Ordinary Sex Life - 2 devils, 0 angels
Page 3:
- VisualNovel.Hoshizora No Memoria - 2 devils, 0 angels
- Main.The Sex Star - 2 devils, 0 angels
edited 27th Jul '12 7:56:31 AM by tdgoodrich1
"Polite life will fill you full of cancer." - Iggy Pop "I've seen the future, brother, it is murder." -Leonard CohenAh, you want me to talk on Ironwood? It's been a while since I read it, first issue is very porny, but the plot kicks in quickly and while there's sex in every issue, after the first one it tends to feel a little shoehorned. The author cares more about the plot and there's focus on that and the action, there's just sex and nudity in a fantasy comic. There is no paedopandering.
Any other questions?
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. DickNot really. Thanks. If there's less sex in later volumes, it's probably OK.
"Polite life will fill you full of cancer." - Iggy Pop "I've seen the future, brother, it is murder." -Leonard Cohen@Shima: Hmm, I must've read just the first issue... gosh, that devil head was undeserved.
Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.Like I said, it's not that bad. The problem with western comic books is that anything with any genitalia at all (this includes just bare breasts) is classified as "Pornographic" thanks to the idea that comics are only for children. They're not pure porn by our standards, but they are rated R.
edited 27th Jul '12 8:39:43 AM by shimaspawn
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. DickOkay, "R," not "NC-17." Got it.
Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.Oh, there's still sex in them. NC-17 isn't even the same thing as porn. And I am not going to go into a long rant about movie ratings and how they up the ratings on anything that doesn't depict sex as violent rape...
Yeah, they're probably NC-17 because they show consensual sex and healthy relationships and you can only get away with having sex in R rated media if it's violent rape, and the woman isn't shown as enjoying it.
edited 27th Jul '12 8:57:52 AM by shimaspawn
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. DickThat's... interesting. Depressingly unfortunate, but interesting.
Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.It is. This Film Is Not Yet Rated explains it well, but I don't think that their standards are wiki standards. Real porn isn't rated at all. Most NC-17 stuff isn't porn. It's just stuff that makes conservatives uncomfortable. You know, things like homosexuals having sex at all. Women enjoying sex. Any sex scene that doesn't put the man in charge. Any sex scene that shows a healthy sex life and not just deviants...
edited 27th Jul '12 9:14:35 AM by shimaspawn
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. DickSo about Sengoku Rance's decision. VideoGame.Sengoku Rance is to be redirected to Alice Soft. Should all the other sub-pages be cutlisted?
Yep. Make it so.
Also zapped and reflagged Yosuga No Sora to clear my double-vote.
edited 27th Jul '12 9:33:46 AM by tdgoodrich1
"Polite life will fill you full of cancer." - Iggy Pop "I've seen the future, brother, it is murder." -Leonard CohenFolks, please pay attention to which page you are redirecting something. The page is AliceSoft not Alice Soft
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanThanks for catching that; both redirects for Sengoku Rance now point to the Creator page.
On that note, Rance Quest probably needs to be the next thing reviewed, for completeness' sake.
edited 27th Jul '12 4:31:05 PM by Willbyr
Well it was put under Creator/ just yesterday so it's understandable.
Just wondering why was that not cut with the franchise? I apologize if this is an idiotic question.
edited 27th Jul '12 6:50:03 PM by shadis
He had a similarly lengthy absence not long before. He has been around very little for this and while he apparently did say he had some real life stuff to deal with on occasion by this point I don't think it actually matters. He's not here and he was barely here to begin with. While the P5 is technically functioning on four members now and was limping along on three before, if he isn't here then we really need to think about replacing.