Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Up To Eleven is a defunct trope
Changed line(s) 7,8 (click to see context) from:
When the added distinction is "the same, but played UpToEleven," this is known simply as Administrivia/TheSameButMore since most instances are just an ExaggeratedTrope.
to:
When the added distinction is "the same, but played UpToEleven," up to eleven," this is known simply as Administrivia/TheSameButMore since most instances are just an ExaggeratedTrope.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Fix typo
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
For attempts to create a suspiciously-similar SisterTrope, instead of a hierarchial SubTrope, see Administrivia/RidiculouslySimilarTrope. Please try to avoid getting the two confused.
to:
For attempts to create a suspiciously-similar SisterTrope, instead of a hierarchial hierarchical SubTrope, see Administrivia/RidiculouslySimilarTrope. Please try to avoid getting the two confused.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7,8 (click to see context) from:
When the added distinction is "the same, but played UpToEleven", this is known simply as Administrivia/TheSameButMore (since most instances are just an ExaggeratedTrope).
to:
When the added distinction is "the same, but played UpToEleven", UpToEleven," this is known simply as Administrivia/TheSameButMore (since since most instances are just an ExaggeratedTrope).
ExaggeratedTrope.
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
For attempts to create a suspiciously-similar SisterTrope, instead of a hierarchial SubTrope, see Administrivia/RidiculouslySimilarTrope. (Please try to avoid getting the two confused.)
to:
For attempts to create a suspiciously-similar SisterTrope, instead of a hierarchial SubTrope, see Administrivia/RidiculouslySimilarTrope. (Please Please try to avoid getting the two confused.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,4 (click to see context) from:
When someone wants to start a new article which can be summed up as "the same as Article X, only with <specification>" -- or may alternately be phrased as "[[JustForFun/XMeetsY a combination of article X and article Y]]".
This is generally ''not'' a very good idea, since it can easily clutter the wiki with [[Administrivia/RidiculouslySimilarTrope nigh-indistinguishable trope variations]]. On the other hand, if the added qualification is clear enough that the result serves a distinct narrative function from the original -- then it becomes a SubTrope.
This is generally ''not'' a very good idea, since it can easily clutter the wiki with [[Administrivia/RidiculouslySimilarTrope nigh-indistinguishable trope variations]]. On the other hand, if the added qualification is clear enough that the result serves a distinct narrative function from the original -- then it becomes a SubTrope.
to:
When someone wants to start a new article which can be summed up as "the same as Article X, only with <specification>" -- or <specification>"--or may alternately be phrased as "[[JustForFun/XMeetsY a combination of article X and article Y]]".
This is generally ''not'' a very good idea, since it can easily clutter the wiki with [[Administrivia/RidiculouslySimilarTrope nigh-indistinguishable trope variations]]. On the other hand, if the added qualification is clear enough that the result serves a distinct narrative function from theoriginal -- then original--then it becomes a SubTrope.
This is generally ''not'' a very good idea, since it can easily clutter the wiki with [[Administrivia/RidiculouslySimilarTrope nigh-indistinguishable trope variations]]. On the other hand, if the added qualification is clear enough that the result serves a distinct narrative function from the
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Apparently that IS a word, but it's so non-standard that there's no real reason to use it in favor of the standard form, is there?
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
This is generally ''not'' a very good idea, since it can easily clutter the wiki with [[Administrivia/RidiculouslySimilarTrope nigh-undistinguishable trope variations]]. On the other hand, if the added qualification is clear enough that the result serves a distinct narrative function from the original -- then it becomes a SubTrope.
to:
This is generally ''not'' a very good idea, since it can easily clutter the wiki with [[Administrivia/RidiculouslySimilarTrope nigh-undistinguishable nigh-indistinguishable trope variations]]. On the other hand, if the added qualification is clear enough that the result serves a distinct narrative function from the original -- then it becomes a SubTrope.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
Whether a given proposal qualifies as a SubTrope or Administrivia/TheSameButMoreSpecific can be [[Administrivia/LumperVsSplitter highly subjective]]; Administrivia/TropesAreFlexible, after all, but we don't need a new page for ''every last variation'' possible. Please [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/tlp_activity.php consult your fellow Tropers first]] to get opinions.
to:
Whether a given proposal qualifies as a SubTrope or Administrivia/TheSameButMoreSpecific The Same But More Specific can be [[Administrivia/LumperVsSplitter highly subjective]]; Administrivia/TropesAreFlexible, after all, but we don't need a new page for ''every last variation'' possible. Please [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/tlp_activity.php consult your fellow Tropers first]] to get opinions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
When someone wants to start a new article which can be summed up as "the same as Article X, only with <specification>" -- or may alternately be phrased as "[[XMeetsY a combination of article X and article Y]]".
to:
When someone wants to start a new article which can be summed up as "the same as Article X, only with <specification>" -- or may alternately be phrased as "[[XMeetsY "[[JustForFun/XMeetsY a combination of article X and article Y]]".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
Whether a given proposal qualifies as a SubTrope or Administrivia/TheSameButMoreSpecific can be [[Administrivia/LumperVsSplitter highly subjective]]; Administrivia/TropesAreFlexible, after all, but we don't need a new page for ''every last variation'' possible. Please [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/ykttw.php?interval=1 consult your fellow Tropers first]] to get opinions.
to:
Whether a given proposal qualifies as a SubTrope or Administrivia/TheSameButMoreSpecific can be [[Administrivia/LumperVsSplitter highly subjective]]; Administrivia/TropesAreFlexible, after all, but we don't need a new page for ''every last variation'' possible. Please [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/ykttw.php?interval=1 org/pmwiki/tlp_activity.php consult your fellow Tropers first]] to get opinions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
Whether a given proposal qualifies as a SubTrope or Administrivia/TheSameButMoreSpecific can be [[Administrivia/LumperVsSplitter highly subjective]]; TropesAreFlexible, after all, but we don't need a new page for ''every last variation'' possible. Please [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/ykttw.php?interval=1 consult your fellow Tropers first]] to get opinions.
to:
Whether a given proposal qualifies as a SubTrope or Administrivia/TheSameButMoreSpecific can be [[Administrivia/LumperVsSplitter highly subjective]]; TropesAreFlexible, Administrivia/TropesAreFlexible, after all, but we don't need a new page for ''every last variation'' possible. Please [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/ykttw.php?interval=1 consult your fellow Tropers first]] to get opinions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
Whether a given proposal qualifies as a SubTrope or Administrivia/TheSameButMoreSpecific can be [[LumperVsSplitter highly subjective]]; TropesAreFlexible, after all, but we don't need a new page for ''every last variation'' possible. Please [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/ykttw.php?interval=1 consult your fellow Tropers first]] to get opinions.
to:
Whether a given proposal qualifies as a SubTrope or Administrivia/TheSameButMoreSpecific can be [[LumperVsSplitter [[Administrivia/LumperVsSplitter highly subjective]]; TropesAreFlexible, after all, but we don't need a new page for ''every last variation'' possible. Please [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/ykttw.php?interval=1 consult your fellow Tropers first]] to get opinions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
Whether a given proposal qualifies as a SubTrope or TheSameButMoreSpecific can be [[LumperVsSplitter highly subjective]]; TropesAreFlexible, after all, but we don't need a new page for ''every last variation'' possible. Please [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/ykttw.php?interval=1 consult your fellow Tropers first]] to get opinions.
to:
Whether a given proposal qualifies as a SubTrope or TheSameButMoreSpecific Administrivia/TheSameButMoreSpecific can be [[LumperVsSplitter highly subjective]]; TropesAreFlexible, after all, but we don't need a new page for ''every last variation'' possible. Please [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/ykttw.php?interval=1 consult your fellow Tropers first]] to get opinions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Namespace move
Added DiffLines:
When someone wants to start a new article which can be summed up as "the same as Article X, only with <specification>" -- or may alternately be phrased as "[[XMeetsY a combination of article X and article Y]]".
This is generally ''not'' a very good idea, since it can easily clutter the wiki with [[Administrivia/RidiculouslySimilarTrope nigh-undistinguishable trope variations]]. On the other hand, if the added qualification is clear enough that the result serves a distinct narrative function from the original -- then it becomes a SubTrope.
Whether a given proposal qualifies as a SubTrope or TheSameButMoreSpecific can be [[LumperVsSplitter highly subjective]]; TropesAreFlexible, after all, but we don't need a new page for ''every last variation'' possible. Please [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/ykttw.php?interval=1 consult your fellow Tropers first]] to get opinions.
When the added distinction is "the same, but played UpToEleven", this is known simply as Administrivia/TheSameButMore (since most instances are just an ExaggeratedTrope).
If the added distinction is so narrow that the result fails to actually ''establish a pattern'', the trope is Administrivia/TooRareToTrope.
For attempts to create a suspiciously-similar SisterTrope, instead of a hierarchial SubTrope, see Administrivia/RidiculouslySimilarTrope. (Please try to avoid getting the two confused.)
----
This is generally ''not'' a very good idea, since it can easily clutter the wiki with [[Administrivia/RidiculouslySimilarTrope nigh-undistinguishable trope variations]]. On the other hand, if the added qualification is clear enough that the result serves a distinct narrative function from the original -- then it becomes a SubTrope.
Whether a given proposal qualifies as a SubTrope or TheSameButMoreSpecific can be [[LumperVsSplitter highly subjective]]; TropesAreFlexible, after all, but we don't need a new page for ''every last variation'' possible. Please [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/ykttw.php?interval=1 consult your fellow Tropers first]] to get opinions.
When the added distinction is "the same, but played UpToEleven", this is known simply as Administrivia/TheSameButMore (since most instances are just an ExaggeratedTrope).
If the added distinction is so narrow that the result fails to actually ''establish a pattern'', the trope is Administrivia/TooRareToTrope.
For attempts to create a suspiciously-similar SisterTrope, instead of a hierarchial SubTrope, see Administrivia/RidiculouslySimilarTrope. (Please try to avoid getting the two confused.)
----
