Follow TV Tropes

Following

History NightmareFuel / KingKong1933

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Renamed, cutting ZCEs, low-context potholes and non-examples.


** Ann herself doesn't have it any better. She ends up at risk of getting killed and eaten by a ''Tyrannosaurus rex'', an [[SeaMonster elasmosaurus]], and a [[PteroSoarer pteranodon]] in relatively short order, and is completely helpless to defend herself against them. And if Kong had either not been present, or had lost his fights against them, either one of them could (and very likely ''would'') have eaten her!

to:

** Ann herself doesn't have it any better. She ends up at risk of getting killed and eaten by a ''Tyrannosaurus rex'', an [[SeaMonster elasmosaurus]], ''[[SeaMonster Elasmosaurus]]'', and a [[PteroSoarer pteranodon]] ''Pteranodon'' in relatively short order, and is completely helpless to defend herself against them. And if Kong had either not been present, or had lost his fights against them, either one of them could (and very likely ''would'') have eaten her!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** If any of those women escaped Kong in the jungle they ''might'' have been able to make their way back to the village; and anyone left unclaimed on the altar could also probably be brought back inside. Of course, being rejected by your god would likely have its own ramifications...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The [[FridgeHorror implication]] that the natives have been giving their ''own'' women to Kong for many years... and Kong either killed them or just ignored them to wander around and die alone on Kong's side of the island.

to:

* The [[FridgeHorror implication]] that the natives have been giving their ''own'' women to Kong for many years... and Kong either killed them or just ignored them to wander around and die alone on Kong's side of the island. Or maybe he ignored them altogether, [[NothingIsScarier without even bothering to untie them from the altar...]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The [[FridgeHorror implication]] in the original movie that the natives have been giving their ''own'' women to Kong for many years... and Kong either killed them or just ignored them to wander around and die alone on Kong's side of the island.

to:

* The [[FridgeHorror implication]] in the original movie that the natives have been giving their ''own'' women to Kong for many years... and Kong either killed them or just ignored them to wander around and die alone on Kong's side of the island.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** While it's obvious Kong has to win when he fights the T. Rex, the scene is staged in such a way that it's perfectly believable at any moment that Kong could die. The fight goes on ''far'' longer than you'd expect given the difficulty of shooting such a scene in 1933, and when it finally ends with Kong tearing open the dinosaur's jaw, there is very obviously a ''lot'' of blood coming out of its mouth.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Disambiguating; deleting and renaming wicks as appropriate


** Ann herself doesn't have it any better. She ends up at risk of getting killed and eaten by a TyrannosaurusRex, an [[SeaMonster elasmosaurus]], and a [[PteroSoarer pteranodon]] in relatively short order, and is completely helpless to defend herself against them. And if Kong had either not been present, or had lost his fights against them, either one of them could (and very likely ''would'') have eaten her!

to:

** Ann herself doesn't have it any better. She ends up at risk of getting killed and eaten by a TyrannosaurusRex, ''Tyrannosaurus rex'', an [[SeaMonster elasmosaurus]], and a [[PteroSoarer pteranodon]] in relatively short order, and is completely helpless to defend herself against them. And if Kong had either not been present, or had lost his fights against them, either one of them could (and very likely ''would'') have eaten her!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The Apatosaurus featured ''thoroughly'' averts the GentleGiantSauropod trope by proving shockingly aggressive against Carl, Jack, and the other sailors present when it catches them in the swamp that is presumably its territory. Acting not entirely too different from an [[CruelElephant elephant]] or hippo, it goes so far as to brutally attack the sailors in the water after capsizing their raft and leaving them forced to swim away without any chance of reclaiming their weapons, grabbing them by the shirts with its mouth and tossing them around like ragdolls (and in one notable instance, even lifting one of them up and down into and out of the water repeatedly as if trying to drown him) before then following the ones that escape to land and chasing them from just to ensure they actually leave. And despite supplementary sources and eagle eyed viewers later making it clear that all it did was kill them and leave the bodies, the images on screen make it easy for the common misconception that it [[AscendedToCarnivorism ATE the sailors it killed]]!

to:

** The Apatosaurus featured ''thoroughly'' averts the GentleGiantSauropod trope by proving shockingly aggressive against Carl, Jack, and the other sailors present when it catches them in the swamp that is presumably its territory. Acting not entirely too different from an [[CruelElephant elephant]] or hippo, [[AngryAngryHippos hippo]], it goes so far as to brutally attack the sailors in the water after capsizing their raft and leaving them forced to swim away without any chance of reclaiming their weapons, grabbing them by the shirts with its mouth and tossing them around like ragdolls (and in one notable instance, even lifting one of them up and down into and out of the water repeatedly as if trying to drown him) before then following the ones that escape to land and chasing them from there just to ensure they actually leave. And despite supplementary sources and eagle eyed viewers later making it clear that all it did was kill them and leave the bodies, the images on screen make it easy for the common misconception that it [[AscendedToCarnivorism ATE the sailors it killed]]!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[caption-width-right:350:Still terrifying 85 years later.]]

to:

[[caption-width-right:350:Still terrifying 85 terrifying, many years later.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The dinosaurs and other prehistoric creatures themselves aren't necessarily any less scary. Admittedly, the Stegosaurus may not be quite so bad since Carl and the sailors were able to take it out relatively quickly with their guns and gas bombs. The other prehistoric animals, on the other hand...:
** The Apatosaurus featured ''thoroughly'' averts the GentleGiantSauropod trope by proving shockingly aggressive against Carl, Jack, and the other sailors present when it catches them in the swamp that is presumably its territory. Acting not entirely too different from an [[CruelElephant elephant]] or hippo, it goes so far as to brutally attack the sailors in the water after capsizing their raft and leaving them forced to swim away without any chance of reclaiming their weapons, grabbing them by the shirts with its mouth and tossing them around like ragdolls (and in one notable instance, even lifting one of them up and down into and out of the water repeatedly as if trying to drown him) before then following the ones that escape to land and chasing them from just to ensure they actually leave. And despite supplementary sources and eagle eyed viewers later making it clear that all it did was kill them and leave the bodies, the images on screen make it easy for the common misconception that it [[AscendedToCarnivorism ATE the sailors it killed]]!
** Ann herself doesn't have it any better. She ends up at risk of getting killed and eaten by a TyrannosaurusRex, an [[SeaMonster elasmosaurus]], and a [[PteroSoarer pteranodon]] in relatively short order, and is completely helpless to defend herself against them. And if Kong had either not been present, or had lost his fights against them, either one of them could (and very likely ''would'') have eaten her!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* A scene of crewmen being eaten by giant spiders (also lizards, crabs and ''something'' that looked like an octopus) was considered too scary (the producers insisted the scene was cut for pacing and production concerns); the 2005 version reinstated the idea, and director Creator/PeterJackson also produced a {{Retraux}} re-creation of the scene for the 1933 film's DVD release, depicting how it might have looked had it been made as written. Andy Serkis himself described the monsters in the 2005 version as "Freudian penis monsters."

to:

* A scene of crewmen being eaten by giant spiders (also lizards, crabs and ''something'' that looked like an octopus) was considered too scary (the producers insisted the scene was cut for pacing and production concerns); the 2005 version reinstated the idea, and director Creator/PeterJackson also produced a {{Retraux}} re-creation of the scene for the 1933 film's DVD release, depicting how it might have looked had it been made as written. Andy Serkis Creator/AndySerkis himself described the monsters in the 2005 version as "Freudian penis monsters."

Changed: 144

Removed: 146

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Many of the screams of the sailors killed in the rescue attempt are genuinely chilling.
** The log scene in particular is horrifying, unlike most versions they actually ''show'' the poor men smacking the ground like gruesome ragdolls.

to:

* Many of the screams of the sailors killed in the rescue attempt are genuinely chilling.
**
chilling. The log scene in particular is horrifying, horrifying; unlike most versions they actually ''show'' the poor men smacking the ground like gruesome ragdolls.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The log scene in particular is horrifying, unlike most versions they actually ''show'' the poor men smacking the ground like gruesome ragdolls.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* A scene of crewmen being eaten by giant spiders (also lizards, crabs and ''something'' that looked like an octopus) was considered too scary (the producers insisted the scene was cut for pacing and production concerns); the 2005 version reinstated the idea, and director Peter Jackson also produced a {{Retraux}} re-creation of the scene for the 1933 film's DVD release, depicting how it might have looked had it been made as written. Andy Serkis himself described the monsters in the 2005 version as "Freudian penis monsters."

to:

* A scene of crewmen being eaten by giant spiders (also lizards, crabs and ''something'' that looked like an octopus) was considered too scary (the producers insisted the scene was cut for pacing and production concerns); the 2005 version reinstated the idea, and director Peter Jackson Creator/PeterJackson also produced a {{Retraux}} re-creation of the scene for the 1933 film's DVD release, depicting how it might have looked had it been made as written. Andy Serkis himself described the monsters in the 2005 version as "Freudian penis monsters."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[caption-width-right:350:Still terrifying 75 years later.]]

to:

[[caption-width-right:350:Still terrifying 75 85 years later.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[caption-width-right:350:Still terrifying 75 years later.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* A scene of crewmen being eaten by giant spiders, was considered too scary (the producers insisted the scene was cut for pacing and production concerns); the 2005 version reinstated the idea, and director Peter Jackson also produced a {{Retraux}} re-creation of the scene for the 1933 film's DVD release, depicting how it might have looked had it been made as written. Andy Serkis himself described the monsters in the 2005 version as "Freudian penis monsters."

to:

* A scene of crewmen being eaten by giant spiders, spiders (also lizards, crabs and ''something'' that looked like an octopus) was considered too scary (the producers insisted the scene was cut for pacing and production concerns); the 2005 version reinstated the idea, and director Peter Jackson also produced a {{Retraux}} re-creation of the scene for the 1933 film's DVD release, depicting how it might have looked had it been made as written. Andy Serkis himself described the monsters in the 2005 version as "Freudian penis monsters."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[quoteright:350:http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/king_kong_1933.jpg]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Many of the screams of the sailors killed in the rescue attempt are genuinely chilling.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* A scene of crewmen being eaten by giant spiders, was considered too scary (the producers insisted the scene was cut for pacing and production concerns); the 2005 version reinstated the idea, and director Jackson also produced a {{Retraux}} re-creation of the scene for the 1933 film's DVD release, depicting how it might have looked had it been made as written. Andy Serkis himself described the monsters in the 2005 version as "Freudian penis monsters."

to:

* A scene of crewmen being eaten by giant spiders, was considered too scary (the producers insisted the scene was cut for pacing and production concerns); the 2005 version reinstated the idea, and director Peter Jackson also produced a {{Retraux}} re-creation of the scene for the 1933 film's DVD release, depicting how it might have looked had it been made as written. Andy Serkis himself described the monsters in the 2005 version as "Freudian penis monsters."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* A scene of crewmen being eaten by giant spiders, was considered too scary (the producers insisted the scene was cut for pacing and production concerns); the 2005 version reinstated the idea, and director Jackson also produced a scene for the 1933 film's DVD release, depicting how the scene might have looked had it been made as written. Andy Serkis himself described the monsters in the 2005 version as "Freudian penis monsters."

to:

* A scene of crewmen being eaten by giant spiders, was considered too scary (the producers insisted the scene was cut for pacing and production concerns); the 2005 version reinstated the idea, and director Jackson also produced a {{Retraux}} re-creation of the scene for the 1933 film's DVD release, depicting how the scene it might have looked had it been made as written. Andy Serkis himself described the monsters in the 2005 version as "Freudian penis monsters."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* A scene of crewmen being eaten by giant spiders, was considered too scary (the producers insist the scene was cut for pacing and production concerns); the 2005 version reinstated the idea, and director Jackson also produced a scene for the 1933 film's DVD release, depicting how the scene might have looked had it been made as written. Andy Serkis himself described the monsters in the 2005 version as "Freudian penis monsters."

to:

* A scene of crewmen being eaten by giant spiders, was considered too scary (the producers insist insisted the scene was cut for pacing and production concerns); the 2005 version reinstated the idea, and director Jackson also produced a scene for the 1933 film's DVD release, depicting how the scene might have looked had it been made as written. Andy Serkis himself described the monsters in the 2005 version as "Freudian penis monsters."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moved entries were relevant to the 2005 film, not this one.


* It has a special ability to frighten New Zealand viewers, knowing that some of the insects are actually GIANT WETAS, bloody ugly insects native to their fair land. And while they normally live in forests, they can turn up anywhere, and they're big enough as it is, so the concept of wetas the size of a dog would freak any [=NZer=] out...
* Their NAME (Wetapunga) means 'God of Ugly Things' in Maori. Worse, the leech-like things are real, too... they're bloodworms, a carnivorous worm with protruding... er... lips.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Split the different works off to their own pages.

Added DiffLines:

* The [[FridgeHorror implication]] in the original movie that the natives have been giving their ''own'' women to Kong for many years... and Kong either killed them or just ignored them to wander around and die alone on Kong's side of the island.
* A scene of crewmen being eaten by giant spiders, was considered too scary (the producers insist the scene was cut for pacing and production concerns); the 2005 version reinstated the idea, and director Jackson also produced a scene for the 1933 film's DVD release, depicting how the scene might have looked had it been made as written. Andy Serkis himself described the monsters in the 2005 version as "Freudian penis monsters."
* It has a special ability to frighten New Zealand viewers, knowing that some of the insects are actually GIANT WETAS, bloody ugly insects native to their fair land. And while they normally live in forests, they can turn up anywhere, and they're big enough as it is, so the concept of wetas the size of a dog would freak any [=NZer=] out...
* Their NAME (Wetapunga) means 'God of Ugly Things' in Maori. Worse, the leech-like things are real, too... they're bloodworms, a carnivorous worm with protruding... er... lips.
----

Top