Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / TheNostalgiaCriticS12E33

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BileFascination: Some people have sought this out specifically because word of mouth got out about just how bad it was.

to:

* BileFascination: Some people have sought this out specifically because word of mouth got out about just how bad it was. A repeated mention is because of how much effort Doug Walker put into such an ill designed review. Were it just Doug having a bunch of bad takes and missing the point of ''The Wall'' it probably wouldn't have drawn as much attention. But this being made into a musical, with a companion album that Doug sold on the side for real money, with Corey Taylor, and Fennah's animation makes the project utterly bizarre as it highlights how much importance the project had for Doug which only further contrasts how weak his criticism of the film is.

Added: 358

Changed: 121

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The "In the Flesh" parody bizarrely claims that the song was meant to be an attack on UsefulNotes/MargaretThatcher, even though Thatcher was only Prime Minister for five months at the time the album came out and was nowhere near as controversial as she would later become. It goes on to claim that the whole bit is vague enough that it could be about anyone or anything the viewer dislikes; while it can certainly be ''applied'' to a number of different things, both the album and the movie make it very clear that the song/scene is meant to be about neo-Nazis.

to:

** The "In the Flesh" parody bizarrely claims that the song was meant to be an attack on UsefulNotes/MargaretThatcher, even though Thatcher was only Prime Minister for five months at the time the album came out and was nowhere near as controversial as she would later become. It goes on to claim that the whole bit is vague enough that it could be about anyone or anything the viewer dislikes; while it can certainly be ''applied'' to a number of different things, both the album and the movie make it very clear that the song/scene is meant to be about neo-Nazis. In fact, the symbols the movie used for the neo-Nazis in the movie wound up IRL being co-opted by ''actual'' Neo-Nazis.


Added DiffLines:

** Broadly speaking the entire review completely misses the running societal commentary the movie tries to make. Discussing the after effects of WW2 and how the systems that arose in countries who patted themselves on the back for beating the Nazis only for themselves to turn towards authoritarianism and Fascism, as well as the commodification of people.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ShallowParody: A big part of why this episode garnered the backlash it did was because it often comes off as ignorant, causing many of the jokes and criticisms to fall flat.
** He accuses "Another Brick In The Wall, Part 2" of just pandering to rebellious high schoolers who resent being made into productive members of society and want to feel victimized by their teachers. Music/PinkFloyd's depiction of a school where students are abused and brainwashed into uniform clones devoid of individuality is startlingly accurate of UK boarding schools of the time (in fact, the teacher in charge of the children's choir in the song had to keep the recording a secret for fear of the head teacher shutting it down), and the film includes a scene where a teacher physically beats the young Pink for writing poetry (which was based on an actual event in Waters' youth). He also declares that the film is saying that ''all'' teachers are {{sadist teacher}}s, despite "The Happiest Days of Our Lives" only claiming this to be the case for "certain teachers" and surmising that the Schoolmaster is who he is because of [[AwfulWeddedLife his decaying, abusive marriage]]. Roger Waters clarified that he's actually ''for'' education; what he's against is the kind of education shown in the film, steeped in rote memorization, squelching creativity, and allowing or even encouraging teachers to mistreat their students.
** He refers "Goodbye Blue Sky" as an "[[AwardBaitSong Oscar bait song]]" when it was one of the tracks on the original album and thus wouldn't have qualified for an Oscar when it was made. He also accuses the song's placement as insensitive due to being a song about World War II coming right after "Another Brick in the Wall", a song about high school (claiming it's arguing high school is as bad as the Holocaust). In all versions, there's at least one song separating the parts of "Another Brick in the Wall" from "Goodbye Blue Skies"--on the album, it's "Mother", in the film, it's "The Happiest Days of Our Lives" and "When the Tigers Broke Free" (these do both deal with school and World War II, but again, it's a film about a British boy born in the early 40s whose father died in the war; those two topics would overlap a lot).
** The "In the Flesh" parody bizarrely claims that the song was meant to be an attack on UsefulNotes/MargaretThatcher, even though Thatcher was only Prime Minister for five months at the time the album came out and was nowhere near as controversial as she would later become. It goes on to claim that the whole bit is vague enough that it could be about anyone or anything the viewer dislikes; while it can certainly be ''applied'' to a number of different things, both the album and the movie make it very clear that the song/scene is meant to be about neo-Nazis.
** When discussing "The Trial", Fennah accuses the monsters as being underdeveloped and existing only for spectacle. In the film, none of the monsters in "The Trial" are actually meant to exist beyond being personifications of Pink's self-loathing, meaning that accusing them of not being well-developed is rather baffling when they're not meant to be characters at all--indeed, three of the five are pretty clearly just preexisting developed characters from the film run through a monstrous filter (the puppet is Pink's schoolmaster, the scorpion is his wife, and the bomber is his mother); the film doesn't even try to ''hide'' this, as the line ''right before the first verse'' is "Call the schoolmaster!"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
removed an Up To Eleven wick


* HePannedItNowHeSucks: While some defend the review, many (especially fans of the original album) do not. On the video as well as the subreddits, many find the review cringey and totally missing the point of the album as well as insulting to Music/RogerWaters's autobiographical aspects. Not made better by the fact that many don't feel that it's actually being reviewed until a few seconds towards the very end. The outrage from fans of the movie/album, combined with confusion from non-fans, resulted in a staggering amount of dislikes on the video, negative for even his most divisive reviews[[note]]disregarding those that came out during [[OvershadowedByControversy the height of the Channel Awesome PR nightmare]][[/note]]. This backlash was so immense that some of his most vocal critics have and continue to use it as their main argument against the entire ''Nostalgia Critic'' series, if not [[UpToEleven the "angry reviewer" format as a whole]].

to:

* HePannedItNowHeSucks: While some defend the review, many (especially fans of the original album) do not. On the video as well as the subreddits, many find the review cringey and totally missing the point of the album as well as insulting to Music/RogerWaters's autobiographical aspects. Not made better by the fact that many don't feel that it's actually being reviewed until a few seconds towards the very end. The outrage from fans of the movie/album, combined with confusion from non-fans, resulted in a staggering amount of dislikes on the video, negative for even his most divisive reviews[[note]]disregarding those that came out during [[OvershadowedByControversy the height of the Channel Awesome PR nightmare]][[/note]]. This backlash was so immense that some of his most vocal critics have and continue to use it as their main argument against the entire ''Nostalgia Critic'' series, if not [[UpToEleven the "angry reviewer" format as a whole]].whole.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SoBadItsGood: Some such as the crew of Podcast/EveryFrameAPause pointed out that while the review suffers from terrible singing, mediocre special effects and the lack of actual critique, they ironically enjoy the review for those very aspects. They also point out that Doug Walker seems to be [[TookTheBadFilmSeriously putting in genuine effort in the project, flawed as it is]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BrokenBase: Is "The Trial" segment, which features a crossover with ''WebVideo/SatelliteCity'', a beautifully animated addition and the best part (or, according to some, the only good part) of the review, or is it a complete mess that comes out of nowhere and only makes things more confusing? To most, this will come down to their familiarity with Fennah's work and whether they find the character designs appealing or not.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SpecialEffectsFailure: Another reason the review got so disparaged: while no one's going to say the Nostalgia Critic ever had the best effects -- and even some of the harshest critics of the review have admitted that the stuff done by Fenneh for this is pretty good despite the crappy greenscreening and obvious CGI version of Doug in a few shots -- the episode's attempts to imitate the still impressive animation of ''The Wall'' with some very subpar CGI and poorly done green screen effects just serves to highlight how cheap and amateurish it all is.

to:

* SpecialEffectsFailure: Another reason the review got so disparaged: while no one's going to say the Nostalgia Critic ever had the best effects -- and even some of the harshest critics of the review have admitted that the stuff done by Fenneh Fennah for this is pretty good despite the crappy greenscreening and obvious CGI version of Doug in a few shots -- the episode's attempts to imitate the still impressive animation of ''The Wall'' with some very subpar CGI and poorly done green screen effects just serves to highlight how cheap and amateurish it all is.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MisaimedFandom: The most common accusations towards this review was that people felt like Doug Walker was missing the point entirely with the movie depicting Roger Waters's life, he was intentionally insulting Waters, and he made a mockery of the movie itself and didn't like it. According to Doug Walker when he was [[https://youtu.be/CLqtV9fai8w?t=2396 interviewed on Double Toasted Interviews]] it was that he wanted his review to be experimental just like the movie itself was. He explained that his idea for the review was to be comparing from the perspective how he saw the film as a young man and the perspective of watching it again as a cynical adult, and he openly admitted that people not getting what his intentions were with the review was his fault since he basically pulled a GambitRoulette on the review and didn't really do a good job with getting his point across. And he also stated that he does like the movie.

to:

* MisaimedFandom: The most common accusations towards this review was that people felt like Doug Walker was missing the point entirely with the movie depicting Roger Waters's life, he was intentionally insulting Waters, and he made a mockery of the movie itself and didn't like it. According to Doug Walker when he was [[https://youtu.be/CLqtV9fai8w?t=2396 interviewed on Double Toasted Interviews]] it was that he wanted his review to be experimental just like the movie itself was. He explained that his idea for the review was to be comparing from the perspective of how he saw the film as a young man and the perspective of watching it again as a cynical adult, and he openly admitted that people not getting what his intentions were with the review was his fault since he basically pulled a GambitRoulette on the review and didn't really do a good job with getting his point across. And he also stated that he does like the movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HePannedItNowHeSucks: While some defend the review, many (especially fans of the original album) do not. On the video as well as the subreddits, many find the review cringey and totally missing the point of the album as well as insulting to the Music/RogerWaters's autobiographical aspects. Not made better by the fact that many don't feel that it's actually being reviewed until a few seconds towards the very end. The outrage from fans of the movie/album, combined with confusion from non-fans, resulted in a staggering amount of dislikes on the video, negative for even his most divisive reviews[[note]]disregarding those that came out during [[OvershadowedByControversy the height of the Channel Awesome PR nightmare]][[/note]]. This backlash was so immense that some of his most vocal critics have and continue to use it as their main argument against the entire ''Nostalgia Critic'' series, if not [[UpToEleven the "angry reviewer" format as a whole]].

to:

* HePannedItNowHeSucks: While some defend the review, many (especially fans of the original album) do not. On the video as well as the subreddits, many find the review cringey and totally missing the point of the album as well as insulting to the Music/RogerWaters's autobiographical aspects. Not made better by the fact that many don't feel that it's actually being reviewed until a few seconds towards the very end. The outrage from fans of the movie/album, combined with confusion from non-fans, resulted in a staggering amount of dislikes on the video, negative for even his most divisive reviews[[note]]disregarding those that came out during [[OvershadowedByControversy the height of the Channel Awesome PR nightmare]][[/note]]. This backlash was so immense that some of his most vocal critics have and continue to use it as their main argument against the entire ''Nostalgia Critic'' series, if not [[UpToEleven the "angry reviewer" format as a whole]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MisaimedFandom: The most common accusations towards this review was that people felt like Doug Walker was missing the point entirely with the movie depicting Roger Waters's life, he was intentionally insulting Waters, and he made a mockery of the movie itself and didn't like it. According to Doug Walker when he was [[https://youtu.be/CLqtV9fai8w?t=2396 interviewed on Double Toasted Interviews]] was that he wanted his review to be experimental just like the movie itself was. He explained that his idea for the review was to be comparing from the perspective how he saw the film as a young man and the perspective of watching it again as a cynical adult, and he openly admitted that people not getting what his intentions were with the review was his fault since he basically pulled a GambitRoulette on the review and didn't really do a good job with getting his point across. And he also stated that he does like the movie.

to:

* MisaimedFandom: The most common accusations towards this review was that people felt like Doug Walker was missing the point entirely with the movie depicting Roger Waters's life, he was intentionally insulting Waters, and he made a mockery of the movie itself and didn't like it. According to Doug Walker when he was [[https://youtu.be/CLqtV9fai8w?t=2396 interviewed on Double Toasted Interviews]] it was that he wanted his review to be experimental just like the movie itself was. He explained that his idea for the review was to be comparing from the perspective how he saw the film as a young man and the perspective of watching it again as a cynical adult, and he openly admitted that people not getting what his intentions were with the review was his fault since he basically pulled a GambitRoulette on the review and didn't really do a good job with getting his point across. And he also stated that he does like the movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MisaimedFandom: The most common accusations towards this review was that people felt like Doug Walker was missing the point entirely with the movie depicting Roger Waters's life, he was intentionally insulting Waters, and he made a mockery of the movie itself and didn't like it. According to Doug Walker when he was [[https://youtu.be/CLqtV9fai8w?t=2396 interviewed on Double Toasted Interviews]] was that he wanted his review to be experimental just like the movie itself was. He explained that his idea for the review was to be comparing from the perspective how how he saw the film as a young man and the perspective of watching it again as a cynical adult, and he openly admitted that people not getting what his intentions were with the review was his fault since he basically pulled a GambitRoulette on the review. And he also stated that he does like the movie.

to:

* MisaimedFandom: The most common accusations towards this review was that people felt like Doug Walker was missing the point entirely with the movie depicting Roger Waters's life, he was intentionally insulting Waters, and he made a mockery of the movie itself and didn't like it. According to Doug Walker when he was [[https://youtu.be/CLqtV9fai8w?t=2396 interviewed on Double Toasted Interviews]] was that he wanted his review to be experimental just like the movie itself was. He explained that his idea for the review was to be comparing from the perspective how how he saw the film as a young man and the perspective of watching it again as a cynical adult, and he openly admitted that people not getting what his intentions were with the review was his fault since he basically pulled a GambitRoulette on the review.review and didn't really do a good job with getting his point across. And he also stated that he does like the movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* MisaimedFandom: The most common accusations towards this review was that people felt like Doug Walker was missing the point entirely with the movie depicting Roger Waters's life, he was intentionally insulting Waters, and he made a mockery of the movie itself and didn't like it. According to Doug Walker when he was [[https://youtu.be/CLqtV9fai8w?t=2396 interviewed on Double Toasted Interviews]] was that he wanted his review to be experimental just like the movie itself was. He explained that his idea for the review was to be comparing from the perspective how how he saw the film as a young man and the perspective of watching it again as a cynical adult, and he openly admitted that people not getting what his intentions were with the review was his fault since he basically pulled a GambitRoulette on the review. And he also stated that he does like the movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* CriticalResearchFailure: The review has been routinely criticized for this:
** Doing any research on ''The Wall'' and Roger Waters' life can very well explain why the film tackles classroom abuse and World War II in the same film. The review shows that Doug Walker clearly don't understand why. The video acts as if Waters is comparing school to ''the Holocaust'' when that was clearly never the intention.
** He claims that "Another Brick in the Wall (Part 2)" was meant to pander to rebellious teenagers who resent being made into productive members of society and want to feel victimized by their teachers. In reality, Pink Floyd's depiction of a school where students are abused and brainwashed into uniform clones devoid of individuality is startlingly accurate of UK boarding schools of the time (in fact, the teacher in charge of the children's choir in the song had to keep the recording a secret for fear of the head teacher shutting it down). It's likely that Walker is thinking of US public schools and Pink Floyd as the band beloved by school music snobs.
** He mocks "Goodbye Blue Sky" as an "[[AwardBaitSong Oscar bait song]]," despite it originally coming from the Music/PinkFloyd [[Music/TheWall album]], meaning it wouldn't have qualified for an Oscar when it was made.
** Before and in the above-mentioned "Goodbye Blue Sky" parody, Critic attempts to criticize following a song about how bad school is with one talking about the horrors of UsefulNotes/WorldWarII, implying that the scene involving the train comes after the "Another Brick in the Wall (Part 2)" scene. While "Goodbye Blue Sky" does come immediately after "Another Brick in the Wall (Part 2)" on the album, it comes before it in the movie.
** "Bring the Runtime Down" decries the movie as being too long and should've been cut down -- even though, at a palatable 95 minutes, ''The Wall'' isn't really that long of a film. It also comes off as hypocritical considering that [[WebVideo/SuburbanKnights some of Doug's]] [[WebVideo/ToBoldlyFlee own projects]] actually have longer run-times.
** "In The Floyd (Again?)" claims the Nazi rally was meant as a dig at the Thatcher administration which.... it wasn't. It was about Pink becoming the very thing that killed his father: a Nazi.
*** His version has him begin any kind of authorative figure that choses who people should direct their rage and ultrage, with the hammer symbol changed to smartphones making a [[{{anvilicious}} very obvious]] he's talking about Twitter cancel culture. Which makes it worse considering he and his website went through a huge controversy that had a backlash at Twitter.
*** Doug also ignores the actual historical context behind the Nazis. Economic downturn in the UK in the 1970s and early 1980s led to the rise in popularity of neo-nazi parties in Britain, skinhead like in the movie were depressingly common figures in daily life.
** A good chunk of "The Trial" is spent complaining that the animated characters weren't "properly developed", even though by and large they are merely animated interpretations of the people in Pink's life and the two that aren't (the judge and the prosecutor) are easy enough to figure out within the segment's context. [[{{Hypocrite}} Made even worse]] by the fact that the ''Satellite City'' characters involved in the parody had barely been set up and had not been developed in the slightest within the review's own narrative.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
doesn't explain why it's an unfair exaggeration


* HePannedItNowHeSucks: While some defend the review, many (especially fans of the original album) do not. On the video as well as the subreddits, many find the review cringey and totally missing the point of the album as well as insulting to the Music/RogerWaters's autobiographical aspects. Not made better by the fact that many don't feel that it's actually being reviewed until a few seconds towards the very end. The outrage from fans of the movie/album, combined with confusion from non-fans, resulted in a staggering amount of dislikes on the video, negative for even his most divisive reviews[[note]]disregarding those that came out during [[OvershadowedByControversy the height of the Channel Awesome PR nightmare]][[/note]]. This backlash was so immense that some of his most vocal critics have and [[NeverLiveItDown continue to]] use it as their main argument against the entire ''Nostalgia Critic'' series, if not [[UpToEleven the "angry reviewer" format as a whole]].

to:

* HePannedItNowHeSucks: While some defend the review, many (especially fans of the original album) do not. On the video as well as the subreddits, many find the review cringey and totally missing the point of the album as well as insulting to the Music/RogerWaters's autobiographical aspects. Not made better by the fact that many don't feel that it's actually being reviewed until a few seconds towards the very end. The outrage from fans of the movie/album, combined with confusion from non-fans, resulted in a staggering amount of dislikes on the video, negative for even his most divisive reviews[[note]]disregarding those that came out during [[OvershadowedByControversy the height of the Channel Awesome PR nightmare]][[/note]]. This backlash was so immense that some of his most vocal critics have and [[NeverLiveItDown continue to]] to use it as their main argument against the entire ''Nostalgia Critic'' series, if not [[UpToEleven the "angry reviewer" format as a whole]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Doug also ignores the actual historical context behind the Nazis. Economic downturn in the UK in the 1970s and early 1980s led to the rise in popularity of neo-nazi parties in Britain, skinhead like in the movie were depressingly common figures in daily life.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** His version has him begin any kind of authorative figure that choses who people should direct their rage and ultrage, with the hammer symbol changed to smartphones making a [[{{anvilicious}} very obvious]] he's talking about Twitter cancel culture. Which makes it worse considering he and his website went through a huge controversy.

to:

** *** His version has him begin any kind of authorative figure that choses who people should direct their rage and ultrage, with the hammer symbol changed to smartphones making a [[{{anvilicious}} very obvious]] he's talking about Twitter cancel culture. Which makes it worse considering he and his website went through a huge controversy.controversy that had a backlash at Twitter.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** His version has him begin any kind of authorative figure that choses who people should direct their rage and ultrage, with the hammer symbol changed to smartphones making a [[{{anvilicious}} very obvious]] he's talking about Twitter cancel culture. Which makes it worse considering he and his website went through a huge controversy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Doing any research on ''The Wall'' and Roger Waters' life can very well explain why the film tackles classroom abuse and World War II in the same film. The review shows that Doug and Rob Walker clearly don't understand why. The video acts as if Waters is comparing school to ''the Holocaust'' when that was clearly never the intention.
** He claims that "Another Brick in the Wall (Part 2)" was meant to pander to rebellious teenagers who resent being made into productive members of society and want to feel victimized by their teachers. In reality, Pink Floyd's depiction of a school where students are abused and brainwashed into uniform clones devoid of individuality is startlingly accurate of UK boarding schools of the time (in fact, the teacher in charge of the children's choir in the song had to keep the recording a secret for fear of the head teacher shutting it down).

to:

** Doing any research on ''The Wall'' and Roger Waters' life can very well explain why the film tackles classroom abuse and World War II in the same film. The review shows that Doug and Rob Walker clearly don't understand why. The video acts as if Waters is comparing school to ''the Holocaust'' when that was clearly never the intention.
** He claims that "Another Brick in the Wall (Part 2)" was meant to pander to rebellious teenagers who resent being made into productive members of society and want to feel victimized by their teachers. In reality, Pink Floyd's depiction of a school where students are abused and brainwashed into uniform clones devoid of individuality is startlingly accurate of UK boarding schools of the time (in fact, the teacher in charge of the children's choir in the song had to keep the recording a secret for fear of the head teacher shutting it down). It's likely that Walker is thinking of US public schools and Pink Floyd as the band beloved by school music snobs.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** A good chunk of "The Trial" is spent complaining that the animated characters weren't "properly developped", even though by and large they are merely animated interpretations of the people in Pink's life and the two that aren't (the judge and the prosecutor) are easy enough to figure out within the segment's context. [[{{Hypocrite}} Made even worst]] by the fact that the people involved in the parody are "freaky furry Deviantart Oh Sees" that have barely been set up and not been developped in the slightest within the review's own narrative.

to:

** A good chunk of "The Trial" is spent complaining that the animated characters weren't "properly developped", developed", even though by and large they are merely animated interpretations of the people in Pink's life and the two that aren't (the judge and the prosecutor) are easy enough to figure out within the segment's context. [[{{Hypocrite}} Made even worst]] worse]] by the fact that the people ''Satellite City'' characters involved in the parody are "freaky furry Deviantart Oh Sees" that have had barely been set up and had not been developped developed in the slightest within the review's own narrative.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** "In The Floyd (Again?)" claims the Nazi rally was meant as a dig at the Thatcher administration which.... it wasn't. It was about Pink becoming the very thing that killed his father: a Nazi.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** A good chunk of "The Trial" is spent complaining that the animated characters weren't "properly developped", even though by and large they are merely animated interpretations of the people in Pink's life and the two that aren't (the judge and the prosecutor) are easy enough to figure out within the segment's context. [[{{Hypocrite}} Made even worst]] by the fact that the people involved in the parody are "freaky furry Deviantart Oh Sees" that have barely been set up and not been developped in the slightest within the review's own narrative.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Bob Geldof sings the second instance of In The Flesh, did you even watch the movie??


*** That's the joke. The movie had Bob Geldof, a real life rock star, as the main character Pink, who doesn't sing at all in the movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** That's the joke. The movie had Bob Geldof, a real life rock star, as the main character Pink, who doesn't sing at all in the movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Some critical reviews pointed out that the sequence comes across as Doug Walker trying to get back at/make fun of the #ChangeTheChannel movement and the backlash he and Channel Awesome received; portraying those involved as nothing more than angry keyboard warriors, mindlessly following the latest outrage.

to:

** Some critical reviews pointed out that the sequence comes across as Doug Walker trying to get back at/make fun of the #ChangeTheChannel [=#ChangeTheChannel=] movement and the backlash he and Channel Awesome received; portraying those involved as nothing more than angry keyboard warriors, mindlessly following the latest outrage.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Some critical reviews pointed out that the sequence comes across as Doug Walker trying to get back at/make fun of the #ChangeTheChannel movement and the backlash he and Channel Awesome received; portraying those involved as nothing more than angry keyboard warriors, mindlessly following the latest outrage.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SpecialEffectsFailure: Another reason the review got so disparaged: while no one's going to say the Nostalgia Critic ever had the best effects -- and even some of the harshest critics of the review have admitted that the stuff done by Fenneh for this is pretty good -- the episode's attempts to imitate the still impressive animation of ''The Wall'' with some very subpar CGI and poorly done green screen effects just serves to highlight how cheap and amateurish it all is.

to:

* SpecialEffectsFailure: Another reason the review got so disparaged: while no one's going to say the Nostalgia Critic ever had the best effects -- and even some of the harshest critics of the review have admitted that the stuff done by Fenneh for this is pretty good despite the crappy greenscreening and obvious CGI version of Doug in a few shots -- the episode's attempts to imitate the still impressive animation of ''The Wall'' with some very subpar CGI and poorly done green screen effects just serves to highlight how cheap and amateurish it all is.

Added: 338

Changed: 337

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CriticalResearchFailure: The review has been routinely criticized for this. Doing any research on ''The Wall'' and Roger Waters' life can very well explain why the film tackles classroom abuse and World War II in the same film. The review shows that Doug and Rob Walker clearly don't understand why. The video acts as if Waters is comparing school to ''the Holocaust'' when that was clearly never the intention.

to:

* CriticalResearchFailure: The review has been routinely criticized for this. this:
**
Doing any research on ''The Wall'' and Roger Waters' life can very well explain why the film tackles classroom abuse and World War II in the same film. The review shows that Doug and Rob Walker clearly don't understand why. The video acts as if Waters is comparing school to ''the Holocaust'' when that was clearly never the intention.

Added: 851

Changed: 373

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: Some viewers have questioned what was the purpose of [[Music/{{Slipknot}} Corey Taylor]] appearing in a musical-themed video if the only song he ended up singing was a cover of the ''Spongebob Squarepants'' theme at the very end of the video. The episode even lampshades this, as if to say that it was an elaborate joke to have a professional singer barely do any singing.

to:

* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter:
**
Some viewers have questioned what was the purpose of [[Music/{{Slipknot}} Corey Taylor]] appearing in a musical-themed video if the only song he ended up singing was a cover of the ''Spongebob Squarepants'' theme at the very end of the video. The episode even lampshades this, as if to say that it was an elaborate joke to have a professional singer barely do any singing.singing.
** While even some of the harsher critics of this review have admitted that the scene for The Trial is the best part of the review, it's been argued that it should've featured other characters who are actually in Critic's other reviews (i.e. Chester A. Bum, Devil Boner, Hyper Fangirl, etc.) to make it more personal and thematically similar to what's being parodied instead of using a cast of characters that come out of nowhere and have nothing to do with the Critic's work.

Changed: 43

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CriticalResearchFailure[=/=]ShallowParody: The review has been routinely criticized for this. Doing any research on ''The Wall'' and Roger Waters' life can very well explain why the film tackles classroom abuse and World War II in the same film. The review shows that Doug and Rob Walker clearly don't understand why. The video acts as if Waters is comparing school to ''the Holocaust'' when that was clearly never the intention.

to:

* CriticalResearchFailure[=/=]ShallowParody: CriticalResearchFailure: The review has been routinely criticized for this. Doing any research on ''The Wall'' and Roger Waters' life can very well explain why the film tackles classroom abuse and World War II in the same film. The review shows that Doug and Rob Walker clearly don't understand why. The video acts as if Waters is comparing school to ''the Holocaust'' when that was clearly never the intention.



* {{Narm}}: Part of the backlash against the review is because of this. Much of it is seen as ridiculous -- for all the wrong reasons. The obvious green screen and ConspicuousCGI (especially in "The Trial", where Critic interacts with the ''WebVideo/SatelliteCity'' characters) is perhaps unavoidable, but the effect of Sam Fennah's [[SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome beautifully elaborate and creative animation]] is mostly ruined by the fact that Doug seems to be [[DullSurprise barely summoning up the effort to pretend he's not looking at a green screen]].

to:

* {{Narm}}: Part of the backlash against the review is because of this. Much of it is seen as ridiculous -- for all the wrong reasons. The obvious green screen and ConspicuousCGI CGI (especially in "The Trial", where Critic interacts with the ''WebVideo/SatelliteCity'' characters) is perhaps unavoidable, but the effect of Sam Fennah's [[SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome beautifully elaborate and creative animation]] is mostly ruined by the fact that Doug seems to be [[DullSurprise barely summoning up the effort to pretend he's not looking at a green screen]].



* SpecialEffectsFailure: Another reason the review got so disparaged: while no one's going to say the Nostalgia Critic ever had the best effects -- and even some of the harshest critics of the review have admitted that the stuff done by Fenneh for this is pretty good -- the episode's attempts to imitate the still impressive animation of ''The Wall'' with some very ConspicuousCGI and poorly done green screen effects just serves to highlight how cheap and amateurish it all is.

to:

* SpecialEffectsFailure: Another reason the review got so disparaged: while no one's going to say the Nostalgia Critic ever had the best effects -- and even some of the harshest critics of the review have admitted that the stuff done by Fenneh for this is pretty good -- the episode's attempts to imitate the still impressive animation of ''The Wall'' with some very ConspicuousCGI subpar CGI and poorly done green screen effects just serves to highlight how cheap and amateurish it all is.

Added: 121

Changed: 358

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BileFascination: Some people have sought this out specifically because word of mouth got out about just how bad it was.



** This episode also could have had a better review of the movie and avoided most of its criticism by keeping it at the usual Nostalgia Critic review format, and actually including accurate research of the album and Rodger Walters' life into the review.

to:

** This episode also could have had Towards the beginning there's a video within the video which starts like Critic's usual reviews before it cuts back to Corey Taylor and the first parody song, which makes one wonder if maybe most if not all of the backlash could've been avoided and this could've been an overall better review of the movie and avoided most of its criticism by keeping it at if they had kept with the usual Nostalgia Critic review format, and format while actually including and discussing accurate research of the album film, album, and Rodger Walters' Roger Waters' life into the review. instead.

Top