Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / TheOfficeUS

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This is partly the joke; Dwight, for all the lionising he tends to get from certain quarters, is basically a KnowNothingKnowItAll idiot with some unshakeable oddball convictions.

to:

** This is partly the joke; Dwight, for all the lionising he tends to get from certain quarters, is basically a KnowNothingKnowItAll idiot with some unshakeable oddball convictions. The idea that he might somehow get the idea that cats are useless merely because they don't produce a foodstuff in spite of 20,000-odd years of evidence otherwise and stubbornly hold on to it is entirely consistent with what we know of his character.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** This is partly the joke; Dwight, for all the lionising he tends to get from certain quarters, is basically a KnowNothingKnowItAll idiot with some unshakeable oddball convictions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None





to:

\n\n[[folder:"Cats are not useful"]]
This is more of an observation than a question because the answer it going to be RuleOfFunny but isn't it odd that Dwight callously dismisses cats as not as important as cows because they don't provide meat or milk? He runs an old fashioned farm that still has an outhouse, surely he would appreciate having some cats as ratters.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** This is the whole joke; the guy acts like a stereotypical mafioso.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Jim has a well-established character trait of messing with people who annoy him. Michael has annoyed Jim by manipulating him into an uncomfortable, awkward and miserable event that has completely ruined his evening. Ergo, he messes with Michael. And frankly, Jim deliberately mis-guessing some charades answers is a comparatively minor contribution to the pressure cooker of that evening, so it's hard to see why he's being singled out.

Added: 303

Changed: 110

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This is an AnthropicPrinciple situation; there wouldn't have been an episode if the characters had taken this kind of level-headed and relentlessly professional approach to the situation. The point of the episode is to watch our obnoxious and unprofessional AttentionWhore protagonist have to cope with entering a situation and world dominated by another equally obnoxious and unprofessional but somewhat more capable AttentionWhore antagonist, and to laugh at the comedy generated by their interactions. If either Michael or Captain Jack were as professional and accomodating as this Headscratcher is critiquing them for not being, they wouldn't be who they are and the episode wouldn't happen.

to:

** This is an AnthropicPrinciple situation; there wouldn't have been an episode if the characters had taken this kind of level-headed and relentlessly professional approach to the situation. The point of the episode is to watch our obnoxious and unprofessional AttentionWhore protagonist have to cope with entering a situation and world dominated by another equally obnoxious and unprofessional but somewhat more capable AttentionWhore antagonist, and to laugh at the comedy generated by their interactions. If either Michael or Captain Jack were as professional and accomodating accommodating as this Headscratcher is critiquing them for not being, they wouldn't be who they are and the episode wouldn't happen.have happened at all.



** Despite appearances, the booze cruise captain is very much ''not'' a professional person. The whole joke and point of his character is that he is basically a Michael Scott who actually has a (kind of) cool job, more charisma and is better at throwing his weight around and dominating the situation and the people in it. A truly professional captain wouldn't spend all his time basically trying to sabotage and one-up a middle manager hosting an (ill-advised) office event on his boat instead of just, well, just getting on with piloting the boat. The fact that he hooks up with passengers is just yet more evidence of his unprofessional conduct.

to:

** Despite appearances, the The booze cruise captain is very much ''not'' a professional person. The whole joke and point of his character is that he is basically a Michael Scott who actually has a (kind of) cool job, more charisma and is better at throwing his weight around and dominating the situation and the people in it. A truly professional captain wouldn't spend all his time basically trying to sabotage and one-up a middle manager hosting an (ill-advised) office event on his boat instead of just, well, just getting on with piloting the boat. The fact that he hooks up with passengers is just yet more evidence of his unprofessional conduct.



** In-universe, however, even in the early seasons it's suggested that Ryan isn't quite as clever and superior to the world of Dunder-Mifflin as he makes out. We don't know how well he's performed at any other temping jobs he's had, but it's possible that he sticks with Dunder-Mifflin despite the discomforts because it's all he can get.

to:

** In-universe, however, even in the early seasons it's suggested that Ryan isn't quite as clever and superior to the world of Dunder-Mifflin as he makes out. We don't know how well he's performed at any other temping jobs he's had, but it's possible that he sticks with Dunder-Mifflin despite the discomforts because it's all he can get.get, having flamed out at other opportunities provided to him by the agency.


Added DiffLines:

** It's less that they had sex, and more that Andy didn't tell her that they'd even had a prior relationship. It is, from her point of view, the lack of trust and openness this suggests of Andy rather than the actual physical intimacy. Had Andy been open about this, Erin would likely have minded less.

Added: 1354

Changed: 62

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This is an AnthropicPrinciple situation; there wouldn't have been an episode if the characters had taken this kind of level-headed and relentlessly professional approach to the situation. The point of the episode is to watch our obnoxious and unprofessional AttentionWhore protagonist have to cope with entering a situation and world dominated by another equally obnoxious and unprofessional but somewhat more capable AttentionWhore antagonist, and to laugh at the comedy generated by their interactions. If either Michael or Captain Jack were as professional and accomodating as this Headscratcher is critiquing them for not being, they wouldn't be who they are and the episode wouldn't happen.



** The booze cruise captain is very much ''not'' a professional person. The whole joke and point of his character is that he is basically a Michael Scott who actually has a (kind of) cool job, more charisma and is better at throwing his weight around and dominating the people and situations around him. A truly professional captain wouldn't spend all his time basically trying to sabotage and one up a middle manager hosting an ill-advised office event on his boat instead of just, well, getting on with piloting the boat. The fact that he hooks up with passengers is just yet more evidence of his unprofessional conduct.

to:

** The Despite appearances, the booze cruise captain is very much ''not'' a professional person. The whole joke and point of his character is that he is basically a Michael Scott who actually has a (kind of) cool job, more charisma and is better at throwing his weight around and dominating the situation and the people and situations around him. in it. A truly professional captain wouldn't spend all his time basically trying to sabotage and one up one-up a middle manager hosting an ill-advised (ill-advised) office event on his boat instead of just, well, just getting on with piloting the boat. The fact that he hooks up with passengers is just yet more evidence of his unprofessional conduct.


Added DiffLines:

** Because if he did this... his character would disappear within a couple of episodes as the temp agency took action to reassign him, and the show would either have to replace him with a different-yet-similar character or would flounder as there was no one to fill his role in the show. AnthropicPrinciple, basically.
** In-universe, however, even in the early seasons it's suggested that Ryan isn't quite as clever and superior to the world of Dunder-Mifflin as he makes out. We don't know how well he's performed at any other temping jobs he's had, but it's possible that he sticks with Dunder-Mifflin despite the discomforts because it's all he can get.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The booze cruise captain is very much ''not'' a professional person. The whole joke and point of his character is that he is basically a Michael Scott who actually has a (kind of) cool job, more charisma and is better at throwing his weight around and dominating the people and situations around him. A truly professional captain wouldn't spend all his time basically trying to sabotage and one up a middle manager hosting an ill-advised office event on his boat instead of just, well, getting on with piloting the boat. The fact that he hooks up with passengers is just yet more evidence of his unprofessional conduct.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added: 1339

Changed: 90

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Having just watched the episode, she's not selling them products or trying to sell DM product through them. She's actually getting discounts on 'office supplies', including paper. (The mind still boggles why a paper company doesn't use their own product, but nvm.) Which makes sense, as Meredith is not in Sales -- she's in either office management or procurement. The reason she keeps her job isn't because she's earning the company money, but (because HR is even more messed up than Michael himself) she's saving them money on procurement for their own needs. I work closely with the IT procurement departments myself so I recognised the dilemma DM had. Of course, anyone doing what Meredith was doing would be fired (I even refused to order cabs from a firm who provided an incentive scheme to receptionists due to that conflict of interests) but the logic is clear in the episode that this is a hefty purchasing discount benefiting the whole company's bottom line rather than sales to a client they had yet to snag. It's actually good that they cover issues faced by accounting and procurement as well as the core salesmanship as too often the support staff get overlooked.

to:

** Having just watched the episode, she's not selling them products or trying to sell DM product through them. She's actually getting discounts on 'office supplies', including paper. (The mind still boggles why a paper company doesn't use their own product, but nvm.) never mind) Which makes sense, as Meredith is not in Sales -- she's in either office management or procurement. The reason she keeps her job isn't because she's earning the company money, but (because HR is even more messed up than Michael himself) she's saving them money on procurement for their own needs. I work closely with the IT procurement departments myself so I recognised recognized the dilemma DM had. Of course, anyone doing what Meredith was doing would be fired (I even refused to order cabs from a firm who that provided an incentive scheme to receptionists due to that conflict of interests) but the logic is clear in the episode that this is a hefty purchasing discount benefiting the whole company's bottom line rather than sales to a client they had yet to snag. It's actually good that they cover issues faced by accounting and procurement as well as the core salesmanship as too often the support staff get overlooked.overlooked.
*** Why would she be fired? This isn't a government agency or some group that needs accountability to a larger public. If the share holders find out, why would they care that much?



** With Roy, depending on the time line involved, there might've been no time between Roy making his declaration and getting to the office, and the second unit filming him to get a hold of the main unit at the office. Or they just wanted to see happens.

to:

** With Roy, depending on the time line involved, there might've been no time between Roy making his declaration and getting to the office, and the second unit filming him to get a hold of the main unit at the office. Or they just wanted to see what happens.



*** If Dunder-Mifflin's legal team was so worried about harrassment suits that it offered everyone three months paid vacation, they would have fired Michael long ago.



*** Novak explained in an interview that he loves the show and wants to continue working with it, but is beginning to lose interest in continually playing "Ryan The Temp", hence his drastically reduced role in later seasons.

to:

*** Novak explained in an interview that he loves the show and wants to continue working with it, but is was beginning to lose interest in continually playing "Ryan The Temp", hence his drastically reduced role in later seasons.



**** It's a found family trope and a very fickle one. Yes, they giggle at Jim's pranks and like Jim when Jim is deflating Dwight who they generally like less, but if Jim rubs them the wrong way, they'll call him out on it. In this troper's opinion, this balance makes things bearable.



* WordofGod says that one of the main network notes to the writers was that Michael had to be good at his job and they would often get network interference if they did not abide by this rule.




to:

[[folder:Why did Erin care so much that Andy and Angela have sex?]]
* First off, I don't remember them getting far with each other sexually. Didn't Andy want to rush the marriage because she wasn't willing to have sex with him out of wedlock. Secondly, Erin seemed to have an alarming repulsion of two adults having sex with each other as if she wasn't sexually active. But the episode where Andy gets impotence demonstrates that two people in a relationship having sex outside of marriage wasn't a big deal anyways to her, right? So why did she have such a state of panic
[[/folder]]



Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** From my own experience: Being able to have meaningful social interactions and being good at customer service are too different skills. I have aesperger's and have often been awkward in certain situations and haven't always been amazing at developing relationships. At the same time, I've had no problems working customer service jobs like a tea shop, a movie theater, or a ham sales company. Being able to say "Thank you so much for calling ______ ham, how can I help you with your holiday order" is a very superficial interaction that I have no investment in.

Added: 382

Changed: 39

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

[[folder:Michael being great at sales]]
* I don't get how Michael is supposedly such a great salesperson. ''Every episode'' we're shown how Michael is oblivious to what other people will think of their behavior - the same actions that irritate, offend, or befuddle their office mates should draw much the same reaction from customers. How does someone with so little social awareness manage to win over clients?
[[/folder]]

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Jim messing with Michael during the game of charades only makes so much sense. He loves a good prank, yes. But he's also a character that's good at reading the room and he was in the middle of a tense space that's about to explode.


to:

* Jim messing with Michael during the game of charades only makes so much sense. He loves a good prank, yes. But he's also a character that's good at reading the room and he was in the middle of a tense space that's about to explode. \n\n What was he thinking?
[[/folder]]

Added: 233

Changed: 59

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

[[folder:Jim messing with Michael during The Dinner Party]]
* Jim messing with Michael during the game of charades only makes so much sense. He loves a good prank, yes. But he's also a character that's good at reading the room and he was in the middle of a tense space that's about to explode.

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None







Added DiffLines:


[[folder:Why doesn't Ryan complain to his temp agency if Toby is ineffective]]
* Most of the other workers put up with Michael's harassment because they'd rather keep their jobs. Ryan doesn't care about his job whatsoever and as a temp he probably has no hopes of advancement. Meanwhile, he goes the brunt of the harrassment from Michael. Before he's flanderized, he's one of the most reasonable guys on the show.
[[/folder]]

Added: 279

Changed: 69

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Do you think the captain would have let up a little if Michael would have simply said "hey, my company won't pay for this cruise unless I do some sort of presentation?"

to:

* Do you think the captain would have let up a little if Michael would have simply said "hey, my company won't pay for this cruise unless I do some sort of presentation?"presentation. Can you help me out?" Should the captain have sensed this on his own.


Added DiffLines:

[[folder:Booze Cruise captain hooking up with Meredith]]
* The booze cruise captain seems like a very professional person. Why would he set himself up for a compromising situation? It feels like everything about his character is contrary to that level of carelessness.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[folder:Booze Cruise]]
* Do you think the captain would have let up a little if Michael would have simply said "hey, my company won't pay for this cruise unless I do some sort of presentation?"
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Dwight doesn't really care as much about the office's fire-preparedness or lack thereof as he's making out. Standard office fire drill procedures under the extreme-worst-case circumstances he set up -- communications cut, fire surrounding the building, all exits blocked and obstructed, etc. -- probably wouldn't have helped much anyway. The whole thing is really because he's steamed (pun intended) that the office didn't pay attention to his -- almost-certainly overly dry, overly rigid, overly bureaucratic, overly eccentric and mostly useless -- presentation on the subject, and the whole "fire drill" is just an excuse to get revenge, humiliate them all, and give him an excuse to smugly strut around crowing about procedure and how he told them so. He even contradicts himself at one point; he mockingly demands why no one is calling 911 at one point despite having himself ''sabotaged the phone lines'', as made clear when Pam initially tried to do just that. As noted above, he deliberately stacks the decks against his co-workers, but not just out of concern for their preparedness (there are better, safer and more effective ways of raising the issue), but because he's an officious, pedantic, short-sighted and resentful idiot lashing out at people he views as beneath him for not taking him as seriously as he thinks he deserves. Causing the panic in the second incident was the whole point.

to:

** Causing the panic in the second incident was the whole point. Dwight doesn't really care as much about the office's fire-preparedness or lack thereof as he's making out. Standard office fire drill procedures under the extreme-worst-case circumstances he set up -- communications cut, fire surrounding the building, all exits blocked and obstructed, etc. -- probably wouldn't have helped much anyway. The whole thing is really because he's steamed (pun intended) that the office didn't pay attention to his -- almost-certainly overly dry, overly rigid, overly bureaucratic, overly eccentric and mostly useless -- presentation on the subject, and the whole "fire drill" is just an excuse to get revenge, humiliate them all, and give him himself an excuse to smugly strut around crowing about procedure and how he told them so. He even contradicts himself at one point; he mockingly demands why no one is calling 911 at one point despite having himself ''sabotaged the phone lines'', as made clear when Pam initially tried to do just that. As noted above, he deliberately stacks the decks against his co-workers, but not just out of concern for their preparedness (there are better, safer and more effective ways of raising the issue), issue, which a good safety manager would employ), but because he's an officious, pedantic, short-sighted and resentful idiot lashing out at people he views as beneath him for not taking him as seriously as he thinks he deserves. Causing the panic in the second incident was the whole point.deserves.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


*** Some documentaries film for years - take Jon Ronson's "Reverend Death", filmed over the course of six years. Wiki/TheOtherWiki has a [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_shot_over_three_or_more_years list of films]] shot over many years.

to:

*** Some documentaries film for years - take Jon Ronson's "Reverend Death", filmed over the course of six years. Wiki/TheOtherWiki Website/TheOtherWiki has a [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_shot_over_three_or_more_years list of films]] shot over many years.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Most documentaries are filmed over a lengthy span of time, in order for the documentary makers to get a decent overview of the subject(s). They just got used to the cameras being there and didn't really think about it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** It depends on the circumstances; if the insurance investigator was to have found that someone forgot to lock the office up properly, chances are it'd be on Michael and co to replace the stolen items on their own.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** In "Money", we get to see a brief shot of Dwight's bedroom, and he has all kinds of electronics in there. It's completely in contrast to the rest of the archaic farmhouse. He is also a fan of Battlestar Galactica, which aired on the Sci Fi Channel, which means he has cable/a dish.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** From personal experience, I can tell you that lonely people who eventually find a way to straighten out their lives and get married and start a family often are ashamed of how pathetic they used to be and don't want to revisit it at all. It's a miracle that Michael agreed to be filmed at all at Dwight's wedding. The last thing he probably wants is to sit on a panel talking about the painful period of loneliness and desperation he went through.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Dwight and the shredder was really early in the series, and was something his UK counterpart, Gareth Keenan, would do. Gareth was much more obnoxious to Tim (Jim's counterpart) than Dwight would eventually end up being, as the US version developed their characters away from being direct copies of the UK version's characters. But that early on, they were still working from that template.


Added DiffLines:

** Kevin was based on Keith Bishop from the UK Office. Keith wasn't bright, but being extremely dull was his main trait- as well as being inappropriately blunt. Kevin is less stupid and more dull in the early episodes. By the end of the 2nd season, the writers were much more comfortable with the characters and Kevin was made more stupid because Brian Baumgartner was funnier as Kevin when Kevin was acting stupid.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Adding to the above, Jim is clearly someone who is used to generally being liked, especially by those in positions of authority. Until Charles comes along, there are only really three people in the entire show whom he doesn't get along with (Dwight, Roy, and Todd Packer) - for two of those three, he consistently comes out on top in his interactions with them one way or another and for Todd, the two don't interact enough on a regular basis for Jim to truly seem to be immensely bothered by him; it's annoying whenever he shows up but not something Jim will get thrown by. Charles, on the other hand, takes an ''immediate'' dislike to Jim and then consistently refuses to allow Jim any opportunity to prove his own worth by constantly keeping him on the back foot in their interactions. During this conversation, Charles repeatedly cuts Jim off before he's finished talking, snaps questions at him in a very abrupt manner, and twists his words around which serves to keep Jim completely off-balance and unable to keep track of the conversation fast enough to provide sufficient responses to Charles' assertions (to put things into perspective, this is the exact technique journalists use in "gotcha" interviews, not how a new boss will ask someone about their role in the company). Charles doesn't actually ''want'' to know what responsibilities Jim's job consists of because he's already convinced himself that Jim is a waste of space who isn't interested in doing any work - all he's doing is reinforcing that idea to himself. And Jim simply isn't used to being treated like that nor at being powerless to get his own back in any significant way.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Why does Robert California, the CEO of Sabre, who now runs this enormous company, spend all of his time still hanging out at the Scranton branch?

to:

* Why does Robert California, the CEO of Sabre, who now runs this enormous company, company based out of Florida, spend all of his time still hanging out at the Scranton branch?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** We see his relationship with his parents in a later episode, and it's terrible. It's not hard to imagine his parents going off in a limo and leaving him with the nanny or the maid. Otherwise, RuleOfFunny applies here.

to:

*** We see his relationship with his parents in a later episode, and it's terrible. It's not hard to imagine his parents and little brother going off in a limo and leaving him with the nanny or the maid. Otherwise, RuleOfFunny applies here.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Which brings up the question as to why they aren't weirded out by the fact that there's a 9 year documentary being made about their lives.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Also, worth noting that when Dwight begins to ask them to move, Michael quite pointedly tells Dwight not to bother them. The clear implication is that Michael doesn't actually want Dwight sitting with them, which the couple may have picked up on. Had Michael also demonstrated more desire for Dwight to join them they may have been amenable to moving, but since he didn't they didn't feel it worth pressing the issue if they didn't have to.

to:

** Also, worth noting that when Dwight begins to ask them to move, Michael quite pointedly tells Dwight not to bother them. The clear implication is that Michael doesn't actually want or care about Dwight sitting with them, which the couple may have picked up on. Had Michael also demonstrated more desire for Dwight to join them they may have been amenable to moving, but since he didn't they didn't feel it worth pressing the issue if they didn't have to.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[folder:No insurance?]]
* In Crime Aid, the staff hold a raffle to replace the office equipment that was stolen. Wouldn't Dunder-Mifflin and/or the building owners have insurance to cover equipment being stolen?

[[/folder]]

Top