Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / AmericaWonWorldWarII

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


When this trope is in play the efforts and contributions of the other Allies are downplayed. Egregiously, the Soviet-German war is considered a ''sideshow'' - if it's even mentioned at all. More than 80% of the Wehrmacht's combat elements were engaged against the Soviets at any given time after the 22nd of June 1941, and the Germans lost ''2/3'' of their dead and captured to them [[note]] Though this is a little non-indicative, as German troops surrendered in droves to the Western Allies in the last couple of months of the war - Operational Group Steiner (yes, ''[[WebVideo/HitlerRants that]]'' [[Film/Downfall Steiner]]), for instance, famously refused to attempt to break the siege of Berlin and instead marched west to surrender to the Americans [[/note]]. Often it seems like the only other Allied nation-state that actually did anything to fight Germany was the UK, which (after the Poles and [[CheeseEatingSurrenderMonkeys French got their asses handed to them]]) kept the hopeless fight alive until the USA joined in and saved the day. The non-European Allies have it even worse. When was the last time you saw an American film about the Sino-Japanese War, or Philipino Guerillas? All these oversights are at least partly a result of the UsefulNotes/ColdWar making American educators and filmmakers unwilling to glorify [[DirtyCommunists the Soviet Union]] or [[NoMoreEmperors China]] (especially [[RedChina Maoist]] [[DirtyCommunists China]]).

to:

When this trope is in play the efforts and contributions of the other Allies are downplayed. Egregiously, the Soviet-German war is considered a ''sideshow'' - if it's even mentioned at all. More than 80% of the Wehrmacht's combat elements were engaged against the Soviets at any given time after the 22nd of June 1941, and the Germans lost ''2/3'' of their dead and captured to them [[note]] Though this is a little non-indicative, as German troops surrendered in droves to the Western Allies in the last couple of months of the war - Operational Group Steiner (yes, ''[[WebVideo/HitlerRants that]]'' [[Film/Downfall [[Film:Downfall Steiner]]), for instance, famously refused to attempt to break the siege of Berlin and instead marched west to surrender to the Americans [[/note]]. Often it seems like the only other Allied nation-state that actually did anything to fight Germany was the UK, which (after the Poles and [[CheeseEatingSurrenderMonkeys French got their asses handed to them]]) kept the hopeless fight alive until the USA joined in and saved the day. The non-European Allies have it even worse. When was the last time you saw an American film about the Sino-Japanese War, or Philipino Guerillas? All these oversights are at least partly a result of the UsefulNotes/ColdWar making American educators and filmmakers unwilling to glorify [[DirtyCommunists the Soviet Union]] or [[NoMoreEmperors China]] (especially [[RedChina Maoist]] [[DirtyCommunists China]]).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Invoked as part of Frenchie's back story. An American on holiday in France draws ire when he claims the US liberated France single-handedly, going so far as to call the French [[CheeseEatingSurrenderMonkeys cowards]]. Frenchie is [[BerserkButton less than]] [[CurbStompBattle impressed]].

to:

** Invoked as part of Frenchie's back story. An American on holiday in France draws ire when he claims the US liberated France single-handedly, going so far as to call the French [[CheeseEatingSurrenderMonkeys cowards]]. Frenchie is [[BerserkButton less than]] [[CurbStompBattle impressed]].impressed]] with him since said American can't even name the divisions and commanders of the real American soldiers but is content to live in reflected glory of their sacrifices.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


America Won World War II is a form of HollywoodHistory in which a story implies or outright states that the United States single-handedly won UsefulNotes/WorldWarII.[[note]] To be fair, US lend-lease may have saved the lives of several million Soviet citizens and soldiers. This was done in a number of ways. The most direct of these was through the delivery of non-grain food (cheese, beef, chocolate), which was crucial given the German military's 'foraging' and later 'scorched earth' strategies (destruction of all cities, all farming equipment, most farms) in the occupied Soviet Union (home to a quarter of the population and a third of the grain output). Another way was through the delivery of machine tools and high-quality or unobtainable items, which allowed Soviet industries to re-tool more rapidly and to focus on the maximum possible output of low-quality items (e.g. the delivery of high-power radio transmitter/receiver sets, which allowed the Soviet electronics industry to focus on low-power sets). A more indirect but still very important way was by improving Soviet combat effectiveness and organisation and so indirectly reducing deaths. For instance, the obsolescent weapons and combat vehicles delivered in 1941-2 were not very good and created logistical issues but were still literally better than nothing until the Soviets finally built up decent surpluses of both in late 1944 (more specifically, the combat aircraft delivered in 1941 were still slightly better than the bulk of the Soviets' airfleet at that time). Reduced deaths aside, without lend-lease the Soviets also would not have made it as far into central Europe as they actually did; their ability to sustain long-distance advances (of more than 200km) with large forces was augmented by deliveries which increased the size of their truck fleet (necessary for bridging the gap between the railheads and the front lines) by a quarter [[/note]] Sometimes, it's [[UnfortunateImplications unintentional]]; the viewpoint or focus is simply too narrow for the audience to be reminded of the bigger picture. Other times, though, it's a blatant example of HollywoodHistory.

to:

America Won World War II is a form of HollywoodHistory in which a story implies or outright states that the United States single-handedly won UsefulNotes/WorldWarII.[[note]] To be fair, US lend-lease may have saved the lives of several million Soviet citizens and soldiers. This was done in a number of ways. The most direct of these was through the delivery of non-grain food (cheese, beef, chocolate), which was crucial given the German military's 'foraging' and later 'scorched earth' strategies (destruction of all cities, all farming equipment, most farms) in the occupied Soviet Union (home to a quarter of the population and a third of the grain output). Another way was through the delivery of machine tools and high-quality or unobtainable items, which allowed Soviet industries to re-tool more rapidly and to focus on the maximum possible output of low-quality items (e.g. the delivery of high-power radio transmitter/receiver sets, which allowed the Soviet electronics industry to focus on low-power sets). A more indirect but still very important way was by improving Soviet combat effectiveness and organisation and so indirectly reducing deaths. For instance, the obsolescent weapons and combat vehicles delivered in 1941-2 were not very good and created logistical issues but were still literally better than nothing until the Soviets finally built up decent surpluses of both domestically-produced modern weapons and combat vehicles in late 1944 (more specifically, the combat aircraft delivered in 1941 were still slightly better than the bulk of the Soviets' airfleet at that time). Reduced deaths aside, without lend-lease the Soviets also would not have made it as far into central Europe as they actually did; their ability to sustain long-distance advances (of more than 200km) with large forces was augmented by deliveries which increased the size of their truck fleet (necessary for bridging the gap between the railheads and the front lines) by a quarter [[/note]] Sometimes, it's [[UnfortunateImplications unintentional]]; the viewpoint or focus is simply too narrow for the audience to be reminded of the bigger picture. Other times, though, it's a blatant example of HollywoodHistory.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


America Won World War II is a form of HollywoodHistory in which a story implies or outright states that the United States single-handedly won UsefulNotes/WorldWarII.[[note]] To be fair, US lend-lease may have saved the lives of several million Soviet citizens and soldiers. This was done in a number of ways. The most direct of these was through the delivery of non-grain food (cheese, beef, chocolate), which was crucial given the German military's 'foraging' and later 'scorched earth' strategies (destruction of all cities, all farming equipment, most farms) in the occupied Soviet Union (home to a quarter of the population and a third of the grain output). Another way was through the delivery of machine tools and high-quality or unobtainable items, which allowed Soviet industries to re-tool more rapidly and to focus on the maximum possible output of low-quality items (e.g. the delivery of high-power radio transmitter/receiver sets, which allowed the Soviet electronics industry to focus on low-power sets). A more indirect but still very important way was by improving Soviet combat effectiveness and organisation and so indirectly reducing deaths. For instance, the obsolescent weapons and combat vehicles delivered in 1941-2 were not very good and created logistical issues but still literally better than nothing until the Soviets finally built up decent surpluses of both in late 1944 (e.g. the combat aircraft, which in 1941 were slightly better than the bulk of the Soviets' own mostly-obsolescent airfleet). Reduced deaths aside, without lend-lease the Soviets also would not have made it as far into central Europe as they actually did; their ability to sustain long-distance advances (of more than 200km) with large forces was augmented by deliveries which increased the size of their truck fleet (necessary for bridging the gap between the railheads and the front lines) by a quarter [[/note]] Sometimes, it's [[UnfortunateImplications unintentional]]; the viewpoint or focus is simply too narrow for the audience to be reminded of the bigger picture. Other times, though, it's a blatant example of HollywoodHistory.

to:

America Won World War II is a form of HollywoodHistory in which a story implies or outright states that the United States single-handedly won UsefulNotes/WorldWarII.[[note]] To be fair, US lend-lease may have saved the lives of several million Soviet citizens and soldiers. This was done in a number of ways. The most direct of these was through the delivery of non-grain food (cheese, beef, chocolate), which was crucial given the German military's 'foraging' and later 'scorched earth' strategies (destruction of all cities, all farming equipment, most farms) in the occupied Soviet Union (home to a quarter of the population and a third of the grain output). Another way was through the delivery of machine tools and high-quality or unobtainable items, which allowed Soviet industries to re-tool more rapidly and to focus on the maximum possible output of low-quality items (e.g. the delivery of high-power radio transmitter/receiver sets, which allowed the Soviet electronics industry to focus on low-power sets). A more indirect but still very important way was by improving Soviet combat effectiveness and organisation and so indirectly reducing deaths. For instance, the obsolescent weapons and combat vehicles delivered in 1941-2 were not very good and created logistical issues but were still literally better than nothing until the Soviets finally built up decent surpluses of both in late 1944 (e.g. (more specifically, the combat aircraft, which aircraft delivered in 1941 were still slightly better than the bulk of the Soviets' own mostly-obsolescent airfleet).airfleet at that time). Reduced deaths aside, without lend-lease the Soviets also would not have made it as far into central Europe as they actually did; their ability to sustain long-distance advances (of more than 200km) with large forces was augmented by deliveries which increased the size of their truck fleet (necessary for bridging the gap between the railheads and the front lines) by a quarter [[/note]] Sometimes, it's [[UnfortunateImplications unintentional]]; the viewpoint or focus is simply too narrow for the audience to be reminded of the bigger picture. Other times, though, it's a blatant example of HollywoodHistory.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


America Won World War II is a form of HollywoodHistory in which a story implies or outright states that the United States single-handedly won UsefulNotes/WorldWarII.[[note]] To be fair, US lend-lease may have saved the lives of several million Soviet citizens and soldiers. This was done in a number of ways. The most direct one was through the deliver of non-grain food (cheese, beef, chocolate), which was crucial given Germany's capture of and later 'scorched earth' strategies (destruction of all cities, all farming equipment, most farms) in the occupied Soviet Union (where a quarter of the population lived). Another way was through the delivery of machine tools and high-quality or unobtainable items, which allowed Soviet industries to re-tool more rapidly and to focus on the maximum possible output of low-quality items (e.g. the delivery of high-power radio transmitter/receiver sets, which allowed the Soviet electronics industry to focus on low-power sets). A more indirect but still very important way was by improving Soviet combat effectiveness and organisation and so indirectly reducing deaths. For instance, the obsolescent weapons and combat vehicles delivered in 1941-2 were not very good and created logistical issues but still literally better than nothing until the Soviets finally built up decent surpluses of both in late 1944 (e.g. the combat aircraft, which in 1941 were slightly better than the bulk of the Soviets' own mostly-obsolescent airfleet). Reduced deaths aside, without lend-lease the Soviets also would not have made it as far into central Europe as they actually did; their ability to sustain long-distance advances (of more than 200km) with large forces was augmented by deliveries which increased the size of their truck fleet (necessary for bridging the gap between the railheads and the front lines) by a quarter [[/note]] Sometimes, it's [[UnfortunateImplications unintentional]]; the viewpoint or focus is simply too narrow for the audience to be reminded of the bigger picture. Other times, though, it's a blatant example of HollywoodHistory.

to:

America Won World War II is a form of HollywoodHistory in which a story implies or outright states that the United States single-handedly won UsefulNotes/WorldWarII.[[note]] To be fair, US lend-lease may have saved the lives of several million Soviet citizens and soldiers. This was done in a number of ways. The most direct one of these was through the deliver delivery of non-grain food (cheese, beef, chocolate), which was crucial given Germany's capture of the German military's 'foraging' and later 'scorched earth' strategies (destruction of all cities, all farming equipment, most farms) in the occupied Soviet Union (where (home to a quarter of the population lived).and a third of the grain output). Another way was through the delivery of machine tools and high-quality or unobtainable items, which allowed Soviet industries to re-tool more rapidly and to focus on the maximum possible output of low-quality items (e.g. the delivery of high-power radio transmitter/receiver sets, which allowed the Soviet electronics industry to focus on low-power sets). A more indirect but still very important way was by improving Soviet combat effectiveness and organisation and so indirectly reducing deaths. For instance, the obsolescent weapons and combat vehicles delivered in 1941-2 were not very good and created logistical issues but still literally better than nothing until the Soviets finally built up decent surpluses of both in late 1944 (e.g. the combat aircraft, which in 1941 were slightly better than the bulk of the Soviets' own mostly-obsolescent airfleet). Reduced deaths aside, without lend-lease the Soviets also would not have made it as far into central Europe as they actually did; their ability to sustain long-distance advances (of more than 200km) with large forces was augmented by deliveries which increased the size of their truck fleet (necessary for bridging the gap between the railheads and the front lines) by a quarter [[/note]] Sometimes, it's [[UnfortunateImplications unintentional]]; the viewpoint or focus is simply too narrow for the audience to be reminded of the bigger picture. Other times, though, it's a blatant example of HollywoodHistory.

Changed: 1156

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


America Won World War II is a form of HollywoodHistory in which a story implies or outright states that the United States single-handedly won UsefulNotes/WorldWarII.[[note]] To be fair, US lend-lease may have saved the lives of several million Soviet citizens and soldiers. The most important form of aid was undoubtedly non-grain food (cheese, beef, chocolate), given Germany's capture of and later 'scorched earth' strategy in the central-western Ukraine, but there were numerous other deliveries which improved Soviet combat effectiveness and organisation and so indirectly reduced deaths. One way was by allowing Soviet industry to concentrate on bulkier and less complicated products (such as high-power radio transmitter/receiver sets). Another was that the weapons and combat vehicles were often literally better than nothing (such as the obsolescent combat aircraft delivered in 1941-2, which at the time were slightly better than the bulk of the Soviets' own mostly-obsolescent airfleet), with the Soviets only fully retiring lend-lease combat vehicles and weapons when they became literally worse than nothing (late 1944-early 1945). Deaths aside, without lend-lease the Soviets would not have made it as far into central Europe as they actually did because their ability to sustain long-distance advances (of more than 200km) with large forces was augmented by deliveries which increased the size of their truck fleet (necessary for bridging the gap between the railheads and the front lines) by a quarter [[/note]] Sometimes, it's [[UnfortunateImplications unintentional]]; the viewpoint or focus is simply too narrow for the audience to be reminded of the bigger picture. Other times, though, it's a blatant example of HollywoodHistory.

to:

America Won World War II is a form of HollywoodHistory in which a story implies or outright states that the United States single-handedly won UsefulNotes/WorldWarII.[[note]] To be fair, US lend-lease may have saved the lives of several million Soviet citizens and soldiers. This was done in a number of ways. The most important form of aid direct one was undoubtedly through the deliver of non-grain food (cheese, beef, chocolate), which was crucial given Germany's capture of and later 'scorched earth' strategy strategies (destruction of all cities, all farming equipment, most farms) in the central-western Ukraine, but there were numerous other deliveries occupied Soviet Union (where a quarter of the population lived). Another way was through the delivery of machine tools and high-quality or unobtainable items, which improved allowed Soviet industries to re-tool more rapidly and to focus on the maximum possible output of low-quality items (e.g. the delivery of high-power radio transmitter/receiver sets, which allowed the Soviet electronics industry to focus on low-power sets). A more indirect but still very important way was by improving Soviet combat effectiveness and organisation and so indirectly reduced reducing deaths. One way was by allowing Soviet industry to concentrate on bulkier and less complicated products (such as high-power radio transmitter/receiver sets). Another was that For instance, the obsolescent weapons and combat vehicles delivered in 1941-2 were often not very good and created logistical issues but still literally better than nothing (such as until the obsolescent Soviets finally built up decent surpluses of both in late 1944 (e.g. the combat aircraft delivered in 1941-2, aircraft, which at the time in 1941 were slightly better than the bulk of the Soviets' own mostly-obsolescent airfleet), with the Soviets only fully retiring lend-lease combat vehicles and weapons when they became literally worse than nothing (late 1944-early 1945). Deaths airfleet). Reduced deaths aside, without lend-lease the Soviets also would not have made it as far into central Europe as they actually did because did; their ability to sustain long-distance advances (of more than 200km) with large forces was augmented by deliveries which increased the size of their truck fleet (necessary for bridging the gap between the railheads and the front lines) by a quarter [[/note]] Sometimes, it's [[UnfortunateImplications unintentional]]; the viewpoint or focus is simply too narrow for the audience to be reminded of the bigger picture. Other times, though, it's a blatant example of HollywoodHistory.

Changed: 2392

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


America Won World War II is a form of HollywoodHistory in which a story implies or outright states that the United States single-handedly won UsefulNotes/WorldWarII.[[note]] To be fair, the USA ''did'' provide ''mountains'' of desperately-needed aid in the form of food, munitions, ships, tanks, planes, trucks, trains, guns, and raw materials to the other Allies that they could not produce for themselves (at least not in anything like the quantities needed). The USSR received 9/10 of all lend-lease material sent (much of which was never paid back), which in turn accounted for some 4-5% of the USSR's total wartime production. That percentage is a little deceptive, however, as that figure was more like 10-15% of the USSR's production during the first year (1941-2) of its involvement in the war (when Soviet industry was still relocating to the Urals). The lend-lease was also concentrated on several very specific items to free up Soviet industry to focus on other things; early-war Russian combat aircraft were ''terrible'', and for over two years the Red Air Force relied on American- (and some British) built aircraft until their own engineers finally managed to turn out something worthwhile; as much as 70% of the Red Army's trucks and a similar proportion of their radios and leather boots (as well as ''all'' the coffee, chocolate, tinned beef, and tobacco) came from overseas. That said, the Soviets suffered 10 million military and 17 million civilian dead. The 'Westerm Allies' (USA and British Commonwealth minus India) lost fewer than 2 million military and civilian dead. This is why Anthony Beevor quipped that 'The Allies bought victory with Soviet blood and paid in Spam' [[/note]] Sometimes, it's [[UnfortunateImplications unintentional]]; the viewpoint or focus is simply too narrow for the audience to be reminded of the bigger picture. Other times, though, it's a blatant example of HollywoodHistory.

When this trope is in play the efforts and contributions of the other Allies are downplayed. Egregiously, the Soviet-German war is considered a ''sideshow'' - if it's even mentioned at all. More than 80% of the Wehrmacht's combat elements were engaged against the Soviets at any given time after the 22nd of June 1941, and the Germans lost ''2/3'' of their dead and captured to them [[note]] Though this is a little non-indicative, as German troops surrendered in droves to the Western Allies in the last couple of months of the war - Operational Group Steiner, for instance, famously refused to attempt to break the siege of Berlin and instead marched west to surrender to the Americans [[/note]]. Often it seems like the only other Allied nation-state that actually did anything to fight Germany was the UK, which (after the Poles and [[CheeseEatingSurrenderMonkeys French got their asses handed to them]]) kept the hopeless fight alive until the USA joined in and saved the day. The non-European Allies have it even worse. When was the last time you saw an American film about the Sino-Japanese War, or Philipino Guerillas? All these oversights are at least partly a result of the UsefulNotes/ColdWar making American educators and filmmakers unwilling to glorify [[DirtyCommunists the Soviet Union]] or [[NoMoreEmperors China]] (especially [[RedChina Maoist]] [[DirtyCommunists China]]).

to:

America Won World War II is a form of HollywoodHistory in which a story implies or outright states that the United States single-handedly won UsefulNotes/WorldWarII.[[note]] To be fair, the USA ''did'' provide ''mountains'' of desperately-needed aid in the form of food, munitions, ships, tanks, planes, trucks, trains, guns, and raw materials to the other Allies that they could not produce for themselves (at least not in anything like the quantities needed). The USSR received 9/10 of all US lend-lease material sent (much of which was never paid back), which in turn accounted for some 4-5% of may have saved the USSR's total wartime production. That percentage is a little deceptive, however, as that figure was more like 10-15% lives of the USSR's production during the first year (1941-2) of its involvement in the war (when Soviet industry was still relocating to the Urals). The lend-lease was also concentrated on several very specific items to free up million Soviet citizens and soldiers. The most important form of aid was undoubtedly non-grain food (cheese, beef, chocolate), given Germany's capture of and later 'scorched earth' strategy in the central-western Ukraine, but there were numerous other deliveries which improved Soviet combat effectiveness and organisation and so indirectly reduced deaths. One way was by allowing Soviet industry to focus concentrate on other things; early-war Russian bulkier and less complicated products (such as high-power radio transmitter/receiver sets). Another was that the weapons and combat vehicles were often literally better than nothing (such as the obsolescent combat aircraft delivered in 1941-2, which at the time were ''terrible'', and for over two years slightly better than the Red Air Force relied on American- (and some British) built aircraft until their own engineers finally managed to turn out something worthwhile; as much as 70% bulk of the Red Army's trucks and a similar proportion of their radios and leather boots (as well as ''all'' the coffee, chocolate, tinned beef, and tobacco) came from overseas. That said, Soviets' own mostly-obsolescent airfleet), with the Soviets suffered 10 million military only fully retiring lend-lease combat vehicles and 17 million civilian dead. The 'Westerm Allies' (USA and British Commonwealth minus India) lost fewer weapons when they became literally worse than 2 million military and civilian dead. This is why Anthony Beevor quipped that 'The Allies bought victory nothing (late 1944-early 1945). Deaths aside, without lend-lease the Soviets would not have made it as far into central Europe as they actually did because their ability to sustain long-distance advances (of more than 200km) with Soviet blood large forces was augmented by deliveries which increased the size of their truck fleet (necessary for bridging the gap between the railheads and paid in Spam' the front lines) by a quarter [[/note]] Sometimes, it's [[UnfortunateImplications unintentional]]; the viewpoint or focus is simply too narrow for the audience to be reminded of the bigger picture. Other times, though, it's a blatant example of HollywoodHistory.

When this trope is in play the efforts and contributions of the other Allies are downplayed. Egregiously, the Soviet-German war is considered a ''sideshow'' - if it's even mentioned at all. More than 80% of the Wehrmacht's combat elements were engaged against the Soviets at any given time after the 22nd of June 1941, and the Germans lost ''2/3'' of their dead and captured to them [[note]] Though this is a little non-indicative, as German troops surrendered in droves to the Western Allies in the last couple of months of the war - Operational Group Steiner, Steiner (yes, ''[[WebVideo/HitlerRants that]]'' [[Film/Downfall Steiner]]), for instance, famously refused to attempt to break the siege of Berlin and instead marched west to surrender to the Americans [[/note]]. Often it seems like the only other Allied nation-state that actually did anything to fight Germany was the UK, which (after the Poles and [[CheeseEatingSurrenderMonkeys French got their asses handed to them]]) kept the hopeless fight alive until the USA joined in and saved the day. The non-European Allies have it even worse. When was the last time you saw an American film about the Sino-Japanese War, or Philipino Guerillas? All these oversights are at least partly a result of the UsefulNotes/ColdWar making American educators and filmmakers unwilling to glorify [[DirtyCommunists the Soviet Union]] or [[NoMoreEmperors China]] (especially [[RedChina Maoist]] [[DirtyCommunists China]]).

Changed: 998

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Series/BandOfBrothers'' is a bit of an interesting example, as it focuses on American soldiers in the war, but most of the main cast are played by British actors. Foreign allies do show up in the series, though not necessarily in a positive light. In Market Garden, the British armor support is shown to be [[TanksForNothing completely ineffective]], forcing Easy Company to retreat (In the book, Ambrose not-so-subtly implies that Operation Market Garden, which was led by Montgomery, was doomed to fail and that Patton's plan for crossing the Rhine would have been far more effective - a longtime debate in military history circles). Later on, Easy is tasked with rescuing a number of British soldiers trapped behind enemy lines, though both sides do get along very well after the success of the mission. When Easy Company is advancing on Eagle's Nest, they are specifically ordered to get there before the French do.
** Generally, ''BandOfBrothers'' averts this trope. For instance, the epilogue to the Operation Market Garden episode points out that the British suffered far worse casualties at Arnhem than the [=101st=]. Similarly, the British tank support ''does'' cover Easy's retreat in that episode, and the only reason the British tanks do badly is because their orders force them to "avoid unnecessary destruction of property" which would have allowed them to ambush the German tanks, rather than be ambushed.

to:

* ''Series/BandOfBrothers'' is a bit of an interesting example, as it focuses on American soldiers in the war, but most of the main cast are played by British actors. Foreign allies do show up in the series, though not necessarily in a positive light. In Market Garden, the British armor support is shown to be [[TanksForNothing completely ineffective]], forcing Easy Company to retreat (In the book, Ambrose not-so-subtly implies that Operation Market Garden, which was led by Montgomery, was doomed to fail and that Patton's plan for crossing the Rhine would have been far more effective - a longtime debate in military history circles).circles, with some Americans favoring Monty and some Brits favoring Patton). Later on, Easy is tasked with rescuing a number of British soldiers trapped behind enemy lines, though both sides do get along very well after the success of the mission. The British troops are survivors of the disaster at Arnhem, and assemble seemingly out of nowhere in near-total darkness with impeccable discipline when signaled, leaving the men of Easy visibly impressed with their fieldcraft. When Easy Company is advancing on Eagle's Nest, they are specifically ordered to get there before the French do.
** Generally, ''BandOfBrothers'' averts this trope. For instance, the epilogue to the Operation Market Garden episode points out that the British suffered far worse casualties at Arnhem than the [=101st=]. Similarly, the British tank support ''does'' cover Easy's retreat in that episode, and the only reason the British tanks do badly is because their orders (which came directly from Montgomery) force them to "avoid unnecessary destruction of property" which would have allowed them to ambush the German tanks, rather than be ambushed.



** In the show itself J P Morgan causes a fight with some Australia troops by disrespecting the Australians and claiming that the USA was saving them from having 'chopsticks up their ass'.

to:

** In the show itself J P Morgan causes a fight with some Australia troops by disrespecting the Australians (who weren't particularly respectful themselves) and claiming that the USA was saving them from having 'chopsticks up their ass'.ass'. Both sides actually had a point, as the Australians had stopped the Japanese cold in the hellish Kokoda Trail campaign in the Owen Stanley Mountains of New Guinea. Guadalcanal was a Japanese attempt to bypass the AIF in New Guinea and cut off Australia from the USA, with conditions every bit as nightmarish, and with the ground combat being an entirely American endeavor.



*** To be fair to the Western Allies, the Germans did commit most of their air strength against the British and Americans and suffered their heaviest air losses against them. The air battles of Western Europe and the Pacific dwarfed those of the Eastern front.

to:

*** To be fair to the Western Allies, the Germans did commit most of their air strength against the British and Americans and suffered their heaviest air losses against them. The air battles of Western Europe and the Pacific dwarfed those of the Eastern front.front, and German aircraft became increasingly rare in Russian skies as more and more were pulled back to counter the American bombing campaign against Germany. The Soviets ''would not'' have enjoyed getting the full attention of the Luftwaffe.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Despite his good publicity, Montgomery made some major mistakes that cost a lot of British, Canadian, and American lives. A particularly touchy issue is how he proceeded to do absolutely ''nothing'' during the Battle of the Bulge, [[BlatantLies then claimed that he had somehow saved the Americans]]. While certainly capable, it's the opinion of many that Montgomery wasn't fit to stand on the same field as General Bill Slim, the brilliant British commander of Allied forces facing the Japanese in Burma.

to:

** Despite his good publicity, Montgomery made some major mistakes that cost a lot of British, Canadian, and American lives. A particularly touchy issue is how he proceeded to do absolutely ''nothing'' during the Battle of the Bulge, [[BlatantLies then claimed that he had somehow saved the Americans]]. While certainly capable, it's the opinion of many that Montgomery wasn't fit to stand on the same field as [[FourStarBadass General Bill Slim, Slim]], the brilliant British commander of Allied forces facing the Japanese in Burma.

Added: 522

Changed: 789

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Pretty much averted in the film ''Film/TheGreatRaid'' about the Raid at Cabanatuan wherein the American Alamo Scouts with help from Filipino guerillas rescued a group of American [=POWs=] in the Philippines from a Japanese prison camp. The film showed just how critical the local forces were to the rescue by showing the guerillas holding back Japanese reinforcements at an important choke point and providing hundreds of carabao carts to quickly transport the weakened and diseased American [=POWs=].

to:

** Despite his good publicity, Montgomery made some major mistakes that cost a lot of British, Canadian, and American lives. A particularly touchy issue is how he proceeded to do absolutely ''nothing'' during the Battle of the Bulge, [[BlatantLies then claimed that he had somehow saved the Americans]]. While certainly capable, it's the opinion of many that Montgomery wasn't fit to stand on the same field as General Bill Slim, the brilliant British commander of Allied forces facing the Japanese in Burma.
* Pretty much averted in the film ''Film/TheGreatRaid'' about the Raid at Cabanatuan wherein the American Alamo Scouts US 6th Rangers with help from Filipino guerillas and American Alamo Scouts rescued a group of American [=POWs=] in the Philippines from a Japanese prison camp. The film showed just how critical the local forces were to the rescue by showing the guerillas holding back Japanese reinforcements at an important choke point and providing hundreds of carabao carts to quickly transport the weakened and diseased American [=POWs=].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


America Won World War II is a form of HollywoodHistory in which a story implies or outright states that the United States single-handedly won UsefulNotes/WorldWarII.[[note]] To be fair, the USA 'did' provide ''mountains'' of desperately-needed aid in the form of food, munitions, ships, tanks, planes, trucks, trains, guns, and raw materials to the other Allies that they could not produce for themselves (at least not in anything like the quantities needed). The USSR received 9/10 of all lend-lease material sent (much of which was never paid back), which in turn accounted for some 4-5% of the USSR's total wartime production. That percentage is a little deceptive, however, as that figure was more like 10-15% of the USSR's production during the first year (1941-2) of its involvement in the war (when Soviet industry was still relocating to the Urals). The lend-lease was also concentrated on several very specific items to free up Soviet industry to focus on other things; early-war Russian combat aircraft were ''terrible'', and for over two years the Red Air Force relied on American- (and some British) built aircraft until their own engineers finally managed to turn out something worthwhile; as much as 70% of the Red Army's trucks and a similar proportion of their radios and leather boots (as well as ''all'' the coffee, chocolate, tinned beef, and tobacco) came from overseas. That said, the Soviets suffered 10 million military and 17 million civilian dead. The 'Westerm Allies' (USA and British Commonwealth minus India) lost fewer than 2 million military and civilian dead. This is why Anthony Beevor quipped that 'The Allies bought victory with Soviet blood and paid in Spam' [[/note]] Sometimes, it's [[UnfortunateImplications unintentional]]; the viewpoint or focus is simply too narrow for the audience to be reminded of the bigger picture. Other times, though, it's a blatant example of HollywoodHistory.

to:

America Won World War II is a form of HollywoodHistory in which a story implies or outright states that the United States single-handedly won UsefulNotes/WorldWarII.[[note]] To be fair, the USA 'did' ''did'' provide ''mountains'' of desperately-needed aid in the form of food, munitions, ships, tanks, planes, trucks, trains, guns, and raw materials to the other Allies that they could not produce for themselves (at least not in anything like the quantities needed). The USSR received 9/10 of all lend-lease material sent (much of which was never paid back), which in turn accounted for some 4-5% of the USSR's total wartime production. That percentage is a little deceptive, however, as that figure was more like 10-15% of the USSR's production during the first year (1941-2) of its involvement in the war (when Soviet industry was still relocating to the Urals). The lend-lease was also concentrated on several very specific items to free up Soviet industry to focus on other things; early-war Russian combat aircraft were ''terrible'', and for over two years the Red Air Force relied on American- (and some British) built aircraft until their own engineers finally managed to turn out something worthwhile; as much as 70% of the Red Army's trucks and a similar proportion of their radios and leather boots (as well as ''all'' the coffee, chocolate, tinned beef, and tobacco) came from overseas. That said, the Soviets suffered 10 million military and 17 million civilian dead. The 'Westerm Allies' (USA and British Commonwealth minus India) lost fewer than 2 million military and civilian dead. This is why Anthony Beevor quipped that 'The Allies bought victory with Soviet blood and paid in Spam' [[/note]] Sometimes, it's [[UnfortunateImplications unintentional]]; the viewpoint or focus is simply too narrow for the audience to be reminded of the bigger picture. Other times, though, it's a blatant example of HollywoodHistory.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''[[Film/Fortress2012 Fortress]]'' focuses on a B-17 crew in the 99th Bombardment Group (Heavy), 12th Air Force flying out of North Africa in 1943. Despite the narrow focus, this gets averted when every mission briefing includes a mention of RAF bombers hitting high-risk targets too. No mention of the Russians, but it's justified because they were only slightly more relevant than the Japanese in the Mediterranean Theater of Operations.

to:

* ''[[Film/Fortress2012 ''[[Film/{{Fortress2012}} Fortress]]'' focuses on a B-17 crew in the 99th Bombardment Group (Heavy), 12th Air Force flying out of North Africa in 1943. 1943. Despite the narrow focus, this gets averted when every mission briefing includes a mention of RAF bombers hitting high-risk targets too. too. No mention of the Russians, but it's justified because they were only slightly more relevant than the Japanese in the Mediterranean Theater of Operations.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''[[Film/Fortress2012 Fortress]]'' focuses on a B-17 crew in the 99th Bombardment Group (Heavy), 12th Air Force flying out of North Africa in 1943. Despite the narrow focus, this gets averted when every mission briefing includes a mention of RAF bombers hitting high-risk targets too. No mention of the Russians, but it's justified because they were only slightly more relevant than the Japanese in the Mediterranean Theater of Operations.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It also completely skips the part where the real Master Ip didn't like the communists any better than he liked the Japanese, which is why he left Mao's domain in 1947 for British-controlled Hong Kong, where he trained a promising young man named [[Creator/BruceLee Bruce]].

Changed: 523

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


America Won World War II is a form of HollywoodHistory in which a story implies or outright states that the United States single-handedly won UsefulNotes/WorldWarII.[[note]] To be fair, the USA 'did' provide the USSR with 9/10 of all lend-lease material sent, which in turn accounted for some 4-5% of the USSR's total wartime production. That percentage is a little deceptive, however, as that figure was more like 10-15% of the USSR's production during the first year (1941-2) of its involvement in the war (when Soviet industry was still relocating to the Urals). The lend-lease was also concentrated on several very specific items to free up Soviet industry to focus on other things; as much as 70% of the Red Army's trucks and a similar proportion of their radios and leather boots (as well as ''all'' the coffee, chocolate, tinned beef, and tobacco) came from overseas. That said, the Soviets suffered 10 million military and 17 million civilian dead. The 'Westerm Allies' (USA and British Commonwealth minus India) lost fewer than 2 million military and civilian dead. This is why Anthony Beevor quipped that 'The Allies bought victory with Soviet blood and paid in Spam' [[/note]] Sometimes, it's [[UnfortunateImplications unintentional]]; the viewpoint or focus is simply too narrow for the audience to be reminded of the bigger picture. Other times, though, it's a blatant example of HollywoodHistory.

to:

America Won World War II is a form of HollywoodHistory in which a story implies or outright states that the United States single-handedly won UsefulNotes/WorldWarII.[[note]] To be fair, the USA 'did' provide ''mountains'' of desperately-needed aid in the form of food, munitions, ships, tanks, planes, trucks, trains, guns, and raw materials to the other Allies that they could not produce for themselves (at least not in anything like the quantities needed). The USSR with received 9/10 of all lend-lease material sent, sent (much of which was never paid back), which in turn accounted for some 4-5% of the USSR's total wartime production. That percentage is a little deceptive, however, as that figure was more like 10-15% of the USSR's production during the first year (1941-2) of its involvement in the war (when Soviet industry was still relocating to the Urals). The lend-lease was also concentrated on several very specific items to free up Soviet industry to focus on other things; early-war Russian combat aircraft were ''terrible'', and for over two years the Red Air Force relied on American- (and some British) built aircraft until their own engineers finally managed to turn out something worthwhile; as much as 70% of the Red Army's trucks and a similar proportion of their radios and leather boots (as well as ''all'' the coffee, chocolate, tinned beef, and tobacco) came from overseas. That said, the Soviets suffered 10 million military and 17 million civilian dead. The 'Westerm Allies' (USA and British Commonwealth minus India) lost fewer than 2 million military and civilian dead. This is why Anthony Beevor quipped that 'The Allies bought victory with Soviet blood and paid in Spam' [[/note]] Sometimes, it's [[UnfortunateImplications unintentional]]; the viewpoint or focus is simply too narrow for the audience to be reminded of the bigger picture. Other times, though, it's a blatant example of HollywoodHistory.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The D-Day landings are another good example. Many American-made productions will focus solely on Omaha Beach, the most heavily fortified of the four landing sites as well as the best-defended--both facts which Allied intelligence failed to realize prior to the operation. The carnage that ensued is a favourite among producers, since it emphasizes the sacrifice Americans made during the war--but doing so gives the impression that Omaha Beach was ''the'' decisive turning point that led to the Allied victory in Europe. The focus on Omaha Beach is also partially because ''Film/SavingPrivateRyan'' did it, [[FollowTheLeader other games/movies/TV shows want to replicate its success]], and because it's more exciting to show a strongly opposed landing than an unopposed one -- not that the other landings were exactly unopposed (for instance, Canadian troops landing at Juno Beach on that day faced opposition almost as formidable, but punched through quickly and made better progress towards their objectives in spite of it[[note]]Due to better small-unit communication and leadership, something the military training of smaller nation-states tends to emphasize given their lesser material resources. Not to mention that the Canadians accepted "Hobart's Funnies" such as the amphibious tanks to give the landing troops armor support.[[/note]]), but still.

to:

The D-Day landings are another good example. Many American-made productions will focus solely on Omaha Beach, the most heavily fortified of the four landing sites as well as the best-defended--both facts which Allied intelligence failed to realize prior to the operation. The carnage that ensued is a favourite among producers, since it emphasizes the sacrifice Americans made during the war--but doing so gives the impression that Omaha Beach was ''the'' decisive turning point that led to the Allied victory in Europe. The focus on Omaha Beach is also partially because ''Film/SavingPrivateRyan'' did it, [[FollowTheLeader other games/movies/TV shows want to replicate its success]], and because it's more exciting to show a strongly opposed landing than an unopposed one -- not that the other landings were exactly unopposed (for instance, Canadian troops landing at Juno Beach on that day faced opposition almost as formidable, with a ''full-blown tank battle'' raging right on the beach, but punched through quickly and made better progress towards their objectives in spite of it[[note]]Due to better small-unit communication and leadership, something the military training of smaller nation-states tends to emphasize given their lesser material resources. Not to mention that the Canadians accepted "Hobart's Funnies" such as the amphibious tanks to give the landing troops armor support.[[/note]]), but still.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The ''VideoGame/MedalOfHonor'' series, however, tend to play this pretty straight, in which you're an American soldier who seems to single-handedly ensure victory in every major Allied campaign and save the day. In later expansion packs and games, this even included battles in which ''America played no part whatsoever''. That said, the second game of the series focused on a French woman, Manon Batiste, fighting the Germans as a Maquis and an OSS operative.

to:

* The ''VideoGame/MedalOfHonor'' series, however, tend to play this pretty egregiously straight, in which you're an American soldier who seems to single-handedly ensure victory in every major Allied campaign and save the day. In later expansion packs and games, this even included battles in which ''America played no part whatsoever''. That said, the second game of the series focused on a French woman, Manon Batiste, fighting the Germans as a Maquis and an OSS operative.

Added: 315

Changed: 1267

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Parodied indirectly in ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons''; in an episode set TwentyMinutesIntoTheFuture, Moe tells Lisa's British fiance that "We saved your ass in World War II." The fiance replies "Well, we saved your [America's] ''arse'' in [[WorldWarThree World War ''III'']]", and Moe concedes the point.
** ''Bart-Mangled Banner'', which is mainly a TakeThat episode aimed at misguided patriotism, plays with it. The Simpsons are rescued from the sea by a boat captained by a xenophobic Frenchman, who acknowledges his unjustified hatred of the Americans by admitting they were the (not a, the) country [[UsefulNotes/WorldWarTwo which saved France from the Germans]] - [[UsefulNotes/WorldWarOne twice]].
** In ''[[Recap/TheSimpsonsS15E4TheReginaMonologues The Regina Monologues]]'' Homer, as usual, handles this in his usual way when visiting London: ''"We're big shot tourists from everyone's favorite country, the USA. We saved your ass in Vietnam and shared our prostitutes with Creator/HughGrant"''.

to:

* ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'':
**
Parodied indirectly in ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons''; "Lisa's Wedding"; in an episode set TwentyMinutesIntoTheFuture, Moe tells Lisa's British fiance that "We saved your ass in World War II." The fiance replies "Well, we saved your [America's] ''arse'' in [[WorldWarThree World War ''III'']]", {{World War|III}} ''[[WorldWarIII III]]''", and Moe concedes the point.
** ''Bart-Mangled Banner'', "Bart-Mangled Banner", which is mainly a TakeThat episode aimed at misguided patriotism, plays with it. The Simpsons are rescued from the sea by a boat captained by a xenophobic Frenchman, who acknowledges his unjustified hatred of the Americans by admitting they were the (not a, the) country [[UsefulNotes/WorldWarTwo which saved France from the Germans]] - [[UsefulNotes/WorldWarOne twice]].
** In ''[[Recap/TheSimpsonsS15E4TheReginaMonologues "[[Recap/TheSimpsonsS15E4TheReginaMonologues The Regina Monologues]]'' Monologues]]" Homer, as usual, handles this in his usual way when visiting London: ''"We're London:
--->'''Homer Simpson:''' We're
big shot tourists from everyone's favorite country, the USA. We saved your ass in Vietnam and shared our prostitutes with Creator/HughGrant"''.Creator/HughGrant!

Changed: 152

Removed: 498

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Justifying Edits towards other tropers is one thing. But Justifying Edits towards what a fictional character said?


* In ''Film/ItsAMadMadMadMadWorld'', Milton Berle's character invokes this while arguing with Terry-Thomas. It proves to be something of a BerserkButton for the latter.
-->"As far as I'm concerned, the whole British race is practically finished. If it hadn't been for Lend-Lease, if we hadn't kept your whole country afloat by giving you billions that you never even said 'Thank you' for, the whole phony outfit would've sunk under the Atlantic years ago...What are you stopping for?"
-->"GetOut of this machine."
** Well the Brits did say thank you for lend lease. A lot of British bases passed in American hands, the most prominent one later in the Cold War being Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean the only US base in the region which is actually a British Overseas Territory. Also US had first dibs on technological developments in the UK for 50 years after Lend Lease, that is how the Harrier became the AV-8 and why the first tank equipped with Chobham Armour (developed by the Brits) was the M1 Abrams (US).

to:

* In ''Film/ItsAMadMadMadMadWorld'', Milton Berle's character Fresno entrepreneur J. Russell Finch invokes this while arguing with Terry-Thomas.British Army Officer Lt. Col. J. Algernon Hawthorne. It proves to be something of a BerserkButton for the latter.
-->"As -->'''Finch:''' As far as I'm concerned, the whole British race is practically finished. If it hadn't been for Lend-Lease, if we hadn't kept your whole country afloat by giving you billions that you never even said 'Thank you' "Thank you" for, the whole phony outfit would've sunk under the Atlantic years ago...ago... What are you stopping for?"
-->"GetOut
for?\\
'''Hawthorne:''' GetOut
of this machine."
** Well the Brits did say thank you for lend lease. A lot of British bases passed in American hands, the most prominent one later in the Cold War being Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean the only US base in the region which is actually a British Overseas Territory. Also US had first dibs on technological developments in the UK for 50 years after Lend Lease, that is how the Harrier became the AV-8 and why the first tank equipped with Chobham Armour (developed by the Brits) was the M1 Abrams (US).



* The (Peoples' Republic of) Chinese equivalent appears in ''Film/IpMan'', which is set during the UsefulNotes/SecondSinoJapaneseWar. The concluding captions mention China's defeat of Japan without mentioning [[UsefulNotes/WorldWarTwo the Guomindang or the international Allied forces]] that had pushed UsefulNotes/ImperialJapan back and blockaded the Home Islands in preparation for an amphibious invasion. In reality, the Guomindang and their warlord allies acted as a huge punching bag, losing battle after battle until The United States, Britain, and later the Soviet Union entered the conflict. The importance of US Lend-lease - which was critical to propping the Guomindang with things like massive loans and anti-tank weaponry - also goes unmentioned, naturally.

to:

* The (Peoples' (People's Republic of) Chinese equivalent appears in ''Film/IpMan'', which is set during the UsefulNotes/SecondSinoJapaneseWar. The concluding captions mention China's defeat of Japan without mentioning [[UsefulNotes/WorldWarTwo the Guomindang or the international Allied forces]] that had pushed UsefulNotes/ImperialJapan back and blockaded the Home Islands in preparation for an amphibious invasion. In reality, the Guomindang and their warlord allies acted as a huge punching bag, losing battle after battle until The United States, Britain, and later the Soviet Union entered the conflict. The importance of US Lend-lease - which was critical to propping the Guomindang with things like massive loans and anti-tank weaponry - also goes unmentioned, naturally.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
just adding in a new example, from a propaganda flick in 1955.

Added DiffLines:

* ''Film/ErnstThälmann:FührerSeinerKlasse'' is a notable case in that it's an East German film made in 1955, showing the Soviets singlehandedly winning the war- so many shots of T-34s racing dramatically across snow and plains. The British only show up as bombers overhead, depicted as lights in the aky. Granted, this is actually pretty accurate in terms of the numbers on the eastern vs. western fronts, but it was done here to show the Russian Communists rescuing their German comrades from evil fascists and capitalists. Bit more complicated irl.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


America Won World War II is a form of HollywoodHistory in which a story implies or outright states that the United States single-handedly won UsefulNotes/WorldWarII.[[note]]To be fair, the USA 'did' provide the USSR with 9/10 of all lend-lease material sent, which in turn accounted for some 4-5% of the USSR's total wartime production. That percentage is a little deceptive, however, as that figure was more like 10-15% of the USSR's production during the first year (1941-2) of its involvement in the war (when Soviet industry was still relocating to the Urals). The lend-lease was also concentrated on several very specific items to free up Soviet industry to focus on other things; as much as 80% of the Red Army's trucks and a similar proportion of their radios and leather boots (as well as ''all'' the coffee, chocolate, tinned beef, and tobacco) came from overseas. All that said, there was a certain imbalance of 'blood' versus 'iron' spent to achieve victory, one very much in the USSR's 'favor' with 9-14 million Soviet military and 15-20 million Soviet civilian dead versus 2 million suffered by The Allies (minus India and China). This is where the saying 'The Allies bought victory with Soviet blood and paid in Spam' comes from. German dead and crippled stood at 5+ million, for comparison.[[/note]] Sometimes, it's [[UnfortunateImplications unintentional]]; the viewpoint or focus is simply too narrow for the audience to be reminded of the bigger picture. Other times, though, it's a blatant example of HollywoodHistory.

When this trope is in play, the efforts and contributions of the other "Western" Allies are downplayed, and the Eastern Front (where more than ''80%'' of the Wehrmacht was engaged at any one time after June 22 1941, and where the Germans lost ''2/3'' of their dead and captured[[note]]Though this is a little non-indicative, as German troops surrendered in droves to the Western Allies in the last couple of months of the war - Operational Group Steiner, for instance, infamously refused to attempt to break the siege of Berlin and instead tried to march west and reach Anglo-American lines so they could surrender to them.[[/note]]) is considered a ''sideshow'', if it's even mentioned at all. Often it seems like the only other Allied nation-state that actually did anything to fight Germany was the UK, which (after the Poles and [[CheeseEatingSurrenderMonkeys French got their asses handed to them]]) kept the hopeless fight alive until the USA joined in and saved the day. This is likely a result of the UsefulNotes/ColdWar making American educators and filmmakers unwilling to glorify [[DirtyCommunists the Soviet Union]] or [[NoMoreEmperors China]] (especially [[RedChina Maoist]] [[DirtyCommunists China]]).

to:

America Won World War II is a form of HollywoodHistory in which a story implies or outright states that the United States single-handedly won UsefulNotes/WorldWarII.[[note]]To [[note]] To be fair, the USA 'did' provide the USSR with 9/10 of all lend-lease material sent, which in turn accounted for some 4-5% of the USSR's total wartime production. That percentage is a little deceptive, however, as that figure was more like 10-15% of the USSR's production during the first year (1941-2) of its involvement in the war (when Soviet industry was still relocating to the Urals). The lend-lease was also concentrated on several very specific items to free up Soviet industry to focus on other things; as much as 80% 70% of the Red Army's trucks and a similar proportion of their radios and leather boots (as well as ''all'' the coffee, chocolate, tinned beef, and tobacco) came from overseas. All that That said, there was a certain imbalance of 'blood' versus 'iron' spent to achieve victory, one very much in the USSR's 'favor' with 9-14 Soviets suffered 10 million Soviet military and 15-20 17 million Soviet civilian dead versus dead. The 'Westerm Allies' (USA and British Commonwealth minus India) lost fewer than 2 million suffered by The Allies (minus India military and China). civilian dead. This is where the saying why Anthony Beevor quipped that 'The Allies bought victory with Soviet blood and paid in Spam' comes from. German dead and crippled stood at 5+ million, for comparison.[[/note]] Sometimes, it's [[UnfortunateImplications unintentional]]; the viewpoint or focus is simply too narrow for the audience to be reminded of the bigger picture. Other times, though, it's a blatant example of HollywoodHistory.

When this trope is in play, play the efforts and contributions of the other "Western" Allies are downplayed, and downplayed. Egregiously, the Eastern Front (where more Soviet-German war is considered a ''sideshow'' - if it's even mentioned at all. More than ''80%'' 80% of the Wehrmacht was Wehrmacht's combat elements were engaged against the Soviets at any one given time after the 22nd of June 22 1941, and where the Germans lost ''2/3'' of their dead and captured[[note]]Though captured to them [[note]] Though this is a little non-indicative, as German troops surrendered in droves to the Western Allies in the last couple of months of the war - Operational Group Steiner, for instance, infamously famously refused to attempt to break the siege of Berlin and instead tried to march marched west and reach Anglo-American lines so they could to surrender to them.[[/note]]) is considered a ''sideshow'', if it's even mentioned at all.the Americans [[/note]]. Often it seems like the only other Allied nation-state that actually did anything to fight Germany was the UK, which (after the Poles and [[CheeseEatingSurrenderMonkeys French got their asses handed to them]]) kept the hopeless fight alive until the USA joined in and saved the day. This is likely The non-European Allies have it even worse. When was the last time you saw an American film about the Sino-Japanese War, or Philipino Guerillas? All these oversights are at least partly a result of the UsefulNotes/ColdWar making American educators and filmmakers unwilling to glorify [[DirtyCommunists the Soviet Union]] or [[NoMoreEmperors China]] (especially [[RedChina Maoist]] [[DirtyCommunists China]]).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Some see this general 'limited scope' thing as extending to the "official" date of the war's beginning, September 1st, 1939, the date of Germany's invasion of Poland. Most, however, accept that the moniker of 'World War' denotes merely the geography of a war (the British Empire alone spanned three continents at the time), rather than [[UnfortunateImplications implying the conflict wasn't 'serious' or something]] ([[UsefulNotes/ImperialJapan the Japan of the time]], and many Japanese ultranationalists since, call it [[InsistentTerminology 'The China Incident']]). Though bloody and horrific in its own right[[note]]With war-dead to the tune of at least 10 and as many as 20 million (the Chinese Civil War that followed has to account for another 10 million or so, but Communist China, in [[ImplausibleDeniability classic form, likes to pretend that no one died in it]]), as well as an impressive gamut of war-crimes like mass-rape (e.g. Nanjing) and live-human-experimentation[[/note]], [[SecondSinoJapaneseWar the war]] that [[UsefulNotes/ChiangKaiShek Chiang Kai-Shek's]] [[UsefulNotes/NoMoreEmperors Guomindang]] waged against UsefulNotes/ImperialJapan wasn't part of the 'World War' until the Imperial Navy lashed out to take Malaya and the Philippines.

to:

Some see this general 'limited scope' thing as extending to the "official" date of the war's beginning, September 1st, 1939, the date of Germany's invasion of Poland. Most, however, accept that the moniker of 'World War' denotes merely the geography of a war (the British Empire alone spanned three continents at the time), rather than [[UnfortunateImplications implying the conflict wasn't 'serious' or something]] ([[UsefulNotes/ImperialJapan the Japan of the time]], and many Japanese ultranationalists since, call it [[InsistentTerminology 'The China Incident']]). Though bloody and horrific in its own right[[note]]With war-dead to the tune of at least 10 and as many as 20 million (the Chinese Civil War that followed has to account for another 10 million or so, but Communist China, in [[ImplausibleDeniability classic form, likes to pretend that no one died in it]]), as well as an impressive gamut of war-crimes like mass-rape (e.g. Nanjing) and live-human-experimentation[[/note]], [[SecondSinoJapaneseWar the war]] that [[UsefulNotes/ChiangKaiShek Chiang Kai-Shek's]] [[UsefulNotes/NoMoreEmperors Guomindang]] waged against UsefulNotes/ImperialJapan wasn't part of the 'World War' until the Imperial Navy lashed out to take Malaya and the Philippines.
Philippines[[note]]Surprisingly, it wasn't until then that the Republic of China got around to formally declaring war on Japan, which further complicates the matter of when World War II started[[/note]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Averted with ''VideoGame/SilentStorm'', given that it was developed by a Russian company, where you assemble a MultinationalTeam when playing for either the Allies or the Axis. Then again, the focus fairly quickly moves away from the war into SpyFiction territory ([[spoiler:including PoweredArmor and FrickinLaserBeams]]).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Cases of this trope are not limited to the European Theater. Most films featuring the Pacific theatre only focus on the naval and air battles fought by the U.S., appearing as though they were the sole force fighting in the Pacific. In reality, UK and Australian forces played significant roles against overwhelming forces in atrocious conditions, and many other nations contributed as well. Not to mention the [[UsefulNotes/SecondSinoJapaneseWar brutally violent war in China]], probably the most ignored battlefront of the war. This neglect is strange given that it was the longest conflict (starting in 1937) and believed to be the the second-bloodiest theatre of war in human history after the Eastern European Theatre.

to:

Cases of this trope are not limited to the European Theater. Most films featuring the Pacific theatre only focus on the naval and air battles fought by the U.S., appearing as though they were the sole force fighting in the Pacific. In reality, UK reality Chinese, Indian, British, and Australian forces played significant roles against overwhelming forces in atrocious conditions, and many other nations countries contributed as well. Not to mention Indeed, the [[UsefulNotes/SecondSinoJapaneseWar brutally violent war in China]], China]] is probably the most ignored battlefront of the war. This neglect is strange given that it was the longest conflict (starting in 1937) and believed to be the the second-bloodiest theatre of war in human history after the Eastern European Theatre.

Added: 408

Changed: 284

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** ''Big Red One'' plays it straight, putting you in the boots of an American soldier for almost the entire game.

to:

** ''Big Red One'' plays it straight, straight however, putting you in the boots of an American soldier for almost the entire game.game.
** ''World at War'' has an interesting aversion of the inverse "Germany fights alone", as it's a shooter that includes the Pacific theatre, but is not solely focused on it (you still switch from there to the Soviets fighting in eastern Europe every couple missions). At the same time though, it still plays this trope straight in that the American Marines are the ''only'' Allied forces seen in that theatre.



* The ''VideoGame/MedalOfHonor'' series, however, tend to play this pretty straight, in which you're an American soldier who seems to single-handedly ensure victory in every major Allied campaign and save the day. In later expansion packs, this even included battles in which ''America played no part whatsoever''. That said, the second game of the series focused on a French woman, Manon Batiste, fighting the Germans as a Maquis and an OSS operative.
** ''[=MoH=]: Airborne'', where each mission ends with a debriefing voice-over from the commanding officer. After a relatively minor skirmish in Italy in early 1943, he proclaims "The war has begun", and after a very over-the-top raid on a flak tower in early 1945 he says that the war is over and effectively gives the Airborne itself full credit in his speech. The British are mentioned in passing in one mission, Operation Market Garden - fascinatingly, in contrast to the earlier ''[=MoH=]: Frontline'', it is presented as a great victory in spite of the fact it's actually the Allies' most notorious bungle. It's also an example of the reverse angle (as in the Axis consisting entirely of Germans), as despite half the game taking place in Italy you only fight Italian blackshirts in the first half of the first level - where they are [[ArtificialStupidity much dumber than the German soldiers]] and [[ImproperlyPlacedFirearms only use German weapons]].

to:

* The ''VideoGame/MedalOfHonor'' series, however, tend to play this pretty straight, in which you're an American soldier who seems to single-handedly ensure victory in every major Allied campaign and save the day. In later expansion packs, packs and games, this even included battles in which ''America played no part whatsoever''. That said, the second game of the series focused on a French woman, Manon Batiste, fighting the Germans as a Maquis and an OSS operative.
** ''[=MoH=]: Airborne'', where each mission ends with a debriefing voice-over from the commanding officer. After a relatively minor skirmish in Italy in early 1943, he proclaims "The war has begun", and after a very over-the-top raid on a flak tower in early 1945 he says that the war is over and effectively gives the Airborne itself full credit in his speech. The British are mentioned in passing in one mission, Operation Market Garden - fascinatingly, in contrast to the earlier ''[=MoH=]: Frontline'', it is presented as a great victory in spite of the fact it's actually the Allies' most notorious bungle. It's also an example of the reverse angle (as in the Axis consisting entirely of Germans), as despite half the game taking place in Italy you only fight Italian blackshirts in the first half of the first level - where they are [[ArtificialStupidity much dumber than the German soldiers]] soldiers]][[note]]Italian ''soldiers'' were actually pretty competent, to the point Erwin Rommel noted they were better than his own German troops at times - it was their ''commanders'' that [[MilesGloriosus had]] [[TheNeidermeyer issues]][[/note]] and [[ImproperlyPlacedFirearms only use German weapons]].



* Averted - ''probably'' - in ''VideoGame/CommandAndConquerRedAlert''. As per HitlersTimeTravelExemptionAct, this version of WWII is quite different, with a Soviet invasion of Europe being countered by Allies led by a German supreme commander and aided by technology developed by AlbertEinstein, while WordOfGod is that America didn't directly join the war until the Soviets were already losing. That said, the Allied armory includes what look like Abrams tanks and M16 rifles ([[AnachronismStew in the 1950's]]), but it's unclear whether this is due to an extensive lend-lease campaign by the United States and the result of {{alternate history}} shenanigans, or simply because the game reuses a lot of assets from the original ''[[VideoGame/CommandAndConquerTiberianDawn Command & Conquer]]''.

to:

* Averted - ''probably'' - in ''VideoGame/CommandAndConquerRedAlert''. As per HitlersTimeTravelExemptionAct, this version of WWII is quite different, with a Soviet invasion of Europe being countered by Allies led by a German supreme commander and aided by technology developed by AlbertEinstein, UsefulNotes/AlbertEinstein, while WordOfGod is that America didn't directly join the war until the Soviets were already losing. That said, the Allied armory includes what look like Abrams tanks and M16 rifles ([[AnachronismStew in the 1950's]]), but it's unclear whether this is due to an extensive lend-lease campaign by the United States and the result of {{alternate history}} shenanigans, or simply because the game reuses a lot of assets from the original ''[[VideoGame/CommandAndConquerTiberianDawn Command & Conquer]]''.



** ''VideoGame/{{Wolfenstein|2009}}'' (2009) can be said to subvert this. While you are still American OneManArmy B.J. Blazkowicz, the assistance of the German resistance is necessary and invaluable to your success, which also nicely averts the common AllGermansAreNazis trope that appears so often in Nazi-based [=FPSs=].

to:

** The 2009 ''VideoGame/{{Wolfenstein|2009}}'' (2009) can be said to subvert this. While you are still American OneManArmy B.J. Blazkowicz, the assistance of the German resistance is necessary and invaluable to your success, which also nicely averts the common AllGermansAreNazis trope that appears so often in Nazi-based [=FPSs=].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Lastly, winning a war means nothing unless one also [[StrategyVersusTactics "wins the peace"]], as was the case [[NapoleonicWars in Vienna in 1815]] and infamously not [[UsefulNotes/WorldWarI at Versailles in 1918]]. In the aftermath of World War II, the USA and Britain and the USSR all deserve recognition for demarking and respecting crystal-clear 'spheres of influence' that kept the peace despite the outbreak of the Yugoslavian, Greek, and [[NoMoreEmperors Chinese]] civil wars. When the CCP gained the upper hand in the Chinese Civil War, and the USA began to [[RedScare see the USSR as a threat]], the USA also began to funnel a great deal of money into reconstructing Western European economies[[note]]Britain got a lot less than France or Germany, as conservative American opinion was appalled that they had the temerity to elect a socialist government; Britain were still repaying US loans, written off for other countries, well into the 1980's.[[/note]] so that they [[UsefulNotes/ColdWar could sustain larger militaries and thus avoid the need for committing US troops to Western Europe in its defense]]. The membership of the USSR and USA in the UsefulNotes/UnitedNations also gave it a lot more clout than its predecessor the League of Nations.

to:

Lastly, winning a war means nothing unless one also [[StrategyVersusTactics "wins the peace"]], as was the case [[NapoleonicWars [[UsefulNotes/TheNapoleonicWars in Vienna in 1815]] and infamously not [[UsefulNotes/WorldWarI at Versailles in 1918]]. In the aftermath of World War II, the USA and Britain and the USSR all deserve recognition for demarking and respecting crystal-clear 'spheres of influence' that kept the peace despite the outbreak of the Yugoslavian, Greek, and [[NoMoreEmperors Chinese]] civil wars. When the CCP gained the upper hand in the Chinese Civil War, and the USA began to [[RedScare see the USSR as a threat]], the USA also began to funnel a great deal of money into reconstructing Western European economies[[note]]Britain got a lot less than France or Germany, as conservative American opinion was appalled that they had the temerity to elect a socialist government; Britain were still repaying US loans, written off for other countries, well into the 1980's.[[/note]] so that they [[UsefulNotes/ColdWar could sustain larger militaries and thus avoid the need for committing US troops to Western Europe in its defense]]. The membership of the USSR and USA in the UsefulNotes/UnitedNations also gave it a lot more clout than its predecessor the League of Nations.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
namespacing


* As did ''[[NickFury Sgt. Fury]] and his HowlingCommandos''. At least Fury's team actually had a (stereotypical) British soldier on it.

to:

* As did ''[[NickFury ''[[ComicBook/NickFury Sgt. Fury]] and his HowlingCommandos''.ComicBook/HowlingCommandos''. At least Fury's team actually had a (stereotypical) British soldier on it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Deleting period.


* "We cannot win it (the war) without the Americans!" Says Churchill in ''Film/IntoTheStorm2009'' (the Churchill biopic). . Despite this, the movie actually subverts this: The Americans are shown as worthy allies, but the British (and to a lesser extent the Russians) are shown as just as responsible, if not more so, for the ultimate victory.

to:

* "We cannot win it (the war) without the Americans!" Says Churchill in ''Film/IntoTheStorm2009'' (the Churchill biopic). . Despite this, the movie actually subverts this: The Americans are shown as worthy allies, but the British (and to a lesser extent the Russians) are shown as just as responsible, if not more so, for the ultimate victory.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Alternate history. Removing complaining.


* Averted in ''VideoGame/MetalGearSolid3SnakeEater'' with the Cobra Unit, which while led by an American (and apparently a hugely patriotic one) contains at least two Russians and three people of unknown origin (all that's said is that they're from the Allied Nations). The game tells you rather erroneously that they all but won WWII as if all the other millions of Allied soldiers were just twiddling their thumbs at the Axis Powers.

to:

* Averted in ''VideoGame/MetalGearSolid3SnakeEater'' with the Cobra Unit, which while led by an American (and apparently a hugely patriotic one) contains at least two Russians and three people of unknown origin (all that's said is that they're from the Allied Nations). The game tells you rather erroneously that According to the game, they all but won WWII as if all the other millions of Allied soldiers were just twiddling their thumbs at the Axis Powers.by themselves.

Added: 44552

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

%%
%% Image selected via consensus in the Image Pickin' forum. Please stop by there before changing/removing it.
%%
[[quoteright:300:[[WebAnimation/ZeroPunctuation http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/AmericaWinsTheWar_ZP_2546.jpg]]]]
%%
%% Image selected via consensus in the Image Pickin' forum. Please stop by there before changing/removing it.
%%
->''"We saved your ass in Vietnam!"''
-->-- '''[[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Homer Simpson]]''' to some British citizens, [[Recap/TheSimpsonsS15E4TheReginaMonologues "The Regina Monologues"]]

America Won World War II is a form of HollywoodHistory in which a story implies or outright states that the United States single-handedly won UsefulNotes/WorldWarII.[[note]]To be fair, the USA 'did' provide the USSR with 9/10 of all lend-lease material sent, which in turn accounted for some 4-5% of the USSR's total wartime production. That percentage is a little deceptive, however, as that figure was more like 10-15% of the USSR's production during the first year (1941-2) of its involvement in the war (when Soviet industry was still relocating to the Urals). The lend-lease was also concentrated on several very specific items to free up Soviet industry to focus on other things; as much as 80% of the Red Army's trucks and a similar proportion of their radios and leather boots (as well as ''all'' the coffee, chocolate, tinned beef, and tobacco) came from overseas. All that said, there was a certain imbalance of 'blood' versus 'iron' spent to achieve victory, one very much in the USSR's 'favor' with 9-14 million Soviet military and 15-20 million Soviet civilian dead versus 2 million suffered by The Allies (minus India and China). This is where the saying 'The Allies bought victory with Soviet blood and paid in Spam' comes from. German dead and crippled stood at 5+ million, for comparison.[[/note]] Sometimes, it's [[UnfortunateImplications unintentional]]; the viewpoint or focus is simply too narrow for the audience to be reminded of the bigger picture. Other times, though, it's a blatant example of HollywoodHistory.

When this trope is in play, the efforts and contributions of the other "Western" Allies are downplayed, and the Eastern Front (where more than ''80%'' of the Wehrmacht was engaged at any one time after June 22 1941, and where the Germans lost ''2/3'' of their dead and captured[[note]]Though this is a little non-indicative, as German troops surrendered in droves to the Western Allies in the last couple of months of the war - Operational Group Steiner, for instance, infamously refused to attempt to break the siege of Berlin and instead tried to march west and reach Anglo-American lines so they could surrender to them.[[/note]]) is considered a ''sideshow'', if it's even mentioned at all. Often it seems like the only other Allied nation-state that actually did anything to fight Germany was the UK, which (after the Poles and [[CheeseEatingSurrenderMonkeys French got their asses handed to them]]) kept the hopeless fight alive until the USA joined in and saved the day. This is likely a result of the UsefulNotes/ColdWar making American educators and filmmakers unwilling to glorify [[DirtyCommunists the Soviet Union]] or [[NoMoreEmperors China]] (especially [[RedChina Maoist]] [[DirtyCommunists China]]).

In particularly nasty cases, films based on actual WWII events will be warped to make the most prominent characters into US soldiers--see Steve [=McQueen=] in ''Film/TheGreatEscape'' and, perhaps most infamously, the film ''Film/{{U571}}''. It will occasionally even be said that WWII only began on December 7, 1941, when the United States entered the war, although that's usually poor phrasing or mixing up the dates, rather than a belief that the war did not begin until the US entry.

The D-Day landings are another good example. Many American-made productions will focus solely on Omaha Beach, the most heavily fortified of the four landing sites as well as the best-defended--both facts which Allied intelligence failed to realize prior to the operation. The carnage that ensued is a favourite among producers, since it emphasizes the sacrifice Americans made during the war--but doing so gives the impression that Omaha Beach was ''the'' decisive turning point that led to the Allied victory in Europe. The focus on Omaha Beach is also partially because ''Film/SavingPrivateRyan'' did it, [[FollowTheLeader other games/movies/TV shows want to replicate its success]], and because it's more exciting to show a strongly opposed landing than an unopposed one -- not that the other landings were exactly unopposed (for instance, Canadian troops landing at Juno Beach on that day faced opposition almost as formidable, but punched through quickly and made better progress towards their objectives in spite of it[[note]]Due to better small-unit communication and leadership, something the military training of smaller nation-states tends to emphasize given their lesser material resources. Not to mention that the Canadians accepted "Hobart's Funnies" such as the amphibious tanks to give the landing troops armor support.[[/note]]), but still.

Cases of this trope are not limited to the European Theater. Most films featuring the Pacific theatre only focus on the naval and air battles fought by the U.S., appearing as though they were the sole force fighting in the Pacific. In reality, UK and Australian forces played significant roles against overwhelming forces in atrocious conditions, and many other nations contributed as well. Not to mention the [[UsefulNotes/SecondSinoJapaneseWar brutally violent war in China]], probably the most ignored battlefront of the war. This neglect is strange given that it was the longest conflict (starting in 1937) and believed to be the the second-bloodiest theatre of war in human history after the Eastern European Theatre.

Keep in mind that despite having the name "America Won World War II," this is '''not''' a strictly American trope. The British can and will exaggerate ''their'' role in the war as well, with an additional jab that the Americans were not only late to the party but also stole all the credit, and additionally only joined in when they knew who was going to win. Russia also gets this; there, you'll find claims that WWII lasted from June 22, 1941 to May 9, 1945 -- when this was actually just the duration of the war between the USSR and Germany.[[note]]More specifically, in a classic Russian history course, it is mentioned that the war was fought elsewhere for quite some time, but only the Great Patriotic War is studied in detail - which still gives this impression.[[/note]] Which, ironically, sells the Soviet Union short, because their successful campaigns against Japan in 1939 and late 1945 aren't included in that time frame. Lately they've also picked up the [[MakeTheBearAngryAgain highly disturbing tendency]] to [[WrittenByTheWinners gloss over or outright deny some of the crimes that the Soviet Union committed]] during and shortly after the war. In short, many countries have tried to play up their part in the war at the expense of others and such examples are more than welcome.

Some see this general 'limited scope' thing as extending to the "official" date of the war's beginning, September 1st, 1939, the date of Germany's invasion of Poland. Most, however, accept that the moniker of 'World War' denotes merely the geography of a war (the British Empire alone spanned three continents at the time), rather than [[UnfortunateImplications implying the conflict wasn't 'serious' or something]] ([[UsefulNotes/ImperialJapan the Japan of the time]], and many Japanese ultranationalists since, call it [[InsistentTerminology 'The China Incident']]). Though bloody and horrific in its own right[[note]]With war-dead to the tune of at least 10 and as many as 20 million (the Chinese Civil War that followed has to account for another 10 million or so, but Communist China, in [[ImplausibleDeniability classic form, likes to pretend that no one died in it]]), as well as an impressive gamut of war-crimes like mass-rape (e.g. Nanjing) and live-human-experimentation[[/note]], [[SecondSinoJapaneseWar the war]] that [[UsefulNotes/ChiangKaiShek Chiang Kai-Shek's]] [[UsefulNotes/NoMoreEmperors Guomindang]] waged against UsefulNotes/ImperialJapan wasn't part of the 'World War' until the Imperial Navy lashed out to take Malaya and the Philippines.

None of this is meant to diminish the contribution the United States, or any other single country, made to winning World War II, of course. The United States was very important, since not only was it the main presence on the Western and Pacific Fronts, but by virtue of heavy European investment over the last century or so they had developed the world's no.1 economy, accounting for perhaps a third of the entire world's GDP and maybe as much as 'half' of its industry (though not all of the latter was useful, of course). The United States also had more than twice the population of the Commonwealth, India aside. From the point of American entry, the Allies could have just broken even in the death count and material-destruction figures and still have won (Guomindang China aside, of course). Josef Stalin is on record acknowledging that without American loans and industry backing them up the Soviets would have had far more dead and crippled, and there would basically have been no chance of the Allies ''winning'' any part of Europe in the peace to follow (when the USSR won in 1946/7, or '48 at the latest). None of the anti-Axis powers won the war all by their lonesome; everyone had their part, and the USA's was certainly in the top three.

Lastly, winning a war means nothing unless one also [[StrategyVersusTactics "wins the peace"]], as was the case [[NapoleonicWars in Vienna in 1815]] and infamously not [[UsefulNotes/WorldWarI at Versailles in 1918]]. In the aftermath of World War II, the USA and Britain and the USSR all deserve recognition for demarking and respecting crystal-clear 'spheres of influence' that kept the peace despite the outbreak of the Yugoslavian, Greek, and [[NoMoreEmperors Chinese]] civil wars. When the CCP gained the upper hand in the Chinese Civil War, and the USA began to [[RedScare see the USSR as a threat]], the USA also began to funnel a great deal of money into reconstructing Western European economies[[note]]Britain got a lot less than France or Germany, as conservative American opinion was appalled that they had the temerity to elect a socialist government; Britain were still repaying US loans, written off for other countries, well into the 1980's.[[/note]] so that they [[UsefulNotes/ColdWar could sustain larger militaries and thus avoid the need for committing US troops to Western Europe in its defense]]. The membership of the USSR and USA in the UsefulNotes/UnitedNations also gave it a lot more clout than its predecessor the League of Nations.

On the flip side, this trope might be known as "Nazis Fight Alone." In media about the European Theater, only German soldiers will serve as the antagonists.[[labelnote:*]]And when non-German Axis forces ''are'' shown, [[SelectiveHistoricalArmoury it's likely they're still using German weapons anyway]].[[/labelnote]] A possible but still very rare exception would be North Africa, where the Italians made up a good portion of the troops fighting there. Hungarians, Slovaks, Romanians, Bulgarians, Finns, and the various foreign units of the SS are almost entirely absent, despite their sizable presence on the Eastern Front.

See also AmericaSavesTheDay, of which this is a sub-trope, and HollywoodHistory, of which ''that'' is a sub-trope.

'''Note''': This trope specifically deals with UsefulNotes/WorldWarII. It does not apply to any other war, particularly modern conflicts.
----
!!Examples

[[foldercontrol]]

[[folder:Anime and Manga]]
* Webcomic/AxisPowersHetalia: Set in WWII. America's plan to defeat Germany? All the other Allies support him while he wins the war. "I'm the Hero!"
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Comicbooks]]
* ''Comicbook/SgtRock'' and his 1960s spin-off series ''The Losers'' had one small team of US commandos pretty much holding up the Allied war effort.
** But generally averted in the other major DCUniverse WWII "team" series, ''Comicbook/{{Blackhawk}}'', about a multinational squadron of pilots where the leader is Polish (although sometimes he is a first-generation American of Polish descent). Even the American members of the team are generally immigrants or refugees from other countries.
* As did ''[[NickFury Sgt. Fury]] and his HowlingCommandos''. At least Fury's team actually had a (stereotypical) British soldier on it.
* Averted in ''ComicBook/AtomicRobo'', where of the five issues dealing with the titular robot's exploits against Nazi super-science, three of them has him teamed up with British agents (including one extremely {{Badass}} and nigh-unintelligible Scotsman).
* Given a head nod in ''ComicBook/ThePunisher: Comicbook/CivilWar'', when Frank is having a tense disagreement over tactics with ComicBook/CaptainAmerica.
-->'''Cap''': My ways stopped [[UsefulNotes/AdolfHitler Hitler]], boy.\\
'''Frank''': [[WithDueRespect No sir]], the Russians stopped Hitler.
* British comics set in World War 2 tended to concentrate on the Desert War up until El Alamein, the last major battle won by the British and Empire forces without the involvement of American troops.
* ''ComicBook/TheBoys'':
** Invoked as part of Frenchie's back story. An American on holiday in France draws ire when he claims the US liberated France single-handedly, going so far as to call the French [[CheeseEatingSurrenderMonkeys cowards]]. Frenchie is [[BerserkButton less than]] [[CurbStompBattle impressed]].
** Also averted when fighting Stormfront. Billy (English), Mother's Milk (American) and Frenchie ([[CaptainObvious ...French]]) are whaling on Stormfront (a Nazi super), but he's still standing. Then Billy, very much aware of the parallels of the current situation, asks Stormfront about the guys who reached Berlin first... [[MotherRussiaMakesYouStrong Hello, Vas.]]
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Fan Fiction]]
* Subverted in ''FanFic/WorldwarWarOfEquals''. America's military is considered the biggest threat to Race domination of Earth and they provide assistance to Mexico, Iraq, and Australia. However, many operations in the American homeland succeed with the help of Canadian forces and they help fight The Race's advance in the north west United States.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Films -- Live-Action]]
* ''Film/{{U571}}'', which Americanized the story of the British capture of ''U-110'' and her all-important Enigma machine. In real life, most of the captured machines were acquired by the British and the original breaking of the code was done by the Polish (the first captured Enigma being literally found at the Warsaw Post Office in a parcel addressed to the German Embassy). ''U-571'' herself was never captured. When the film was released in the UK it had to have a disclaimer added at the start stating that it was in no way based on real events. Ironically, the filmmakers could have avoided all this by basing the movie on U.S. Navy's even more dramatic capture of ''U-505'', making this film a trifecta of America Won World War II, ArtisticLicenseHistory and ArtisticLicenseShips.
* Averted in ''Film/EnemyAtTheGates'', an American film about a Soviet sniper in the battle of Stalingrad... in which Americans played no part. Granted, director/producer/writer Jean-Jacques Annaud is French, but Mandalay Pictures produced the movie, and Paramount Pictures distributed it.
%% Whoever changed this to say it was a British and not American movie, look up the actual information on which companies were responsible for this movie, and please don't do that again.
* ''Film/ChurchillTheHollywoodYears'' parodies this. It suggests that Winston Churchill was a tough as nails American G.I. (Creator/ChristianSlater) who won WWII and romanced then-Princess Elizabeth. The Churchill history is familiar with? The film says he was in fact an actor called Roy Bubbles. The irony of this is compounded by the fact that Churchill's mother was American. Never mind that the RealLife Winston Churchill had a remarkable political and military career already long ''before'' WWII broke out. The Brits didn't pick just any nobody for Prime Minister in 1940.
* ''Film/SavingPrivateRyan'' was criticized for this in the UK, since the sole reference in the movie to any non-American involvement in the battle was a brief exchange on how "overrated" General Montgomery was. Of course, like its successor, ''Series/BandOfBrothers'', the narrative maintains a narrow focus on a small unit who might not have encountered foreign Allied soldiers during their mission and might have actually espoused this opinion ([[UsefulNotes/BernardLawMontgomery Field Marshal Montgomery]] being not-very-popular with a large segment of the American military).
* Pretty much averted in the film ''Film/TheGreatRaid'' about the Raid at Cabanatuan wherein the American Alamo Scouts with help from Filipino guerillas rescued a group of American [=POWs=] in the Philippines from a Japanese prison camp. The film showed just how critical the local forces were to the rescue by showing the guerillas holding back Japanese reinforcements at an important choke point and providing hundreds of carabao carts to quickly transport the weakened and diseased American [=POWs=].
* Absolutely averted in ''Film/TheLongestDay''. It includes practically ''everyone''. Also the Germans. Memorable for its portrayal of German officers:
-->'''Blumentritt:''' ''(as a sarcastic response to the message, that the Führer is asleep, and therefore unable to give permission to deploy vital Panzer reserves to Normandy)'' This is history. We are living an historical moment. We are going to lose the war because our glorious Führer has taken a sleeping pill and is not to be awakened. Sometimes I wonder which side God is on.
** The film does tend to focus on the American sectors, especially Omaha beach (with some justification, given the intensity of the fighting and the numbers of Americans vs. other Allies involved on June 6, 1944), and the Canadians are nowhere to be seen (although it is mentioned that they are making good progress in their section). Also, it is one of several major Hollywood movies focusing on the Western front very much to the exclusion of developments on the Eastern front, which presents an incomplete picture even for 1944, when the crushing Soviet summer offensive was coordinated with the Normandy landing.
* The 1945 Creator/ErrolFlynn film ''Objective, Burma!'' caused a minor uproar in the UK for supposedly suggesting that British involvement in the Burmese campaign was minimal, when, in fact, the British had been the primary combatants in the campaign. [[UsefulNotes/WinstonChurchill Churchill]] himself was said to have been incensed by the film, and it was denounced in the ''Times''. WarnerBros. withdrew the film from circulation in the UK, and it did not appear there until 1952.
** Interestingly author/screenwriter Creator/GeorgeMacDonaldFraser, who had been an infantryman in Burma during the war, said in his book ''Hollywood History'' that he rather liked ''Objective, Burma!' and that at least American troops had fought in that theater.
* In ''Film/ItsAMadMadMadMadWorld'', Milton Berle's character invokes this while arguing with Terry-Thomas. It proves to be something of a BerserkButton for the latter.
-->"As far as I'm concerned, the whole British race is practically finished. If it hadn't been for Lend-Lease, if we hadn't kept your whole country afloat by giving you billions that you never even said 'Thank you' for, the whole phony outfit would've sunk under the Atlantic years ago...What are you stopping for?"
-->"GetOut of this machine."
** Well the Brits did say thank you for lend lease. A lot of British bases passed in American hands, the most prominent one later in the Cold War being Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean the only US base in the region which is actually a British Overseas Territory. Also US had first dibs on technological developments in the UK for 50 years after Lend Lease, that is how the Harrier became the AV-8 and why the first tank equipped with Chobham Armour (developed by the Brits) was the M1 Abrams (US).
* Averted in the 1961 adaptation of ''Film/TheGunsOfNavarone''. The team consisted of a American (Mallory), two Brits (Franklin and Miller), two Greeks (Stavros and Pappadimos) and one person of unknown nationality ("Butcher" Brown, played by Welshman Stanley Baker).
** Actually zig-zaged as in the book Mallory was from New Zealand ( and based on the real world Mallory that died in 1924 while trying to conquer the Everest) and Miller was the American. The Film kind of falls in this trope as it has the higher ranking character switched to American.
* The (Peoples' Republic of) Chinese equivalent appears in ''Film/IpMan'', which is set during the UsefulNotes/SecondSinoJapaneseWar. The concluding captions mention China's defeat of Japan without mentioning [[UsefulNotes/WorldWarTwo the Guomindang or the international Allied forces]] that had pushed UsefulNotes/ImperialJapan back and blockaded the Home Islands in preparation for an amphibious invasion. In reality, the Guomindang and their warlord allies acted as a huge punching bag, losing battle after battle until The United States, Britain, and later the Soviet Union entered the conflict. The importance of US Lend-lease - which was critical to propping the Guomindang with things like massive loans and anti-tank weaponry - also goes unmentioned, naturally.
* The 2011 ''Film/CaptainAmericaTheFirstAvenger'' movie, of all places, makes it a point of him having a MultinationalTeam backing him up, and that the program that helped give him his powers was a joint Anglo-American operation. However, you won't find any mention of the Soviet Union save amidst the sea of flags in the end credits.
* This trope is blatantly invoked in ''Film/IronSky'', when the President of the U.S. defends her nation's claim to the [[spoiler:Helium-3 deposits on the moon]] by saying that America won World War II and saved the world (albeit with tiny contributions here and there by her allies)... She even goes so far as to base this historic "fact" on Hollywood war movies which "never lie". PlayedForLaughs, of course.
* Thoroughly averted in ''Film/{{Patton}}'', despite what some would have you believe. Yes, the film focuses on the deeds of George S. Patton throughout World War II, but Patton does not single-handedly curb stomp the Nazis. His rivalry with British general UsefulNotes/BernardLawMontgomery features prominently, and he expresses frustration when resources are diverted to important British operations rather than his own. He is just as much upset by the Soviets conquering Berlin and being the ones to force Nazi Germany to surrender.
** Early in the film, Patton boasts that America had never experienced defeat while addressing his troops. Historian Shelby Foote in Ken Burns' ''The Civil War'' series pointed out the irony of this, given that Patton's grandfather had been a Confederate officer and certainly lost a war of his own.
* On the whole averted in German movies about the war, a lot of which focus on the Eastern Front. Here the battles of Stalingrad and Berlin are particular favourites, maybe in part because with their intense house-to-house fighting they are easier to recreate than e. g. the battle of Kursk, the greatest tank battle in history.
* Subverted in ''Film/InglouriousBasterds'': the trailers suggested that the movie would be about a bunch of US special forces guys killing Germans in occupied Europe, but the main plot of the film is about the cat-and-mouse game between a vengeful Jewish French woman and a MagnificentBastard Austrian SS man (mostly in subtitled French and German) and the US special forces guys are the comic relief B-plot.
* "We cannot win it (the war) without the Americans!" Says Churchill in ''Film/IntoTheStorm2009'' (the Churchill biopic). . Despite this, the movie actually subverts this: The Americans are shown as worthy allies, but the British (and to a lesser extent the Russians) are shown as just as responsible, if not more so, for the ultimate victory.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Literature]]
* This trope is pretty much the entire justification for Tom Brokaw to write ''The Greatest Generation'', a book about the brilliance of Americans born in the 1920s and 1930s.
* Sergei Lukyanenko mocks this attitude in the book ''Literature/DayWatch'' where an American soldier (a Light Other) in Prague talks about how they liberated the place from the Germans. Earlier in the same book, Las is described as wearing a t-shirt with a picture of a Red Army-man bayoneting a Wehrmacht soldier and the text "Remember who really won the War!"
** Las was in "Twilight (Dusk) Watch", and [[{{Bowdlerization}} (in the original Russian version, at least)]] he wears t-shirt with a picture of Russian paratrooper knifing "negro in American uniform". And the text was something like "We can ''help to recall'' who won the Second World War".
* Averted in ''Literature/TheGunsOfNavarone''. It was about an Allied commando team, consisting of a New Zealander, an American, a Greek, a Scot, and another Brit. They were sent on their mission by the British army, to destroy enemy guns threatening British ships, that were on their way to rescue British soldiers. The blurb on the movie tie-in edition said something along the lines of "They had to succeed where the entire ''U.S. Navy'' had failed!" This story is based on the SAS attack lead by Paddy Mayne against the guns at Sicily prior to Allied invasion of the Island.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Live-Action TV]]
* Spoofed in a 2006 ''Series/TheDailyShow''. Jon Stewart comments that the Iraq War has "gone on longer than UsefulNotes/{{WW2}}"; Englishman John Oliver corrects him that [=WW2=] was going on for 2 years longer than the US involvement. Though Stewart wasn't correct until 2009, John Oliver wasn't historically correct ''either'' if the Sino-Japanese angle, considered a separate war in European countries, is factored in (which would place the start at July 1937).
* Explored in the episodes of ''Series/FoylesWar'' which focus on the American entry into the war; whilst the American soldiers who appear are treated largely sympathetically, there's a certain amount of realistic tension between them and the British characters, many of whom take the attitude that they took their time to get involved and now seem to be taking over everything since they got here - and the American 'we're here to save the day' attitude doesn't entirely help matters or endear them.
* ''Series/{{Friends}}'': Invoked in the fourth series finale when Ross and Emily's parents are arguing over paying the costs of the wedding.
--> '''Mr. Geller:''' "All right! Fine, but I just want to say, I'm not paying for your wine cellar, you thieving, would-be-speaking-German-if-it-weren't-for-us, cheap little man!"
* In ''Series/StarTrekEnterprise'' there is an alternate timeline where Lenin was assassinated, so quite naturally Germany didn't much bother with Russia and instead invaded the United States.
* ''Series/StarTrekTheOriginalSeries''. "The City On The Edge Of Forever". Due to pacifist movement USA did not enter WW II, and Hitler won precisely because of it, causing humanity to be enslaved and never reaching the stars.
* [[JustifiedTrope Justified]] in the Creator/KenBurns documentary, ''TheWar'', as its format was specifically created to show, compare, and contrast WWII's impacts on 4 American towns and people from them. Since obviously few if any people from those towns would have been with the British, Russian or any other military, by default it focuses on the American parts of the war (although the British and Russians do get the occasional narrator-said nod).
* In the ''Series/DadsArmy'' episode "My British Buddy", the Walmington Home Guard are infuriated by the arrival of American troops whose attitude is that they're going to succeed where the British have failed. Matters aren't helped by the fact that the first thing the American soldiers do when they get there is try and steal the British soldiers' girlfriends, and then act very entitled and hard-done-by when they find they can't get a good drink. It all ends in a fistfight.
** [[JerkAss Warden Hodges']] comments didn't help the situation any either - mockingly saying that the US had joined the war quickly this time, "Two and a half years instead of [[UsefulNotes/WorldWarOne three]]!"
* For a long, long, time, the definitive TV-documentary history of UsefulNotes/WW2 was the British-made ''The World At War'', which condensed [=WW2=] into twenty-six hours of TV narrative. Scrupulous care was taken to make this as objective as possible, to allow the American and Russian involvements to be related accurately and in context. The last thing the makers wanted was half a year of British triumphalism. American TV has since commissioned its own version of TWAW. And whaddya know, the British and Russian aspects have been pared back to invisibility, as second-rate allies of a triumphant world-leading USA...
* Whenever the French were mentioned in front of [[EverybodyLovesRaymond Raymond's dad]], his automatic response was "Pulled their ass out of two world wars!"
** Which was deeply ironic, coming from a [[NationalStereotypes Italian-American]]....
* A ''Series/SaturdayNightLive'' sketch featured an uptight and AmbiguouslyGay British host getting into a snit with Mickey Rooney, played by DanaCarvey. As they traded barbs, Mickey sneered at the host: "All I know is we hauled your butt out of two world wars!"
* ''Series/BandOfBrothers'' is a bit of an interesting example, as it focuses on American soldiers in the war, but most of the main cast are played by British actors. Foreign allies do show up in the series, though not necessarily in a positive light. In Market Garden, the British armor support is shown to be [[TanksForNothing completely ineffective]], forcing Easy Company to retreat (In the book, Ambrose not-so-subtly implies that Operation Market Garden, which was led by Montgomery, was doomed to fail and that Patton's plan for crossing the Rhine would have been far more effective - a longtime debate in military history circles). Later on, Easy is tasked with rescuing a number of British soldiers trapped behind enemy lines, though both sides do get along very well after the success of the mission. When Easy Company is advancing on Eagle's Nest, they are specifically ordered to get there before the French do.
** Generally, ''BandOfBrothers'' averts this trope. For instance, the epilogue to the Operation Market Garden episode points out that the British suffered far worse casualties at Arnhem than the [=101st=]. Similarly, the British tank support ''does'' cover Easy's retreat in that episode, and the only reason the British tanks do badly is because their orders force them to "avoid unnecessary destruction of property" which would have allowed them to ambush the German tanks, rather than be ambushed.
* ''Series/ThePacific'' earned some minor controversy in Australia after the tv station that aired the show advertised it as the 'fight for Australia', despite Australia doing well enough on its own against the Japanese Army.
** In the show itself J P Morgan causes a fight with some Australia troops by disrespecting the Australians and claiming that the USA was saving them from having 'chopsticks up their ass'.
* ''Series/TheRatPatrol'' was licensed in the UK but taken off air due to the volume of complaints received about its exaggeration of the American involvement in what had been primarily a UK and Commonwealth theatre.
* The British attitude towards this trope is mocked in ''Series/DoctorWho'', "The Day of The Doctor" - the justification UNIT gives for keeping Jack's time machine locked away from the Americans is, "Americans with the ability to change history? You've seen their movies."
* ''Series/HorribleHistories'', being a British {{Edutainment}} series, reminds us constantly that the "Britain wins the war" variant (often taught to British children) is just as untrue as the American version. For instance, the RAF Pilots introduce us to their Eastern European members and go out of their way to mention that "some of our bravest men were Polish and Czech", and a sketch taking place in a trench in World War I features a British soldier trying to find the British unit he's assigned to, but instead meeting French-Canadian, Australian, and South African soldiers (with extremely silly accents) fighting as part of the British Army.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Videogames]]
* Averted in the ''VideoGame/CallOfDuty'' series, in which you change your player character every once in a while so that you can see the war from several Allied perspectives; one mission concerns an American paratrooper, then you're a British commando in a few other missions, then a Russian grunt, etc. Of course, you rarely hear of what else is going on as you are fighting.
** ''Big Red One'' plays it straight, putting you in the boots of an American soldier for almost the entire game.
* ''VideoGame/CompanyOfHeroes'' plays it straight in the first game. The main campaign for the game follows the US Army from D-Day onwards.
** The expansion campaign ''Opposing Fronts'' has one campaign as the German Army as they steamroll the British airborne during Operation Market Garden.
** The sequel is on the Eastern Front for the first time, following the Russians during the Stalingrad campaign.
* The ''VideoGame/MedalOfHonor'' series, however, tend to play this pretty straight, in which you're an American soldier who seems to single-handedly ensure victory in every major Allied campaign and save the day. In later expansion packs, this even included battles in which ''America played no part whatsoever''. That said, the second game of the series focused on a French woman, Manon Batiste, fighting the Germans as a Maquis and an OSS operative.
** ''[=MoH=]: Airborne'', where each mission ends with a debriefing voice-over from the commanding officer. After a relatively minor skirmish in Italy in early 1943, he proclaims "The war has begun", and after a very over-the-top raid on a flak tower in early 1945 he says that the war is over and effectively gives the Airborne itself full credit in his speech. The British are mentioned in passing in one mission, Operation Market Garden - fascinatingly, in contrast to the earlier ''[=MoH=]: Frontline'', it is presented as a great victory in spite of the fact it's actually the Allies' most notorious bungle. It's also an example of the reverse angle (as in the Axis consisting entirely of Germans), as despite half the game taking place in Italy you only fight Italian blackshirts in the first half of the first level - where they are [[ArtificialStupidity much dumber than the German soldiers]] and [[ImproperlyPlacedFirearms only use German weapons]].
* ''VideoGame/OperationDarkness'' mixes this trope up a bit, by instead using Britain Wins The War. Both the plot of the game and its brief historical asides emphasize the British contribution to the war effort in the same way this trope does for the US. The funny thing? It's a Japanese game.
* Averted - ''probably'' - in ''VideoGame/CommandAndConquerRedAlert''. As per HitlersTimeTravelExemptionAct, this version of WWII is quite different, with a Soviet invasion of Europe being countered by Allies led by a German supreme commander and aided by technology developed by AlbertEinstein, while WordOfGod is that America didn't directly join the war until the Soviets were already losing. That said, the Allied armory includes what look like Abrams tanks and M16 rifles ([[AnachronismStew in the 1950's]]), but it's unclear whether this is due to an extensive lend-lease campaign by the United States and the result of {{alternate history}} shenanigans, or simply because the game reuses a lot of assets from the original ''[[VideoGame/CommandAndConquerTiberianDawn Command & Conquer]]''.
** Outright inverted in ''VideoGame/CommandAndConquerRedAlert2'', as the United States grudgingly have to ask for help to the European Allies. The French President is [[FrenchJerk stereotypically uppity]]. In the intro cutscene of ''Yuri's Revenge'', though, the desperate U.S. President Dugan acknowledges Yuri that it in fact [[BlatantLies was the United States who won the war]]. The backstory makes it a bit of a mess, however, in that the whole reason the game is ''Film/{{Red Dawn|1984}}'' the RTS is because Premier Romanov blames ''America'' for his country's loss of the Great World War II - rather than, you know, Germany or Greece, for doing the actual ass-kicking, he blames the guys who gave them a couple tanks to do the ass-kicking with (or possibly he blames the USA because, only joining the last war towards the end and therefore not having their manpower exhausted by slogging through much of Europe, they ended up handling a lot of the occupation duties).
** And averted again in ''VideoGame/CommandAndConquerRedAlert3''. The viewpoint for the Allied Campaign is mostly from the British, and while the USA do contribute heavily to the Allied army, the paranoid U.S. President Ackerman isn't willing to cooperate with the Soviets, whether or not they're fighting the Rising Sun together. [[spoiler:In the Imperial Campaign it turns out the President is an android spy]].
* Averted in ''VideoGame/MetalGearSolid3SnakeEater'' with the Cobra Unit, which while led by an American (and apparently a hugely patriotic one) contains at least two Russians and three people of unknown origin (all that's said is that they're from the Allied Nations). The game tells you rather erroneously that they all but won WWII as if all the other millions of Allied soldiers were just twiddling their thumbs at the Axis Powers.
* Averted in the ''VideoGame/{{Resistance}}'' series. The Chimera have pretty much steamrolled over all of Europe and Asia. In the sequel, they begin their invasion of the United States...and steamroll over ''them'' too. It's only the SuperSoldier main character and his pals that achieve anything even resembling success.
* The ''VideoGame/{{Wolfenstein}}'' series is about American soldier B.J. Blazkowicz taking on the Nazis [[OneManArmy all by himself]].
** ''[[VideoGame/ReturnToCastleWolfenstein Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory]]'' allows you to play as one of two sides: one is UsefulNotes/NaziGermany, guess who the other is? Considering you know how the war turns out the implication is a given. In this specific case, however, it's probably less an intentional use of this trope, and more paralleling the singleplayer games.
** ''VideoGame/{{Wolfenstein|2009}}'' (2009) can be said to subvert this. While you are still American OneManArmy B.J. Blazkowicz, the assistance of the German resistance is necessary and invaluable to your success, which also nicely averts the common AllGermansAreNazis trope that appears so often in Nazi-based [=FPSs=].
* Averted in the ''VideoGame/IL2Sturmovik'' series of WWII combat flight sims. The US is an important aerial power there, but the focus is more on their struggles in the Pacific theatre instead of the Western European front. They're certainly not winning single-handedly all the time, either. The British, Australian, Soviet and Dutch air forces play an equal role in the Pacific (British pilots attacking Okinawa from Royal Navy aircraft carriers, Soviets fighting in Manchuria and the Dutch defending their colonial turf in Indonesia) and often join US forces on various missions. In a humorous inversion, the Brits are sometimes even ''in command'' of certain US Army/Navy Air Corps squadrons.
** And this is a notable example because it is played straight in many, many combat flight simulators, where the focus is overwhelmingly on the European Western front and/or the battles between Japan and the US.
*** To be fair to the Western Allies, the Germans did commit most of their air strength against the British and Americans and suffered their heaviest air losses against them. The air battles of Western Europe and the Pacific dwarfed those of the Eastern front.
** Considering that the Il-2 series were developed in Russia, the series' even-handed coverage (including its ready acknowledgment of the importance of British- and American-built Lend-Lease aircraft that were used alongside Soviet types in the Soviet Air Force) also counts as an aversion of The Soviet Union Wins the War.
* Averted in ''VideoGame/RedOrchestra'' and its sequel: they focus entirely on the conflict between Germany and Russia. To an extent this is also averted in the mods that add other Allied factions; for example, the only D-Day battle present in ''Darkest Hour'' is the Canadian's Juno Beach.
* Averted in the original ''Day of Defeat'' by Creator/ValveSoftware, which featured both American and British armies fighting against Nazi Germany, albeit with a much more limited weapon selection for the British. Played straight in the sequel, which features only the United States versus Nazi Germany.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Web Comics]]
* ''Webcomic/HarkAVagrant'' mentions this trend in war movies [[http://www.harkavagrant.com/index.php?id=292 here]].
* Parodied in ''Webcomic/ScandinaviaandtheWorld'', where [[http://satwcomic.com/better-late-than-never America believes that he single-handedly saved all of the other countries]] during World War II, despite the fact that [[http://satwcomic.com/america-has-spoken he didn't even know what was going on.]]
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Western Animation]]
* In the ''WesternAnimation/JusticeLeague'' episode, "The Savage Time," the immortal supervillain, Vandal Savage, manages to send a laptop full of technical information for superweapons to himself during World War II. There was also a video recording message telling himself what to do with the info, such as usurp Hitler and a specific warning to ready the Third Reich for a massive US/UK/Canada seaborne invasion of Normandy on June 6th, 1944. While the success of Operation Overlord in 1944 was definitely very bad news for Germany, why no mention of the Soviet Union's offensive at the same time in the East?
** The laptop he sent back in time could have arrived ''years'' before 1945 (the Martian says it). Savage had enough time to set himself up as a revolutionary scientist, prove his new weapons, and then remove Hitler. Since there's no mention made of the Soviets, one could assume he never invaded the USSR or instead had already destroyed them, and was instead focusing on the center of Allied supply lines, the US.
** Also, Savage shut the laptop off while the message was in mid-sentence, implying that there may have been more to it.
* Spoofed in the ''MonkeyDust'' sketch ''Hollywood Pictures Presents: The Diary of Anne Frank'', along with a slew of other Hollywood clichés. The sketch ends with Anne Frank's all-American boyfriend Johnny killing a room full of Nazis with an American flag, then sucker-punching Hitler with a cry of "This one's for President Churchill!" [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xJq1f_8bw4]]
** Several other spoofs appear also, one set in the 'Camelot' era where everyone has American accents, and then 'They all come home' which is a parody of ''Film/BlackHawkDown'' lampooning various American military cliches.
* Parodied indirectly in ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons''; in an episode set TwentyMinutesIntoTheFuture, Moe tells Lisa's British fiance that "We saved your ass in World War II." The fiance replies "Well, we saved your [America's] ''arse'' in [[WorldWarThree World War ''III'']]", and Moe concedes the point.
** ''Bart-Mangled Banner'', which is mainly a TakeThat episode aimed at misguided patriotism, plays with it. The Simpsons are rescued from the sea by a boat captained by a xenophobic Frenchman, who acknowledges his unjustified hatred of the Americans by admitting they were the (not a, the) country [[UsefulNotes/WorldWarTwo which saved France from the Germans]] - [[UsefulNotes/WorldWarOne twice]].
** In ''[[Recap/TheSimpsonsS15E4TheReginaMonologues The Regina Monologues]]'' Homer, as usual, handles this in his usual way when visiting London: ''"We're big shot tourists from everyone's favorite country, the USA. We saved your ass in Vietnam and shared our prostitutes with Creator/HughGrant"''.
[[/folder]]

%%
%% No Real Life, please.[[admin]]
%%
----

Top