Follow TV Tropes

Following

VERY YMMV yet not categorized as such: Adorkable

Go To

0dd1 Just awesome like that from Nowhere Land Since: Sep, 2009
Just awesome like that
#1: Jul 9th 2011 at 7:46:20 PM

Why isn't Adorkable a YMMV trope? Frankly, does it really even seem too tropable? Someone who is awkward and nerdy but in cute way—that last part just nails the subjectivity of this. "You can't not love them." It is very possible to not love a character like this.

Insert witty and clever quip here. My page, as the database hates my handle.
Discar Since: Jun, 2009
#2: Jul 9th 2011 at 7:49:50 PM

It's pretty clear when its intended to be cute and when its intended to be creepy (do we have a creepy nerd trope?). Like Badass. Yes, YMMV on whether it works, but its clear when they're trying.

0dd1 Just awesome like that from Nowhere Land Since: Sep, 2009
Just awesome like that
#3: Jul 9th 2011 at 7:54:51 PM

But if it's when the writers are trying to invoke this, shouldn't the page reflect that instead of sounding like that's what the audience will no matter what have as a reaction?

Insert witty and clever quip here. My page, as the database hates my handle.
Arha Since: Jan, 2010
#4: Jul 9th 2011 at 8:01:20 PM

Then rewrite the description, don't make the page YMMV.

0dd1 Just awesome like that from Nowhere Land Since: Sep, 2009
Just awesome like that
#5: Jul 10th 2011 at 3:54:24 PM

But aside from Word of God admitted examples, how do we really know for sure that the writers are actively campaigning to make a character seem this way and that it's not just all in a viewer's head?

Insert witty and clever quip here. My page, as the database hates my handle.
KJMackley Since: Jan, 2001
#6: Jul 11th 2011 at 9:34:33 AM

Characters within the story usually comment on how dorky the character is and there is humor in them trying to act cool while downplaying how dorky they are, hence the adorable dork. A lot of times writers and even actors may not even be aware they are using an objective trope, that doesn't make it any less objective. If we need Word of God to back up every trope we wouldn't get very far.

Basically, Adorkable lists a series of common traits for the character, none of which hinges on the audience having a strong reaction to them (all character tropes usually get some sort of response, that doesn't mean the trope is about how the audience responds). Compare that to The Woobie, when audience reaction to the character is key to the entire trope. The Woobie may have some common traits but you can check out the subtropes (Iron Woobie, Jerkass Woobie) to see how widely defined that trope can be.

Vyctorian ◥▶◀◤ from Domhain Sceal Since: Mar, 2011
◥▶◀◤
#7: Jul 11th 2011 at 10:46:44 AM

Ya, I have to agree Adorkable is a set of define character traits which are not based upon the subjective opinions of an audience. The trope need to better state that, but it's not a YMMV.

Rarely active, try DA/Tumblr Avatar by pippanaffie.deviantart.com
phantomangel08 Since: May, 2011
#8: Jul 11th 2011 at 8:34:48 PM

[up] Seconding.

I don't think this is a YMMV trope, for the most part, I think most of these characters are intended to come off this way. Whether its a conscious or subconscious decision on the creator's part.

Add Post

Total posts: 8
Top