Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / StarTrekIntoDarkness

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WhatAnIdiot:
** Even if [[CloakAndDagger Section 31]] of Starfleet Intelligence is a bunch of WellIntentionedExtremist SecretPolice imperialists, how could they be so stupid as to [[spoiler:threaten to kill the family of the amoral superman who at one point had conquered a quarter of Earth]]?
** [[spoiler:Kirk falsified his Captain's Log and failed to inform his by-the-book second officer that he had done so or what he said instead. Oddly enough he seems convinced Spock stabbed him in the back by not guessing this. There actually is a deleted scene explaining it (Spock was present when he made the false log), but in the final cut there's no explanation.]]
** Great work on storming the bridge of the [[spoiler:''Vengeance'']], Kirk! I'm sure that ''one stun round'' will be more than enough to incapacitate the ''genetically enhanced, virtually unkillable super soldier'' whom you already know is capable of enduring a beatdown that would cripple a normal man. Sure, he didn't have a lot of other options, but he could at least have gone for a double tap.
** [[spoiler:Admiral Marcus for thinking he could control a man who was basically an emperor in his own time period.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The [[http://i.imgur.com/PhtOMun.jpg Random Cool Hair Redshirt Girl]], whose name isn't even given. But she has cool hair. The ongoing IDW comic series has retconned her to be this universe's version of [[http://en.memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Zahra Yeoman Zahra]]… [[RaceLift somehow]].

to:

** The [[http://i.imgur.com/PhtOMun.jpg Random Cool Hair Redshirt Girl]], whose name isn't even given. But she has cool hair.hair and some affecting facial expressions during grim scenes. The ongoing IDW comic series has retconned her to be this universe's version of [[http://en.memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Zahra Yeoman Zahra]]… [[RaceLift somehow]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* FanNickname:
** "Star Trek XII: The Wrath of John". [[spoiler:It turned out to be quite appropriate.]]
** "Star Trek XII: [[spoiler:The Wrath of Khanberbatch]]", which is equally appropriate.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Mere actor mortality doesn't counas Funny Anneurysm Moment


* FunnyAneurysmMoment: Chekov being told to put on a RedShirt doesn't feel the same after Creator/AntonYelchin died following the filming of [[Film/StarTrekBeyond the next Star Trek film]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MagnificentBastard: Khan Noonien Singh is a superhuman with incredibly high-intelligence. Though believed to be genocidal and seeking to dispose of any race not on the same superiority level as his own kind, the tie-in comic ''Star Trek: Khan'' reveals Khan to have been a beloved and benevolent leader over his people despite being a conqueror. Preserved along with his crew for hundreds of years in cryo-sleep, Khan is awoken by the warmongering Admiral Alexander Marcus and as Commander John Harrison is forced to design the fighter starship the ''USS Vengeance'' and torpedos to go with it. Khan rebels by inciting a bombing of the secret Defense division and then mowing down several Starfleet officers, including Admiral Christopher Pike, in an ambush where he specifically targets Marcus. Khan learns his crew still lives in their pods in the torpedos he hid them in and surrenders himself to Captain James T. Kirk and the ''USS Enterprise''. Khan then provides the info of the Vengeance and helps Kirk take it over, brutally kills Marcus and then attempts to escape and fights off Lieutenant Spock after nearly crashing the damaged ship into Starfleet Headquarters.

to:

* MagnificentBastard: [[Characters/StarTrekTheOriginalSeriesKhanNoonienSingh Khan Noonien Singh Singh]] is a superhuman with incredibly high-intelligence. Though believed to be genocidal and seeking to dispose of any race not on the same superiority level as his own kind, the tie-in comic ''Star Trek: Khan'' reveals Khan to have been a beloved and benevolent leader over his people despite being a conqueror. Preserved along with his crew for hundreds of years in cryo-sleep, Khan is awoken by the warmongering Admiral Alexander Marcus and as Commander John Harrison is forced to design the fighter starship the ''USS Vengeance'' and torpedos to go with it. Khan rebels by inciting a bombing of the secret Defense division and then mowing down several Starfleet officers, including Admiral Christopher Pike, in an ambush where he specifically targets Marcus. Khan learns his crew still lives in their pods in the torpedos he hid them in and surrenders himself to Captain James T. Kirk and the ''USS Enterprise''. Khan then provides the info of the Vengeance and helps Kirk take it over, brutally kills Marcus and then attempts to escape and fights off Lieutenant Spock after nearly crashing the damaged ship into Starfleet Headquarters.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Despite its writers' {{Anvilicious}} attempts to decry militarization and aggression, quite a few people who saw the movie ended up rooting for [[spoiler:[[WellIntentionedExtremist Alexander Marcus]]]] and his goal in militarizing Starfleet for a war against the Klingon Empire. Seemingly, [[spoiler:Marcus']] only detraction is that he went about it in the manner of a standard GeneralRipper, to the point that he brought [[spoiler:[[BigBad Khan]], an infamous genetically engineered warlord that nearly took over the Earth long ago, out of [[HumanPopsicle cold storage]] to utilize as a slave ([[TooDumbToLive thinking he could actually control Khan]])]], as well as attempted to purposely start said war with the Klingons (using the oblivious crew of the ''Enterprise'' to do so no less) as opposed to letting it happen naturally. Even [[spoiler:Marcus's]] actor [[spoiler:Creator/PeterWeller]] [[WordOfStPaul roots for his character, saying he disliked how the public viewed him as a villain and has this to say about him]].

to:

** Despite its writers' {{Anvilicious}} attempts to decry militarization and aggression, quite a few people who saw the movie ended up rooting for [[spoiler:[[WellIntentionedExtremist Alexander Marcus]]]] and his goal in militarizing Starfleet for a war against the Klingon Empire. Seemingly, [[spoiler:Marcus']] only detraction is that he went about it in the manner of a standard GeneralRipper, to the point that he brought [[spoiler:[[BigBad Khan]], an infamous genetically engineered warlord that nearly took over the Earth long ago, out of [[HumanPopsicle cold storage]] to utilize as a slave ([[TooDumbToLive thinking he could actually control Khan]])]], as well as attempted to purposely start said war with the Klingons (using the oblivious crew of the ''Enterprise'' to do so no less) as opposed to letting it happen naturally. Even [[spoiler:Marcus's]] actor [[spoiler:Creator/PeterWeller]] [[WordOfStPaul roots for defended his character, saying he disliked how the public viewed him as a villain and has this to say about him]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Website/SFDebris [[https://sfdebris.com/videos/startrek/film12.php criticizes the film as a high-budget ripoff]] of ''Wrath of Khan'', where any number of relatively small changes to events or lines would have addressed many of the common criticisms of the film.
** The film also [[https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/miscellaneous-star-trek-thread.400203/page-29#post-13896192 arguably]] missed an opportunity to make a point about the way ''Star Trek'' scapegoats Augments for the Eugenics Wars and WorldWarIII even as late as ''Series/StarTrekDeepSpaceNine'', one that would have fit very well into UsefulNotes/TheWarOnTerror allegories.

to:

** Website/SFDebris [[https://sfdebris.com/videos/startrek/film12.php criticizes the The film as is essentially a high-budget ripoff]] ripoff of ''Wrath of Khan'', where any number of relatively small changes to events or lines would could have addressed many of the common criticisms of the film.
** The film also [[https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/miscellaneous-star-trek-thread.400203/page-29#post-13896192 arguably]] missed misses an opportunity to make a point about the way ''Star Trek'' scapegoats Augments for the Eugenics Wars and WorldWarIII even as late as ''Series/StarTrekDeepSpaceNine'', one that would have fit very well into UsefulNotes/TheWarOnTerror allegories.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not So Different has been reworked by TRS into Not So Different Remark


* CryForTheDevil: [[spoiler:Khan]] in this movie is a monster; he admits he is, and Admiral Marcus isn't wrong when calling him [[spoiler:a war criminal]]. Then we find out that [[spoiler:Marcus used Khan to create weaponry, threatening the lives of his people, who are in cryogenic tubes, to get him to cooperate. Khan actually has a NotSoDifferent moment when he and Kirk says they would do anything to keep their crew alive]], and you can see a hint of DeathSeeker when he tells Marcus, [[spoiler:"You should have let me sleep" before killing him]]. In the climax, he goes MyGodWhatHaveIDone when [[spoiler:his threatening the ''Enterprise'' leads to Spock bluffing by firing the missiles that have his family in them, and you can tell he's running from Spock in full DespairEventHorizon mode, not even bothering to wipe out any of the {{Innocent Bystander}}s or using them as a HumanShield. His fate -- to be put back to cryogenic sleep-- is both karmic and fitting, as he got exactly what he wanted]].

to:

* CryForTheDevil: [[spoiler:Khan]] in this movie is a monster; he admits he is, and Admiral Marcus isn't wrong when calling him [[spoiler:a war criminal]]. Then we find out that [[spoiler:Marcus used Khan to create weaponry, threatening the lives of his people, who are in cryogenic tubes, to get him to cooperate. Khan actually has a NotSoDifferent moment when he and Kirk says both say they would do anything to keep their crew alive]], and you can see a hint of DeathSeeker when he tells Marcus, [[spoiler:"You should have let me sleep" before killing him]]. In the climax, he goes MyGodWhatHaveIDone when [[spoiler:his threatening the ''Enterprise'' leads to Spock bluffing by firing the missiles that have his family in them, and you can tell he's running from Spock in full DespairEventHorizon mode, not even bothering to wipe out any of the {{Innocent Bystander}}s or using them as a HumanShield. His fate -- to be put back to cryogenic sleep-- is both karmic and fitting, as he got exactly what he wanted]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
That's not quite accurate. Security officers working the jail McCoy was briefly incarcerated in during Star Trek 3 wore funky ball caps (think of the unfortunate schmuck who made the mistake of calling Sulu "Tiny"...) and in other film installments wore those bizarre boxing helmets with their security armor. So headgear was not completely out of the question, just rarely used.


* WTHCostumingDepartment: This is literally the only entry in the franchise, movie or television, even in alternate universes, where Starfleet uniforms have included hats.

to:

* WTHCostumingDepartment: This is literally the only entry in the franchise, movie or television, even in alternate universes, where Starfleet uniforms have included hats.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Kirk getting reprimanded for his actions towards the beginning also qualifies. [[RealityEnsues Turns out that when you're a cocky, inexperienced captain of a starship who keeps breaking the rules]], [[spoiler:you eventually get removed from command]].

to:

** Kirk getting reprimanded for his actions towards the beginning also qualifies. [[RealityEnsues [[SurprisinglyRealisticOutcome Turns out that when you're a cocky, inexperienced captain of a starship who keeps breaking the rules]], [[spoiler:you eventually get removed from command]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ContestedSequel: There's [[BrokenBase a lot of debate]] amongst the fandom over this film borrowing elements from the older ''Star Trek'' films, [[spoiler:Khan being the main villain and now white, the ChekhovsGun that is Khan's blood, and Kirk's [[DisneyDeath 5-minute death]].]]
* CriticalDissonance: ''Into Darkness'' is currently sitting at an 87% on Rotten Tomatoes[[note]]In 4th place behind ''Film/StarTrek2009'' (95%), ''Film/StarTrekIITheWrathOfKhan'' (92%), and ''Film/StarTrekFirstContact'' (90%)[[/note]], with the consensus from the critics being that it is a very good, but not ''as good'' followup to the first film. It's also one of the highest rated on Website/IMDb (7.7/10, tied with ''The Wrath of Khan'' for second place behind the 2009 movie). Fan reactions have been mixed: some agreed; some thought it was an EvenBetterSequel; and one [[http://www.theguardian.com/film/2013/aug/14/star-trek-into-darkness-voted-worst Star Trek convention]] voted it the worst ''Trek'' film of all time.

to:

* ContestedSequel: There's [[BrokenBase a lot of debate]] debate amongst the fandom over whether this film is either as good as the 2009 film or one of the worst ''Star Trek'' films ever. Common complaints include borrowing elements from the older ''Star Trek'' films, [[spoiler:Khan being the main villain and now white, the ChekhovsGun that is Khan's blood, and Kirk's [[DisneyDeath 5-minute death]].]]
* CriticalDissonance: ''Into Darkness'' is currently sitting at an 87% on Rotten Tomatoes[[note]]In 4th place behind ''Film/StarTrek2009'' (95%), ''Film/StarTrekIITheWrathOfKhan'' (92%), and ''Film/StarTrekFirstContact'' (90%)[[/note]], with the consensus from the critics being that it is a very good, but not ''as good'' followup to the first film. It's also one of the highest rated on Website/IMDb (7.7/10, tied with ''The Wrath of Khan'' for second place behind the 2009 movie). Fan reactions have been mixed: some agreed; agreed, some thought it was an EvenBetterSequel; EvenBetterSequel, and one [[http://www.theguardian.com/film/2013/aug/14/star-trek-into-darkness-voted-worst Star Trek convention]] voted it the worst ''Trek'' film of all time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Noel Clarke is onscreen for all of five minutes, has virtually no dialogue, and [[spoiler:dies before the plot fully kicks off]], but he makes [[TearJerker quite an impression]].

to:

** Noel Clarke Creator/NoelClarke is onscreen for all of five minutes, has virtually no dialogue, and [[spoiler:dies before the plot fully kicks off]], but he makes [[TearJerker quite an impression]].



** The film also arguably missed an opportunity to make a point about the way ''Star Trek'' scapegoats Augments for the Eugenics Wars and WorldWarIII even as late as ''Series/StarTrekDeepSpaceNine'', one that would have fit very well into UsefulNotes/TheWarOnTerror allegories.[[https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/miscellaneous-star-trek-thread.400203/page-29#post-13896192]]

to:

** The film also arguably missed an opportunity to make a point about the way ''Star Trek'' scapegoats Augments for the Eugenics Wars and WorldWarIII even as late as ''Series/StarTrekDeepSpaceNine'', one that would have fit very well into UsefulNotes/TheWarOnTerror allegories.[[https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/miscellaneous-star-trek-thread.400203/page-29#post-13896192]]400203/page-29#post-13896192 arguably]] missed an opportunity to make a point about the way ''Star Trek'' scapegoats Augments for the Eugenics Wars and WorldWarIII even as late as ''Series/StarTrekDeepSpaceNine'', one that would have fit very well into UsefulNotes/TheWarOnTerror allegories.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Actually, we could do this.


* LateArrivalSpoiler: There's a comic regarding Harrison's past called [[spoiler:''Star Trek: Khan'']] that outright spoils John Harrison's true identity by putting [[Creator/BenedictCumberbatch his actor right on the cover, and of all subsequent issues]].

to:

* LateArrivalSpoiler: There's a comic regarding Harrison's past called [[spoiler:''Star Trek: Khan'']] that outright spoils John Harrison's "John Harrison's" true identity by putting [[Creator/BenedictCumberbatch his actor right on the cover, and of all subsequent issues]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The " marks mess with the ' mark.


* LateArrivalSpoiler: There's a comic regarding Harrison's past called [[spoiler:''Star Trek: Khan'']] that outright spoils "John Harrison"'s true identity by putting [[Creator/BenedictCumberbatch his actor right on the cover, and of all subsequent issues.

to:

* LateArrivalSpoiler: There's a comic regarding Harrison's past called [[spoiler:''Star Trek: Khan'']] that outright spoils "John Harrison"'s John Harrison's true identity by putting [[Creator/BenedictCumberbatch his actor right on the cover, and of all subsequent issues.issues]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AwardSnub: In addition to the film not receiving the same Oscar recognition the 2009 film did, Creator/BenedictCumberbatch deserved recognition for Best Supporting Actor as well.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This isn't the first film where ''Creator/PeterWeller'' plays a character who [[spoiler: [[Film/RoboCop1987 "dies" from head trauma.]]]]

to:

** This isn't the first film where ''Creator/PeterWeller'' Creator/PeterWeller plays a character who [[spoiler: [[Film/RoboCop1987 "dies" from head trauma.]]]]]]]] As an added bonus, Weller's character, Admiral Marcus is the leader of The Federation and has green-lit the clandestine development of advanced weapons of war, much like company OCP in the original ''Robocop'' trilogy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** This isn't the first film where ''Creator/PeterWeller'' plays a character who [[spoiler: [[Film/RoboCop1987 "dies" from head trauma.]]]]

Added: 356

Changed: 1251

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BaseBreakingCharacter: James T. Kirk. While most will agree he had good character development over the course of the two movies, many more will debate whether said development is enough to actually make him a credible Captain, pointing out that he still lacks several of his Prime Universe counterpart's qualities. [[spoiler:By the conclusion, a lot were arguing that it would've made more sense for ''Spock'' to be Captain instead.]]
** Whether Creator/BenedictCumberbatch version of Khan was an effective villain or whether he should have just been an original character.

to:

* BaseBreakingCharacter: BaseBreakingCharacter:
**
James T. Kirk. While most will agree he had good character development over the course of the two movies, many more will debate whether said development is enough to actually make him a credible Captain, pointing out that he still lacks several of his Prime Universe counterpart's qualities. [[spoiler:By Notably, Pike pulls his command on the basis that he isn't "ready for the chair," having falsified logs and learning nothing since taking the helm at the end of the previous movie. By the conclusion, a lot were arguing that it would've made more sense for ''Spock'' to be the Captain instead.]]
instead.
** Whether Creator/BenedictCumberbatch Creator/BenedictCumberbatch's version of Khan was an effective villain villain, or whether he should have just been an original character.character. Even the AuthorsSavingThrow presented in the ''Khan'' comic miniseries (where he is shown to have [[spoiler:undergone plastic surgery in order to justify an apparent RaceLift situation]]) is controversial for some.



* LateArrivalSpoiler: There's a comic coming out in October regarding Harrison's past called [[spoiler:''Star Trek: KHAN'']]. Pretty blatant example, eh?

to:

* LateArrivalSpoiler: There's a comic coming out in October regarding Harrison's past called [[spoiler:''Star Trek: KHAN'']]. Pretty blatant example, eh?Khan'']] that outright spoils "John Harrison"'s true identity by putting [[Creator/BenedictCumberbatch his actor right on the cover, and of all subsequent issues.



** [[spoiler:Long before the movie came out it was speculated that Khan was going to be the villain. When Harrison revealed his true identity as Khan a lot of people were not surprised.]]

to:

** [[spoiler:Long before the movie came out it was speculated that Khan was going to be the villain. When Harrison revealed his true identity as Khan Khan, a lot of people were not surprised.]]surprised]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Examples Are Not Recent — these announcements were from six years ago.


** Due to the disastrous handling of the extras for the [=BluRay=] release, Paramount is now offering a [[http://www.thedigitalbits.com/columns/my-two-cents/062314_0600 new box set]], which includes the IMAX scenes in the film and loads of special features. It also includes the 2009 film with all of the goodies from the 3 disc set as well. They are also working on offering a discount for owners of original ''Into Darkness'' discs as well.

to:

** Due to the disastrous handling of the extras for the [=BluRay=] release, release (which included an enhanced version of the film that was locked to iTunes and most of the available extras only available through exclusives at multiple retailers), Paramount is now offering released a [[http://www.thedigitalbits.com/columns/my-two-cents/062314_0600 new box set]], which includes the IMAX scenes in the film and loads of special features. It also includes the 2009 film with all of the goodies from the 3 disc set as well. They are also working on offering a discount for owners of original ''Into Darkness'' discs as well.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** A franchise film swears their villain is an original character despite fan speculation that the villain will be a new version of an old favourite, then having a twist which reveals it was the old favourite villain all along. This is either Into Darkness or the Bond film ''Film/Spectre''.

to:

** A franchise film swears their villain is an original character despite fan speculation that the villain will be a new version of an old favourite, then having a twist which reveals it was the old favourite villain all along. This is either Into Darkness or the Bond film ''Film/Spectre''.''Film/{{Spectre}}''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** A franchise film swears there villain is an original character despite fan speculation that the villain will be a new version of an old favourite, then having a twist which reveals it was the old favourite villain all along. This is either Into Darkness or the Bond film Film/Spectre.

to:

** A franchise film swears there their villain is an original character despite fan speculation that the villain will be a new version of an old favourite, then having a twist which reveals it was the old favourite villain all along. This is either Into Darkness or the Bond film Film/Spectre.''Film/Spectre''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CriticalDissonance: ''Into Darkness'' is currently sitting at an 87% on Rotten Tomatoes[[note]]In 4th place behind ''Film/StarTrek2009'' (95%), ''Film/StarTrekIITheWrathOfKhan'' (92%), and ''Film/StarTrekFirstContact'' (90%)[[/note]], with the consensus from the critics being that it is a very good, but not ''as good'' followup to the first film. Fan reactions have been mixed: some agreed; some thought it was an EvenBetterSequel; and one [[http://www.theguardian.com/film/2013/aug/14/star-trek-into-darkness-voted-worst Star Trek convention]] voted it the worst ''Trek'' film of all time.

to:

* CriticalDissonance: ''Into Darkness'' is currently sitting at an 87% on Rotten Tomatoes[[note]]In 4th place behind ''Film/StarTrek2009'' (95%), ''Film/StarTrekIITheWrathOfKhan'' (92%), and ''Film/StarTrekFirstContact'' (90%)[[/note]], with the consensus from the critics being that it is a very good, but not ''as good'' followup to the first film. It's also one of the highest rated on Website/IMDb (7.7/10, tied with ''The Wrath of Khan'' for second place behind the 2009 movie). Fan reactions have been mixed: some agreed; some thought it was an EvenBetterSequel; and one [[http://www.theguardian.com/film/2013/aug/14/star-trek-into-darkness-voted-worst Star Trek convention]] voted it the worst ''Trek'' film of all time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* WTHCostumingDepartment: This is literally the only entry in the franchise, movie or television, even in alternate universes, where Starfleet uniforms have included hats.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Deleting Natter.


* WTHCastingAgency: The RaceLift. As mentioned, intentional on the part of the filmmakers. Having said that, Cumberbatch's performance was [[SubvertedTrope almost unanimously praised and/or anticipated]], even from people (like Creator/GeorgeTakei) who criticized his casting. If you're going to whitewash a role, you might as well get one of the finest actors of the age in the bargain.

to:

* WTHCastingAgency: The RaceLift. As mentioned, intentional on the part of the filmmakers. Having said that, Cumberbatch's performance was [[SubvertedTrope almost unanimously praised and/or anticipated]], even from people (like Creator/GeorgeTakei) who criticized his casting. If you're going to whitewash a role, you might as well get one of the finest actors of the age in the bargain.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BestKnownForTheFanservice: Often brought up by critics discussing the film's flaws. Carol Marcus is in her underwear for only one short clip which only lasts a few seconds: she changes clothes, Kirk peeks, we see. Blatant {{Fanservice}} that could have been left on the cutting room floor without affecting the plot at all? Yes, no doubt. But it is only one scene.

to:

* BestKnownForTheFanservice: Often brought up by critics discussing the film's flaws. Carol Marcus is in her underwear for only one short clip which only lasts a few seconds: she changes clothes, Kirk peeks, we see. Blatant {{Fanservice}} that could have been left on the cutting room floor without affecting the plot at all? Yes, no doubt. But it is only one scene. scene, albeit [[SexSells one that was prominent in the trailers.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It is not clear if Thomas sends Admiral Marcus the message saying that John Harrison is responsible for the archive bombing because it was part of Harrison's overall plan and he wanted to reveal himself or if this was Thomas's attempt to make some good out of the situation by telling Marcus who is responsible.

to:

** It is not clear if Thomas sends Admiral Marcus the message saying that John Harrison is responsible for the archive bombing because it was part of Harrison's overall plan and he wanted to reveal himself or if this was Thomas's attempt to make some good out of the situation by telling Marcus who is responsible. [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMKXf1RjB4M&list=PL1GxhT7X6rCs2yKmGfq3aMyFZqRN6nAHL&index=3&t=0s This deleted scene]] suggests that it's the former.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ValuesDissonance: [[spoiler:Khan's RaceLift was because of this. Had Khan--whose name might suggest that he is Muslim to people who have little knowledge of Sikhs--been cast by an Indian or Middle-Eastern actor, "John Harrison's" overtly terrorist actions may have led to further UnfortunateImplications with the character.]]

to:

* ValuesDissonance: [[spoiler:Khan's RaceLift was because of this. Had Khan--whose name might suggest that he is Muslim to people who have little knowledge of Sikhs--been cast by an Indian or Middle-Eastern actor, "John Harrison's" overtly terrorist actions may have led to further UnfortunateImplications with the character. In particular, Khan's last act after believing that he's lost his crew is to ''fly his aircraft into several buildings''; the 9/11 comparisons would be unavoidable.]]

Added: 1009

Changed: 49

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In the climax, would Khan [[spoiler:have tried to wipe out the ''Enterprise'' whether or not Kirk ordered Scotty to incapacitate him once they dethroned the Captain?]] After all, he doesn't seem surprised when [[spoiler:he recovers too fast for Scotty or Kirk to defend themselves]], but there is a hint of disappointment. He also has VillainRespect by telling Kirk that he likes a man who has a conscience. Perhaps [[spoiler:he would have kept his word]], or maybe not.

to:

** In the climax, would Khan [[spoiler:have tried to wipe out the ''Enterprise'' whether or not Kirk ordered Scotty to incapacitate him once they dethroned the Captain?]] Admiral Marcus?]] After all, he doesn't seem surprised when [[spoiler:he recovers too fast for Scotty or Kirk to defend themselves]], but there is a hint of disappointment. He also has VillainRespect by telling Kirk that he likes a man who has a conscience. Perhaps [[spoiler:he would have kept his word]], or maybe not. It's left up to the viewers.


Added DiffLines:

* CryForTheDevil: [[spoiler:Khan]] in this movie is a monster; he admits he is, and Admiral Marcus isn't wrong when calling him [[spoiler:a war criminal]]. Then we find out that [[spoiler:Marcus used Khan to create weaponry, threatening the lives of his people, who are in cryogenic tubes, to get him to cooperate. Khan actually has a NotSoDifferent moment when he and Kirk says they would do anything to keep their crew alive]], and you can see a hint of DeathSeeker when he tells Marcus, [[spoiler:"You should have let me sleep" before killing him]]. In the climax, he goes MyGodWhatHaveIDone when [[spoiler:his threatening the ''Enterprise'' leads to Spock bluffing by firing the missiles that have his family in them, and you can tell he's running from Spock in full DespairEventHorizon mode, not even bothering to wipe out any of the {{Innocent Bystander}}s or using them as a HumanShield. His fate -- to be put back to cryogenic sleep-- is both karmic and fitting, as he got exactly what he wanted]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** In the climax, would Khan [[spoiler:have tried to wipe out the ''Enterprise'' whether or not Kirk ordered Scotty to incapacitate him once they dethroned the Captain?]] After all, he doesn't seem surprised when [[spoiler:he recovers too fast for Scotty or Kirk to defend themselves]], but there is a hint of disappointment. He also has VillainRespect by telling Kirk that he likes a man who has a conscience. Perhaps [[spoiler:he would have kept his word]], or maybe not.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Pike reveals that, after Kirk has been demoted, he's regained command of the Enterprise and wants Kirk with him on his ship, as his First Commander. Kirk is actually relieved about this, with Pike saying he's not giving up on the boy who failed to hold his own in a bar fight. Sadly, Pike [[spoiler:gets killed a few minutes later. It would have been interesting to see the men work together again after they had good chemistry in the first film and Kirk stinging from the loss of his captaincy]].

Top