Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Film / ThePhantomOfTheOpera1925

Go To

OR

Added: 2412

Changed: 538

Removed: 203

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
added appropriate tropes, there really should be a complete listing here


''Literature/ThePhantomOfTheOpera'' had its second film adaptation in 1925[[note]]The first adaptation was a German film which has since been lost[[/note]], starring Creator/LonChaney as the eponymous Erik. It is a well-known silent film, and is seen as one of the most faithful adaptations to the original book. It depicts the Phantom as tragic, but also murderous and criminally insane.

to:

''The Phantom of the Opera'' is a 1925 film directed by Rupert Julian, starring Creator/LonChaney as the Phantom.

The Paris Opera House has come under new ownership. After the papers are signed, the old owners mention in a faux-casual aside that the new owners ''may'' hear of a ghost. In fact, the legend of the Phantom of the Opera is well known. A mysterious figure in cloak and hat is sometimes seen in Box Five. Joseph Bouquet, a stagehand, tells the terrified chorus girls of a "living skeleton" who lurks in the theater's depths.

Meanwhile, a nobleman named Raoul comes to see his old girlfriend, Christine, the understudy to ''prima donna'' Carlotta. Raoul wants Christine to leave the theater world and marry him, but she's reluctant. Part of the reason she's reluctant is the mysterious voice, coming from behind the walls, telling her that she will be the greatest opera singer ever. Soon after the new owners of the theater get a letter from the Phantom himself, saying that if they don't let Christine sing in the next production instead of Carlotta, they'll regret it...

This is the second adaptation of
''Literature/ThePhantomOfTheOpera'' had its second film adaptation in 1925[[note]]The first adaptation was and the oldest to survive, a previous German film which has version having since been lost[[/note]], starring Creator/LonChaney as the eponymous Erik. lost. It is a well-known silent film, and is seen as one of the most faithful adaptations to the original book. It depicts the Phantom as tragic, but also murderous and criminally insane.
insane, and deformed from birth. It's also the most famous role of Lon Chaney's career.



This film is a fairly faithful adaptation of the Gaston Leroux novel (except for the ending), so most of the tropes on the Literature page apply here. Tropes particular to the 1925 film are listed below.



* BeastAndBeauty: Beautiful Christine and the deformed, insane Phantom.



* CompellingVoice: As in the novel, there is clearly something hypnotic about the Phantom's voice that compels Christine to obey. (He probably could have had sex with her if he'd kept talking instead of playing his creepy organ.)
* DeathTrap: The Phantom has a heat room that is used basically for boiling alive (this being a relic of the torture chambers used in pre-Revolutionary France), and another room that is a drowning pit where he can let in the water in the lake.



* DrowningPit: The Phantom lures Raoul and the policeman into one of these; they barely escape when Christine pulls the lever on the trap door.



* ElaborateUndergroundBase: A DrowningPit, a SaunaOfDeath, and a lake which apparently has pumps to allow the Phantom to control the water level.



* HypnotizeThePrincess: The Phantom's voice exerts a hypnotic control on Christine.



* ReCut: A sound version of this film was made in 1929 and released in 1930, with Mary Philbin (Christine) and Norman Kerry (Raoul) reprising their roles in talking scenes, and with other scenes being re-shot. Lon Chaney was under contract to MGM so his scenes were re-used with some voiceover added. The dialogue scenes have since been lost, but the silent version of this 1929-30 recut still survives. The original 1925 edition only exists in an inferior 16mm version, so most home video and presentations use the silent 1929-30 version, which, among other differences, has a different actress playing Carlotta (Virginia Peterson in 1925, Mary Fabian in 1929).

to:

* ReCut: A sound version of this film was made in 1929 and released in 1930, with Mary Philbin (Christine) and Norman Kerry (Raoul) reprising their roles in talking scenes, and with other scenes being re-shot. Lon Chaney was under contract to MGM so his scenes were re-used with some voiceover added. The dialogue scenes have since been lost, but the a silent version of this 1929-30 recut still survives. survives.[[note]]There seems to be some uncertainty over why the silent 1929 version exists in the first place. The best guess is that it was meant to be run in theaters that hadn't yet converted to sound.[[/note]] The original 1925 edition only exists in an inferior 16mm version, so most home video and presentations use the silent 1929-30 version, which, among other differences, has a different actress playing Carlotta (Virginia Peterson in 1925, Mary Fabian in 1929).1929).
* SaunaOfDeath: One of the traps that the Phantom leads Raoul and the policeman into. He lets them go when Christine begs him for their release.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* GeorgeLucasAlteredVersion: Perhaps the earliest well-known example of a movie getting an altered version. After being released silent in 1925, the film was given a sound re-release in 1930; about 60% of the footage was re-shot with sound, and the other 40% had sound dubbed over it. A third version of the movie called the Eastman House Print also exists, but nobody actually knows where it came from or why it exists. It's silent, but it uses footage from the sound version, and features a scene which looks like it was shot with sound but does not appear in the sound version at all. The Eastman House Print is, ironically, the most popular version of the movie due to its extremely high quality and completeness compared to the surviving materials from the other two versions.

to:

* GeorgeLucasAlteredVersion: Perhaps the earliest well-known example of a movie getting an altered version. After being released silent in 1925, the film was given a sound re-release in 1930; about 60% of the footage was re-shot with sound, and the other 40% had sound dubbed over it. A third version of the movie called the Eastman House Print also exists, but nobody actually knows where it came from or why it exists. [[note]]Possibilities include that the Eastman House print was made for re-issue in foreign markets, or it was made for exhibitions in theaters that hadn't yet converted to sound in 1930. Or both.[[/note]] It's silent, but it uses footage from the sound version, and features a scene which looks like it was shot with sound but does not appear in the sound version at all. all. The Eastman House Print is, ironically, the most popular version of the movie due to its extremely high quality and completeness compared to the surviving materials from the other two versions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheFilmOfTheBook: This version revises the ending but is otherwise the most faithful adaptation of the novel. It includes Raoul's brother, who is usually AdaptedOut. It also originally included the Persian--he is shown wearing a fez--but in post-production he was turned into a French police detective. Since it was a silent movie, all they had to do was change the title cards. Chaney's deformed head resembles the "death's head" the book describes, and is a deformity from birth as in the book, unlike most later adaptations in which it is an injury.

to:

* TheFilmOfTheBook: This version revises the ending but is otherwise the most faithful adaptation of the novel. It includes Raoul's brother, who is usually AdaptedOut. It also originally included the Persian--he is shown wearing a fez--but in post-production he was turned into a French police detective. Since it was a silent movie, all they had to do was change the title cards. Chaney's deformed head resembles the "death's head" (skull) that the book describes, and is a deformity from birth as in the book, unlike most later adaptations in which it is an injury.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Page quotes should not have potholes


->''[[ForbiddenFruit "You are in no peril as long as you do not touch my mask."]]''

to:

->''[[ForbiddenFruit "You ->''"You are in no peril as long as you do not touch my mask."]]''"''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

->''[[ForbiddenFruit "You are in no peril as long as you do not touch my mask."]]''
-->-- '''The Phantom'''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Netflix no longer has this film


It has since fallen in the public domain and may be watched [[http://www.archive.org/details/ThePhantomoftheOpera here]] and [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vElsIYXbhMU here]]. And [[http://movies.netflix.com/WiMovie/The_Phantom_of_the_Opera/854375?trkid=2361637 on Netflix]], if you have it.

to:

It has since fallen in the public domain and may be watched [[http://www.archive.org/details/ThePhantomoftheOpera here]] and [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vElsIYXbhMU here]]. And [[http://movies.netflix.com/WiMovie/The_Phantom_of_the_Opera/854375?trkid=2361637 on Netflix]], if you have it.\n

Changed: 239

Removed: 659

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


It is grouped in the franchise of [[Franchise/UniversalHorror Universal Monster films]] along with its [[Film/PhantomOfTheOpera1943 1943 remake]]

to:

It is grouped in the franchise of [[Franchise/UniversalHorror Universal Monster films]] along with its [[Film/PhantomOfTheOpera1943 1943 remake]]
remake]].



* DramaticUnmask: Phantom's unmasking is probably the ''most'' dramatic one, and one of the best ever examples of this trope. According to the Website/IMDb, "The sight was said to have caused some patrons at the premiere to faint."
** Creator/RobertBloch wrote about having seen this movie as a child. He didn't follow the plot much, and didn't get why the Phantom was wearing a mask. Then came the dramatic unmasking scene, and he slept the next ten years with lights on.

to:

* DramaticUnmask: Phantom's unmasking is probably the ''most'' dramatic one, and one of the best ever examples of this trope. According to the Website/IMDb, "The sight was said to have caused some patrons at the premiere to faint."
**
" Creator/RobertBloch wrote about having seen this movie as a child. He didn't follow the plot much, and didn't get why the Phantom was wearing a mask. Then came the dramatic unmasking scene, and he slept the next ten years with lights on.



** Likely a result of a MythologyGag in a PragmaticAdaptation; the Phantom of the book ''is'' missing his nose entirely, but such an effect would have been difficult to pull off with silent movie-era special effects.



* MissingEpisode: A complete cut of the 1925 version was believed to have been lost to time for decades, until the British Film Institute discovered a copy in 2011 and released it on DVD two years later.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Grammar fix.


It is grouped in the franchise of [[Franchise/UniversalHorror Universal Monster films]] along with it's [[Film/PhantomOfTheOpera1943 1943 remake]]

to:

It is grouped in the franchise of [[Franchise/UniversalHorror Universal Monster films]] along with it's its [[Film/PhantomOfTheOpera1943 1943 remake]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

It is grouped in the franchise of [[Franchise/UniversalHorror Universal Monster films]] along with it's [[Film/PhantomOfTheOpera1943 1943 remake]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The information I put for the trope entry does not apply to YMMV.

Added DiffLines:

* MissingEpisode: A complete cut of the 1925 version was believed to have been lost to time for decades, until the British Film Institute discovered a copy in 2011 and released it on DVD two years later.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Likely a result of a MythologyGag in a PragmaticAdaptation; the Phantom of the book ''is'' missing his nose entirely, but such an effect would have been difficult to pull off with silent movie-era special effects.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* MilkingTheGiantCow: The Phantom resorts to this when denouncing Christine moments after the DramaticUnmask.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* GeorgeLucasAlteredVersion: perhaps the earliest well-known example of a movie getting an altered version. After being released silent in 1925, the film was given a sound re-release in 1930; about 60% of the footage was re-shot with sound, and the other 40% had sound dubbed over it. A third version of the movie called the Eastman House Print also exists, but nobody actually knows where it came from or why it exists. It's silent, but it uses footage from the sound version, and features a scene which looks like it was shot with sound but does not appear in the sound version at all. The Eastman House Print is, ironically, the most popular version of the movie due to its extremely high quality and completeness compared to the surviving materials from the other two versions.

to:

* GeorgeLucasAlteredVersion: perhaps Perhaps the earliest well-known example of a movie getting an altered version. After being released silent in 1925, the film was given a sound re-release in 1930; about 60% of the footage was re-shot with sound, and the other 40% had sound dubbed over it. A third version of the movie called the Eastman House Print also exists, but nobody actually knows where it came from or why it exists. It's silent, but it uses footage from the sound version, and features a scene which looks like it was shot with sound but does not appear in the sound version at all. The Eastman House Print is, ironically, the most popular version of the movie due to its extremely high quality and completeness compared to the surviving materials from the other two versions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


It has since fallen in the public domain and may be watched [[http://www.archive.org/details/ThePhantomoftheOpera here]] and [[http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5224364451553593147 here]]. And [[http://movies.netflix.com/WiMovie/The_Phantom_of_the_Opera/854375?trkid=2361637 on Netflix]], if you have it.

to:

It has since fallen in the public domain and may be watched [[http://www.archive.org/details/ThePhantomoftheOpera here]] and [[http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5224364451553593147 [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vElsIYXbhMU here]]. And [[http://movies.netflix.com/WiMovie/The_Phantom_of_the_Opera/854375?trkid=2361637 on Netflix]], if you have it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


''Literature/ThePhantomOfTheOpera'' had its second film adaptation in 1925[[note]]The first adaptation was a Russian film which had since been lost in time[[/note]], starring Creator/LonChaney as the eponymous Erik. It is a well-known silent film, and is seen as one of the most faithful adaptations to the original book. It depicts the Phantom as tragic, but also murderous and criminally insane.

to:

''Literature/ThePhantomOfTheOpera'' had its second film adaptation in 1925[[note]]The first adaptation was a Russian German film which had has since been lost in time[[/note]], lost[[/note]], starring Creator/LonChaney as the eponymous Erik. It is a well-known silent film, and is seen as one of the most faithful adaptations to the original book. It depicts the Phantom as tragic, but also murderous and criminally insane.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* JumpScare: The aforementioned DramaticUnmask scene. Once unmasked, the Phantom stares RIGHT at the camera and jumps to his feat. As mentioned above, this was enough to make people faint during the film's premiere.(This is one of the shots that is different in the re-release and ironically the version often referred to as the classic original scene is usually not.)

to:

* JumpScare: The aforementioned DramaticUnmask scene. Once unmasked, the Phantom stares RIGHT at the camera and jumps to his feat.feet. As mentioned above, this was enough to make people faint during the film's premiere. (This is one of the shots that is different in the re-release and ironically the version often referred to as the classic original scene is usually not.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* JumpScare: The aforementioned DramaticUnmask scene. Once unmasked, [[http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-1mUOhMSI6jU/UJFDB4RzCvI/AAAAAAAACzI/gQ79Akvpwb8/s640/unmasking.gif The Phantom stares RIGHT at the camera, and looks as if he's screaming]]. As mentioned above, this was enough to make people faint during the film's premiere.

to:

* JumpScare: The aforementioned DramaticUnmask scene. Once unmasked, [[http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-1mUOhMSI6jU/UJFDB4RzCvI/AAAAAAAACzI/gQ79Akvpwb8/s640/unmasking.gif The the Phantom stares RIGHT at the camera, camera and looks as if he's screaming]].jumps to his feat. As mentioned above, this was enough to make people faint during the film's premiere. (This is one of the shots that is different in the re-release and ironically the version often referred to as the classic original scene is usually not.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* GeorgeLucasAlteredVersion: perhaps the earliest well-known example of a movie getting an altered version. After being released silent in 1925, the film was given a sound re-release in 1930; about 60% of the footage was re-shot with sound, and the other 40% had sound dubbed over it. A third version of the movie called the Eastman House Print also exists, but nobody actually knows where it came from or why it exists. It's silent, but it uses footage from the sound version, and features a scene which looks like it was shot with sound but does not appear in the sound version at all. The Eastman House Print is, ironically, the most popular version of the movie due to its extremely high quality and completeness compared to the surviving materials from the other two versions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SplashOfColor: Most of the movie is in black and white, except for the masked ball scene, which is presented in early Technicolor.

to:

* SplashOfColor: Most of the movie is in black and white, except for the masked ball scene, which is white (usually presented with color tinting) but the ''Faust'' scenes and the masquerade were filmed in early Technicolor.early, two-strip Technicolor. Also, for a scene of the Phantom lurking around on the roof, his robes were painstakingly colored red by hand using a complex stenciling method. The technicolor masquerade footage still exists, but the ''Faust'' and rooftop scenes only exist in black and white. Some home video versions feature a digital recreation of the rooftop's hand-colored effect.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DramaticUnmask: Phantom's unmasking is probably the ''most'' dramatic one, and one of the best ever examples of this trope. According to the {{IMDB}}, "The sight was said to have caused some patrons at the premiere to faint."

to:

* DramaticUnmask: Phantom's unmasking is probably the ''most'' dramatic one, and one of the best ever examples of this trope. According to the {{IMDB}}, Website/IMDb, "The sight was said to have caused some patrons at the premiere to faint."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* JumpScare: The aforementioned DramaticUnmask scene. Once unmasked, [[http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-1mUOhMSI6jU/UJFDB4RzCvI/AAAAAAAACzI/gQ79Akvpwb8/s640/unmasking.gif The Phantom stares RIGHT at the camera, and looks as if he's screaming]]. As mentioned above, this was enough to make people faint during the film's premiere.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** RobertBloch wrote about having seen this movie as a child. He didn't follow the plot much, and didn't get why the Phantom was wearing a mask. Then came the dramatic unmasking scene, and he slept the next ten years with lights on.

to:

** RobertBloch Creator/RobertBloch wrote about having seen this movie as a child. He didn't follow the plot much, and didn't get why the Phantom was wearing a mask. Then came the dramatic unmasking scene, and he slept the next ten years with lights on.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


This film is a fairly faithful adaptation of the Gaston Leroux novel (except for the ending), so most of the tropes on the Literature page apply here. Tropes particular to the 1925 film are listed below.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DramaticUnmask: OK, it isn't really specific to the 1925 film, but this version's take of the Phantom's unmasking is probably the ''most'' dramatic one, and one of the best ever examples of this trope. According to the {{IMDB}}, "The sight was said to have caused some patrons at the premiere to faint."

to:

* DramaticUnmask: OK, it isn't really specific to the 1925 film, but this version's take of the Phantom's unmasking is probably the ''most'' dramatic one, and one of the best ever examples of this trope. According to the {{IMDB}}, "The sight was said to have caused some patrons at the premiere to faint."



* DyingMomentOfAwesome: In the silent film, see BrandishmentBluff above.

to:

* DyingMomentOfAwesome: In the silent film, see See BrandishmentBluff above.



* InformedAttribute: In the 1925 film, Joseph Buquet describes the Phantom as having a huge hole in his face where the nose should be, but when the Phantom finally appears, he clearly ''does'' have a nose, albeit a horribly deformed one. Of course, Buquet may be exaggerating.

to:

* InformedAttribute: In the 1925 film, Joseph Buquet describes the Phantom as having a huge hole in his face where the nose should be, but when the Phantom finally appears, he clearly ''does'' have a nose, albeit a horribly deformed one. Of course, Buquet may be exaggerating.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

[[caption-width-right:194:"Feast your eyes! Glut your soul on my accursed ugliness!"]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:

* FallingChandelierOfDoom: Like in the novel, the Phantom sabotages the opera chandelier to drop on the audience.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[caption-width-right:194:Lon Chaney as Erik in the 1925 film.]]

to:

[[caption-width-right:194:Lon Chaney as Erik in the 1925 film.]]

Added: 4136

Changed: 105

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[redirect:Franchise/ThePhantomOfTheOpera]]

to:

[[redirect:Franchise/ThePhantomOfTheOpera]][[quoteright:194:http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/imgres_3425.jpeg]]
[[caption-width-right:194:Lon Chaney as Erik in the 1925 film.]]

''Literature/ThePhantomOfTheOpera'' had its second film adaptation in 1925[[note]]The first adaptation was a Russian film which had since been lost in time[[/note]], starring Creator/LonChaney as the eponymous Erik. It is a well-known silent film, and is seen as one of the most faithful adaptations to the original book. It depicts the Phantom as tragic, but also murderous and criminally insane.

It has since fallen in the public domain and may be watched [[http://www.archive.org/details/ThePhantomoftheOpera here]] and [[http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5224364451553593147 here]]. And [[http://movies.netflix.com/WiMovie/The_Phantom_of_the_Opera/854375?trkid=2361637 on Netflix]], if you have it.
----
!!Contains examples of:
* BrandishmentBluff: When Erik is cornered by the mob, he appears to hold something in the air and brandishes it to hold them back, even turning to make those behind him retreat, then he laughs and shows an empty hand, prompting the mob to move in for the kill.
* CaptainObvious: A weirdo in a mask and cape lures Christine to his underground lair. He plays her creepy organ music and shows her the coffin he sleeps in. After taking all this in Christine says "You--you are the Phantom!"
* DramaticUnmask: OK, it isn't really specific to the 1925 film, but this version's take of the Phantom's unmasking is probably the ''most'' dramatic one, and one of the best ever examples of this trope. According to the {{IMDB}}, "The sight was said to have caused some patrons at the premiere to faint."
** RobertBloch wrote about having seen this movie as a child. He didn't follow the plot much, and didn't get why the Phantom was wearing a mask. Then came the dramatic unmasking scene, and he slept the next ten years with lights on.
* DyingMomentOfAwesome: In the silent film, see BrandishmentBluff above.
* TheFilmOfTheBook: This version revises the ending but is otherwise the most faithful adaptation of the novel. It includes Raoul's brother, who is usually AdaptedOut. It also originally included the Persian--he is shown wearing a fez--but in post-production he was turned into a French police detective. Since it was a silent movie, all they had to do was change the title cards. Chaney's deformed head resembles the "death's head" the book describes, and is a deformity from birth as in the book, unlike most later adaptations in which it is an injury.
* FocusGroupEnding: Chaney was a strong supporter of being faithful to the novel, including using the original ending where Erik is redeemed and dies. When test audiences reacted negatively to the original cut of the film, many scenes were reshot, and the ending was revised to the mob chase scene. Other book accurate scenes were also cut out.
* ImpairmentShot: Erik's face goes out of focus as he uses his hypnotic power (or whatever he's using, the film is vague) to get Christine to follow him to the boat.
* InformedAttribute: In the 1925 film, Joseph Buquet describes the Phantom as having a huge hole in his face where the nose should be, but when the Phantom finally appears, he clearly ''does'' have a nose, albeit a horribly deformed one. Of course, Buquet may be exaggerating.
* ReCut: A sound version of this film was made in 1929 and released in 1930, with Mary Philbin (Christine) and Norman Kerry (Raoul) reprising their roles in talking scenes, and with other scenes being re-shot. Lon Chaney was under contract to MGM so his scenes were re-used with some voiceover added. The dialogue scenes have since been lost, but the silent version of this 1929-30 recut still survives. The original 1925 edition only exists in an inferior 16mm version, so most home video and presentations use the silent 1929-30 version, which, among other differences, has a different actress playing Carlotta (Virginia Peterson in 1925, Mary Fabian in 1929).
* SlippingAMickey: The Phantom drugs the security guards before snatching Christine from the opera stage.
* SplashOfColor: Most of the movie is in black and white, except for the masked ball scene, which is presented in early Technicolor.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[redirect:ThePhantomOfTheOpera]]

to:

[[redirect:ThePhantomOfTheOpera]][[redirect:Franchise/ThePhantomOfTheOpera]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[redirect:ThePhantomOfTheOpera]]

Top