Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / SafeSaneAndConsensual

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
removed part about intoxicated people because I\'m not sure what to say.


* Consensual means that everyone involved has a sufficiently high intellectual capacity so they understand the risks and consequences of their actions. People who are intoxicated may not be able to give consent because some drugs temporarily lower intellectual capacity.

to:

* Consensual means that everyone involved has a sufficiently high intellectual capacity so they understand the risks and consequences of their actions. People who are intoxicated may not be able to give consent because some drugs temporarily lower intellectual capacity.
actions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I omitted some of the ageist (disciminatory against children) language in this article and clarified the SSC definitions. \"Sane\" was mixed up with \"consensual.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I omitted some of the ageist (disciminatory against children) language in this article and clarified the SSC definitions. \"Sane\" was mixed up with \"consensual


It's okay for people to do pretty much anything to each other, as long as they are all into it, know what they are getting into, and the risk of permanent harm isn't unreasonably high. Right?

to:

It's okay for people to do pretty much anything to each other, as long as they are all into it, and they know what they are getting into, and the risk of permanent harm isn't unreasonably high. into- Right?



* Sane means that everyone involved are at an accountable mental capacity: No one is drugged down, too insane, or too young or immature.
* Consensual means that everyone involved participates by their own free will.

This pattern can also be used to describe, for example, the difference between a honest boxing match and simply beating someone up. There are many variations of the pattern: Consenting Adults, Informed Consent, Risk Awareness Consensual Kink, and so on. But while nuances may differ and may be important in specific contexts, the basic concept is the same: Everyone involved does not merely give lip-service consent, they know what they are getting into and are capable of deciding for themselves what they want and don't want. For more on the fine nuances of the difference between these phrases, see the [[UsefulNotes/{{Consent}} Useful Notes entry on Consent]].

to:

* Sane means that everyone the individuals involved are at an accountable mental capacity: No one is drugged down, too insane, or too young or immature.
have self-control and will not betray their partners trust.
* Consensual means that everyone involved participates by has a sufficiently high intellectual capacity so they understand the risks and consequences of their own free will.

actions. People who are intoxicated may not be able to give consent because some drugs temporarily lower intellectual capacity.

This pattern can also be used to describe, for example, the difference between a honest boxing match and simply beating someone up. There are many variations of the pattern: Consenting Adults, Individuals, Informed Consent, Risk Awareness Consensual Kink, and so on. But while nuances may differ and may be important in specific contexts, the basic concept is the same: Everyone involved does not merely give lip-service consent, they know what they are getting into and are capable of deciding for themselves what they want and don't want. For more on the fine nuances of the difference between these phrases, see the [[UsefulNotes/{{Consent}} Useful Notes entry on Consent]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


This trope is about discussing and defining the limits of proper behavior. People simply ''doing'' BDSM in a SSC way is not this trope: It is either CasualKink or BrainsAndBondage, while people doing BDSM in an anti-SSC way falls under BondageIsBad unless this trope comes into play in some form; for example, the victim or another character pointing out that it's not the proper way to do BDSM.

to:

This trope is about discussing and defining the limits of proper behavior.behavior, [[InternalSubtrope or]] simply waving a ConsentFlag. People simply ''doing'' BDSM in a SSC way is not this trope: It is either CasualKink or BrainsAndBondage, while people doing BDSM in an anti-SSC way falls under BondageIsBad unless this trope comes into play in some form; for example, the victim or another character pointing out that it's not the proper way to do BDSM.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


One notable subversion of this trope is pretending that abuse or exploitation is BDSM (and thus implied to be SSC). One notable aversion/way of darkly playing it for laughs is to highlight the need for Safe and Sane by sarcastically pretending that consent is all that's needed - and use an example where someone naively or stupidly agrees to something that they obviously can't handle.

to:

One notable subversion of this trope is pretending that abuse or exploitation is BDSM (and thus implied to be SSC). One notable aversion/way of darkly playing it for laughs is to highlight the need for Safe and Sane by sarcastically pretending that consent is all that's needed - [[QuestionableConsent and use an example where someone naively or stupidly agrees to something that they obviously can't handle.handle]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The difference between on the one hand BDSM and similar activities (sexual and otherwise) and on the other hand abuse is often described in the terms of BDSM being SSC -- Safe Sane And Consensual:

to:

The difference between on the one hand BDSM and similar activities (sexual and otherwise) and on the other hand abuse is often described in the terms of BDSM being SSC -- Safe Sane Safe, Sane, And Consensual:



This pattern can also be used to describe for example the difference between a honest boxing match and simply beating someone up. There are many variations of the pattern: Consenting Adults, Informed Consent, Risk Awareness Consensual Kink, and so on. But while nuances may differ and may be important in specific contexts, the basic concept is the same: Everyone involved does not merely give lip-service consent, they know what they are getting into and are capable of deciding for themselves what they want and don't want. For more on the fine nuances of the difference between these phrases, see the [[UsefulNotes/{{Consent}} Useful Notes entry on Consent]]

This trope is about discussing and defining the limits of proper behavior. People simply ''doing'' BDSM in a SSC way is not this trope: It is either CasualKink or BrainsAndBondage, while people doing BDSM in an anti-SSC way falls under BondageIsBad unless this trope comes into play in some form, for example the victim or another character pointing out that it's not the proper way to do BDSM.

One notable subversion of this trope is pretending that abuse or exploitation is BDSM (and thus implied to be SSC). One notable aversion way of darkly playing it for laughs is to highlight the need for Safe and Sane by sarcastically pretending that consent is all that's needed - and use an example where someone naively or stupidly agree to something they obviously can't handle.

to:

This pattern can also be used to describe describe, for example example, the difference between a honest boxing match and simply beating someone up. There are many variations of the pattern: Consenting Adults, Informed Consent, Risk Awareness Consensual Kink, and so on. But while nuances may differ and may be important in specific contexts, the basic concept is the same: Everyone involved does not merely give lip-service consent, they know what they are getting into and are capable of deciding for themselves what they want and don't want. For more on the fine nuances of the difference between these phrases, see the [[UsefulNotes/{{Consent}} Useful Notes entry on Consent]]

Consent]].

This trope is about discussing and defining the limits of proper behavior. People simply ''doing'' BDSM in a SSC way is not this trope: It is either CasualKink or BrainsAndBondage, while people doing BDSM in an anti-SSC way falls under BondageIsBad unless this trope comes into play in some form, form; for example example, the victim or another character pointing out that it's not the proper way to do BDSM.

One notable subversion of this trope is pretending that abuse or exploitation is BDSM (and thus implied to be SSC). One notable aversion way aversion/way of darkly playing it for laughs is to highlight the need for Safe and Sane by sarcastically pretending that consent is all that's needed - and use an example where someone naively or stupidly agree agrees to something that they obviously can't handle.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The wording still seems a little weird, but whatever.


* In ''Slave Jade'', the female lead is a sexually submissive woman who starts dating a "dominant" psycho who kidnaps her and executes a miserable attempt at inducing StockholmSyndrome. Before they actually met, he seemed to have a very good understanding of consent and safety - what she doesn't know is that the bulk of his mails to her are reasonable thoughts that he have never thought in his own head, but merely copy/pasted from various sites.

to:

* In ''Slave Jade'', the female lead is a sexually submissive woman who starts dating a "dominant" psycho who kidnaps her and executes a miserable attempt at inducing StockholmSyndrome. Before they actually met, he seemed to have a very good understanding of consent and safety - what she doesn't didn't know is that the bulk of his mails to her are were reasonable thoughts ideas that he have never thought in his own head, but merely copy/pasted from various sites.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


See also SafeWord. Compare EthicalSlut. Contrast SexIsEvilAndIAmHorny and BondageIsBad.

to:

See also SafeWord.SafeWord and AbuseMistake. Compare EthicalSlut. Contrast SexIsEvilAndIAmHorny and BondageIsBad.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the [[{{KushielsLegacy}} Kushiel's Legacy]] universe, things can get plenty kinky, but there are ''rules'' in place and violating them is an insult to the Gods.

to:

* In the [[{{KushielsLegacy}} Kushiel's Legacy]] universe, things can get plenty kinky, but there are ''rules'' in place and violating them is an insult to the Gods.
isn't just illegal, it's ''heresy''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Quote not contributing to clarity - \"pain\" and \"consent\" are separate issue. Also, compare Fight Club: people who DO look for a fight in order to get beaten up usually don\'t do it for the pain. :-)


->S&M guys are ''not'' into pain. If they were, they'd be getting their asses kicked every night.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

->S&M guys are ''not'' into pain. If they were, they'd be getting their asses kicked every night.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

**In the UK it was the House of Lords case of R. v. Brown. This was followed in Ontario by its Court of Appeal in R. v. Welch. In the latter case the court stated that S&M is "inherently degrading and dehumanizing" and does not allow someone to consent to harm as they would in an activity with "a generally approved social purpose" such as a contact sport like hockey.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In theory completely averted in the UK, in which no consent can ever be legally given for anything that goes so far as to leave a mark or bruise, and charges can be made by the police regardless of the consent levels of the participants. However, this law is rarely used against heterosexual sadomasochists (or vanilla sex that also leave marks). [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Spanner Homosexuals, on the other hand...]]

to:

* In theory completely averted in the law of the UK, in which no consent can ever be legally given for anything that goes so far as to leave a mark or bruise, and charges can be made by the police regardless of the consent levels of the participants. However, this law is rarely used against heterosexual sadomasochists (or heterosexual vanilla sex that also leave marks). [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Spanner Homosexuals, on the other hand...]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Completely averted in the UK, in which no consent can ever be legally given for anything that goes so far as to leave a mark or bruise, and charges can be made by the police regardless of the consent levels of the participants.

to:

* Completely In theory completely averted in the UK, in which no consent can ever be legally given for anything that goes so far as to leave a mark or bruise, and charges can be made by the police regardless of the consent levels of the participants.
participants. However, this law is rarely used against heterosexual sadomasochists (or vanilla sex that also leave marks). [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Spanner Homosexuals, on the other hand...]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Completely averted in the UK, in which no consent can ever be legally given for anything that goes so far as to leave a mark or bruise, and charges can be made by the police regardless of the consent levels of the participants.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the German Internet Cannibal case, the defense argued that the victim/"victim" had consented to being eaten. The court rule that noone who is willing to consent to being cannibalized [[MortonsFork is mentally fit to give consent in the first place]]. In other words, not Safe enough to be considered Sane.

to:

* In the German Internet Cannibal case, the defense argued that the victim/"victim" had consented to being eaten. The court rule that noone no one who is willing to consent to being cannibalized [[MortonsFork is mentally fit to give consent in the first place]]. In other words, not Safe enough to be considered Sane.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[AC: Live Action TV]]
* The episode of {{CSI}} that introduced Lady Heather also featured her schooling both Gil and Catherine on the difference between BDSM and abuse, with heavy emphasis on Safe Sane and Consensual, although she didn't use that phrase.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* The Time Warp from TheRockyHorrorPictureShow is implied to be this for most, genuinely weird, Transylvanians. Contrast this with [[{{CompleteMonster}} Frank-N-Furter's]] [[{{CorruptTheCutie}} "Experiments" with easily manipulated humans]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
fixed/added pothole, yay enforced formatting!


* In the Kushiel's Legacy universe, things can get plenty kinky, but there are ''rules'' in place and violating them is an insult to the Gods.

to:

* In the [[{{KushielsLegacy}} Kushiel's Legacy Legacy]] universe, things can get plenty kinky, but there are ''rules'' in place and violating them is an insult to the Gods.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


One notable subversion of this trope is pretending that abuse or exploitation is BDSM (and thus implied to be SSC). One notable aversion way of darkly playing it for laughs is to highlight the need for Safe and Sane by sarcastically pretend that consent is all that's needed - and use an example where someone naively or stupidly agree to something they obviously can't handle.

to:

One notable subversion of this trope is pretending that abuse or exploitation is BDSM (and thus implied to be SSC). One notable aversion way of darkly playing it for laughs is to highlight the need for Safe and Sane by sarcastically pretend pretending that consent is all that's needed - and use an example where someone naively or stupidly agree to something they obviously can't handle.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* In the Kushiel's Legacy universe, things can get plenty kinky, but there are ''rules'' in place and violating them is an insult to the Gods.




to:

* This is the core philosophy of Mistress Matisse's and Dan Savage's sex columns for The Seattle Stranger.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Sane means that everyone involved are at an accountable mental capacity: Noone is drugged down, too insane, or too young or immature.

to:

* Sane means that everyone involved are at an accountable mental capacity: Noone No one is drugged down, too insane, or too young or immature.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[AC:ComicBooks]]

to:

[[AC:ComicBooks]][[AC:NewspaperComics]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


It's okay for people to do pretty much anything to each other, as long as they are all into it, know what they are getting into, and the risk of permanent harm isn't unreasonably high. Right? Of course right.

to:

It's okay for people to do pretty much anything to each other, as long as they are all into it, know what they are getting into, and the risk of permanent harm isn't unreasonably high. Right? Of course right.
Right?



The difference between on the one hand BDSM and similar activities (sexual and otherwise) and on the other hand abuse is often described in the terms of BDSM being SSC - Safe Sane And Consensual:

to:

The difference between on the one hand BDSM and similar activities (sexual and otherwise) and on the other hand abuse is often described in the terms of BDSM being SSC - -- Safe Sane And Consensual:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Nut how do we really know what's going on? A mutual game, or abuse? Sometimes it can be hard to see the difference between the two.

to:

Nut But how do we really know what's going on? A mutual game, or abuse? Sometimes it can be hard to see the difference between the two.



This pattern can also be used to describe for example the difference between a honest boxing match and simply beating someone up. There are many variations of the pattern: Consenting Adults, Informed Consent, Risk Awareness Consensual Kink, and so on. But while nuances may differ and may be important in specific contexts, the basic concept is the same: Everyone involved does not merely give lip-service consent, they know what they are getting into and are capable of deciding for themselves what they want and don't want.

to:

This pattern can also be used to describe for example the difference between a honest boxing match and simply beating someone up. There are many variations of the pattern: Consenting Adults, Informed Consent, Risk Awareness Consensual Kink, and so on. But while nuances may differ and may be important in specific contexts, the basic concept is the same: Everyone involved does not merely give lip-service consent, they know what they are getting into and are capable of deciding for themselves what they want and don't want. \n For more on the fine nuances of the difference between these phrases, see the [[UsefulNotes/{{Consent}} Useful Notes entry on Consent]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


This pattern can also be used to describe for example the difference between a honest boxing match and simply beating someone up. There are many variations of the pattern: Consenting Adults, Informed Consent, Risk Awareness Consensual Kink, and so on. But while nuances may differ, the vasic concept is the same: Everyone involved does not merely give lip-service consent, they know what they are getting into and are capable of deciding for themselves what they want and don't want.

to:

This pattern can also be used to describe for example the difference between a honest boxing match and simply beating someone up. There are many variations of the pattern: Consenting Adults, Informed Consent, Risk Awareness Consensual Kink, and so on. But while nuances may differ, differ and may be important in specific contexts, the vasic basic concept is the same: Everyone involved does not merely give lip-service consent, they know what they are getting into and are capable of deciding for themselves what they want and don't want.

Changed: 119

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In one {{Dilbert}} strip (28 August 2010), the PointyHairedBoss is trying to make people believe that slave labor is ok by pretending that "slave" really refers to the BDSM kind of slavery rather then economical exploitation of poor people.
* Aversion played for laughs in one strip in the comics magazine Larsson, with a therapist encouraging a couple to play with live hand-grenades in bed as part of their sex-life... as long as they both consented to it.

to:

* In one {{Dilbert}} ''{{Dilbert}}'' strip (28 August 2010), the PointyHairedBoss is trying to make people believe that slave labor is ok by pretending that "slave" really refers to the BDSM kind of slavery rather then economical exploitation of poor people.
* Aversion played for laughs in one strip in the comics magazine Larsson, ''Larsson'', with a therapist encouraging a couple to play with live hand-grenades in bed as part of their sex-life... as long as they both consented to it.



* In PreachingToThePerverted, with the mistress explaining BDSM to the newcomers.
* In ExitToEden, with the mistress explaining BDSM to the newcomers.
* Discussed in TheSMJudge, as Magda is trying to explain the difference between spousal abuse and what her husband has been doing with her.

to:

* In PreachingToThePerverted, ''PreachingToThePerverted'', with the mistress explaining BDSM to the newcomers.
* In ExitToEden, ''ExitToEden'', with the mistress explaining BDSM to the newcomers.
* Discussed in TheSMJudge, ''TheSMJudge'', as Magda is trying to explain the difference between spousal abuse and what her husband has been doing with her.



* In SlaveWorld, this trope is sometimes played straight, but usually overtly Defied with a lot of LampshadeHanging.
* In Slave Jade, the female lead is a sexually submissive woman who starts dating a "dominant" psycho who kidnaps her and executes a miserable attempt at inducing StockholmSyndrome. Before they actually met, he seemed to have a very good understanding of consent and safety - what she doesn't know is that the bulk of his mails to her are reasonable thoughts that he have never thought in his own head, but merely copy/pasted from various sites.

to:

* In SlaveWorld, ''SlaveWorld'', this trope is sometimes played straight, but usually overtly Defied with a lot of LampshadeHanging.LampshadeHanging that the plot is not SSC and thus not BDSM even thought it makes great BDSM FetishFuel.
* In Slave Jade, ''Slave Jade'', the female lead is a sexually submissive woman who starts dating a "dominant" psycho who kidnaps her and executes a miserable attempt at inducing StockholmSyndrome. Before they actually met, he seemed to have a very good understanding of consent and safety - what she doesn't know is that the bulk of his mails to her are reasonable thoughts that he have never thought in his own head, but merely copy/pasted from various sites.



* A core philosophy in {{Hair}} - see page quote

to:

* A core philosophy in {{Hair}} ''{{Hair}}'' - see page quote
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Hair}} - see page quote

to:

* A core philosophy in {{Hair}} - see page quote
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None









* Averted and played for laughs in one strip in the magazine Larsson, with a therapist encouraging a couple to play with live hand-grenades in bed as part of their sex-life... as long as they both consented to it.

to:

* Averted and Aversion played for laughs in one strip in the comics magazine Larsson, with a therapist encouraging a couple to play with live hand-grenades in bed as part of their sex-life... as long as they both consented to it.

Added: 4524

Changed: 46

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Click the edit button to start this new page.

to:

Click the edit button to start
->You know kids, I wish every mother and father in
this theater would go home tonight and make a speech to their teenagers and say kids, be free, no guilt, be whatever you are, do whatever you want to do, just so long as you don't hurt anybody.
-->'''"My Conviction"''', in ''{{Hair}}''



It's okay for people to do pretty much anything to each other, as long as they are all into it, know what they are getting into, and the risk of permanent harm isn't unreasonably high. Right? Of course right.

Nut how do we really know what's going on? A mutual game, or abuse? Sometimes it can be hard to see the difference between the two.

The difference between on the one hand BDSM and similar activities (sexual and otherwise) and on the other hand abuse is often described in the terms of BDSM being SSC - Safe Sane And Consensual:

* Safe means that the risks are known and minimized: That people know what they are getting into and handle it responsibly.
* Sane means that everyone involved are at an accountable mental capacity: Noone is drugged down, too insane, or too young or immature.
* Consensual means that everyone involved participates by their own free will.

This pattern can also be used to describe for example the difference between a honest boxing match and simply beating someone up. There are many variations of the pattern: Consenting Adults, Informed Consent, Risk Awareness Consensual Kink, and so on. But while nuances may differ, the vasic concept is the same: Everyone involved does not merely give lip-service consent, they know what they are getting into and are capable of deciding for themselves what they want and don't want.

This trope is about discussing and defining the limits of proper behavior. People simply ''doing'' BDSM in a SSC way is not this trope: It is either CasualKink or BrainsAndBondage, while people doing BDSM in an anti-SSC way falls under BondageIsBad unless this trope comes into play in some form, for example the victim or another character pointing out that it's not the proper way to do BDSM.

One notable subversion of this trope is pretending that abuse or exploitation is BDSM (and thus implied to be SSC). One notable aversion way of darkly playing it for laughs is to highlight the need for Safe and Sane by sarcastically pretend that consent is all that's needed - and use an example where someone naively or stupidly agree to something they obviously can't handle.

See also SafeWord. Compare EthicalSlut. Contrast SexIsEvilAndIAmHorny and BondageIsBad.
---------
!!Examples

[[AC:ComicBooks]]
* In one {{Dilbert}} strip (28 August 2010), the PointyHairedBoss is trying to make people believe that slave labor is ok by pretending that "slave" really refers to the BDSM kind of slavery rather then economical exploitation of poor people.
* Averted and played for laughs in one strip in the magazine Larsson, with a therapist encouraging a couple to play with live hand-grenades in bed as part of their sex-life... as long as they both consented to it.

[[AC:{{Film}}]]
* In PreachingToThePerverted, with the mistress explaining BDSM to the newcomers.
* In ExitToEden, with the mistress explaining BDSM to the newcomers.
* Discussed in TheSMJudge, as Magda is trying to explain the difference between spousal abuse and what her husband has been doing with her.

[[AC:{{Literature}}]]
* In SlaveWorld, this trope is sometimes played straight, but usually overtly Defied with a lot of LampshadeHanging.
* In Slave Jade, the female lead is a sexually submissive woman who starts dating a "dominant" psycho who kidnaps her and executes a miserable attempt at inducing StockholmSyndrome. Before they actually met, he seemed to have a very good understanding of consent and safety - what she doesn't know is that the bulk of his mails to her are reasonable thoughts that he have never thought in his own head, but merely copy/pasted from various sites.
** In the end, she shoots him and escapes. He survives the bullet and ends up in jail for all he did to her, while her shooting him is ruled as self-defence. In the epilogue she decides to find a
new page. man to dominate her - a man who isn't psycho, but really understand SSC.

[[AC:RealLife]]
* In the German Internet Cannibal case, the defense argued that the victim/"victim" had consented to being eaten. The court rule that noone who is willing to consent to being cannibalized [[MortonsFork is mentally fit to give consent in the first place]]. In other words, not Safe enough to be considered Sane.

[[AC:{{Theater}}]]
* {{Hair}} - see page quote
----------

Top