Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: A modern FPS where there's actual ambiguity on which side is telling the truth more in a conflict with the player playing both sides is an interesting idea, [[spoiler:but the The Burning Flag making it all one group behind it all removes any ambiguity, as well as opens up some plot holes. (Such as why the "Civilian" ship with planted evidence was still filled with hostile US Soldiers.)]]
to:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: A modern FPS where there's actual ambiguity on which side is telling the truth more in a conflict with the player playing both sides is an interesting idea, [[spoiler:but the The Burning Flag making it all one group behind it all removes any ambiguity, as well as opens up some plot holes. (Such as why the "Civilian" ship with planted evidence was still filled with hostile US Soldiers.)]])]]
* VindicatedByHistory: There a good few fans who believe this game's hotswap mechanic with large battles is the ideal way to handle a Battlefield single player compared to the games that came after.
* VindicatedByHistory: There a good few fans who believe this game's hotswap mechanic with large battles is the ideal way to handle a Battlefield single player compared to the games that came after.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: A modern FPS where there's actual ambiguity on which side is telling the truth more in a conflict with the player playing both sides is an interesting idea, [[[spoiler:but the The Burning Flag making it all one group behind it all removes any ambiguity, as well as opens up some plot holes. (Such as why the "Civilian" ship with planted evidence was still filled with hostile US Soldiers.)]]
to:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: A modern FPS where there's actual ambiguity on which side is telling the truth more in a conflict with the player playing both sides is an interesting idea, [[[spoiler:but [[spoiler:but the The Burning Flag making it all one group behind it all removes any ambiguity, as well as opens up some plot holes. (Such as why the "Civilian" ship with planted evidence was still filled with hostile US Soldiers.)]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: A modern FPS where there's actual ambiguity on which side is telling the truth more in a conflict with the player playing both sides is an interesting idea, [[[spoiler:but the The Burning Flag making it all one group behind it all removes any ambiguity, as well as opens up some plot holes. (Such as why the "Civilian" ship with planted evidence was still filled with hostile US Soldiers.)}}
to:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: A modern FPS where there's actual ambiguity on which side is telling the truth more in a conflict with the player playing both sides is an interesting idea, [[[spoiler:but the The Burning Flag making it all one group behind it all removes any ambiguity, as well as opens up some plot holes. (Such as why the "Civilian" ship with planted evidence was still filled with hostile US Soldiers.)}})]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* DifficultySpike: The moment a mission asks you to hold a position or capture a heavily defended enemy command post, you start to feel the ineptitude of your AI teammates and the unfairness of enemy units always [[GangUpOnTheHuman aiming to kill you]] rather than your teammates, in moments like this you start to see how fast your team's tickets (lives shared by the entire team) plummet to zero.
to:
* DifficultySpike: The moment a mission asks you to hold a position or capture a heavily defended enemy command post, you start to feel the ineptitude of your AI teammates and the unfairness of enemy units always [[GangUpOnTheHuman aiming to kill you]] rather than your teammates, in moments like this you start to see how fast your team's tickets (lives shared by the entire team) plummet to zero.zero.
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: A modern FPS where there's actual ambiguity on which side is telling the truth more in a conflict with the player playing both sides is an interesting idea, [[[spoiler:but the The Burning Flag making it all one group behind it all removes any ambiguity, as well as opens up some plot holes. (Such as why the "Civilian" ship with planted evidence was still filled with hostile US Soldiers.)}}
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: A modern FPS where there's actual ambiguity on which side is telling the truth more in a conflict with the player playing both sides is an interesting idea, [[[spoiler:but the The Burning Flag making it all one group behind it all removes any ambiguity, as well as opens up some plot holes. (Such as why the "Civilian" ship with planted evidence was still filled with hostile US Soldiers.)}}
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* CompleteMonster: [[BigBad Commander 31]], the leader of a powerful terrorist group called The Burning Flag, seeks to TakeOverTheWorld. To this end, Commander 31 [[WarForFunAndProfit orchestrated the long and devastating war]] between China and NATO, which resulted in the deaths of thousands. When he believed that all sides of the war were weakened enough, he revealed himself, proudly announcing his intention of destroying part of the world with nuclear weapons, so [[DespotismJustifiesTheMeans he alone could rule the rest]]. As either China or NATO track him down, Commander 31 tries to [[NukeEm launch nuclear missiles]] upon China, the United States, the Middle East, and Europe.
to:
* CompleteMonster: [[BigBad Commander 31]], the leader of a powerful terrorist group called The Burning Flag, seeks to TakeOverTheWorld. To this end, Commander 31 [[WarForFunAndProfit orchestrated the long and devastating war]] between China and NATO, which resulted in the deaths of thousands. When he believed that all sides of the war were weakened enough, he revealed himself, proudly announcing his intention of destroying part of the world with nuclear weapons, so [[DespotismJustifiesTheMeans he alone could rule the rest]]. As either China or NATO track him down, Commander 31 tries to [[NukeEm launch nuclear missiles]] upon China, the United States, the Middle East, and Europe.Europe.
* DifficultySpike: The moment a mission asks you to hold a position or capture a heavily defended enemy command post, you start to feel the ineptitude of your AI teammates and the unfairness of enemy units always [[GangUpOnTheHuman aiming to kill you]] rather than your teammates, in moments like this you start to see how fast your team's tickets (lives shared by the entire team) plummet to zero.
* DifficultySpike: The moment a mission asks you to hold a position or capture a heavily defended enemy command post, you start to feel the ineptitude of your AI teammates and the unfairness of enemy units always [[GangUpOnTheHuman aiming to kill you]] rather than your teammates, in moments like this you start to see how fast your team's tickets (lives shared by the entire team) plummet to zero.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Canon Discontinuity is not YMMV.
Deleted line(s) 2 (click to see context) :
* CanonDiscontinuity: DICE doesn't seen to be very proud of this game, most notably during a montage before the reveal of ''VideoGame/BattlefieldV'' showcasing all of the games before it - except this game. Even ''Vietnam'' (a game so unpopular compared to ''1942'' that they implicitly ignored it with ''Battlefield 2''[='=]s numbering), ''[[VideoGame/BattlefieldHardline Hardline]]'' and ''[[VideoGame/BattlefieldHeroes Heroes]]'' (two games developed by other studios entirely, and also rather unpopular compared to contemporary main-line games) were shown, but not this game.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Approved by the thread
.
.Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* CanonDiscontinuity: DICE doesn't seen to be very proud of this game, most notably during a montage before the reveal of ''VideoGame/BattlefieldV'' showcasing all of the games before it - except this game. Even ''Vietnam'' (a game so unpopular compared to ''1942'' that they implicitly ignored it with ''Battlefield 2''[='=]s numbering), ''[[VideoGame/BattlefieldHardline Hardline]]'' and ''[[VideoGame/BattlefieldHeroes Heroes]]'' (two games developed by other studios entirely, and also rather unpopular compared to contemporary main-line games) were shown, but not this game.
to:
* CanonDiscontinuity: DICE doesn't seen to be very proud of this game, most notably during a montage before the reveal of ''VideoGame/BattlefieldV'' showcasing all of the games before it - except this game. Even ''Vietnam'' (a game so unpopular compared to ''1942'' that they implicitly ignored it with ''Battlefield 2''[='=]s numbering), ''[[VideoGame/BattlefieldHardline Hardline]]'' and ''[[VideoGame/BattlefieldHeroes Heroes]]'' (two games developed by other studios entirely, and also rather unpopular compared to contemporary main-line games) were shown, but not this game.game.
*CompleteMonster: [[BigBad Commander 31]], the leader of a powerful terrorist group called The Burning Flag, seeks to TakeOverTheWorld. To this end, Commander 31 [[WarForFunAndProfit orchestrated the long and devastating war]] between China and NATO, which resulted in the deaths of thousands. When he believed that all sides of the war were weakened enough, he revealed himself, proudly announcing his intention of destroying part of the world with nuclear weapons, so [[DespotismJustifiesTheMeans he alone could rule the rest]]. As either China or NATO track him down, Commander 31 tries to [[NukeEm launch nuclear missiles]] upon China, the United States, the Middle East, and Europe.
*CompleteMonster: [[BigBad Commander 31]], the leader of a powerful terrorist group called The Burning Flag, seeks to TakeOverTheWorld. To this end, Commander 31 [[WarForFunAndProfit orchestrated the long and devastating war]] between China and NATO, which resulted in the deaths of thousands. When he believed that all sides of the war were weakened enough, he revealed himself, proudly announcing his intention of destroying part of the world with nuclear weapons, so [[DespotismJustifiesTheMeans he alone could rule the rest]]. As either China or NATO track him down, Commander 31 tries to [[NukeEm launch nuclear missiles]] upon China, the United States, the Middle East, and Europe.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
* BrokenBase: Many fans cannot agree if the game was good or not or if it was a good Battlefield game in comparison to its PC counterpart or the original ''Bad Company'' game.
* CanonDiscontinuity: DICE doesn't seen to be very proud of this game, most notable during a montage before the reveal of Battlefield V showcasing all of the games before it except this game, even Hardline and Heroes were shown, two games that were developed by other studios.
* CanonDiscontinuity: DICE doesn't seen to be very proud of this game, most notable during a montage before the reveal of Battlefield V showcasing all of the games before it except this game, even Hardline and Heroes were shown, two games that were developed by other studios.
to:
* BrokenBase: Many fans cannot agree if the game was good or not not, or if it was a good Battlefield ''Battlefield'' game in comparison to its PC counterpart or the original ''Bad Company'' game.
* CanonDiscontinuity: DICE doesn't seen to be very proud of this game, mostnotable notably during a montage before the reveal of Battlefield V ''VideoGame/BattlefieldV'' showcasing all of the games before it - except this game, even Hardline game. Even ''Vietnam'' (a game so unpopular compared to ''1942'' that they implicitly ignored it with ''Battlefield 2''[='=]s numbering), ''[[VideoGame/BattlefieldHardline Hardline]]'' and Heroes were shown, two ''[[VideoGame/BattlefieldHeroes Heroes]]'' (two games that were developed by other studios.studios entirely, and also rather unpopular compared to contemporary main-line games) were shown, but not this game.
* CanonDiscontinuity: DICE doesn't seen to be very proud of this game, most
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* BrokenBase: Many fans cannot agree if the game was good or not or if it was a good Battlefield game in comparison to its PC counterpart or the original ''Bad Company'' game.
* CanonDiscontinuity: DICE doesn't seen to be very proud of this game, most notable during a montage before the reveal of Battlefield V showcasing all of the games before it except this game, even Hardline and Heroes were shown, two games that were developed by other studios.
* CanonDiscontinuity: DICE doesn't seen to be very proud of this game, most notable during a montage before the reveal of Battlefield V showcasing all of the games before it except this game, even Hardline and Heroes were shown, two games that were developed by other studios.
