Follow TV Tropes

Following

Example Sectionectomy?: One True Threesome

Go To

troacctid "µ." from California Since: Apr, 2010
#1: Jan 22nd 2011 at 11:25:42 PM

One True Pairing doesn't list examples, and this is a pretty straight variant of One True Pairing, so...should we drop the example list here?

Rhymes with "Protracted."
EternalSeptember Since: Sep, 2010
#2: Jan 23rd 2011 at 12:25:51 AM

One True Pairing doesn't need examples because the examples would be every shipping ever. It's not about a specific form of shipping, but about a certain fan reaction that often comes with it.

OT3 is inherently more specific, first of all, because only a certain type of works have any room for a threesome, and even then, not every fandom is shipping them at all.

helterskelter Since: Nov, 2009 Relationship Status: Drift compatible
#3: Jan 23rd 2011 at 9:21:52 AM

[up] I disagree. Most fiction has at least three characters. Therefore, it is open to this trope. There is no point in listing examples.

Arha Since: Jan, 2010
#4: Jan 23rd 2011 at 9:44:53 AM

Yeah, but are they three characters who... wait, I'm venturing into shipping territory while using normal logic. Forget I said anything. Still, I don't know if we should cut the examples, it seems a lot more specific than OTP and less likely to get filled with complete garbage.

Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#5: Jan 23rd 2011 at 10:28:50 AM

Limit the examples to those where there is not only fandom shipping, but the author indicates that a threesome is possible, or when it's canon. There are a surprising number of them hidden in the examples.

edited 23rd Jan '11 10:36:47 AM by Madrugada

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
TripleElation Diagonalizing The Matrix from Haifa, Isarel Since: Jan, 2001
Diagonalizing The Matrix
#6: Jan 23rd 2011 at 10:44:01 AM

[up] I agree we should salvage those instances, but shouldn't they be in their own objective Ménage à trois trope instead of a subjective shipping trope like this?

Edit: Please tell me we do have this one. Search turns up a work happened to be named this, but that's all.

edited 23rd Jan '11 10:45:31 AM by TripleElation

Pretentious quote || In-joke from fandom you've never heard of || Shameless self-promotion || Something weird you'll habituate to
shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#7: Jan 23rd 2011 at 10:47:38 AM

You know, what we could do instead of removing all the examples from both of these tropes is just have examples that are specific fanfics, or fan arts. We have a whole lot of fanfiction written up on the site. Perhaps the problem with these tropes is that they try to look at fandom as a whole rather than fandom in specific.

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
EternalSeptember Since: Sep, 2010
#8: Jan 23rd 2011 at 10:49:02 AM

[up][up][up][up][up] Not really, this trope also require that there is either a canonical love triangle, or at least a sipping fandom for all of the combinations, and the OT3 is supposed to end these shipping wars.

OT3 can't happen, for example if:

  • There is really one dominant pairing, and all others are niches, so the fandom doesn't need a compromise. (most works with only a superficial romantic plot)
  • There are more than 3 options, so a threesome wouldn't solve anything. (like most harem anime)

[up][up][up][up] I don't like this whole "LOL, sipping is crazy!" attitude. Shipping has its own patterns, that are worthy of noting, even if subjectively.

[up] [up]I agree, maybe there are enough examples for another objective trope, but this page is still legit on its own right as a fandom trope.

Maybe if enough of those objectives are subtextual, that new trope could be Three Yay, since that snowclone family was recently repurposed for "Kinky in-univers subtext".

edited 23rd Jan '11 10:49:30 AM by EternalSeptember

shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#9: Jan 23rd 2011 at 10:53:23 AM

Triang Relations is the trope you're looking for.

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
EternalSeptember Since: Sep, 2010
#10: Jan 23rd 2011 at 10:57:26 AM

You know, what we could do instead of removing all the examples from both of these tropes is just have examples that are specific fanfics, or fan arts. We have a whole lot of fanfiction written up on the site. Perhaps the problem with these tropes is that they try to look at fandom as a whole rather than fandom in specific.

The problem is with the reading habits of fanfic fans.

I think it's perfectly reasonable that I just search a fanfic database for Harry/Ginny/Hermione fics, notice that there is a lot of them, quickly browse through some of their text, conclude that the Harry Potter fandom likes this sipping, and frequently uses x and y objective tropes in them, so next time when I edit TV Tropes, I note under a new bullet point that "The Harry Potter fandom" as if it would be a homogenous work, uses that trope. At no point do I think about the title, or author of the various 1000 word fanfics I actually read.

No, I don't actually do that, I just say that I can imagine how for these fandoms, this behavior appears to be consistent with the treatment of "other works".

edited 23rd Jan '11 10:58:04 AM by EternalSeptember

TripleElation Diagonalizing The Matrix from Haifa, Isarel Since: Jan, 2001
Diagonalizing The Matrix
#11: Jan 23rd 2011 at 11:14:03 AM

Triang Relations is a supertrope, no? There are plenty of triangular situations that don't actually involve a threesome. I mean, a Betty and Veronica situation also fits under Triang Relations. That clearly can't be the exact trope we're looking for here.

edited 23rd Jan '11 11:14:19 AM by TripleElation

Pretentious quote || In-joke from fandom you've never heard of || Shameless self-promotion || Something weird you'll habituate to
shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#12: Jan 23rd 2011 at 11:16:57 AM

It is a supertrope, but all the different permutations are listed on that page unless they have their own page which currently only Betty and Veronica do. Type 8 under Triang Relations is exactly what the wiki has for this trope.

edited 23rd Jan '11 11:17:30 AM by shimaspawn

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
EternalSeptember Since: Sep, 2010
#13: Jan 23rd 2011 at 11:19:22 AM

Anyways, even if we have a page for threesomes, I'm pretty sure that we don't have one for canon threesome subtext, and that sounds tropable, so I'm going to YKTTW it.

TripleElation Diagonalizing The Matrix from Haifa, Isarel Since: Jan, 2001
Diagonalizing The Matrix
#14: Jan 23rd 2011 at 11:22:00 AM

[up] We don't even have a separate trope for canon threesome text... text. This is what surprised me.

edited 23rd Jan '11 11:23:40 AM by TripleElation

Pretentious quote || In-joke from fandom you've never heard of || Shameless self-promotion || Something weird you'll habituate to
EternalSeptember Since: Sep, 2010
#15: Jan 23rd 2011 at 11:31:33 AM

Well, we have Twin Threesome Fantasy...

Oh, there it is: Three-Way Sex

edited 23rd Jan '11 11:34:35 AM by EternalSeptember

shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#16: Jan 23rd 2011 at 11:34:18 AM

But that's more of a subtrope.

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
Arha Since: Jan, 2010
#17: Jan 23rd 2011 at 11:39:56 AM

I know the Negima example on the page about Yue and Nodoka wouldn't be there except for a joke about it that occurred about midway through the series, so there should definitely be examples of intentional examples of this.

Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#18: Jan 23rd 2011 at 2:01:08 PM

ES, Three-Way Sex is about the act of having a threesome, not an ongoing three-way relationship.

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Jomlos Since: Dec, 1969
#19: Feb 3rd 2011 at 4:45:55 PM

I'd rather go with Canon / Subtext example than with no example at all, let me take few samples....

  1. In Star Driver, Takuto/Wako/Sugata almost seems canon, at least if the ED has anything to say about it.

  2. To Love Ru has Haruna/Rito/Lala, and chapter 162 shows that Lala not only doesn't mind but she actually wants this to happen.

Two examples took from anime & manga section, both of them are heavily featured in fandom as well as hinted in the story, neither made it fully Canon. So, adding 'heavily implied' examples is my suggestion.

Don't sue me

edited 3rd Feb '11 4:48:45 PM by Jomlos

Raso Cure Candy Since: Jul, 2009
Cure Candy
#20: Feb 3rd 2011 at 9:40:25 PM

[1] This page right here is the Negima example Her diary reads anyones mind so she read her own to see her true feelings on resolving the Love Triangle....

PLAN 1! Saishodoukin (means Relations with wife and mistress at the same time)

edited 4th Feb '11 12:31:52 AM by Raso

Sparkling and glittering! Jan-Ken-Pon!
Discar Since: Jun, 2009
#21: Mar 4th 2011 at 5:13:42 PM

Bump. Also, what are the names of the tropes September is YKTTW-ing?

EternalSeptember Since: Sep, 2010
#22: Mar 5th 2011 at 3:22:14 AM

[up] It's Three Yay, though I sort of forgot about it, and now I have other tropes to sort out, I will probably launch it a few weeks from now.

MarqFJA The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer from Deserts of the Middle East (Before Recorded History) Relationship Status: Anime is my true love
The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer
#23: Apr 27th 2011 at 9:54:39 AM

Bump. Are there still any unresolved issues?

Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.
Discar Since: Jun, 2009
#24: Apr 27th 2011 at 10:52:58 AM

Well, Three Yay still hasn't been launched.

EternalSeptember Since: Sep, 2010
#25: Apr 27th 2011 at 11:10:49 AM

It only gathered 4 examples in the YKTTW, after repeated bumps. I could technically launch it with that much, but I doubt that it would go anywhere after that.


Total posts: 39
Top