Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* NightmareFuel: The scenes where the Wolf eats the pigs might be a bit frightening for younger readers.
to:
* NightmareFuel: The scenes where the Wolf eats accidentally kills the pigs and then eats their corpses might be a bit frightening for younger readers.readers, especially after he has the second one and has grown fat and happy from it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: How much of the story is actually true is certainly a matter of debate. [[UnreliableNarrator The wolf isn't an unbiased source]] and he could be lying to paint himself in a sympathetic light. Even if his story ''is'' true, he could still be evil, since he doesn't seem even remotely perturbed when he [[AccidentalMurder accidentally kills]] the first two pigs either, and is all too eager to [[SapientEatSapient eat them]] afterward. It could just be simple BlueAndOrangeMorality on his part (he ''is'' a predator after all, and he even admits it's not good to waste food), but it still calls into question just how nice a guy he's supposed to be.
to:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: How much of the story is actually true is certainly a matter of debate. [[UnreliableNarrator The wolf isn't an unbiased source]] and he could be lying to paint himself in a sympathetic light. Even if his story ''is'' true, he could still be evil, since he doesn't seem even remotely perturbed when he [[AccidentalMurder accidentally kills]] the first two pigs either, and is all too eager to [[SapientEatSapient eat them]] afterward.afterward, and the fact that he doesn't even stop after accidentally killed the first pig despite having enough lung power to kill with a sneeze. It could just be simple BlueAndOrangeMorality on his part (he ''is'' a predator after all, and he even admits it's not good to waste food), but it still calls into question just how nice a guy he's supposed to be.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: How much of the story is actually true is certainly a matter of debate. [[UnreliableNarrator The wolf isn't an unbiased source]] and he could be lying to paint himself in a sympathetic light. He doesn't seem even remotely perturbed when he accidentally kills the first two pigs either, and is all too eager to eat them afterward. It could just be simple BlueAndOrangeMorality on his part (he ''is'' a predator after all, and he even admits it's not good to waste food), but it still calls into question just how nice a guy he's supposed to be.
to:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: How much of the story is actually true is certainly a matter of debate. [[UnreliableNarrator The wolf isn't an unbiased source]] and he could be lying to paint himself in a sympathetic light. He Even if his story ''is'' true, he could still be evil, since he doesn't seem even remotely perturbed when he [[AccidentalMurder accidentally kills kills]] the first two pigs either, and is all too eager to [[SapientEatSapient eat them them]] afterward. It could just be simple BlueAndOrangeMorality on his part (he ''is'' a predator after all, and he even admits it's not good to waste food), but it still calls into question just how nice a guy he's supposed to be.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* NightmareFuel: The scenes where the Wolf eats the pigs might be a bit frightening for younger readers.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not a subjective trope.
Deleted line(s) 2 (click to see context) :
* AmbiguousSituation: The big bad wolf (named Alexander) is in jail and claims that he went to the pigs' houses to borrow some sugar but had a cold, so blew the houses down accidentally by sneezing, then the pigs died in the destruction and he ate them to clean up. It's unclear if this really is the true story, or if Alexander is just lying.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Crosswick
Added DiffLines:
* AmbiguousSituation: The big bad wolf (named Alexander) is in jail and claims that he went to the pigs' houses to borrow some sugar but had a cold, so blew the houses down accidentally by sneezing, then the pigs died in the destruction and he ate them to clean up. It's unclear if this really is the true story, or if Alexander is just lying.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: How much of the story is actually true is certainly a matter of debate. [[UnreliableNarrator The wolf isn't an unbiased source]] and he could be lying to paint himself in a sympathetic light. He doesn't seem even remotely perturbed when he accidentally kills the first two pigs either, and is all too eager to eat them afterward. It could just be simple BlueAndOrangeMorality on his part (he ''is'' a predator after all, and he even admits it's not good to waste food), but it still calls into question just how nice a guy he's supposed to be.
to:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: How much of the story is actually true is certainly a matter of debate. [[UnreliableNarrator The wolf isn't an unbiased source]] and he could be lying to paint himself in a sympathetic light. He doesn't seem even remotely perturbed when he accidentally kills the first two pigs either, and is all too eager to eat them afterward. It could just be simple BlueAndOrangeMorality on his part (he ''is'' a predator after all, and he even admits it's not good to waste food), but it still calls into question just how nice a guy he's supposed to be.be.
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: How much of the story is actually true is certainly a matter of debate. [[UnreliableNarrator The wolf isn't an unbiased source]] and he could be lying to paint himself in a sympathetic light. He doesn't seem even remotely perturbed when he accidentally kills the first two pigs either, and is all too eager to eat them afterward. It could just be simple BlueAndOrangeMorality on hi part (he ''is'' a predator after all, and he even admits it's not good to waste food), but it still calls into question just how nice a guy he's supposed to be.
to:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: How much of the story is actually true is certainly a matter of debate. [[UnreliableNarrator The wolf isn't an unbiased source]] and he could be lying to paint himself in a sympathetic light. He doesn't seem even remotely perturbed when he accidentally kills the first two pigs either, and is all too eager to eat them afterward. It could just be simple BlueAndOrangeMorality on hi his part (he ''is'' a predator after all, and he even admits it's not good to waste food), but it still calls into question just how nice a guy he's supposed to be.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: How much of the story is actually true is certainly a matter of debate. [[UnreliableNarrator The wolf isn't an unbiased source]] and he could be lying to paint himself in a sympathetic light. He doesn't seem even remotely perturbed when he accidentally kills the first two pigs either, and is all too eager to eat them afterward. It could just be simple BlueAndOranceMorality on hi part (he ''is'' a predator after all, and he even admits it's not good to waste food), but it still calls into question just how nice a guy he's supposed to be.
to:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: How much of the story is actually true is certainly a matter of debate. [[UnreliableNarrator The wolf isn't an unbiased source]] and he could be lying to paint himself in a sympathetic light. He doesn't seem even remotely perturbed when he accidentally kills the first two pigs either, and is all too eager to eat them afterward. It could just be simple BlueAndOranceMorality BlueAndOrangeMorality on hi part (he ''is'' a predator after all, and he even admits it's not good to waste food), but it still calls into question just how nice a guy he's supposed to be.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: How much of the story is actually true is certainly a matter of debate. [[UnreliableNarrator The wolf isn't an unbiased source]] and he could be lying to paint himself in a sympathetic light. He doesn't seem even remotely perturbed when he accidentally kills the first two pigs either, and is all too eager to eat them afterward, which calls into question just how nice a guy he's supposed to be.
to:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: How much of the story is actually true is certainly a matter of debate. [[UnreliableNarrator The wolf isn't an unbiased source]] and he could be lying to paint himself in a sympathetic light. He doesn't seem even remotely perturbed when he accidentally kills the first two pigs either, and is all too eager to eat them afterward, which afterward. It could just be simple BlueAndOranceMorality on hi part (he ''is'' a predator after all, and he even admits it's not good to waste food), but it still calls into question just how nice a guy he's supposed to be.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: How much of the story is actually true is certainly a matter of debate. [[UnreliableNarrator The wolf isn't an unbiased source]] and he could be lying to paint himself in a sympathetic light. He doesn't seem even remotely perturbed when he accidentally kills the first two pigs either, and is all too eager to eat them afterward, which calls into question just how nice a guy he's supposed to be.
