Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Okay, but now it\'s a Zero Context Example that requires you to go to another page to understand. Please choose another adjective synonymous with \"Sexy\" or \"Hot\" if you find attractive unsuitable, or a different way of illustrating this audience reaction.
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* EvilIsSexy: [[BigBad John Harrison]] as played by Creator/BenedictCumberbatch.
to:
* EvilIsSexy: [[BigBad John Harrison]] as played by the attractive Creator/BenedictCumberbatch.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Okay, but now it\'s a Zero Context Example. Choose another adjective synonymous with
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
\"Good looking\" is very debatable, beyond the parameters of YMMV.
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* EvilIsSexy: [[BigBad John Harrison]] is played by the good looking, svelte Creator/BenedictCumberbatch.
to:
* EvilIsSexy: [[BigBad John Harrison]] is as played by the good looking, svelte Creator/BenedictCumberbatch.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
** [[spoiler:Kirk going to his death by taking Spock's place in the damaged reactor room, ''while Spock watches on''.]]
to:
** [[spoiler:Kirk going to his death by taking Spock's place in to repair the damaged reactor room, ''while Spock watches on''.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** [[spoiler:Kirk going to his death by taking Spock's place in the damaged reactor room, ''while Spock watches on''.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None of those rumors actually come to pass in this film. Move to YMMV.Star Trek page?
Deleted line(s) 13 (click to see context) :
* TheyChangeItNowItSucks: There are rumors of certain part of the Star Trek mythos being tweaked, such as Vulcans losing pointy ears, less goofy costumes and less yakking on the bridge, all in an attempt to get more foreign markets and get more 'normal' people into it, does risk leaving a bad taste in the mouth of longtime fans.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
* TheyChangeItNowItSucks: There are rumors of certain part of the Star Trek mythos being tweaked, such as Vulcans losing pointy ears,less goofy costumes and less yakking on the bridge, all in an attempt to get more foreign markets and get more 'normal' people into it, does risk leaving a bad taste in the mouth of longtime fans.
to:
* TheyChangeItNowItSucks: There are rumors of certain part of the Star Trek mythos being tweaked, such as Vulcans losing pointy ears,less ears, less goofy costumes and less yakking on the bridge, all in an attempt to get more foreign markets and get more 'normal' people into it, does risk leaving a bad taste in the mouth of longtime fans.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I might have used this wrong I admit.
Added DiffLines:
* TheyChangeItNowItSucks: There are rumors of certain part of the Star Trek mythos being tweaked, such as Vulcans losing pointy ears,less goofy costumes and less yakking on the bridge, all in an attempt to get more foreign markets and get more 'normal' people into it, does risk leaving a bad taste in the mouth of longtime fans.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
* WhatAnIdiot: How could Starfleet Intelligence be so stupid as to [[spoiler:hire the war criminal who at one point had conquered a quarter of Earth, and then turn around and betray him?]] Even if [[CloakAndDagger Section 31]] is a bunch of WellIntentionedExtremist SecretPolice imperalists.
to:
* WhatAnIdiot: How could Even if [[CloakAndDagger Section 31]] of Starfleet Intelligence is a bunch of WellIntentionedExtremist SecretPolice imperalists, how could they be so stupid as to [[spoiler:hire the war criminal who at one point had conquered a quarter of Earth, and then turn around and betray him?]] Even if [[CloakAndDagger Section 31]] is a bunch of WellIntentionedExtremist SecretPolice imperalists.him?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Repair Dont Respond; avoid secondary references for readers who may not be familiar with TNG / DS 9; Examples Are Not Arguable, avoid speculative langauge like \"for all we know\"
Changed line(s) 17,18 (click to see context) from:
* WhatAnIdiot: How could Starfleet Intelligence be so stupid as to [[spoiler:hire the war criminal who at one point had conquered a quarter of Earth, and then turn around and betray him?]]
** Well, we are talking about Section 31 which makes Tal Shiar looks like toddler. For all we know it's part of the plan to push them closer to an imperial state.
** Well, we are talking about Section 31 which makes Tal Shiar looks like toddler. For all we know it's part of the plan to push them closer to an imperial state.
to:
* WhatAnIdiot: How could Starfleet Intelligence be so stupid as to [[spoiler:hire the war criminal who at one point had conquered a quarter of Earth, and then turn around and betray him?]]
** Well, we are talking abouthim?]] Even if [[CloakAndDagger Section 31 which makes Tal Shiar looks like toddler. For all we know it's part 31]] is a bunch of the plan to push them closer to an imperial state.WellIntentionedExtremist SecretPolice imperalists.
** Well, we are talking about
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
**Well, we are talking about Section 31 which makes Tal Shiar looks like toddler. For all we know it's part of the plan to push them closer to an imperial state.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
* WhatAnIdiot: How could Starfleet Intelligence be so stupid as to [[spoiler:hire the tyrant who at one point had conquered a quarter of Earth, and then turn around and betray him?]]
to:
* WhatAnIdiot: How could Starfleet Intelligence be so stupid as to [[spoiler:hire the tyrant war criminal who at one point had conquered a quarter of Earth, and then turn around and betray him?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
maybe here? gonna some Word Cruft too.
Added DiffLines:
* WhatAnIdiot: How could Starfleet Intelligence be so stupid as to [[spoiler:hire the tyrant who at one point had conquered a quarter of Earth, and then turn around and betray him?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
? What The Hell hero is a trope in a work, not YMMV audience reaction.
Deleted line(s) 17 (click to see context) :
* WhatTheHellHero: To Starfleet Command, specifically Starfleet Intelligence. [[spoiler:How could they be so stupid as to first take on the worst war criminal in human history, a man who at one point had conquered a quarter of Earth's land surface, as an agent, and then turn around and betray him?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* WhatTheHellHero: To Starfleet Command, specifically Starfleet Intelligence. [[spoiler:How could they be so stupid as to first take on the worst war criminal in human history, a man who at one point had conquered a quarter of Earth's land surface, as an agent, and then turn around and betray him?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Of course I left the fix unfinished ... gah.
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
** Finding out [[spoiler: Its basically a [[Film/StarTrekTheWrathOfKhan Wrath of Khan]] remake, because the [[StarTrekNemesis last one]] worked out [[SarcasmMode so well]].]]
to:
** Finding out [[spoiler: Its that [[spoiler:it's basically a [[Film/StarTrekTheWrathOfKhan Wrath of Khan]] remake, because the [[StarTrekNemesis last one]] worked out [[SarcasmMode so well]].]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I don\'t know about the spoiler rumours, but at least we can format things correctly ...
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
* ItsTheSameNowItSucks: The damaged and fiery ''Enterprise'' falling to Earth garnered responses along the lines of "Oh great, [[Film/StarTrekIIITheSearchForSpock they're blowing up the]] ''[[Film/StarTrekGenerations Enterprise ... again]]''."
** Finding out [[spoiler: Its basically a Wraith of Khan remake, because the [[StarTrekNemesis Last one]] worked out so well.]]
** Finding out [[spoiler: Its basically a Wraith of Khan remake, because the [[StarTrekNemesis Last one]] worked out so well.]]
to:
* ItsTheSameNowItSucks: ItsTheSameNowItSucks:
** The damaged and fiery ''Enterprise'' falling to Earth in posters and trailers garnered responses along the lines of "Oh great, [[Film/StarTrekIIITheSearchForSpock they're blowing up the]] ''[[Film/StarTrekGenerations Enterprise ... again]]''."
** Finding out [[spoiler: Its basically aWraith [[Film/StarTrekTheWrathOfKhan Wrath of Khan Khan]] remake, because the [[StarTrekNemesis Last last one]] worked out [[SarcasmMode so well.well]].]]
** The damaged and fiery ''Enterprise'' falling to Earth in posters and trailers garnered responses along the lines of "Oh great, [[Film/StarTrekIIITheSearchForSpock they're blowing up the]] ''[[Film/StarTrekGenerations Enterprise ... again]]''."
** Finding out [[spoiler: Its basically a
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
** Finding out [[spoiler: Its basically a StarTrekWraithOfKhan remake, because the [[StarTrekNemesis Last one]] worked out so well.]]
to:
** Finding out [[spoiler: Its basically a StarTrekWraithOfKhan Wraith of Khan remake, because the [[StarTrekNemesis Last one]] worked out so well.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
** Finding out [[spoiler: Its basically a WraithOfKhan remake, because the [[StarTrekNemesis Last one]] worked out so well.]]
to:
** Finding out [[spoiler: Its basically a WraithOfKhan StarTrekWraithOfKhan remake, because the [[StarTrekNemesis Last one]] worked out so well.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Finding out [[spoiler: Its basically a WraithOfKhan remake, because the [[StarTrekNemesis Last one]] worked out so well.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
the shade \"jet black\" is spelled without a hyphen, much like \"navy blue\".
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
** Harrison's jet-black CoolStarship.
to:
** Harrison's jet-black jet black CoolStarship.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
You realize this would be the third time the Enterprise would be destroyed on film; that\'s why many fans are miffed about it. If you\'re going to eviscerate what I add, at least keep the critical points — and learn to spell \"fiery\" as well.
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
** Harrison's jet black CoolStarship that many fans fell in love with.
to:
** Harrison's jet black CoolStarship that many fans fell in love with.jet-black CoolStarship.
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* ItsTheSameNowItSucks: The firery ''Enterprise'' falling to Earth garnered responses along the lines of "Oh great, [[Film/StarTrekIIITheSearchForSpock they're blowing up the Enterprise again.]]"
to:
* ItsTheSameNowItSucks: The firery damaged and fiery ''Enterprise'' falling to Earth garnered responses along the lines of "Oh great, [[Film/StarTrekIIITheSearchForSpock they're blowing up the Enterprise again.]]"the]] ''[[Film/StarTrekGenerations Enterprise ... again]]''."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Darkness Induced Audience Apathy is when both sides in the conflict are so reprehensible that you don\'t care if either side wns.
Deleted line(s) 1 (click to see context) :
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: The firery ''Enterprise'' falling to Earth garnered responses along the lines of "Oh great, [[Film/StarTrekIIITheSearchForSpock they're blowing up the Enterprise again.]]"
Added DiffLines:
* ItsTheSameNowItSucks: The firery ''Enterprise'' falling to Earth garnered responses along the lines of "Oh great, [[Film/StarTrekIIITheSearchForSpock they're blowing up the Enterprise again.]]"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: The firery ''Enterprise'' falling to Earth garnered responses along the lines of "Oh great, they're blowing up the Enterprise... again."
to:
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: The firery ''Enterprise'' falling to Earth garnered responses along the lines of "Oh great, [[Film/StarTrekIIITheSearchForSpock they're blowing up the Enterprise... Enterprise again."]]"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: The firery ''Enterprise'' falling to Earth garnered responses along the lines of "Oh great, they're [[Film/StarTrekIIITheSearchForSpock blowing up]] [[Film/StarTrekGenerations the Enterprise... again]]."
to:
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: The firery ''Enterprise'' falling to Earth garnered responses along the lines of "Oh great, they're [[Film/StarTrekIIITheSearchForSpock blowing up]] [[Film/StarTrekGenerations up the Enterprise... again]].again."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Examples Are Not Recent; How To Write An Example: Avoid Irrelevant Potholing and References (Deanna troi injoke is just restating above in more obtuse manner)
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: The North American poster released in mid-April 2013, showing what is supposedly the ''Enterprise'' on fire and falling to Earth, has already garnered a lot of responses along the lines of "Oh great, they're [[Film/StarTrekIIITheSearchForSpock blowing up the]] ''[[Film/StarTrekGenerations Enterprise ... again]]''." That, or snide remarks about how nobody knew that [[Film/StarTrekGenerations Deanna]] [[Film/StarTrekNemesis Troi]] was going to be in the movie.[[hottip:*:There are running jokes in Trek fandom about her tendency to crash the ''Enterprise'' when at the helm, which has happened twice -- the first time was involuntary due to a warp core breach, while the second was [[RammingAlwaysWorks more intentional.]]
to:
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: The North American poster released in mid-April 2013, showing what is supposedly the firery ''Enterprise'' on fire and falling to Earth, has already Earth garnered a lot of responses along the lines of "Oh great, they're [[Film/StarTrekIIITheSearchForSpock blowing up the]] ''[[Film/StarTrekGenerations Enterprise ... again]]''." That, or snide remarks about how nobody knew that up]] [[Film/StarTrekGenerations Deanna]] [[Film/StarTrekNemesis Troi]] was going to be in the movie.[[hottip:*:There are running jokes in Trek fandom about her tendency to crash the ''Enterprise'' when at the helm, which has happened twice -- the first time was involuntary due to a warp core breach, while the second was [[RammingAlwaysWorks more intentional.]]Enterprise... again]]."
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
** Harrison's jet black starship that many fans fell in love with.
to:
** Harrison's jet black starship CoolStarship that many fans fell in love with.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
moving from tropes
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* EvilIsCool: The BadassLongcoat wearing EvilBrit John Harrison.
to:
* EvilIsCool: EvilIsCool:
** The BadassLongcoat wearing EvilBrit JohnHarrison. Harrison.
** Harrison's jet black starship that many fans fell in love with.
** The BadassLongcoat wearing EvilBrit John
** Harrison's jet black starship that many fans fell in love with.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: The North American poster released in mid-April 2013, showing what is supposedly the ''Enterprise'' on fire and falling to Earth, has already garnered a lot of responses along the lines of "Oh great, they're [[Film/StarTrekIIITheSearchForSpock blowing up the]] ''[[Film/StarTrekGenerations Enterprise ... again]]''."
to:
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: The North American poster released in mid-April 2013, showing what is supposedly the ''Enterprise'' on fire and falling to Earth, has already garnered a lot of responses along the lines of "Oh great, they're [[Film/StarTrekIIITheSearchForSpock blowing up the]] ''[[Film/StarTrekGenerations Enterprise ... again]]''."" That, or snide remarks about how nobody knew that [[Film/StarTrekGenerations Deanna]] [[Film/StarTrekNemesis Troi]] was going to be in the movie.[[hottip:*:There are running jokes in Trek fandom about her tendency to crash the ''Enterprise'' when at the helm, which has happened twice -- the first time was involuntary due to a warp core breach, while the second was [[RammingAlwaysWorks more intentional.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: The North American poster released in mid-April 2013, showing what is supposedly the ''Enterprise'' falling to Earth, has already garnered a lot of responses along the lines of "Oh great, they're [[Film/StarTrekIIITheSearchForSpock blowing up the]] ''[[Film/StarTrekGenerations Enterprise ... again]]''."
to:
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: The North American poster released in mid-April 2013, showing what is supposedly the ''Enterprise'' on fire and falling to Earth, has already garnered a lot of responses along the lines of "Oh great, they're [[Film/StarTrekIIITheSearchForSpock blowing up the]] ''[[Film/StarTrekGenerations Enterprise ... again]]''."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* DarknessInducedAudienceApathy: The North American poster released in mid-April 2013, showing what is supposedly the ''Enterprise'' falling to Earth, has already garnered a lot of responses along the lines of "Oh great, they're [[Film/StarTrekIIITheSearchForSpock blowing up the]] ''[[Film/StarTrekGenerations Enterprise ... again]]''."
