Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Indentation
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
* SoBadItsGood: The overall quality of the comic is actually not so bad - however, its artwork definitely falls into this category. To say that copy-pasting is rampant in the comic is a gross understatment--''every'' female character [[YouAllLookFamiliar looks like the same woman with a wig and a different dress]], and every male character looks like a ten-year-old boy. There's just something irrepressibly hilarious about the shoddiness of it all.
** This was fixed in the published version, where Sarah Andersen's art gives it a more {{Animesque}} look.
** This was fixed in the published version, where Sarah Andersen's art gives it a more {{Animesque}} look.
to:
* SoBadItsGood: The overall quality of the comic is actually not so bad - however, its artwork definitely falls into this category. To say that copy-pasting is rampant in the comic is a gross understatment--''every'' female character [[YouAllLookFamiliar looks like the same woman with a wig and a different dress]], and every male character looks like a ten-year-old boy. There's just something irrepressibly hilarious about the shoddiness of it all.
**all. This was fixed in the published version, where Sarah Andersen's art gives it a more {{Animesque}} look.
**
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* SoBadItsGood: The overall quality of the comic is actually [[SoOkayItsAverage not so bad]] - however, its artwork definitely falls into this category. To say that copy-pasting is rampant in the comic is a gross understatment--''every'' female character [[YouAllLookFamiliar looks like the same woman with a wig and a different dress]], and every male character looks like a ten-year-old boy. There's just something irrepressibly hilarious about the shoddiness of it all.
to:
* SoBadItsGood: The overall quality of the comic is actually [[SoOkayItsAverage not so bad]] bad - however, its artwork definitely falls into this category. To say that copy-pasting is rampant in the comic is a gross understatment--''every'' female character [[YouAllLookFamiliar looks like the same woman with a wig and a different dress]], and every male character looks like a ten-year-old boy. There's just something irrepressibly hilarious about the shoddiness of it all.all.
** This was fixed in the published version, where Sarah Andersen's art gives it a more {{Animesque}} look.
** This was fixed in the published version, where Sarah Andersen's art gives it a more {{Animesque}} look.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Natter.
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
* SoBadItsGood: The overall quality of the comic is actually [[SoOkayItsAverage not so bad]] - however, its artwork definitely falls into this category. To say that copy-pasting is rampant in the comic is a gross understatment - ''every'' female character [[YouAllLookFamiliar looks like the same woman with a wig and a different dress]], and every male character looks like a ten-year-old boy. There's just something irrepressibly hilarious about the shoddiness of it all.
** On the other hand, the art stays out of "horrible" territory because there's nothing that truly hurts the eyes: JPEG artefacts, aliasing, antialiasing done wrong, etc. The art may be repetitive, but it's ''clean''.
** On the other hand, the art stays out of "horrible" territory because there's nothing that truly hurts the eyes: JPEG artefacts, aliasing, antialiasing done wrong, etc. The art may be repetitive, but it's ''clean''.
to:
* SoBadItsGood: The overall quality of the comic is actually [[SoOkayItsAverage not so bad]] - however, its artwork definitely falls into this category. To say that copy-pasting is rampant in the comic is a gross understatment - ''every'' understatment--''every'' female character [[YouAllLookFamiliar looks like the same woman with a wig and a different dress]], and every male character looks like a ten-year-old boy. There's just something irrepressibly hilarious about the shoddiness of it all.
** On the other hand, the art stays out of "horrible" territory because there's nothing that truly hurts the eyes: JPEG artefacts, aliasing, antialiasing done wrong, etc. The art may be repetitive, but it's ''clean''.all.
** On the other hand, the art stays out of "horrible" territory because there's nothing that truly hurts the eyes: JPEG artefacts, aliasing, antialiasing done wrong, etc. The art may be repetitive, but it's ''clean''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* SoBadItsGood: The overall quality of the comic is actually [[SoOkayItsAverage not so bad]] - however, its artwork definitely falls into this category. To say that copy-pasting is rampant in the comic is a gross understatment - ''every'' female character [[YouAllLookFamiliar looks like the same woman with a wig and a different dress]], and every male character looks like a ten-year-old boy. There's just something irrepressibly hilarious about the shoddiness of it all.
to:
* SoBadItsGood: The overall quality of the comic is actually [[SoOkayItsAverage not so bad]] - however, its artwork definitely falls into this category. To say that copy-pasting is rampant in the comic is a gross understatment - ''every'' female character [[YouAllLookFamiliar looks like the same woman with a wig and a different dress]], and every male character looks like a ten-year-old boy. There's just something irrepressibly hilarious about the shoddiness of it all.all.
** On the other hand, the art stays out of "horrible" territory because there's nothing that truly hurts the eyes: JPEG artefacts, aliasing, antialiasing done wrong, etc. The art may be repetitive, but it's ''clean''.
** On the other hand, the art stays out of "horrible" territory because there's nothing that truly hurts the eyes: JPEG artefacts, aliasing, antialiasing done wrong, etc. The art may be repetitive, but it's ''clean''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
to:
* SoBadItsGood: The overall quality of the comic is actually [[SoOkayItsAverage not so bad]] - however, its artwork definitely falls into this category. To say that copy-pasting is rampant in the comic is a gross understatment - ''every'' female character [[YouAllLookFamiliar looks like the same woman with a wig and a different dress]], and every male character looks like a ten-year-old boy. There's just something irrepressibly hilarious about the shoddiness of it all.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not YMMV, they happen in-universe.
Changed line(s) 1,3 (click to see context) from:
* CrossoverShip: Hook and West.
** Just after [[spoiler:Peter Pan]] finds reason to like girls, he starts hitting on Alice. To get him to concentrate on the task at hand, Alice tells him she'll see to his physical needs later. She's got other plans in mind, but those few lines are sure to be breeding [[PlotBunny plot bunnies]] as we speak.
* {{Shipping}}: In addition to the CrossoverShip mentioned above, [[spoiler: Peter Pan gets shrunken down and apparently hooks up with Tinker Bell]]. Impossible in canon but, given the circumstances here, totally believable.
** Just after [[spoiler:Peter Pan]] finds reason to like girls, he starts hitting on Alice. To get him to concentrate on the task at hand, Alice tells him she'll see to his physical needs later. She's got other plans in mind, but those few lines are sure to be breeding [[PlotBunny plot bunnies]] as we speak.
* {{Shipping}}: In addition to the CrossoverShip mentioned above, [[spoiler: Peter Pan gets shrunken down and apparently hooks up with Tinker Bell]]. Impossible in canon but, given the circumstances here, totally believable.
to:
** Just after [[spoiler:Peter Pan]] finds reason to like girls, he starts hitting on Alice. To get him to concentrate on the task at hand, Alice tells him she'll see to his physical needs later. She's got other plans in mind, but those few lines are sure to be breeding [[PlotBunny plot bunnies]] as we speak.
* {{Shipping}}: In addition to the CrossoverShip mentioned above, [[spoiler: Peter Pan gets shrunken down and apparently hooks up with Tinker Bell]]. Impossible in canon but, given the circumstances here, totally believable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Trope was redefined for In Universe use only.
Deleted line(s) 1 (click to see context) :
* AdaptionDecay: The comic's interpretation of Oz is clearly based entirely on the film version. Neverland and Wonderland fare better in this regard.
