Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Administrivia / SpeculativeTroping

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


But ''that's ALL'' it implies. Just because a work used ''one'' trope doesn't mean it used [[SisterTrope similar tropes]]. Without any other context, tropers can't just leap to other conclusions. This doesn't automatically make them an OfficialCouple. It doesn't mean one or more of the characters [[RedemptionEqualsSex have redeemed past deeds]]. Heck, it doesn't even mean [[GoodPeopleHaveGoodSex they ENJOYED it]]. The only information we can convey from that basic scene is that something naughty ''may'' have happened, but it's still only ''implied''.

to:

But ''that's ALL'' it implies. Just because a work used ''one'' trope doesn't mean it used [[SisterTrope similar tropes]]. Without any other context, tropers can't just leap to other conclusions. This doesn't automatically make them an OfficialCouple. It doesn't mean one or more of the characters [[RedemptionEqualsSex have redeemed past deeds]]. Heck, it doesn't even mean [[GoodPeopleHaveGoodSex they ENJOYED it]].it. The only information we can convey from that basic scene is that something naughty ''may'' have happened, but it's still only ''implied''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


It also happens to AudienceReactions, such as when a show does something that some of its fans don't like. That doesn't mean a BrokenBase is inevitable; even fans who disagree may feel that their angry kin have a point and the two may never come to blows over it. And just because the title character is NOT the {{Protagonist}} doesn't mean we'll end up with a case of IAmNotShazam. These reactions require that audiences ''actually'' react that way, and in enough quantity that they're a rule and not an exception.

to:

It also happens to AudienceReactions, such as when a show does something that some of its fans don't like. That doesn't mean a BrokenBase is inevitable; even fans who disagree may feel that their angry kin have a point and the two may never come to blows over it. And just because [[ProtagonistTitleFallacy the title character is NOT the {{Protagonist}} protagonist]] doesn't mean we'll end up with a case of IAmNotShazam. These reactions require that audiences ''actually'' react that way, and in enough quantity that they're a rule and not an exception.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

See Administrivia/CreatingAWorkPageForAnUpcomingWork, for how to avoid speculation when creating a page for an upcoming work.

Removed: 36

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


May also overlap with Administrivia/ExamplesAreNotRecent, if the troper uses speculative language "This trope MAY happen in the future" or "This trope seems TO BE GOING this way". And Administrivia/ExamplesAreNotArguable, where the example as written isn't even sure if the trope applies. Also a SuperTrope to ShippingGoggles, because tropers will see ShipTease in ''any'' situation, even when there was none.


'''Administrivia/NoExamplesPlease'''

to:

May also overlap with Administrivia/ExamplesAreNotRecent, if the troper uses speculative language "This trope MAY happen in the future" or "This trope seems TO BE GOING this way". And Administrivia/ExamplesAreNotArguable, where the example as written isn't even sure if the trope applies. Also a SuperTrope to ShippingGoggles, because tropers will see ShipTease in ''any'' situation, even when there was none.


'''Administrivia/NoExamplesPlease'''
none.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


It most often occurs when a troper spots a {{Cliche}} and they've Administrivia/SeenItAMillionTimes. The LovableRogue has abandoned the heroes before the final battle, but is [[ConscienceMakesYouGoBack feeling pangs of guilt]]. The lead characters in a LoveTriangle just shared their FirstKiss, to the [[LoveHurts heartbreak]] of the third party. Clearly, these plot developments are going to end with the rogue going "I ChangedMyMindKid" and pulling a BigDamnHeroes moment, and the RomanceArc is going to end with FirstGirlWins! Except...those tropes haven't happened yet. Yes, these are the classic setups for those tropes, but that doesn't mean the creator intended to [[SubvertedTrope follow through on the trope]], or that they [[FlipFlopOfGod won't change their mind]], or [[ArmedWithCanon hand off the story to a new writer]], or just flat out [[LeftHanging leave the story hanging]]. For all we know, [[ChuckCunninghamSyndrome this is the last time the rogue will ever appear]], and the FirstKiss was also the LastKiss. It probably wouldn't make for a good story, but don't forget that [[SturgeonsLaw there's a LOT]] of bad stories.

to:

It most often occurs when a troper spots a {{Cliche}} and they've Administrivia/SeenItAMillionTimes. The LovableRogue has abandoned the heroes before the final battle, but is [[ConscienceMakesYouGoBack feeling pangs of guilt]]. The lead characters in a LoveTriangle just shared their FirstKiss, to the [[LoveHurts heartbreak]] of the third party. Clearly, these plot developments are going to end with the rogue going "I ChangedMyMindKid" and pulling a BigDamnHeroes moment, and the RomanceArc is going to end with FirstGirlWins! Except...those tropes haven't happened yet. Yes, these are the classic setups for those tropes, but that doesn't mean the creator intended to [[SubvertedTrope follow through on the trope]], or that they [[FlipFlopOfGod won't change their mind]], or [[ArmedWithCanon hand off the story to a new writer]], or just flat out [[LeftHanging leave the story hanging]]. For all we know, [[ChuckCunninghamSyndrome this is the last time the rogue will ever appear]], and the FirstKiss was also the LastKiss. It While many would argue that doing this probably wouldn't make for a good story, but don't forget that [[SturgeonsLaw there's a LOT]] of bad stories.
stories and, yes, this might be one of them.



But ''that's ALL'' it implies. Without any other context, tropers can't just leap to other conclusions. This doesn't automatically make them an OfficialCouple. It doesn't mean one or more of the characters [[RedemptionEqualsSex have redeemed past deeds]]. Heck, it doesn't even mean [[GoodPeopleHaveGoodSex they ENJOYED it]]. The only information we can convey from that basic scene is that something naughty ''may'' have happened, but it's still only ''implied''.

And finally, just because a work isn't using ''one'' trope doesn't mean it's automatically using another one. Just because a villain isn't a NoNonsenseNemesis doesn't mean they qualify as having BondVillainStupidity. The former is the antithesis of the latter, but its absence doesn't ''guarantee'' the latter.


to:

But ''that's ALL'' it implies. Just because a work used ''one'' trope doesn't mean it used [[SisterTrope similar tropes]]. Without any other context, tropers can't just leap to other conclusions. This doesn't automatically make them an OfficialCouple. It doesn't mean one or more of the characters [[RedemptionEqualsSex have redeemed past deeds]]. Heck, it doesn't even mean [[GoodPeopleHaveGoodSex they ENJOYED it]]. The only information we can convey from that basic scene is that something naughty ''may'' have happened, but it's still only ''implied''.

And finally, conversely, just because a work isn't ''isn't'' using ''one'' a specific trope doesn't mean it's automatically using another one. Just because a villain isn't a NoNonsenseNemesis doesn't mean they qualify as having BondVillainStupidity. The former is the antithesis of the latter, but its absence doesn't ''guarantee'' that the latter.

villain is that impractical.

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


It most often occurs when a troper spots a {{Cliche}} and they've Administrivia/SeenItAMillionTimes. The LovableRogue has abandoned the heroes before the final battle, but is [[ConscienceMakesYouGoBack feeling pangs of guilt]]. The lead characters in a LoveTriangle just shared their FirstKiss, to the [[LoveHurts heartbreak]] of the third party. Clearly, these plot developments are going to end with the rogue going "I ChangedMyMindKid" and pulling a BigDamnHeroes moment, and the RomanceArc is going to end with FirstGirlWins! Except...those tropes haven't happened yet. Yes, these are the classic setups for those tropes, but that doesn't mean the creator intended to [[SubvertedTrope follow through on the trope]], or that they won't change their mind, or hand off the story to a new writer, or just flat out leave the story hanging. For all we know, [[ChuckCunninghamSyndrome this is the last time the rogue will ever appear]], and the FirstKiss was also the LastKiss. It probably wouldn't make for a good story, but don't forget that [[SturgeonsLaw there's a LOT]] of bad stories.

to:

It most often occurs when a troper spots a {{Cliche}} and they've Administrivia/SeenItAMillionTimes. The LovableRogue has abandoned the heroes before the final battle, but is [[ConscienceMakesYouGoBack feeling pangs of guilt]]. The lead characters in a LoveTriangle just shared their FirstKiss, to the [[LoveHurts heartbreak]] of the third party. Clearly, these plot developments are going to end with the rogue going "I ChangedMyMindKid" and pulling a BigDamnHeroes moment, and the RomanceArc is going to end with FirstGirlWins! Except...those tropes haven't happened yet. Yes, these are the classic setups for those tropes, but that doesn't mean the creator intended to [[SubvertedTrope follow through on the trope]], or that they [[FlipFlopOfGod won't change their mind, mind]], or [[ArmedWithCanon hand off the story to a new writer, writer]], or just flat out [[LeftHanging leave the story hanging.hanging]]. For all we know, [[ChuckCunninghamSyndrome this is the last time the rogue will ever appear]], and the FirstKiss was also the LastKiss. It probably wouldn't make for a good story, but don't forget that [[SturgeonsLaw there's a LOT]] of bad stories.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


It most often occurs when a troper spots a {{Cliche}} and they've SeenItAMillionTimes. The LovableRogue has abandoned the heroes before the final battle, but is [[ConscienceMakesYouGoBack feeling pangs of guilt]]. The lead characters in a LoveTriangle just shared their FirstKiss, to the [[LoveHurts heartbreak]] of the third party. Clearly, these plot developments are going to end with the rogue going "I ChangedMyMindKid" and pulling a BigDamnHeroes moment, and the RomanceArc is going to end with FirstGirlWins! Except...those tropes haven't happened yet. Yes, these are the classic setups for those tropes, but that doesn't mean the creator intended to [[SubvertedTrope follow through on the trope]], or that they won't change their mind, or hand off the story to a new writer, or just flat out leave the story hanging. For all we know, [[ChuckCunninghamSyndrome this is the last time the rogue will ever appear]], and the FirstKiss was also the LastKiss. It probably wouldn't make for a good story, but don't forget that [[SturgeonsLaw there's a LOT]] of bad stories.

to:

It most often occurs when a troper spots a {{Cliche}} and they've SeenItAMillionTimes.Administrivia/SeenItAMillionTimes. The LovableRogue has abandoned the heroes before the final battle, but is [[ConscienceMakesYouGoBack feeling pangs of guilt]]. The lead characters in a LoveTriangle just shared their FirstKiss, to the [[LoveHurts heartbreak]] of the third party. Clearly, these plot developments are going to end with the rogue going "I ChangedMyMindKid" and pulling a BigDamnHeroes moment, and the RomanceArc is going to end with FirstGirlWins! Except...those tropes haven't happened yet. Yes, these are the classic setups for those tropes, but that doesn't mean the creator intended to [[SubvertedTrope follow through on the trope]], or that they won't change their mind, or hand off the story to a new writer, or just flat out leave the story hanging. For all we know, [[ChuckCunninghamSyndrome this is the last time the rogue will ever appear]], and the FirstKiss was also the LastKiss. It probably wouldn't make for a good story, but don't forget that [[SturgeonsLaw there's a LOT]] of bad stories.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


It also happens to AudienceReactions, such as when a show does something that some of its fans don't like. That doesn't mean a BrokenBase is inevitable; even fans who disagree may feel that their angry kin have a point and the two may never come to blows over it. And just because the title character is NOT the {{Protagonist}} doesn't mean we'll end up with a case of IAmNotShazam. These reactions require that audiences ''actually'' do the the things, and in enough quantity that they're a rule and not an exception.

to:

It also happens to AudienceReactions, such as when a show does something that some of its fans don't like. That doesn't mean a BrokenBase is inevitable; even fans who disagree may feel that their angry kin have a point and the two may never come to blows over it. And just because the title character is NOT the {{Protagonist}} doesn't mean we'll end up with a case of IAmNotShazam. These reactions require that audiences ''actually'' do the the things, react that way, and in enough quantity that they're a rule and not an exception.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
A YMMV is Not A Trope. Call them Audience Reactions instead, which is what they actually are.


It also happens to YMMV tropes, such as when a show does something that some of its fans don't like. That doesn't mean a BrokenBase is inevitable; even fans who disagree may feel that their angry kin have a point and the two may never come to blows over it. And just because the title character is NOT the {{Protagonist}} doesn't mean we'll end up with a case of IAmNotShazam. These tropes require that audiences ''actually'' do the the things the tropes say, and in enough quantity that they're a rule and not an exception.

to:

It also happens to YMMV tropes, AudienceReactions, such as when a show does something that some of its fans don't like. That doesn't mean a BrokenBase is inevitable; even fans who disagree may feel that their angry kin have a point and the two may never come to blows over it. And just because the title character is NOT the {{Protagonist}} doesn't mean we'll end up with a case of IAmNotShazam. These tropes reactions require that audiences ''actually'' do the the things the tropes say, things, and in enough quantity that they're a rule and not an exception.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''NoExamplesPlease'''

to:

'''NoExamplesPlease''''''Administrivia/NoExamplesPlease'''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


It most often occurs when a troper spots a {{Cliche}} and they've SeenItAMillionTimes. The LovableRogue has abandoned the heroes before the final battle, but is [[ConscienceMakesYouGoBack feeling pangs of guilt]]. The lead characters in a LoveTriangle just shared their FirstKiss, to the [[LoveHurts heartbreak]] of the third party. Clearly, these plot developments are going to end with the rogue going "I ChangedMyMindKid" and pulling a BigDamnHeroes moment, and the RomanceArc is going to end with FirstGirlWins! Except...those tropes haven't happened yet. Yes, these are the classic setups for those tropes, but that doesn't mean the creator intended to [[SubvertedTrope follow through on the trope]], or that they won't change their mind, or hand off the story to a new writer, or just flat out leave the story hanging. For all we know, [[ChuckCunninghamSyndrome this is the last time the rogue will ever appear]], and the FirstKiss was also the LastKiss.

to:

It most often occurs when a troper spots a {{Cliche}} and they've SeenItAMillionTimes. The LovableRogue has abandoned the heroes before the final battle, but is [[ConscienceMakesYouGoBack feeling pangs of guilt]]. The lead characters in a LoveTriangle just shared their FirstKiss, to the [[LoveHurts heartbreak]] of the third party. Clearly, these plot developments are going to end with the rogue going "I ChangedMyMindKid" and pulling a BigDamnHeroes moment, and the RomanceArc is going to end with FirstGirlWins! Except...those tropes haven't happened yet. Yes, these are the classic setups for those tropes, but that doesn't mean the creator intended to [[SubvertedTrope follow through on the trope]], or that they won't change their mind, or hand off the story to a new writer, or just flat out leave the story hanging. For all we know, [[ChuckCunninghamSyndrome this is the last time the rogue will ever appear]], and the FirstKiss was also the LastKiss.
LastKiss. It probably wouldn't make for a good story, but don't forget that [[SturgeonsLaw there's a LOT]] of bad stories.

Added: 531

Removed: 514

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None




See also NeverTrustATrailer, because trailers, previews and the like may differ from the published work.

May also overlap with Administrivia/ExamplesAreNotRecent, if the troper uses speculative language "This trope MAY happen in the future" or "This trope seems TO BE GOING this way". And Administrivia/ExamplesAreNotArguable, where the example as written isn't even sure if the trope applies. Also a SuperTrope to ShippingGoggles, because tropers will see ShipTease in ''any'' situation, even when there was none.


Added DiffLines:


!! Related Tropes
See also NeverTrustATrailer, because trailers, previews and the like may differ from the published work.

May also overlap with Administrivia/ExamplesAreNotRecent, if the troper uses speculative language "This trope MAY happen in the future" or "This trope seems TO BE GOING this way". And Administrivia/ExamplesAreNotArguable, where the example as written isn't even sure if the trope applies. Also a SuperTrope to ShippingGoggles, because tropers will see ShipTease in ''any'' situation, even when there was none.

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added: 49

Changed: 1661

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


!! Tropes Are Uncertain



!! Audiences Are Uncertain



It can be hard to distinguish between this and a DownplayedTrope or ImpliedTrope. There's no hard line separating them, but it all comes down to how far your logic is leaping. If two characters are flirting, the DressHitsFloor, and then [[SexyDiscretionShot the scene cuts away]], it ''may'' imply that they were intimate.

But ''that's ALL'' it implies. Without any other context, tropers can't just leap to other conclusions. This doesn't automatically make them an OfficialCouple. It doesn't mean one or more of the characters [[RedemptionEqualsSex have redeemed past deeds]]. Heck, it doesn't even mean [[GoodPeopleHaveGoodSex they ENJOYED it]]. The only information we can convey from that basic scene is that something naughty ''may'' have happened, but it's still only ''implied''.


to:

It !! Intent Is Uncertain
WordOfGod aside, there's no sure way to know what a creator ''intends'', thus it
can be hard to distinguish between this and a DownplayedTrope or ImpliedTrope. There's no hard line separating them, but it all comes down to how far your logic is leaping. If two characters are flirting, the DressHitsFloor, and then [[SexyDiscretionShot the scene cuts away]], it ''may'' imply that they were intimate.

But ''that's ALL'' it implies. Without any other context, tropers can't just leap to other conclusions. This doesn't automatically make them an OfficialCouple. It doesn't mean one or more of the characters [[RedemptionEqualsSex have redeemed past deeds]]. Heck, it doesn't even mean [[GoodPeopleHaveGoodSex they ENJOYED it]]. The only information we can convey from that basic scene is that something naughty ''may'' have happened, but it's still only ''implied''.

''implied''.


Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None





May also overlap with ExamplesAreNotRecent, if the troper uses speculative language "This trope MAY happen in the future" or "This trope seems TO BE GOING this way". And ExamplesAreNotArguable, where the example as written isn't even sure if the trope applies. Also a SuperTrope to ShippingGoggles, because tropers will see ShipTease in ''any'' situation, even when there was none.

to:

May also overlap with ExamplesAreNotRecent, Administrivia/ExamplesAreNotRecent, if the troper uses speculative language "This trope MAY happen in the future" or "This trope seems TO BE GOING this way". And ExamplesAreNotArguable, Administrivia/ExamplesAreNotArguable, where the example as written isn't even sure if the trope applies. Also a SuperTrope to ShippingGoggles, because tropers will see ShipTease in ''any'' situation, even when there was none.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

Speculative Troping is the unfortunate habit of troping based on what is "likely" within a work, instead of what's ''actually'' in the work.

It most often occurs when a troper spots a {{Cliche}} and they've SeenItAMillionTimes. The LovableRogue has abandoned the heroes before the final battle, but is [[ConscienceMakesYouGoBack feeling pangs of guilt]]. The lead characters in a LoveTriangle just shared their FirstKiss, to the [[LoveHurts heartbreak]] of the third party. Clearly, these plot developments are going to end with the rogue going "I ChangedMyMindKid" and pulling a BigDamnHeroes moment, and the RomanceArc is going to end with FirstGirlWins! Except...those tropes haven't happened yet. Yes, these are the classic setups for those tropes, but that doesn't mean the creator intended to [[SubvertedTrope follow through on the trope]], or that they won't change their mind, or hand off the story to a new writer, or just flat out leave the story hanging. For all we know, [[ChuckCunninghamSyndrome this is the last time the rogue will ever appear]], and the FirstKiss was also the LastKiss.

It also happens to YMMV tropes, such as when a show does something that some of its fans don't like. That doesn't mean a BrokenBase is inevitable; even fans who disagree may feel that their angry kin have a point and the two may never come to blows over it. And just because the title character is NOT the {{Protagonist}} doesn't mean we'll end up with a case of IAmNotShazam. These tropes require that audiences ''actually'' do the the things the tropes say, and in enough quantity that they're a rule and not an exception.

It can be hard to distinguish between this and a DownplayedTrope or ImpliedTrope. There's no hard line separating them, but it all comes down to how far your logic is leaping. If two characters are flirting, the DressHitsFloor, and then [[SexyDiscretionShot the scene cuts away]], it ''may'' imply that they were intimate.

But ''that's ALL'' it implies. Without any other context, tropers can't just leap to other conclusions. This doesn't automatically make them an OfficialCouple. It doesn't mean one or more of the characters [[RedemptionEqualsSex have redeemed past deeds]]. Heck, it doesn't even mean [[GoodPeopleHaveGoodSex they ENJOYED it]]. The only information we can convey from that basic scene is that something naughty ''may'' have happened, but it's still only ''implied''.

See also NeverTrustATrailer, because trailers, previews and the like may differ from the published work.

May also overlap with ExamplesAreNotRecent, if the troper uses speculative language "This trope MAY happen in the future" or "This trope seems TO BE GOING this way". And ExamplesAreNotArguable, where the example as written isn't even sure if the trope applies. Also a SuperTrope to ShippingGoggles, because tropers will see ShipTease in ''any'' situation, even when there was none.

And finally, just because a work isn't using ''one'' trope doesn't mean it's automatically using another one. Just because a villain isn't a NoNonsenseNemesis doesn't mean they qualify as having BondVillainStupidity. The former is the antithesis of the latter, but its absence doesn't ''guarantee'' the latter.

'''NoExamplesPlease'''

Top